HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07111995 - D7 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
Costa
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON County
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DATE: July 11, 1995
SUBJECT: HEARING ON ADOPTION OF PRECISE ALIGNMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTHERN
PORTION OF THE STATE ROUTE 4 BYPASS (Specific Plan # 95-0001).
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
In accord with the recommendations of the East County Regional Planning Commission:
1. Certify that the Final Environmental Impact Report is adequate and complete,that it was prepared
consistent with State and County CEQA guidelines, and that the Board considered information
contained in the EIR prior to making a decision on this project;
2. Adopt the Precise Alignment Plan for the unincorporated northern portion of the State Route 4
Bypass project.
3. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk.
FISCAL IMPACT
Adoption of the Plan will ensure that the right-of-way is protected until such time as the County can
acquire the necessary property rights for construction of the Bypass. Purchase of the right-of-way will
be funded by the adopted traffic mitigation fee program. Failure to adopt this Plan could result in
increased costs for right-of-way acquisition.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The State Route 4 Bypass Authority was formed by Contra Costa County and the cities of Antioch and
Brentwood to jointly prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) and to determine the alignment for
the State Route 4 Bypass project. The Authority certified 4Final December 13, 1994, and
recommended that member agencies approve the precise alignern ortion of the route.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE
XL
_ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR - ME A ON OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON I! 9 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED ,/ OTHER
The Board ADOPTED the Precise Alignment Plan for a 6.4 mile portion of
the State Route 4 Bypass Project, and REQUESTED staff to meet with
residents on their concerns and to invite their participation at the
monthly meetings held at the Tri—Delta Transit Authority Office.
See Addendum A for hearing speakers.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
_✓UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Catherine Kutsuris (510/646-2036) ATTESTED LL // -71-,5--'cc: Community Development Department (CDD) PHIL BIAT HEL R, CLERK OF
Public Works: R. Tavanier THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY DEPUTY
CEK:drb
CK21995/drb/sp95001/2bo
'Precise Alignment Plan
July 11, 1995
Page Two
This Precise Alignment Plan addresses the most northern portion of the project, extending from Highway
4 in Antioch to the intersection of Concord Avenue and Briones Valley Road in the unincorporated
Brentwood area. This Plan is limited to the 2.9 mile portion of the 6.4 mile route which is located in the
unincorporated area. The Cities of Antioch and Brentwood will be adopting Precise Alignment Plans
for the portions of the route located within their respective jurisdictions.
The East County Regional Planning Commission held a public hearing on the adoption of the Precise
Alignment Plan on June 5, 1995 and unanimously recommended that the Board adopt the Plan. A copy
of the Planning Commission's Resolution is attached.
IN THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
ADOPTED this Order on July 11 , 1995 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Rogers, Smith, DeSaulnier, Torlakson, Bishop
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
RESOLUTION NO. 95/314
SUBJECT: In the Matter of the Adoption of )
Precise Alignment Plan for the )
State Route 4 Bypass )
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County RESOLVES THAT:
There is filed with this Board and its Clerk a copy of Resolution No.21-1995 adopted by the
East County Regional Planning Commission which discusses a Precise Alignment Plan for the State
Route 4 Bypass in the East County area (County File #SP95-0001).
On Monday, July 11, 1995, the Board held a public hearing on said Precise Alignment Plan
discussed by the East County Regional Planning Commission, Resolution No. 21 , 1995. Notice of
said hearing was duly given in the matter required by law. The Board at the hearing, called for
testimony of all persons interested in this matter.
The Board closed the public hearing and APPROVED the Precise Alignment Plan as
recommended by staff.
Contact: Jim Cutler (510-646-2034)
cc: Community Development Department (CDD)
Public Works Department
State Route 4 Bypass Committee (via
Lowell Tunison at Public Works)
County Counsel
RESOLUTION NO. 95/314
JWC 1995/drb/Bypass.rt4
ADDENDUM A
This is the time heretofore noticed for hearing on recommendation of the East
County Regional Planning Commission on the request by Contra Costa County
(applicant) for the adoption of the Precise Alignment Plan for a 6.4 mile
portion of the State Rout 4 Bypass Project, (SP 1-95).
The following people appeared to speak:
Anthony Reano 3047 Frandoras Circle, Oakley
Adela Medeiors 3023 Frandoras Circle, Oakley
Hoage Lawrence 3053 Frandoras Circle, Oakley
Bill and Barbara Nunu 3048 Frandoras Circle, Oakley
Cie t_ i A x gess we,� L�
\\AJ 0 Q Qo s e,, fie. o�,uf e, w a s.
ff\e, k f f CXf n
LA f tO,\ IQ M M P- YJ� (DW EX".
C� D \1 f- Q-cLA-e. u N) A-o\ 2X C6�
x'40
510-"1-1q-7Z34 �--l-) '1 - 1 4 9 o c�
��U ✓1 ✓�� �" P1• 0 5. 3 F/2,f/✓7,>CGL,I- c P-c (—(E�7
�,ncj tqcL/- c- f to - b 9 r
f
An"V In kA R P,Gr'j b .30L1-7 F r4nd1l l"!a S C, ) f C /-P,
/(:) - 7 06 - &*"'97S
�'�r�.,"'� _ ter..-��-•�.--. '','��'.2:A--Y..,.-t,.-r�,�-r�
,�- -301-7 Fr- r oras Uk r~
7Sy - �
2e�-
I /46- OP kl-g Y CA
� �TKI/U-Scary
... ///�/f''�''}� � � �`✓Cai0 cEUVA
/ ��/moi/ //),/���/y(�//)//�f1 `/'+"�� ////♦^/y�/���y/�/����+r�� �
7 .1
-----------------
��
G '
r
w >
a�
if tl
PROPOSED AUTO AUCTION FACILITY
AND
...':
ADDENDUM TO BUCI��AN FIELD
3
m
AIRPORT MASTER FLAN UPDATE ETT
i
m
� .
ilk
; ' '
..
tot:• y t � �p��y,� �. ��� Vi
�«g / few
n
s %
,«
a
'z
.,
n
to
x..,.. "5. , ..
Al,
o �
:-
.� �, m.
" ,;
' PROPOSED AUTO AUCTION FACILITY
AND
ADDENDUM TO BUCHANAN FIELD
AIRPORT MASTER PLAN UPDATE EIR
Submitted to
Contra Costa County Airports
Prepared by
P&D Consultants, Inc.
400 So. El Camino Real
Suite 500
San Mateo, CA 94402
(415) 343-0108
May 31, 1995
' TABLE OF CONTENTS
A. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................. 1
B. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT.......................................................... 1
' Project Location................................................................................................. 1
General Project Information............................................................................... 1
ProjectOverview ............................................................................................... 2
ProjectDescription............................................................................................. 2
SiteDevelopment............................................................................................... 3
C. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING............................................................................ 3
Local Setting
...................................................................................................... 3
' Consistency With Local and Regional Plans......................................................... 4
D. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS......................... 4
Earth.................................................................................................................. 4
' Air..................................................................................................................... 5
Water................................................................................................................. 6
PlantLife ........................................................................................................... 7
AnimalLife........................................................................................................ 8
Noise................................................................................................................. 8
' Light and Glare.................................................................................................. 8
LandUse............................................................................................................ 9
NaturalResources.............................................................................................. 9
Riskof Upset..................................................................................................... 9
Population.......................................................................................................... 9
Housing ............................................................................................................. 9
Transportation/Circulation ................................................................................. 10
PublicServices................................................................................................... 10
' Energy............................................................................................................... 11
Utilities.............................................................................................................. 11
' Human Health.................................................................................................... 12
Aesthetics .......................................................................................................... 12
Recreation.......................................................................................................... 12
Cultural Resources............................................................................................. 12
E. GROWTH INDUCING IMPACTS ....................................................................... 13
' F. MITIGATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS.............................................. 13
G. CONSISTENCY WITH EXISTING ZONING, PLANS, AND OTHER LAND
USECONTROLS.................................................................................................. 13
' H. FINDINGS............................................................................................................. 13
I. PERSONS PREPARING OR PARTICIPATING IN THE
PREPARATION OF THE STUDY........................................................................ 14
A. INTRODUCTION
' This report presents an analysis of the potential environmental impacts of a proposed auto auction
facility at Buchanan Field. The technical data and other information in this report, or as
' incorporated herein by reference, document and support the conclusion that the proposed project
would not have any significant adverse effect on the environment, and as a consequence, not re-
quire the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report. In accordance
with Section 15164 et seq., of the CEQA Guidelines, this report also represents an addendum to the
Final EIR prepared for the Buchanan Field "Airport Master Plan Update, Airport Access Plan
Amendment, Golf Course Lease, General Plan Amendment, Circulation Improvements and Related
' Implementation.i 1
B. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED PROJECT
' The following sections set forth the nature and extent of the proposedproject:
1. Project Location
' The proposed project is located on Buchanan Field Airport near the intersection of Marsh Drive and
Sally Ride Drive, on property owned by Contra Costa County (see Attachment 1). Buchanan Field
Airport is located on approximately 500 acres of unincorporated territory in north central Contra
' Costa County. The proposed project site is on the westerly side of the airport, west of the
specialty Fixed Base Operators (FBOs) area and east of the mobile home parks (see attached Project
Location Map) along Marsh Drive.
2. General Project Information
a. Name and Address of Developer or Project Sponsor. The proposed project is sponsored
by the County of Contra Costa, as owner and operator of Buchanan Field Airport (the
proposed lessor). The address of the sponsor is:
' Contra Costa County Airports
550 Sally Ride Drive
Concord, CA 94520
b. Project Address. The proposed project will be located on the Buchanan Field Airport.
The project address is the same as above.
1. Contra Costa County, Department of Public Works, "Final Environmental Impact Report/Environmental
' Assessment (EIR/EA): Airport Master Plan Update, Circulation Improvements, Airport Access Plan
Amendment, Golf Course Lease, General Plan Amendment and Related Implementation for Buchanan
Field," The Final EIR/EA was certified by the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors in December
' 1990 and the Airport Master Plan was subsequently approved.
1
c. Permit Requirements and Other Public Agency-Approvals Required for this Project. The
' following regulatory and permit requirements apply to the proposed project:
• Contra Costa County. The County has determined that the lease of land and
' construction of a improvements to accommodate a auto auction facility on the site is
a project under CEQA. A draft EIR for the Airport Master Plan and related projects
was prepared in October 1989. The EIR was circulated for public and agency review
and comment and was subsequently certified by the Contra Costa County Board of
Supervisors in 1990. The Final EIR is hereby incorporated by reference as the basis
for approval of this project, and any other subsequent actions as may be required.
The proposed project would also require a lease from the County, and an approved
site plan and building permit, as well.
' 3. Project Overview
' The Airport Master Plan identified certain parcels of land on the airport that were not required for
aeronautical purposes, and which could be developed for commercial purposes. The proposed use
is consistent with the County's General Plan and Airport Master Plan EIR in this regard in that the
project site is designated for "Commercial" use. The site was recommended for commercial/office
development. The proposed project represents an interim use and is much less intensive than
was anticipated in the Airport Master Plan EIR.
4. Project Description
' The proposed project includes the development of 4.90 acres of land located between Marsh Drive
and Sally Ride Drive as depicted on the attached site plans (see Attachments 2A and 2B). The
property is proposed to be leased to a private developer for use as a site for auctioning automobiles
once a month, with the potential for up to two auctions per month. The proposed lease term is five
years.
' Space will be provided on-site for approximately 458 vehicles; 252 vehicles for the auction; and
206 customer vehicles. Auctions will be conducted one Saturday a month. Vehicles to be
' auctioned will be driven to the site from Tuesday to Friday, prior to the auction. Of these vehicles
to be auctioned, approximately half would be driven to the site by individuals and half would arrive
by transport vehicle. Approximately 10 transport trucks would be used to make these deliveries,
and the loading area will be screened from view. Delivery of vehicles will be coordinated so as to
occur during non-peak traffic periods. Vehicles will be available for inspection the Friday prior to
the auction. Vehicles will be locked on the day of the auction, and no test driving of vehicles will
be permitted at any time. Vehicles sold at the auction must be picked up by customers by 5:0Q
p.m. of the Monday after the auction. However, it is anticipated that the majority of vehicles will
be driven away after completion of the sale on the day of the auction. Any unsold vehicles, or
' vehicles remaining on the site will be removed from the site within 48 hours after the auction.
2
' - n tem will be u to
A portable (truck-mounted) low powered, unidirectional public address (PA) system used
conduct the auction and will be moved from vehicle to vehicle as the auction progresses. At all
times the PA system will be directed away from the mobile home park on the west side of Marsh
Drive. In addition, auction activities will be confined to the half of the site closest to the airport
' and cars will be sold in place (i.e., no vehicles will be driven to an "auction block"). An area
along the easterly property line will be set aside for the parking of food service trucks which will
remain on the site only for the duration of the actual auctions.
5. Site Development
' Since the project site currently exists in a rough graded condition, final preparation of the site will
entail only finish grading and earthwork. All such work will be done in conformance with
Caltrans' "Standard Specifications" and the "Standard Plans" of the Contra Costa County Public
' Works Department. The site will be graded and the surface grade compacted to 90% (relative
compaction). Surface paving will consist of a sealed asphaltic emulsion applied over a 10.8"
aggregate base. Site drainage will be by means of three 18 inch diameter high-density plastic pipe
with two outfalls to the drainage ditch on the west side of the site.
Only the eastern half of the site (the automobile auction area) will be lighted. Lights will be
oriented to avoid glare which could affect the airport to the east or mobile home parks to the west.
Lighting will be controlled by a photocell with manual override. The site will not be lighted during
the time when no automobiles are present.
This site will be fenced with a six foot high chain link fence around the perimeter. The fence will
be topped by three strands of barbed wire. On the west side of the site (adjacent to Marsh Drive),
the fence will be atop a 2 foot high landscaped berm and will contain alternating green and white
vinyl slats.
Utilities to serve the proposed use include water and electricity, both of which are available at the
site. No sewer connection will be required, as bathroom facilities will be provided in the form of
twelve portable toilets. The toilets will be screened from off-site view.
' C. ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
Buchanan Field and the area immediately adjacent to the proposed project comprise the areas
directly affected by the project, and as such constitute the project's environmental setting.
1. Local Setting
As noted above, the proposed project will be located on existing Airport property. The area
surrounding the project is almost completely urbanized and existing land uses in the vicinity of the
project include the Sheraton Motel to the southeast, the golf pro-shop and golf course to the south,
and a mixture of commercial/office uses to the east and southeast across Concord Avenue. Three
mobile home parks are situated immediately west of Marsh Drive.
' 3
2. Consistency With Local and Regional Plans
As noted above, the proposed project is consistent with the Contra Costa County General Plan
' designation of"Commercial," local zoning and the Airport Master Plan (see Attachment 3). As the
approved Airport Master Plan designates the site for "Nonaviation Commercial" uses, the proposed
project is also consistent with the Contra Costa County Airport Land Use Commission's Airport
' Land Use Policy Plan.
D. DISCUSSION OF POTENTIAL ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
This section sets forth an overview of potential project impacts and discusses their potential to
create significant adverse environmental impacts:
' 1. Earth
a. The proposed project will not result in unstable earth conditions or in significant changes
to geologic substructures. No significant impact.
' b. The site currently exists in a rough graded condition. The proposed project will require
final grading and this in turn will result in some localized disruption, displacement,
' compaction and overcovering of site soils for purposes of constructing the proposed berm
and parking lot. No significant impact.
c. Grading for the project will result in only minor localized changes in topography and
ground surface relief features. No significant impact.
d. Because of the localized nature of the project site and the limited area in which con-
struction will take place, the proposed project will not result in the destruction, covering,
or modification of any unique geologic or physical features. No significant impact.
' e. Because site preparation and grading is expected to be completed within five days, the
potential for short term wind and water erosion during construction is strictly limited (the
entire project is expected to be completed in ten working days). Dust from grading
operations will also be strictly controlled. No significant impact.
' f. Given its location and small scale, the project will not result in siltation, deposition or
erosion significant enough to modify any local stream channel or lake bed. All
construction is to take place away from the adjacent drainage ditch. No significant,
impact.
' g. No portion of the proposed project site is located within an Alquist-Priolo Act Special
Studies Zone. It is unlikely that the proposed project will result in the exposure of people
4
or property to geologic hazards such as earthquakes, landslide, mudslides, or ground
failure. No significant impact.
2. Air
a. The primary impact of the proposed project on regional air quality will be from motor
vehicle pollutant emissions. These emissions will be substantially less than that assumed
' in the above-referenced Airport Master Plan EIR. Nonetheless, an analysis of the air
quality impacts of the proposed project resulted in the following findings:
::»»>:::::>::»»::»>:<::«<::«:><»>:<:»:<:>::>::»»:<:::>«:.......PRST:.: ()N�►a::. .at�w Fear.Ia
Carbon Monoxide Hydrocarbons Oxides of Nitrogen
' Thresholds Predicted Threshold Predicted Threshold Predicted
' 550.0 137.5 150.0 12.5 150.0 17.1
a Bay Area Air Quality Management District Guidelines.
b Based on an estimated 500 VTE/day and 500 cold starts of auction vehicles.
' The results of the above analysis indicate that no Bay Area Air Quality Management District
thresholds of significance for carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, or oxides of nitrogen would be
exceed. Less-than- significant impact.
Construction activities may result in some short-term impacts, including the following:
' Fugitive dust may be created both during construction activity and as a result of.wind erosion over
exposed earth surfaces. Grading and earth-moving activities comprise the major source of
construction dust emissions, but traffic on and off paved areas and general disturbance of the soil
' can also generate dust emissions.
' Dust generation is not constant but may be highly variable. The amount of dust generated on a
given day is highly dependent on the types and amount of construction activity, and the
meteorological and soil conditions. The highest potential for dust generation occurs during the
' summer months when winds are highest on average, and soil moisture is lowest. Although the
proposed project anticipated only limited construction over a period of five working days, the
generation of fugitive dust could be a potentially significant project impact if adequate dust control
measures are not implemented with the project.
The following mitigation measures would reduce potentially adverse impacts to less-than-significant
' levels:
' 5
' All construction contracts shall require contractors to control dust generation in accordance with
accepted construction practices:
' • provide equipment and manpower for watering of all exposed or disturbed soil surfaces as
needed during construction to control windblown dust,
' • cover stockpiles of debris, soil, sand or other materials that can be blown by the wind;
• sweep paved construction areas and adjacent pavement areas of all mud and dust on a
tregular basis;
• Limit land-clearing operations during windy periods to control wind erosion and dust;
' • Use sprinkler irrigation or water trucks to moisten site soils during foundation
sP g g
' construction to inhibit wind erosion;
• Maintain the vegetation cover on idle or undeveloped land;
• Mulch bare or exposed soils to stabilize against wind erosion.
b. The proposed project will not result in the creation of objectionable odors, and oxides of
nitrogen from the cold starting of auction vehicles would be less than 1% of the amount
considered significant by the BAQMD.
c. The proposed project will not result in the alteration of air movement, moisture or
' temperature, or any change in climate. No significant impact.
d. The proposed project will not expose area residents to severe air pollution conditions.
3. Water
' As proposed, the project includes drainage measures for the site that conform to the requirements of
the Contra Costa County Public Works Department. The paving of the parking area would
increase runoff amounts, but the project would include adequate provisions for containment and
disposal of stormwater runoff as required by the Contra Costa County Public Works Department,
including five separate drainage inlets on the project site and 18" drainage pipes.
' a. The proposed project will not result in changes in currents, or the course or direction of
water movements. No significant impact.
' b. The proposed project will not result in significant changes to absorption rates, drainage
patterns, and the rate and amounts of surface water runoff. However, additional grading
6
and site preparation will result in minor localized changes in drainage patterns. As
' proposed drainage control complies with the requirements of the Contra Costa County
Public Works Department. No significant impact.
' c. The proposed project will not alter the course or flow of floodwaters. No significant
impact.
d. The proposed project will not significantly change the amount of surface water in any
water body. No significant impact.
' e. The proposed project will not result in any significant discharge into surface waters, or in
any significant alteration to surface water quality. No significant impact.
' f. The proposed project will not alter the direction or rate of flow of ground waters. No
significant impact.
g. The proposed project will not change the quantity of ground waters through either direct
additions or withdrawals, or through the interception of an aquifer. No significant
' impact.
h. The proposed project will not result in any significant reduction to the amount of water
' otherwise available for public water supplies. No significant impact.
L The proposed project will be located on Airport property in an area least subject to
potential flooding and is not within a designated flood hazard area. No significant impact.
j. The proposed project will not have any effect on surface thermal springs, since such
' springs do not exist in the project area. No significant impact.
4. Plant Life
a. The project site currently exists in a rough-graded state, and as such does not provide
significant habitat for plant or animal species. The site is also tilled and mowed on a
' regular basis by the County. No trees exist on the site. No significant impact.
' b. There are no federally designated rare or endangered plants on the project site according
to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's list of "Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and
Plants." No significant impact.
' c. The proposed project will result in the introduction of new plant species into the area as a
result of project landscaping, but these plants will be consistent with approved landscaping
' materials for the area, and will not represent esoteric or other species which could result
in an insurmountable barrier to the normal replenishment of existing species in the area.
' 7
All species will be drought tolerant in accordance with local agency policies. As such,
' there is no significant impact.
d. Since the site is not used for farming or other agricultural uses, the proposed project will
not result in the reduction of acreage devoted to the production of agricultural crops. No
' significant impact.
5. Animal Life
a. The proposed project would not result in any significant effect on the numbers or variety
of animal species in the area, particularly since the area has already been rough graded,
and is mowed and tilled on a regular basis. The site no longer represents significant
habitat. No significant impact.
' b. There are no documented rare or endangered animal species inhabiting the proposed
project site. No significant impact.
c. The proposed project would not result in the introduction of new species of animals into
' the area, or significantly impair the replenishment of existing species. No significant
impact.
' d. Given its rough grade condition, and frequent mowing and tilling, the project site no
longer serves as significant habitat to any vertebrate animals. No significant impact.
' 6. Noise
a. Short-term noise impacts from construction activities and equipment may be anticipated
' only during the five day construction period. No significant long-term noise impacts are
anticipated. Any viewing of automobiles to be auctioned (which could result in the
starting of automobiles, door slamming, etc.) will be limited to the day prior to the
' auction during normal business hours (9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). The localized portable
public address system to be used for the auction of individual cars will be only limited
' power (with a range of only 20 - 25 feet), and be directed away from the mobile home
parks. No significant impact.
' b. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of people to severe noise levels. No
significant impact.
' 7. Light and Glare
a. The proposed project will result in new light emissions from the security lighting. Only
' the eastern half of the lot (the auction area) will be lighted. These lights will be used only
during the time when cars are on the lot immediately before and after the auction.
Because of the close proximity to the Airport runway complex, project lighting must be
8
designed to be compatible with airport operations (i.e., no direct or unshielded bright
' lights or glare) to insure no impact to airport operations. In addition, all lighting will be
designed so as to be directed away from the mobile home park located west of the site.
No significant impact.
tb. The proposed project will not reduce access to sunlight of adjacent properties due to shade
and shadow. No significant impact.
' 8. Land Use
' a. The proposed project is consistent with the planned land use for the site, and is of less
intensity than the commercial uses approved in the EIR for the general plan amendment.
As an interim use, no permanent structures are proposed, and administrative activities will
' be conducted from a tent or portable office trailer. No significant impact.
9. Natural Resources
a. Because of its scale, the proposed project will not result in a significant increase in the use
' of natural resources. No significant impact.
b. The proposed project will not result in the depletion of any non-renewable resources. No
' significant impacts.
10. Risk of Upset
a. The project does not have any fuel storage requirements and will not result in the risk of
explosion or the release of hazardous substances in the event of an accident or emergency
' upset any more than any other large parking lot in the area. No significant impact.
11. Population
a. The proposed project will not require the relocation or displacement of any persons. No
' significant impact.
b. The proposed project will not result in any changes to the distribution, density, or growth
rate of the human population of the area. No significant impact.
12. Housing
a. The proposed project will not affect existing housing stock, or create a demand for
additional housing. No significant impact.
9
' b. The proposed project will not have an impact on the availability of rental housing in the
community. No significant impact.
c. The proposed project will not result in the demolition, relocation or remodeling of
residential, commercial or industrial buildings or other facilities. No significant impact.
' 13. Transportation/Circulation
' a. The proposed project will result in additional traffic on Center Avenue, Marsh Drive and
Sally Ride Drive. However, the 500 projected vehicle trips for the peak day of auction
activity and 80 peak hour trips are substantially less than the 10,888 daily trips and 848
' peak hour trips projected for the commercial development of the site in the EIR. In
addition, no truck traffic or vehicle deliveries would be allowed during peak traffic
periods or after normal business hours. The intersection of Marsh Drive and Sally
' Ride/Sahara Drive will not be significantly impacted by the projected peak hour traffic,
particularly since it is projected for, at most, two Saturdays per month. Existing LOS
will not be substantially reduced. No significant impact.
b. As the proposed auto auction provides adequate on-site circulation and parking for its
' needs, there is no significant impact on parking and circulation. No parking will be
allowed on Marsh Drive. No significant impact.
' c. The proposed project would have no significant impact on existing transportation systems,
in that the proposed project neither requires, nor generates the need for, additional
transportation services.
' d. The proposedject will not significantly alter existing patterns for the movement of
P Y
' people and/or goods, given that it is adjacent to an existing street system. No significant
impact.
' e. The proposed project will not alter waterborne, rail or air traffic. No significant impact.
f. The proposed project will not result in a measurable increased hazard to motor vehicles,
' bicyclists, or pedestrians. No significant impact.
14. Public Services
' a. The proposed project will not require new or altered fire protection services, since the
airport provides its own fire and emergency medical transport (EMT) services. Portable
' fire extinguishers will also be located on the site consistent with fire department
requirements. No significant impact.
' 10
1
b. The proposed project will not have an effect on, or result in the need for additional police
' services. Private security officers will be hired by the developer and be on the site at all
times it is open to the public. No significant impact.
' c. The proposed project will have no effect on local schools. No significant impact.
d. The proposed project will not effect any parks or recreational areas. No significant
impact.
' e. The proposed project will not require maintenance and upkeep by any public agencies.
No significant impact.
' f. The proposed project should have no significant impacts on local government services.
The proposed project will not require alteration or addition to, or the need for new utility
systems, including sphere of influence or airport boundary changes, water, sewer, flood
control or solid waste facilities. No significant impact.
' 15. Enemy
a. The proposed project will not result in the use of exceptional amounts of fuel or energy.
' No significant impact.
b. The proposed project will not result in significant increased demand on existing energy
sources, or require the development of new sources of energy. No significant impact.
16. Utilities
' a. The proposed project will not result in a need for new power or natural gas systems.
While the construction of a permanent structure would require connections to utility
iservices, adequate service levels exist to accommodate said use. No significant impact.
' b. The proposed project will not require new or altered communications systems. While
extension of existing phone lines onto the site would be necessary should a permanent
structure be developed, adequate capacity in the existing systems exists to accommodate
' the potential use. No significant impact.
c. The proposed project will not require new or significantly modified water systems.
' Adequate infrastructure currently exists to accommodate the potential use. No significant
impact.
' d. The proposed project will not require sewer or septic tank connections. Portable toilets
will be located on the site and screened from public view. The toilets will be serviced
after each auction. No significant impact.
' 11
' e. The proposed project will not require alterations to existing solid waste disposal sites or
facilities. No significant impact.
' 17. Human Health
a. The proposed project will not result in the creation of any health hazard or potential health
' hazard. No significant impact.
b. The proposed project will not result in the exposure of people to potential health hazards.
' No significant impact.
18. Aesthetics
' a. The proposed project will not obstruct any Public scenic vista or view. The parldng lot
1 fronting Marsh Drive will be screened from public view by means of a slatted chain link
fence and landscaped berm. The portable toilets will also be screened with landscaping.
No significant impact.
' b. The proposed project will not create an aesthetically offensive site open to public view, or
produce significant new light or glare. No significant impact.
c. The proposed project does not have the potential to destroy a stand of trees, a rock
outcropping or other locally recognized desirable aesthetic natural feature. No significant
impact.
d. The proposed project should not result in any negative aesthetic impacts. No significant
' impact.
19. Recreation
a. The proposed project will not impact the quality or quantity of existing recreational
' opportunities. No significant impact.
20. Cultural Resources
' a. The proposed project should not result in the alteration or destruction of a prehistoric or
historic archaeological site. No significant impact
' b. The project will not result in any physical changes to cultural resources. There are no
nearby registered historic sites that would be adversely impacted by the proposed project.
' No significant impact.
' 12
c. The proposed project does not have the potential to cause a physical change which would
affect unique ethnic or cultural values. No significant impact.
' d. The proposed project will not restrict existing religious or sacred uses. No significant
impact.
' E. GROWTH INDUCING EVIPACTS
In and of itself, the proposed project will not directly induce growth. Growth in the area will come
' about as a result of planned on- and off-airport development in the project area.
' F. MITIGATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECTS
' Short-term construction impacts in the form of dust and noise will require mitigation. Dust will be
controlled through watering of the site as necessary. Construction noise will be mitigated through
industrial standards for noise control, including proper mufflers on construction equipment and
' limiting hours of operation from 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays. With mitigation, such
impacts would be less-than-significant.
' G. CONSISTENCY WITH EXISTING ZONING, PLANS, AND OTHER LAND USE
CONTROLS
' The proposed project is consistent with approved local zoning and land use plans, including the
County General Plan and Airport Master Plan. No amendment to the Airport Layout Plan will be
' required.
' H. FINDINGS
Based on the information developed as part of the project description, and from the Airport Master
' Plan M as incorporated herein by reference, the following findings are made:
a. The proposed project does not have the potential to degrade the quality of the envi-
ronment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife species population to drop below self-sustaining levels, or restrict the range of a
rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of California history
' or prehistory.
b. The proposed project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental
' goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals.
' 13
' c. The proposed project does not have the potential for impacts which are individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable.
' d. The proposed project does not have the potential for causing environmental impacts
which will cause substantial adverse impacts on human beings, either directly or indi-
rectly.
' e. The existing Airport Master Plan EIR adequately assessed the potential environmental
impacts of the proposed project and no further environmental review is warranted.
' I. PERSONS PREPARING OR PARTICIPATING IN THE PREPARATION OF TBE
STUDY
' The following individuals participated in the preparation of the study:
' Contra Costa County Airports
' Mr. Harold E. Wight, Manager of Airports
Ms. Tracy Williams, Assistant Manager
' Contra Costa County Community Development
Mr. James Cutler, Chief Planner
' Mr. Bob Drake, Senior Planner
P&D Consultants, Inc.
' Mr. Michael R. McClintock, AICP, Assoc. V.P.
Mr. Ken Cordes, Planner
' Ms. Deanna Lauser, Word Processing/Editor
14
F'-
R W
oxz 3� W
b a J V
Af
lila <
/ \
Qo N J
a ZU O w
1 sIV Q d U u
i ® m0 �I e
" �II
1 � Ido g � \ \ '% \ `• /\\ N a .� ><
It
IL
Ii
uj
v
ol
,4 Icy // / / >✓"'/ � �'
f \ ,
•``•.. fig` H. � 2 1 I I I �e
w
:Tiom �i l fill;
N
e
Q
O z _
o
" N o
a o W w
O � Q
m o V a N Z U
V
P D 4 O 0 W Z OZ V
_ _ Co Q d Q•
Y D PO m O = .zU N 1..�
a s Z In
2 c Q m aCO
♦W • m « ° m m ]W s O S e
pO •O Oo
Ln
an�aa aaiM a��vs i s M.zz.zi,irl �o
� d E
.ld. bC•0 _ N \ 3,SFg ov\ ■ 10
m
.1d. 68.0— m boo
i o fi o KVOO.I
I n O W
ruLL `n x dxF� r uLL � r a
a W�
LL>W
.ld. bb•1— o
0o
r N N g o
�-pO mp m 00
.ld. 06•I—m o y— o� B N o 00•Z
Y 0
' O
� r a
.ld. b6+Z— 7.,oN� u o e c OOK u ° a, a
�• rF4LL S� '. p CO O J
a u JJ�
.1 d. bb.{— C00'O:S s, d3dOH.91 l_`io„s asi*7 vui Q D
ZI=�
o VJaIP M77
__-�_ M— •— M.ZI._�__N M— _•_ M-��_-.
1
= 00+0--/
.ld. 60•b— m 80 m
r
m f
.1d. 09+b 801 .96b
30,
.O1 u�afo .00ui°u0 F
5
' m C aAIMG HSdVW G-
a
qi
-on•
p o:
_ v n
T
sa$
us g`c 2
a � aY r • _ ��5 b�fig �a$ ��
$ SgF �-g�� •"� g �' _�� 'y•• �$ 'p a �° � °b �Rii � "�b ��'�. m
hwQQ".,- c
' k .Y � 83Yt g w hfi -° go bo b° 6 b 30 �yg58 bb{6{ 3 O g a
g ,$" 'fig x y � °e« °' �o o`°' b" ° fi� �� � .°a �� ao e�q• .'ndy � � g x ° N a o
j
egg = y g ` fag = ° ass _yy �y�txsa � b o =
' xo$N'•eyy �fi=fib u m •a3 o u" c^ Q"ou �� � h o5WW vI
u u U.1
29 KO•e nao"T 8bY$ a W W
Bhas JI \ o $ o
�
$ ills- ! 0 -1 0
a8; aYg y ! I °bgg «" g° '� g; - '•yy O"
gSEEs
' - +•75Yo«} b 5 •; to _g j �i s5b gF -N b SYkY a y
•nbg3 s f xg :€� e YY e` >° 'b ��€ a:
soN sgyge: §-C; sa ss ` Sgs Y � » s• �u_� k ' e N
e173
i
o N
N W� �
b S z �� d
z
<t ° ` W Z2z z
@ CLV
# ° U = Z a Lb
it
Q ter,
F- Lc.
c Co z co
n d3Y 4C O
4
HAtNQ 3QI8 d1'ivS
e3 n
1 I
� ' o
.p Ln
u 3!n
p Q
C Q'
u
@ o
o^ 61of I I I I I I I I I x.89 H
aFIT IIIIIHIM
@
O
' D
tddy�saaods,81x.6-69 c m
it 7
N�
d
Z
C S 4
a9
r o J
o •�—• 0 6u1�1aod p9•sapoas,61x,6-B1 Z W
aXt
t au
% r
�o SAL
it it
•� N Id,Cyl 6ulHaod,p9'saoods,61x.648 .+w►.
n o
.a 6u114aDd.09'SODOM,WC6-90 —�
s
i
0
m�
�96b
o
r^
P
O@ j
O+ i Eo C 5
@ +Q G D U « @ N p N
C
�Q0 Z P=n irvo 070 0 4
p \ ( 1 x V1 W
C=J_L z
W
D
ve
x F-
W o of
o
'4✓ U OLO /� ~�
000
•`tfi1 1
@ u°`u
_D
„ a
O O N
G a Z
O C C
c u « a
Cm U 9
p� W Q o <Q
uj
O
Wi
10
Z
Iooaq apo'6 vui Z
_.. a
Q
3
O0
+' I � o
t
° i
-......li
� o' o« Z
o@ v
n °
U '1�n 0 0 0 >
Q P u P u y E
C9
Y
ATTACHMENT 3. LEGEND
' COUNTY GENERAL PLAN PS— PUBLIC/SEMI—PUBLIC
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
LI— LIGHT INDUSTRY
CO— COMMERCIAL
SCALE
PR— PARKS d RECREATION
0 1,000' 2,000' 3.000'
' NORTH MH— MOBILE HOME PARK
AC — AIRPORT COMMERCIAL
i
9� �N CJ✓"" NVJ
`ter '•A,1�/% ,�,''
CtNiRwl awn.l...r ! ; NI•C'IN ;I _ __I
DISTRICT iNt.IMtNI I I • CO 1 _inCwl CN 1
PLANT
4 rTi1q JA Dk4gy nLLL:Nk5i PANK
�I
� ELEYlN
PS -% U s,;NUOLLI
Al
l
b / 'ENiEA l
V ``''
co P �` L
acc
PARCELItR
�
Ll
/
/J
�•�!!_.',_.,r � �" SCO � � \
J—•— L ' I � / 1� �rT ueLO
acnOOL
\A PR
1 1 � /
AC y a }
9UG Nw NAN fltLDl -'r% •..I` ,•/
a OaL. COVNea PARC L
out j•',i ✓ r; ./b//J I �',•
Y' �' - / -�' / // /ice•J•
�/\ � �✓ �// / .� PANK A aNOV /
0
DIABLO VALLEY WW \. {E'^�', \•`.`:
JUNIOR COLLLGE , sIappi
LLOCENi ENa '��,..� \� •\\t
SUN vAIIET /� ,�•Jl \ \`\ �':
sNovvlNa •'- <•
r
n 1 CENTER \ 1_3 SOURCE:\ MoCLINTOCX, BECKER ASSOCIATES "
JULY 1789 -
i
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ON A PLANNING MATTER
BRENTWOOD AREA
NOTICE is hereby given that on Tuesday, July 11, 1995 at
2 : 15 p.m. in Room 107 of the County Administration Building,
corner of Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California, the
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors will hold a public
hearing to consider the following planning matters :
Recommendation of the East County Regional Planning
Commission on the request by Contra Costa County (applicant) for
the adoption of the Precise Alignment Plan for a 6 .4 mile portion
of the State Route 4 Bypass Project, (SP 1-95) .
The location of the subject land is within the
unincorporated territory of the County of Contra Costa, State of
California, generally identified below (a more precise
description may be examined in the Office of the Director of
Community Development, County Administration Building, Martinez,
California) :
A 6 .4 mile portion of the State Route 4 Bypass Project
located in the unincorporated area of the County between Highway
4 in Antioch and the intersection of Concord Avenue and Briones
Valley Road in the Brentwood area.
If you challenge this matter in Court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the County at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
Date : June 26, 1995
PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors and
County Adm'nistrator
By C�A
Ann ervelli, Deputy Clerk
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
ON
(2015.5 C.C.P.)
STATE OFCALIFORNIA
� \ County ofContra Costa
| am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; \ am over
.the age of eighteen years, and not ez party to
orinterested inthe above-entitled matter.
| am the Principal Legal Clerk ofthe Ledger
Dispatch andBrentwood NNewspapers
of general circulation-, printed and published
at 1650 Cavallo Road in the City of Antioch,
-'-
County mfContra Costa, 945OS. -
And which newspapers have been adjudged
newspapers�n�� � generalof 'e (�o [��nt�a (�oo��
Su-
perior Courto� oo County u/of .
State of California, under the date of March
26. 1870. Case Number 746370.
The notice, ofwhich the annexed ieaprinted
copy (set intype not smaller than nonpanei|).
has been published \neach regular and en-
tire issue of said newspapers and not in any
supplement thereof on the following dates,
to-wit:
--�i.[).c......30. .......................................
in the year of 1995.
| certify declare) underpenalty ufperjury
that the foregoing is true and correct.
Executed at Antioch, California.
On this .3.0 deyof—T�� 1995. JUL 5 1995
...................................
Si�natuna
Ledger-Dispatch and Brentwood News
P.O. Box 2290
Antioch, OAQ4531-2299
(510) 757-2525
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC
HEARING BEFORE THE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ON A PLANNING MATTER
BRENTWOOD AREA
NOTICE Is hereby given that A 6.4 mile portion of the State
on Tuesday,July 11, 1995 at Route 4 Bypass Project loc8t-
2:15 p.m.In Room 107 of the ed in the unincorporated area
County Administration Build- the Go tween High-
of
in way 4 in=and the in-
g�comer of Pine and Esco-
a Streets,Martinez,Califor- tersection of Concord Avenue
nia,the Contra Costa Coun and Briones Valley Road in
Board of Supervisors will h2d the Brentwood area.
a public hearing to consider
the following planning mat- If you challenge this Matter in
ters: Court,you may be limited to
raising only those Issues you
Recommendation of the East or someone else raised at
County Regional Planning
Co the public hearing described
mmission on the request in this notice or In written
by Contra Costa County lap- correspondence delivered to
Fli..nt) for the adoption Of the County at,or prior to,the
he Precise Alignment Plan public hearing.
for a 6.4 mile portion of the
State Route 4 Bypass Pr~ Date:June 26, 1995
1
SPECIFIC PLAN (Precise Alignment Plan)
COUNTY FILE #SP95-0001:
This proposed Precise Alignment Plan address the northern
portion of the State Route 4 Bypass Project which extends from
Highway 4 in Antioch to the intersection of Concord Avenue and
Briones Valley Road in the unincorporated Brentwood area.
This plan is limited to the 2. 9 mile portion of the 6.4 mile
route which is located in the unincorporated area. (Parcel
#053-060-008,-009,-015; 053-072-006,-007; 054-230-009; 054-
220-003,-004,-025,-031; 054-171-007,-008; 054-172-001; 010-
020-004; 007-110-001)
UNINCORPORATED AREAS OF BRENTWOOD AND OAKLEY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
JULY 11, 1995 - 2 :15 P.M.
Resolution No. 21 - 1995
RESOLUTION OF THE EAST COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
ADOPTION OF THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTHERN PORTION OF
THE STATE ROUTE 4 BYPASS (SP95-0001).
WHEREAS, the State Route 4 Bypass Authority was formed by Contra Costa County and the
cities of Antioch and Brentwood to jointly prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) and to
determine the alignment for the State Route 4 Bypass project;
WHEREAS, the State Route 4 Bypass Authority, which was the Lead Agency for the preparation
of the EIR, circulated a Draft EIR in November.of 1993;
WHEREAS, the Final EIR was completed in November of 1994 and was certified by the Bypass
Authority as adequate and complete on December 13, 1994;
WHEREAS, the State Route 4 Bypass Authority recommended that member agencies approve
the precise alignment for the northern portion of the route;
WHEREAS, adoption of the Specific Plan for the precise alignment will ensure that the right of
way is protected until such time as the County can acquire the necessary property rights for the
construction of the Bypass;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the East County Regional Planning Commission
on Monday, June 5, 1995 whereat all that wished to testify were heard and the public hearing
was closed;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the East County Regional Planning Commission
certifies that the Final EIR was prepared consistent with State and County CEQA Guidelines and
that the Commission has considered the information contained in the EIR prior to making a
decision; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Commission recommends that the
Board of Supervisors certify the Final EIR as adequate and complete and as prepared consistent
with State and County CEQA Guidelines;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Commission recommends that the
Board of Supervisors approve the adoption of the Precise Alignment Plan for the 2.9 mile section
located in the unincorporated area; and
Page 2 of 2
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the instruction by the East County
Regional Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Commission
on Monday, June 5, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners - Andrieu, Sobalvarro, Planchon, Wagner and Hanson
NOES: Commissioners - None
ABSENT: Commissioners - Wetzel and hern
I, Harvey E. Bragdon, Secretary of the East County Regional Planning Commission of the
County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was fully called
and held in accordance with the law on June 5, 1995.
ey B agdon
ecretary, st County Regional Planning Commission,
County of ntra Costa.
State of California
CEK:drb
CK21995/drb/sp950001.2re
Agenda Item #
Community Development Contra Costa County
EAST COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION
MONDAY, JUNE 5, 1995 7:30 P. M.
I. INTRODUCTION: Contra Costa County (Applicant), County File # SP95-0001: The
proposed project is the adoption of the Precise Alignment Plan for a 6.4 mile portion
of the State Route 4 Bypass Project located in the unincorporated area of the County
between Highway 4 in Antioch and the intersection of Concord Avenue and Briones
Valley Road in the Brentwood area. (Parcel #053-060-008,-009,-015; 053-072-006,-
007; 054-230-009; 054-220-003,-004,-025,-031;054-171-007,-008;054-172-
001;010-020-004;007-110-00 1)
if. RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. Affirm that the Commission has reviewed the Final EIR for the State Route 4
Bypass Project, has found the EIR to be adequate and complete, and has
considered the information contained in the EIR prior to making a decision on
the project.
B. Recommend to the Board of Supervisors that they adopt the State Route 4
Precise Alignment Plan as recommended by staff.
III. PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
f
A. Background/Purpose of Project:
The existing State Route 4 between State Route 160 and Walnut Boulevard
extends through the downtown areas of Brentwood and the communities of
Byron and Oakley. The existing State Route 4 through these communities is an
at-grade limited capacity highway, located adjacent to schools, retail businesses
and numerous residences with direct access to the highway. The regional
traffic, which includes a significant truck volume, is mixed with local traffic.
The lane capacity (the number of cars per lane) is significantly limited by the
low speeds and the heavy cross traffic on local roads.
Widening the existing State Route 4 has been rejected for a number of reasons
including the negative impacts on the character of the towns, and the high
financial cost of purchasing the property for widening sufficient to
accommodate the planned growth.
B. Project Objectives:
The objective of the State Route 4 Bypass Project is to shift regional traffic
away from town centers in order to provide for the planned growth while
preserving the character of the communities. The Project would reduce
congestion and detour trucks carrying heavy loads or hazardous materials away
from schools and businesses.
This Precise Alignment Plan addresses the most northern portion of the project
which extends from Highway 4 in Antioch to the intersection of Concord
Avenue and Briones Valley Road in the unincorporated Brentwood area. This
Plan is limited to the 2.9 mile portion of the 6.4 mile route which is located in
the unincorporated area. The Cities of Antioch and Brentwood will be adopting
a Precise Alignment Plan for the portions of the route located within their
respective jurisdictions.
C. Project Location:
The State Route 4 Bypass Project begins at the State Route 4/State Route 160
junction and proceeds southward to the west of Neroly Road crossing Lone
Tree Way and Sand Creek Road. The alignment proceeds through the City of
Brentwood along the western side and connects with Concord Avenue. The
portion of the Bypass included in this Precise Alignment Plan ends at the
Concord Avenue and Briones Valley Road junction.
D. Roadway Characteristics:
The portion of the Bypass Project which is included in this Precise Alignment
Plan would be initially constructed as a two-lane highway, and would be
ultimately upgraded to a four-lane divided highway. The median area between
the northbound and southbound lanes would be wide enough (minimum of 90
feet) to accommodate High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes in each direction
and future transit.
At-grade interchanges would be located at Lone Tree Way and at Laurel Road.
The other access to local roads will be at the relocated Sand Creek Road and
Balfour Road junctions. The interchanges would be ultimately upgraded to
grade separated interchanges.
IV. GENERAL PLAN CONFORMANCY:
The Contra Costa County General Plan (on Figure 5-2) identifies the County Roadway
Network Plan. The State Route 4 Bypass Project is conceptually shown on this map,
identified as, "Proposed Delta Expressway." The General Plan includes an
implementation measure which states,
"Establish precise alignments plans for new or expanded arterials, expressways
and freeways in order to reserve adequate rights-of ways for ultimate road
system improvements... " (refer to Implementation Measure 54).
2
Consistent with this General Plan Implementation Measure, the adoption of this Precise
Alignment Plan specifies the precise alignment of the northern portion of the State
Route 4 Bypass Project.
V. PROCEDURAL HISTORY/PURPOSE OF THE HEARING:
The State Route 4 Bypass Authority (the Authority) was formed by Contra Costa
County and the cities of Antioch and Brentwood to jointly prepare an environmental
impact report (EIR) and to determine the alignment for the State Route 4 Bypass
project.
The Authority, which was the Lead Agency for the EIR, circulated a Draft EIR in
November of 1993. The Final Environmental Impact Report was completed in
November of 1994, and was certified by the Bypass Authority as adequate and
complete on December 13, 1994.
The Authority held a number of public meetings to accept input on a precise alignment
for the Bypass project. Following these discussions and the certification of the Final
EIR,the Authority recommended that member agencies approved the precise alignment
for the northern portion of the route. It should be emphasized that the portion of the
alignment which is described in the Precise Alignment Plan and which is the subject
of this public hearing is limited to the northern portion of the project, and does not
extend to the more southern portions of the route such as the portion covered by the
Nunn/Cowell Alternatives. The Authority is currently examining alignment alternatives
for the southerly portion of this project.
The Precise Alignment Plan has been referred to Contra Costa County and the cities
of Antioch and Brentwood to adopt the Plan for the portion of the route within their
respective jurisdictions. Adoption of the Plan will ensure that the right-of-way is
protected until such time as the County can acquire the necessary property rights for
the construction of the Bypass.
3
Joint Exercise of Awers Agency
A BYPASS AUTHORITY 46
®� City of Antioch City of Brentwood County of Contra Costa
STATE ROUTE 4 BYPASS/ DELTA EXPRESSWAY
SAN JOAOUIN R[VER
S I SR i
Ef NORTHERN LIMIT
a
EXERTING
STA T6�ROLTE OAKLEF �
ANTIOCH4D CANAL
LAUREL RO
fly }
(,O t'=7000'
v
11
LONE TRE11 F-1 Unincorporated Sections
E WAT
i
N
PIPEUN u
Z
C If
< tl
SAN
�ReEt
PROPOSED
STATE ROUTE 4 N ,OSE P
wc•eNUE
BYPASS
t�i BRENTWOOD
BALFOUR ROAD
Opp FFK
ECCMW CANAL %
�V6 O PATNE AVENUE cE\tSTINC SRI -
fNCO D AVENUE
SOUTHERN LIMIT I '
RSH CREEK: PROPOSED EAST-R'EST f
44 ROAD
: � CONNECTOR
4
C/ G L
SRF,
3 ,�'OTFO
\O
Staff.
Board of Directors: Ex Officio: Contra Costa County
Tom Torlakson, Chairman City of Livermore 255 Glacier Drive
Barbara Guise Alameda County Martinez, CA 94553
Joe/Keller Contra Costa Water District (415)313-2382
.'I
INS
dF
__ - . ���.� ■...� ■.�m«rr
♦
Milli
sis�'S •
tA� 1�11�
r
•
i
I
� I
X
III I t 1
Qa$bd �:�pfi
CITY OF BRENTWOOD
• t
I
r
i
I
a
1
II
• . I
i
•
J
Zameer Khan Church of Latter Day Roman Catholic Bishop
2355 5th Avenue #4 Saints Oakland
Concord, CA 94518 50 E. North Temple 2900 Lakeshore Avenue
Salt Lake City, Utah Oakland, CA 94610
84150-0001
Charles Wasson
3025 Torre Ramel lane Lois Augustine Anna Smith
Oakley, CA 94561 3035 Frandoras Circle 226 Rolando Avenue
oakley, CA 94561 Brentwood, CA 94513
Bethany Evangelical
Lutheran John Slatten CCC Water District
3644 Freedom Way 6294 Lone Tree Way P.O. Box 4121
Antioch, CA 94509 Brentwood, CA 94513 Concord, CA 94524
Rolling Hill Ranch S.H.Cowell Foundation Ron Nunn
40 River Ridge Road 120 Montgomery St.#2570 Route 1 Box 200
Little Rock, AR 72227 San Francisco, CA 94104 Brentwood, CA 94513
Church of the Nazarene Termo Company Michael Wood
330 Worrell Road P.O. Box 2767 25 Madeira court
Antioch, CA 94509 Long Beach, - CA 90801 Oakley, CA 94561
Richard Phillips Charles Gadke John Perata
4332 Gold Run Drive 4905 Calle de Oro 3065 Frandoras Circle
Oakley, CA 94521 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
Rosie Jacuzzi Anthony Reano George Medeiros
3051 Empire Avenue 3047 Frandoras Circle 3023 Frandoras Circle
Brentwood, CA 94513 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
James Farr Joseph Cunha Susann Steinberg
P.O. Box 2567 1885 W. Cypress Road 3029 Frandoras Circle
martinez, CA 94553 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
Lawrence Hoage Diablo Water District Ralph Mori
3053 Frandoras Circle P.O. Box 127 10 madeira Court
Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
Lucelio Sulprizio Vincent Buchanan Richard McCarty
3059 Frandoras Circle 4875 Calle de Oro 4965 Calle de Oro
Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
William Maggiora Edmund Linscheid Eli Reinhard
5238 Myrtle Drive 106 Linscheid Drive P.O. Box 5368
Concord, CA 94521 Pittsburg, CA 94565 San Jose, CA 95150
Gladstone Jones May Ann Mateas Brentwood Road & Gun Club
4865 Calle de Oro 6287 Park Ridge Drive 2483 Sand Creel Road
Oakley, CA 94561 Anderson, CA 96007 Brentwood, CA 94513
Craig Lindblom Alfred De Martini Leo Saenz
3017 Frandoras Circle 3041 Frandoras Circle 3071 Frandoras Circle
Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
Contra costa county Flood
Peter Daniels Del Prado Co. /McBail Co. Control District
4935 Calle de Oro 3200 Danville Blvd. #200 255 Glacier Drive
Oakley, CA 94561 Alamo, CA 94507 Martinez, CA 94553
Resolution No. 21 - 1995
RESOLUTION OF THE EAST COUNTY REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECOMMENDING
CERTIFICATION OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT AND
ADOPTION OF THE PRECISE ALIGNMENT PLAN FOR THE NORTHERN PORTION OF
THE STATE ROUTE 4 BYPASS (SP95-0001).
WHEREAS, the State Route 4 Bypass Authority was formed by Contra Costa County and the
cities of Antioch and Brentwood to jointly prepare an environmental impact report (EIR) and to
determine the alignment for the State Route 4 Bypass project;
WHEREAS, the State Route 4 Bypass Authority, which was the Lead Agency for the preparation
of the EIR, circulated a Draft EIR in November of 1993;
WHEREAS, the Final EIR was completed in November of 1994 and was certified by the Bypass
Authority as adequate and complete on December 13, 1994;
WHEREAS, the State Route 4 Bypass Authority recommended that member agencies approve
the precise alignment for the northern portion of the route;
WHEREAS, adoption of the Specific Plan for the precise alignment will ensure that the right of
way is protected until such time as the County can acquire the necessary property rights for the
construction of the Bypass;
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held before the East County Regional Planning Commission
on Monday, June 5, 1995 whereat all that wished to testify were heard and the public hearing
was closed;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the East County Regional Planning Commission
certifies that the Final EIR was prepared consistent with State and County CEQA Guidelines and
that the Commission has considered the information contained in the EIR prior to making a
decision; and
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Commission recommends that the
Board of Supervisors certify the Final EIR as adequate and complete and as prepared consistent
with State and County CEQA Guidelines;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Commission recommends that the
Board of Supervisors approve the adoption of the Precise Alignment Plan for the 2.9 mile section
located in the unincorporated area; and
Page 2 of 2
NOW THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the instruction by the East County
Regional Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Commission
on Monday, June 5, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners - Andrieu, Sobalvarro, Planchon, Wagner and Hanson
NOES: Commissioners - None
ABSENT: Commissioners - Wetzel and hern
I, Harvey E. Bragdon, Secretary of the East County Regional Planning Commission of the
County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was fully called
and held in accordance with the law on June 5, 1995.
ey r gdon
Secretar st County Regional Planning Commission,
County of ontra Costa, State of California
CEK:drb
CK21995/drb/sp950001.2re
m CD MM�; ro
0 1 -------*
z 0 C)
U) M co
Z
Sa =6
C) co C)
-0 C) CR Ln m
oz 0
(D
z c z
C) =r I h
C: 0
C)
CD -
M g m
U) (D 0
Z:u
CD >
l< Z r
3 C')
CO U)c
C) c Cl) M
CD 03 Cf) :E cn
CD- 3
CD CD m m C)
m 0 0
CD z Z
cq
_n m U) (D tO _—A
cn 00 01
�w o +-q tH it 0 ZS >
tfl. t1i
Z CD (D >
'M C::o M Lri :o m m m
z
cr k t 0) �L ::F' Fl- M Ln 0 M
o '0 ""+I- t m m IC L, :,o 0
> < m b I -n C;O
CD
C: M z > m>
M M
IE
Qj 0 to Cf)
> 0 m
:E E: p >m
If t m (A cf);o
K >z CY)
m to rn
M 0 G)
M W M
U) cum m
�(2 �El I
D -3 0
i i i M 0
F-h z 0
z 11) 0 X U 0:5 m
> Pi 0 0 K MOOZM < �4
I a 1! -V 0 W o 0
CD 12 it 0 -1 m C:
IT 0 > 10 0
m
z z
�.O W (D CO :3 (D co
=3 R-3 m rt p < m
6 m z
:4 h c 0
0
z7r ti H 0 z
m
m
C-4 z
>
W
�3' . >
(OD z m
D it>
z 0
--I I 3(D
!-h I .
-4 Ul
;CY)
o
0
.1
13,
1,0 0
m C) p
00 z
�t lb
> cn -4
5>1 m m C: I T -0
K CQ x G)m 1>ca P) n
0 -j r-
m M
co m
z z cn
t '(D
(D P, OD cn O- 0 m 0
m c C)ZE :10 C:
(D 0 -0
0 OX o m m o
0_0 m c
m M 0 m H z
z c m
> M 0
m 0 +--
z 0 YO z
co
m Z m z z
0 0
> -u co:)o
m F- z
'o El
> O
C 0 1 LL-ji t�t
Z
Ln
C/)
0 C-4 M M m t1i
__4
-h m
Of
�j CO 0
ON
_t (D !td ✓P 0
1>
Co cn
�-3 C_
m co
0) 3 Co 0-n
000
IW
0 ltl z I-J (D m
M
zq 00
m
>
'o
.......
to
Ln
> >
IVm
V,
0
0
z
m CY)
m
F--1
(D
0
la)
D3
>
U)
NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING BEFORE THE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ON A PLANNING MATTER
BRENTWOOD AREA
NOTICE is hereby given that on Tuesday, July 11, 1995 at
2 : 15 p.m. in Room 107 of the County Administration Building,
corner of Pine and Escobar Streets, Martinez, California, the
Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors will hold a public
hearing to consider the following planning matters :
Recommendation of the East County Regional Planning
Commission on the request by Contra Costa County (applicant) for
the adoption of the Precise Alignment Plan for a 6 .4 mile portion
of the State Route 4 Bypass Project, (SP 1-95) .
The location of the subject land is within the
unincorporated territory of the County of Contra Costa, State of
California, generally identified below (a more precise
description may be examined in the Office of the Director of
Community Development, County Administration Building, Martinez,
California) :
A 6 .4 mile portion of the State Route 4 Bypass Project
located in the unincorporated area of the County between Highway
4 in Antioch and the intersection of Concord Avenue and Briones
Valley Road in the Brentwood area.
If you challenge this matter in Court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the County at, or prior to, the
public hearing.
Date : June 26, 1995
PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors and
CounVAAdam' istrator
By
Ann ervelli, Deputy Clerk
Zameer Khan Church of Latter Day Roman Catholic Bishop
2355 5th Avenue #4 Saints Oakland
Concord, CA 94518 50 E. North Temple 2900 Lakeshore Avenue
Salt Lake City, Utah Oakland, CA 94610
84150-0001
Charles Wasson
3025 Torre Ramel lane Lois Augustine �/ Anna Smith
Oakley, CA 94561 3035 Frandoras Circle 226 Rolando Avenue
oakley, CA 94561 Brentwood, CA 94513
Bethany Evangelical
Lutheran ✓ John Slatten ✓ CCC Water District
3644 Freedom Way 6294 Lone Tree Way P.O. Box 4121
Antioch, CA 94509 ` Brentwood, CA 94513 Concord, CA 94524
Rolling Hill Ranch / S.H.Cowell Foundation ✓ Ron Nunn
40 River Ridge Road 120 Montgomery St.#2570 Route 1 Box 20.0
Little Rock, AR 72227 San Francisco, CA 94104 Brentwood, CA 94513
Church of the Nazarene Termo Company Michael Wood
330 Worrell Road P.O. Box 2767 25 Madeira court
Antioch, CA 94509 Long Beach, CA 90801 Oakley, CA 94561
Richard Phillips Charles Gadke John Perata
4332 Gold Run Drive 4905 Calle de Oro ✓ 3065 Frandoras Circle
Oakley, CA 94521 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
Rosie Jacuzzi Anthony Reano George Medeiros
3051 Empire Avenue ✓ 3047 Frandoras Circle 3023 Frandoras Circle ✓
Brentwood, CA 94513 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
James Farr Joseph Cunha Susann Steinberg
P.O. Box 2567 ✓ 1885 W. Cypress Road 3029 Frandoras Circle
martinez, CA 94553 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
Lawrence Hoage Diablo Water District Ralph Mori
3053 Frandoras Circle P.O. Box 127 ✓ 10 madeira Court
Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
Lucelio Sulprizio / Vincent Buchanan Richard McCarty
3059 Frandoras Circle ✓ 4875 Calle de Oro ✓ 4965 Calle de Oro
Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
William Maggiora Edmund Linscheid Eli Reinhard
5238 Myrtle Drive / 106 Linscheid Drive L.- P.O. Box 5368 l/
Concord, CA 94521 Pittsburg, CA 94565 San Jose, CA 95150
Gladstone Jones ✓ May Ann Mateas Brentwood Road & Gun Club
4865 Calle de Oro 6287 Park Ridge Drive ✓ 2483 Sand Creel Road
Oakley, CA 94561 Anderson, CA 96007 Brentwood, CA 94513
Craig Lindblom Alfred De Martini Leo Saenz
3017 Frandoras Circle,,,,- 3041 Frandoras Circle ti/ 3071 Frandoras Circle
Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561 Oakley, CA 94561
Contra costa county Floo�/
Peter Daniels Del Prado Co. /McBail Co. Control District
4935 Calle de Oro 3200 Danville Blvd. #200 255 Glacier Drive
Oakley, CA 94561 Alamo, CA 94507 Martinez, CA 94553
f
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY (Applicant) , County File #SP95-0001 : The
proposed project is the adoption of the Precise Alignment Plan for
a 6. 4 mile portion of the State Route 4 Bypass Project located in
the unincorporated area of the County between Highway 4 in Antioch
and the intersection of Concord Avenue and Briones Valley Road in
the Brentwood area. (Parcel #053-060-008 .-009, -015; 053-072-006.-
007; 054-230-009; 054-220-003, -004, -025, -031; 054-171-007, -008;
054-172-001; 010-020-004; 007-110-001)
CK21995/drb
RECEIVED
JUN 2 3199b
CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA COSTA CO.
p r1 P •.
} -drJ!+ ` r -, I
1
14
!`.G" d7i rf
Z \� i,�.� r � i!' 15','.`.. �
}�t"5 °y`., f r 1 ! }.: i ,•.••�,g ;{;� � illy {' �„ -�(ttV�: j•. � =x
* ".: ` 1•,1e. �'.'v:°•.y�`�i�ice".. ,j `S1'S' "'"-•!r.� � :.€ 'f
;x4 - =
- �! i 7 L �� r�f ,y r�� .�� �' ,R`YT} �`f;•+ �..T't � � / , � ��� r F
•P r ��:' ,'40 .l r� r• I O!
�,%.,
�"7�f ✓ ��' �� �. y!� 'S�F,���' �L Oji, "' •. * ,��
{ �Z :t L, t'r` � J��1 to i•i ay� w .t�.Ix yam` !!tl= t���.+ +,��
yy, ffi
T,4' � T i
` ,.,� „ y 'fir \ •�''a a } +L'Y����� t f:
h �!
Vk for
^'
F.
�; �U ��'t4� 4 ° ..�`� �'� � �yxf),q,T,� `'( ���►`s'��`�'•y�'�'d��5 ,r;'f d 4 ^ � s f
•+,'�f►' y Y e &V ..' P (r t 5�(a� it �•+1 fit.#=t + m°' ✓` t d ,y�
15
�Y#�� �. �a';� ! h�;' k•: 5 ��.*� r�`�t��'�,tt r�";�gy *�� z\ # . .Y w a: � z
IL,Vit_
`a �,µ � '♦ �; � �. S. ^jai`4 4���[' �yk ��� :.YC� w��� Jr: �x y •£• l ��;e'� t
i
row
�C� �tr a5� _{,. j'�4Y �:#ffi'.� R^...��� �•
q •:
s
!f�fi�`� �k�, 1-y} � �n�t, •k_ '�.� r `1�x° � t �,� ; to °
;t ' � `e4 \•'� �_,. � -*r e .� tt�' �.4 zk� 4 � y �\� Sok. � ,:,, •.�..
fin- t •� r
,
*C:
P•
+ w
ll �,' nA„tCt'tI'�SRt
� a '}rT• � r•'7
�:.. � i'`. -:r +l,+c, �•''�+"�l`4'�" '�.,`r � �fir.
p� -.N" 7�d �� a t '•�f •.�" t �gYY,`� ; �5.,:.,�a�fti6�y��r�'l'�
IL R►'!I+CP'r' Myc. a $'_ .+ SCS v'y�
NO ;� �i,� ' ��;flit V: ,,,:-� � � •�f�''� S '� �.. 7Tris"",'�C�
c },sY it art .n.�t£. C f .y d '{a yl ds?slct�ry•4�'
�� ." 'LJ S-3 j�. ��/Y' � K -� �"(I��a�tN• ".���Ff 7 f. h.
.tv ✓
y
�!, '.i 1'S+"x�� t�. r ��:. 4.-.. p# �.�i. .��,��•s.. fRLt:� �,�'tj{7��.;
�b' '. i� •=fa f��14 c f!� 52 �f s+-�'1., �` �'c,'�`s���j, .S .A.1.r�.
,+ .i;� aS '' -r� +�.�4�� ,�4a �jTr''d,tyL�a�,A'�•7! ,�a�e'C
[n�+�F'!�7'rT4r� ni}kF r a�> ie-�yy h ''Y.`� -r' yr.'t �"r_ r3�+•. j r;;�}�"
4k, •. e 1 f •.r r3, f 7 �. .r / r> '••.:P r y S9t�a•{+.l�.i• "l�G�ibi r
i'. :\ 'r�+ � �h
4
�'4`-,�� n„ Y f y�•�µw'k'r•1g`•-S �� ��sj#�.+.T/�.�� sJ r`},�°w�z�y ori',
.e�'r..w' ti «1• t.t �,*4 �~ Fr't "�� l.elS�r�t.D.i" "7j.�•i� �'� £� %,�w,.
L :3 -;a�.,,,,sy=;��„� -... a .. �. �� �% ti< }�. : �, �� ! .,fib'✓.t:N
4A+ �' tea-_ CC, r _•>,r�.4 .. „r '(.+F 7„�'_ 3 ��y�• .+��. : 1 w ff� ti
>>'S..� .. S .�.,r f •;t-t^ a q;'� - ,t'�' - ,s..
7W
k. �r�• 'r o�F`�. 'j'et• �' � � Nacf.i
OR
�$ x • t
ull''t f • . 1,
+
�' `r: .ems•, ,
w
r s aj
7 ( f«
i
u'Y
l
v�� •noI
, t
X
SS ,45vu'7�''
..,. ��,�i � y aft. r t �= r♦.
+ fir' t 1*y'cxd �9f I
0.! � ,,. �, � -.. �F t-..' +�f ��.��' �g�*'y'•�'} �r§'��yzar?�.�'F `a�,t�dr1 0
.,•'F�,- c<• ,�, .' :' -'. if- -r �� �".f��r, .� ' #�r* �cry��'Y�Sg:�3a� s o-r���£'�4
♦ � t � a Y m {q kr 4'�` "�,phi'k' �is � �'1'W,
i R w'V• ,4,h a°k:'y n :i i.t' o,{2r�C� S! a"��1.-S�t^t
a � _ �$t
a• 1':Y -
lqno
r? Lf r i y •' �5 r' ! =1'eh
♦ ♦ lr h a x�! nx x# z f z
tL(3'F E,/� 1`'f�•., y i1 j� Y�4Y�t. +z-�=c'� �°} �,+,� �r�,;�� ,�
"wd(i C T f .' + A.. {.� i `� °t3�}�♦ £}xz 7 7'fir♦'i � ��7 'tr T»�
g
v ,n, #7'
� 9._i r t�_ r 'q♦ _ +�.,.`9 r�.rq'�i.���d—d+�d-(a 3��� gw�y�Ja��
.� J `� n4 • r •+ t����t r��x��-:�1 4�5 �� �,'ft+''�"' i�,..�^,✓tr
�, � +'t' ¢ `♦ a• y!� ct� 4-' � 'd.r' �w'�`5*rs.c� �a GFX ��"' - ,
-Mi
Ali
o
U2 P
♦ r'.1 yd n, !I k $y...&?J}`. 'r[". gte3 "d.'E`a 5140'",
S f y
•�� ti � '�� �tit � �" �. tr€a�'� '�y,�` � ��� � � �-
Y
Y'
,pg 1
UO
i , ` 1 Y yrs • 17 zl I 11m, Iq
YY'
r uvtit
� d
ONAM
F' 3'.prgi'.ti; d "" ` Tt�^a:Y
-� v U, b�$$7�r fit+
vt tJ��3r
' , � 'r y£r _ 3�` f Ear�'S� 1� �t�.,� ♦� f��GxFiF(j'S•�, r`*�� "R:y
♦•. F- d i'...�' �^siy'ivatrpa #Lr S
t
IN
H
�'��i4+���� t • f 9d �tV� Y�'`�`
'�j' !�• L..� i�. S-y,; �. ��� •� '+Y^"u-��pa tSy� ,.tit +�d r`�yxL�.,.}=ti,d+;�'¢
- .'j !ar3x mosa„sq FmF ^" .
r .d'3♦
y-^ d M1 gY YM Yf 9
lc, t
�. ♦r'!S"� "ty�s,�c�� ��1��' ,'r"
1•.s
3
1 r .r
�� 1.�� 11 <MS. '<e:' b��•. i
• a. st �f ♦T Z.tip �` k
�z f
,n?'r
ifl .{PZ•'dr +.�t'� , s tic rR y`t^'ttf .�'w'
N.��'�`�''� sir•"' ,����f[y- ,3'-�-, ��'�+�'�zi�� "'t}�°"f", � �� }
d k;C
�8a1 {T rys Y i �J7• .�t� y hj� 'r 7� Y� y
VL-
19
��� s:T" y i` i j'r'w �' c'� k '�� q,t�'i5 •4 ���� � rr�3�r•q..``.
.� r •{',, cd` i ; ;�.y ,✓¢r,'tzr^Sit %•#`a iR t rT,y'
t.< }�''. 'I � < ;Iw U�r/ �1�• �i W�`l�Y �Y.fl �Y' r�$ iY t
t
y
fr is
4-4
IF
J
:y1. � , s ..` ... � r:C �1 x'? �500 '�k��.�,•
r
'1. d�..t'' r {(t �• •.'< s - ��'� �aN�y`�a��t4s�a b}��sS:� •�
• � Y
ik
S-<
;� '_'Q= G' � - y'�-4yw k��4�7`�i"�r��s prr•'°'�x r
i T1 �►Y � t'YEA �T��r��'�S"�`f�c'R,i {
,/ � ,.�i r { t t ,vl�r i tst,.•�4x afar'k'�'t y
f ,i � 1' 'r4".*3 . t .'r t ,; }t b'�.t�x1•q r,1 Na,a
rt a.
,z
our.. �`' N '<l��r�t T
s t
r � �#'�.��,,..,,tT%�'i � I,�-{t K J�1tt �•'4+ �K-'"> 6'- r� ^�.tet �'� ,^
e.
ire, �
(t..yd„��` Ca t�>... ` :-t� 9°� r'T)f�?w�.,�,�A1""`r�� 4 Ty�rx�4�+..W4': �^•-f•�s`e� �>F`
rrya"ar�Lrv`�. »�1 ,�
splL �� �a3«. A�} •� R 1.el _+uyty}�n. ye$�+!`y� ;
IW
��� 9 t�t41 '�` t• y Via. �`�: '+�"d3-`� !#� r� +"q'-fin "'4�a 1 f 1•�
- ♦� ,�.,... .. -. act - �"IV
41
"�_"`��Av�i'•"�.-"@ �$^vw.'
kl
I
'1nr< ��f 14 jt '��° 7 '� � � r t �yr+tT c� Y �'iy .,±R. ~- �s •",� �7
kU
• _ �
2
J
+ 'L
FP
0-7
• �y,l}:' t
. �t''I xiY{• . �r ��r*z'�tR � Sf ;ja� K
? e
n
r'�y�� ,#- ^h*,E,': �5. »�,,, amt '�•g,'i7�� �q,rt� yr F N of '.�:.
.. ;� '• � � r. 1- r"z,'3 y r r V � �'�".�ir��•
,+
, .a �k' �. r ,� y� cam, ,�' ac�rY•y^�",y�={�, ,1 r� �,:I r '9'' 4c�;s�.`wg �a.
� ti ..�`� (,-. � ... -',fi'. ,yr' ! E-,+t" y? � ���'+��'2•',,� ��� S" 4 a"`�I x{' �Ss's.-t# �''"�rv��r
Lit
� •A, sr A /ra j�ld��,�•.r�r'y.. �i ,F�z��+'t€'v��"^'t ��,�e ,zr �. �, t'Y _ jrz`` �Y':: ..
• •• � � �*'s�.k- a�-Y-�' ,yrs °��x , �'� >t��r� �f>t ,lt��'}z
c��.2Srtlt. _ �;-" �� r t f.� "�t��� 'fl:�"�,� :��� �•r'•� �, * �ik '' � �?�� tb f4.�su�'1�y``�`�'�i��
• ... �A'r. `+,�.•�''� ~ � �. n W�,.; jai �eYt[..,.p t �� ,
e -' .'�>�t Y � �� _ �. � �f. �1�;,,��,�r ,��.�+�"'•� �'�t �°'�?►� � thA�r�rYt�;t,��'4'�r�rt��x�itr".s�r��"tw�?
r _ °� ` e `°{�� !�y �X•+ 'Q•. ` 5 e£rt d�z., Kf,l"r, t �Y
1 l f'WTi
as `a T4yr,9eJ �, s t ,� ,fy t.y* ,'
I .a..,rzj'r� P., �h�s j'•UI MR, 4 Y
4 1H 1! .� `z'l B .{7 a tt r 'b`. * air
' t f 1� $,+r 7r 4 s 31 V1t�. YES+�a� ,yF�' ]' dtqs'�.,aSz rxtic�rx �'rt•`L7 7t�.mx"C+�
S:,'} , tet. w� li:' t' F° r+'t 'S2 M�' "ti- aGYV �. "t +•Y,r,
v
F n � r 4 it �;�: �•� .+'+ !,T*-.'t Al �t 3"s�. „ 17. '�.�
"... Mzen'kF.:xxz1 ',:;"1 s -S. s� '": 'Y frs-`f -'�. �`^ #'�'^ 3z.
„'`: 1a "` .. r r st .a♦ ,..sS,c .-;<,s1'r''ra; kjr
pRw
a
!�.«
? fa ♦ a 8L) r•1 x�' a)t x ct
Al, AYwsMt (Oli ..
t Nit
''ilk
a 1 }t x y
It ! +€t}eX fits w •7' s :t ' nr�*s.,3 „+ t.'
1
! v
^ KF 1
i
•. J�k>3 y » is �, � r�� te+
s r S
�'�s
- x {� 4E& w'
r s i r i p
! 4^
.1i�, ,j �5
3`
_L .► v d � ,! cz� ''r BSc
vN
•, � "�,y'(. �y* T L`0.
4 tt J• '
r f
j A
•d �ti ,^} +a ..��.g�y.-^ �' f+ Mt i�: �,c 'i't`".t'� �� t G "� ,
sIL r
t ty'
It zt
y a ^
y ,
` A,
t k!4
Z J
R,
Ad
M.
t
-. rte' „�,•, ,- •,.. '. � �� � a
r
rt .i
�~ r
ty� p •y y
- y r
9 i A ,w f xj
D
-
!! 10,
i
gip