HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06131995 - D5 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Adopted this Resolution on June 13,1995, by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Smith, Torlakson, Bishop
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisors Rogers, DeSaulnier
RESOLUTION NO. 95/ 273
SUBJECT: Approve the Formation of the Central County Area of Benefit
Central County Area
Project No. 0676-2310-6P4070, CDD-CP#94-43
The Board of Supervisors, by Resolution, shall:
APPROVE the Development Program Report pertaining to the formation of the Central
County Area of Benefit.
DETERMINE that the activity, formation of the Central County Area of Benefit, is not
subject to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) pursuant to Article 5, Section
15061(b)(3) of the CEQA guidelines.
DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file the Notice of Exemption with the
County Clerk.
DIRECT the Public Works Director to arrange for payment of the $25.00 handling fee to
the County Clerk for the filing of the Notice of Exemption.
DETERMINE that a majority protest does not exist.
INCORPORATE in this resolution by reference the boundaries, costs, and method of fee
apportionment set forth in the Development Program Report and the attached ordinance.
DIRECT the Director of Public Works and Auditor/Controller to continue the existing trust
fund for the Central County subarea of the Central County Regional Area of Benefit, that
was established by Board Resolution 88/122 on March 15, 1988, and that this trust fund
shall now be specific for the Central County Area of Benefit, and that the Treasurer shall
continue the investment of said monies with interest to accrue in the trust fund account.
DIRECT the Director of Public Works and Auditor/Controller to transfer the balance of the
existing trust fund for the Lamorinda Regional Area of Benefit, that was established by
Board Resolution 88/122 on March 15, 1988, into the trust fund for the Central County
Area of Benefit.
DIRECT the Public Works Department and Department of Community Development to
review the fee schedule every year that the Area of Benefit is in effect, and to adjust for
the effects of inflation as described in the attached ordinance. The adjustment for inflation
is not subject to CEQA.
RESOLUTION NO. 95/_Z73
Approve the Formation of the Central County Area of Benefit
June 13,1995
Page 2 of 3
DIRECT the Director of Community Development to monitor future amendments to the
currently adopted General Plan and their impact on traffic within the Central County Area
of Benefit, and to report those amendments to the Public Works Director as necessary to
facilitate updating of the Central County Area of Benefit, and to make recommendations
to the Board.
DIRECT the Public Works Department and Department of Community Development to
comply with CEQA on development application and road projects to be constructed
pursuant to the Development Program Report for the Central County Area of Benefit.
ADOPT the attached ordinance, which forms the Central County Area of Benefit, and
ordains the following:
Traffic Mitigation Fees (Ordinance No. 95 - 32 )
1. Adopt traffic mitigation fees, as recommended in the Development Program
Report.
2. Adjust the fee schedule every year that the Area of Benefit is in effect, to
account for the affects of inflation and that at no time will the fee schedule
be increased at a rate of more that 5% per year.
Financial Impact:
There is no financial impact on the General Fund. The total estimated cost of the road
improvements identified in the Program Development Report for the Central County Area
of Benefit is approximately $20 million. The proposed projects, however, will only be
partially funded by Central County Area of Benefit fees. The United States Navy has made
a financial commitment to participate in the Evora Road Extension project as part of the
mitigation of the Port Chicago Highway closure. Adoption of the Area of Benefit will
generate approximately $4.7 million for road improvement projects, when all the fees are
collected by the year 2015 target date. The United State Navy will contribute an estimated
$4 million. Other sources of funding (State or Federal aid, or local sources such as sales
tax and gas tax, etc...) will have to be found to fund the remaining portions of the project
costs.
Reasons for Recommendations and Background:
The Countywide Area of Benefit was first adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March
15, 1988, to improve the capacity and safety of the arterial road network in Contra Costa
County through the establishment of a traffic mitigation fee. The Countywide Area of
Benefit was divided into seven regions, some of which were further divided into subareas.
RESOLUTION NO. 95/ 273
Approve the Formation of the Central County Area of Benefit
June 13,1995
Page 3of3
Reasons for Recommendations and Background (continued):
The seven regions were named West County, Central County, Lamorinda, Alamo, South
County, East County, and Bethel Island. The Central County region was further divided
into four subareas, named Briones, Martinez, South Walnut Creek, and Central County.
The proposed Central County Area of Benefit involves two of these subareas, Briones and
Central County. The new Area of Benefit also involves the Marsh subarea of the East
County Regional Area of Benefit and the Lamorinda Regional Area of Benefit. The
formation of separate Areas of Benefit based upon the original subareas of the Countywide
Area of Benefit will allow the Public Works Department staff to update and administer
these subareas more efficiently. The Area of Benefit fees will reflect the needs and
potential development of that area and not of the region surrounding it.
Government Code Section 66484 and Division 913, Title 9 of the Contra Costa County
Ordinance Code provide for assessing and collecting fees for bridge and/or major
thoroughfare construction within a designated area of benefit and as a condition of issuing
a building permit. The Public Works Director and Director of Community Development
have completed a Development Program Report for the Central County Area of Benefit,
which was filed with the Clerk of the Board. Notice of the hearing was duly given in
accordance with Government Code Sections 54986, 65091, 66016, and 66484.
Consequences of Negative Action:
Failure to form the Central County Area of Benefit will result in lower revenue and the
funding of future projects may be delayed.
PHIL BATCHELOR, Clerk of the
Board of Supervisors and
County Administrator
By
Deput erk
HJB:ML:ds:eh
g:central.t6
Orig.Dept.: Public Works Depart.(RE)
Contact: Martin Lysons,313-2295
cc: M.Shiu,Deputy PW Director
Community Development
Public Works Accounting
V.Germany,Design Division
County Auditor-Controller
Treasurer-Tax Collector
RESOLUTION NO. 95/_.L7.3
Ordinance No.95-32 SECTION VI. SENIOR HOUS- Boundary Description
P R 0 0 F OF PUBLICATION Central of
Counttyy Area of ING. Nothingin this Ordi- Central Coun Area n
Benefit nance shall be construed to Benefit
abridge or modity the
(2015.5 C.C.P.) The Board of Supervisors of Board s discretion upon EXHIBIT"A"
Contra Costa County ordains proper application for senior
as follows: housing or congregate care The central portion of Contra
facilities pursuant to Govern-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA Costa County; California,
SECTION I. SUMMARY. This ment Code Section 65915 to
ordinance provides for the adjust or to waive the fees lano bounded
onCountythe
the north
on She
County of Contra Costa formation of the Central Provided for this ordinance. southwest by Alameda Coun-
. County Area of Benefit, and ty,and described as follows:
the adoption of fees to be SECTION VII.PURPOSE AND
F.am a citizen of the United States and a resident of the collected from developments USE OF FEES.The purpose of Beginning in Suisun Bay on
proposed in the Central the tees described in this or- the boundary common to
County>afore'said; lam over the:age-;o I.eighteen,.years. and County Area of Benefit local- dinance is to generate funds Contra Costa and Solano
ed in unincorporated Contra to finance improvements to Counties at the Point of Be-
not a party to or interested in the above-entitled matter. Costa County to fund road certain bridges and major ginning of "Eastern Contra
improvements. thoroughfares in the Central Costa Sub-Regional Trans-
County area.The fees will be sortation Mitigation Fee Ar-
I am the Principal Legal Clerk of the Contra Costa Times, a SECTION ll. REPLACEMENT. used to finance the road im- ea"adopted July 26,1994 by
Within the new area of bene- provements listed In the De- Contra Costa County Board
newspaper of general circulation, printed and published at fit, Ordinance No. 93-21,Or- velopment Program Report.
g P PefN Supervisors'also
Resolution
dinance Ordi Ordinance As discussed t more r tall No. west , also being the
2640 Shadelands Drive in the City of Walnut Creek, 93-23 and Ordinance 93-24 in said report,there Is a rea- northwest comer of "West
Countyof Contra Costa, 94598. shall be repealed and re- sonable relationship between Pittsburg Area of Benefit"
placed by this ordinance. the fees and the types of de- adopted December 10 1991
velopment projects that are by Contra Costa bounty
SECTION III. AUTHORITY. subject to the fees. These Board of Supervisors'Resolu-
And which newspaper has been adjudged a newspaper of This ordinance is enacted,in development proects will tion No.91n79;thence from
general circulation by the Superior Court of the County of Code Section 66484 and Dit bridges anddmaorlthoroough the Point
boundaryegcommonalong
vision 913,Title 9 of the Con- fares in the Central County•• Contra Costa, State of California, under the date of ry said adopted areas,southerly
tra Costa County Ordinance area creat inn a need to ex- 7,410 feet, more or less, to
October 22, 1934. Case Number 19764. Code. sand,extend or improve ex- the south right of way line of
fisting bridges and major thor- Contra Costa Canal on the
SECTION III. NOTICE AND u",fares and a need to west line of Section 8 Town-
The notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy (set in HEARING. This ordinance construct new bridges and ship 2 North, Range i West,
was adopted pursuant to the major thoroughfares to miti- Mount Diablo meridian;
type not smaller than nonpareil), has been published in, Procedure set forth in Gov- gate adverse traffic and infra- thence continuing along the
ernment Code Sections structure impacts that would boundary of "West Pittsburg
each regular anti entire issue of said newspaper and not in 5498665091, 66016, 66017 result from such develop- Area of Benefit," westerly,
and 661484 and Division 913, ment projects, southerly southeasterly, and
any supplement thereof on the following dates, to-wit: Title 9 of the Contra Costa easterly X26,000 feet,more or
---_ r County Ordinance Code and SECTION Vlll.SEVERABILITY. less, to its intersection with
all required notices have If any fee or provision of this "Eastern Contra Costa Sub-
•••..J..1.. ........ ..... been properly given and pub- ordinance Is held Invalid or
lic hearings held. Regional Transportation east
.......................................
g unenforceable by a court of anon Fee Area"on the east
competent 1'unscict'on, that fine of Section 17(T2N,R7 W);
..................................................:............................. SECTION IV.FEE ADOPTION. holding shall not affect the thence along the boundary of
The following fees to fund enforceability of the remain- 'Eastern Contra Costa Sub-
road improvements are in fees or provisions, and Regional Transportation Miti-
-� Q -- adopted for the Central the Board declares that each gallon Fee Are'in a general
all in the year of 19....1... County Area of Benefit, as part of this ordinance Is valid, Southeasterly and southerly
established by Resolution - direction 80,000 feet,more or
95/273 dated June 13, 1995 in and of itself irrespective of less direction
the southeast comer
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that the and shall apply to all develop- the validity of any other part. le Stoth 12, (fast comer
foregoing is true and correct. merit within the Fee Area.
o g a SECTION IX. REVIEW OF thence along the south line of
b Central County Area of FEES. Project cost estimates Section 12, westerly 4,400
Benefit shall be reviewed periodically feet,more or less to the cen-
Executed at Walnut Creek, California. while the Central County Area terline of Mount biablo Sce-
Land Use-Single Family Res- of Benefit is in effect.The fee nic Boulevard (South Gate
idential-Recommended Fee schedule shall be adjusted Road);, thence along said
.
I $2,972 per DwellingUnit annually to account for Infla- centerlinle in a general north-
On this .... day of ..T,.4,,Q .; 19..1.S tion using the State of Califor- erty direction 6,700 feet,
Land Use- Multiple Family nia Construction Cost index more or less, tot e center-
Residential
enter-Residential - Recommended as published annually by the line intersection of Summit
." ,...C, l(�.(� Fee$2,641 per Dwelling Unit California Department of Road and Mount Diablo Sce-
••...• ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,-J Transportation.At no time will nic Boulevard (North Gate
Land Use- Commercial - the fee schedule be in- _I Road);thence along the can-
Signature Recommended Fee $5.67 creased at a rate of more j terline of North Gate Road in
per Square Foot Gross Floorthan 5%per year due to infla- t a general westerly direction
Area tion. 12,400 feet, more or less, to
Lesher Communications, Inc. the northwest line of Lot D,
Land Use-Office - Recom- SECTION X. EFFECTIVE I Rancho San Miguel Robert
Contra Costa Times per DATE.This ordinance shall be 9
mended Fee $4.82 Allen Tract'thence along said
P.O. BOX 4147 Square Foot Gross Floor Area come effective 60 days after northwest line, southwesterly
passage and within 15 days 3,100 feet, more or less, to
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
Land use-industrial-Recom- of passage, shall be pub- the southeast comer of that
(510) 935-2525 _ mended Fee $2.08 Per lished once with the names 787.58 acre parcel shown on
Square Foot Gross Floor Area of the Supervisors voting for the REcord of Survey filed
and against It In the Contra I June 22, 1960 in Book 18 of
Land Use- Other - Recom- Costa times,a newspaper of Licensed Surveyor's Maps at
Proof Of Publication Of: mended Fee$2,972 per peak general circutllaaytion published page 439, thence alonof said g the
hour trip Section this County. Pursuant the south 87°52'06"west 91881.2
Wu
(attached is a copy of the legal advertisement that pub contra Costa CountyOrdi- feet and north 6'08'40' west
Fees shall r collected when
)IStled) building permits are issued In nance Code,the Clerk of the 2,389.28 feet, to the most
accordance with Section Board shall promptly file a southern copmer of the Re-
913-204 of Title 9 (Subdivi- certified copy of this orei- cord of Survey filed August
sions) of the Contra Costa nance with the County Re- 27, 1970 in Book 53 of Li-
County Ordinance Code. corder. censed Surveyors' Maps at
page 13; thence along the
SECTION �/. FEE AREA. The SECTION Xi. EXISTING FEE. south line thereof also being
Fee Area shall include all of The replacement of Ordi- the south line thereof al
the unincorporated area with- nances No. 93-21, 93-22, being the south line of Ran-
so
in the Central County Area of 93-23,and 93-24 shall not af- cho San Miguel north
benefit with the following ex- fect fees accrued thereunder 76°53'13"west 1,445.41 feet
ception: prior tothe effective date of to the most southern comer
this ordinance,and such fees of Subdivision 6743 "Stone-
" 1.Any development required shall remain subject to pay- gate Unit 1" filed June 9,
under conditions of approval men and collection. 1987 in Book 313 of Maps at
to construct certain off-site page 28, thence along the
road improvements in lieu of PASSED AND ADOPTED on boundary of Subdivision
fee payment. June 13, 1995 by the follow- 6743 north 13°51'48' west
In�Qg vote: 5,68 .22 feet south 73°16'01"
2.Areas in the Pacheco Area AYES: Supervisors Smith, west 4 599.44 feet,and south
01 of Benefit Toriakson,Bishop 21°53'15"east 3,423.26 feet,
� I NOES:None to the southeast comer of
)L 3. Areas in the Pleasant Hill ABSENT:Supervisors Rogers, Subdivision 4924 "Hill and
I BART Station Specific Plan DeSaulnier Dale, Unit 6" recorded May
,I Area ABSTAIN:None 18, 1977, in Book 196 of
Maps at page 28, thence
-MS4JP_ERU 4.Areas in the Bates Avenue Attest Phil Batchelor,Clerk of along the boundary of Subdi-
Assessment District the Board of Supervisors and vison 4924 in a general west-
11 ft n County Administrator erly direction 2,879.25 feet to
ti 1 `^O"•"` The boundaries of the Central By:Shirley Casillas the northeast corner of Sub-
County Area of benefit as es- Deputy division 4402 recorded De-
` tablished by Resolution No. camber 27, 1974 in book 175
95/273 adopted June 13, Gayle Bishop of Maps at page 25; thence
1995 are described in Exhibit Board Chair along the boundary of Subdi-
A attached to this ordinance. vision 4402, south 1°44'25"
west 1,527.78 feet to the
northeast corner of Lot 37 in
Subdivision 3973 recorded
August 18, 1972 in Book 149
of Maps at page 20; thence
along the east line of Subdivi-
sion 3973, south 1'44'25"
west 1,015.1 feet, to the
along said ooun0ary in a gen-
theroof ; thenc sling north line in a general north- ;lune 18, 1965 in Bo of erat southerly direction
north right of way line of Li- Rud ear Road, Hort ert 245 westerly direction 1,000 feet, Licensed Surveyors's laps 2,325.7 feet to the northeast
Vorna Road, thence continu- feet,more or less to[he west more or less, to a curve at Page 23'thence along said corner of Section 25
-�f ing south 1°44'25" west line of APN 183-b93-023 de- thereon having a radius of 45 Record of§urvey boundary in (T1 S,R2W) thence along the
41.96 feet to the centerline of scribed In the deed to East feet; thence crossing Boule- a general easterly direction east line of Section 25,south-
said road; thence along said vard Way, westerly 180 feet, 1,286.93 feet, to the bound- erly 2,640 feet,more or less,
centerline in a general west- Bay Municipal Utility District more or less, to the north a of the Record of Survey to the northeast corner of
ection 9 (hereinafter referred to as EB- pp
t o o�uthern prolongation of 1g6f�)InrVolumee 5530uof Offi- estem tht of erminus thereof
a curve easteX, direction in 6o,6 8ok 327 March of Subdivision
85,in Book 1filed
15
the west line of said Subdivi- clot Records at page i_ theron having a radius of 133 feet to the northwest corner of Parcel Maps at page 14;
Sion 3973;thence along said feet; thence tangent to said of Subdivision 6815'Del Val- thence along the north line of
f thence along said west line
prolongation and wen line, curve, south 73'38'43" west le" recorded November 12, Subdivision tit 3,03 . north
north 22°53 Oi" west 33.76 1987 in Book 318 of Maps at 88°43'43"west 3,035.66 feet,
north °32'10"east 236.54 feet,more or less,to
967.1 feet, to the southwest feet, to the southeast line of a non-tangent curve concave page 3; thence along the to the northeast corner of
Southern Pacific Railroad g
corner of Subdivision 4402 the to the east having a radius of north line oPf Subdivision Subdivision MS 28-82 filed
175 M 25 thence sion the right of Way APN 6815 north 89°36'27" east November 21, 1983 in Book
( ) $ 183-093-031 described as 11 f n on the east line of Lot
west line of Subdivision • PARCEL THIRTY ONE in the to in "White Orchard Es- right feet, line
the southwest 108 thence
Parcel Maps a page
north o the so east 1,063.311comertares"recorded August 28, right v way line e Tice Valley lin thence along the north
feet,to the southeast comer decor to Contra Costa County 1941 in Book 25 of Maps at Boulevard;thence along said line of Subdivision MS 28-82,
of subdivision 5931 recorded recorded December 9, 1985 page 43; thence alongg the right of way line in a general north 88°47'23" west
R Volume 12652 0f Official rt riy southeasterly and easterly di- 1,062.06 feet, to the north-
June 29,1983 in Book 271 of arc of said curve, no he
Maps at Page 21; thence Records at page 570,being a 12.29 feet, to the south right rection 3,750 feet, more or west comer thereof; thence
along the boundary thereof, non-tangent curve concave of way line of State Freeway less to the west line of Har- north 88°43'05" west
north 55022'55"west 537 feet to the northwest having a ra- 24;thence non-tangent along an Manch shown on the Re- 1,063.84 feet to the west
and in a general northwester- dius of 1,196 feet; thence said south line in a general cord of Survey field Septem- quarter corner of said Section
ly direction 105.63 feet along along the arc of said curve, westerly direction 3,200 feet, ber 8, 193 in Book 7 of 25 thence along the west
Livorna Heights Road right of southewesterly 52 feet,more .more or less,to the east line Licensed Surveyor's Maps at line of Section 25, northerly
way line, to the southeast or less, to the centerline of of Lot 62, in 'Sun Valley Es- page 7; thence along the 2,640 feet, more or less, to
corner of Subdivision 5366 Danville Boulevard; thence tates" recorded February 8, boundary thereof, southerly the northeast corner of Sec-
recorded March 25, 1980 in non-tangent aloggng said can- 1946 in Book 28 of Maps at 552.56 feet, southeasterly tion 26 (T1S, R2W); thence
Book 236 of Maps at page 7; Station 603+n65, Enoirtherts age 27; thence along lot 1,221 feet and easterly along the north lines of Sec-
thence along the boundary of y lines thereof as follow: 1) 379.04 feet,to the southwest tions 26, 27, and 28 1 S,
Subdivision 5366 in a general 110Yfe e,more
of said led,tothe southerly 30.69 feet,2)south- comer of Tract 2304 record- R2W) westerly 15,840 feet,
•-� westerly direction 400.83 feet Parcel, being County easteriy 308 feet,3)southerly ed November 29, 1955 in more or less to the north-
to the east line of Subdivision g anon-tangent 247 feet, 4) southerly 455 Book 61 of Maps at page 50; west comer of SEction 28,al-
3827 recorded June 11,1969 curve concave to the feet 5) southeasterly 273 thence along the south line of so being the northeast corner
in Book 126 of Maps at page nrthwest having a radius of feet,6)southerly 376.59 feet Tract 2304, south 70°20'30" of APN 258-310-002 shown
38; thence along said east 1,091 feetand a d s eiing co 1 ne; 7) southewesterly 550.26 east 733 feet, to the South- on the REcord of Survey field
line, south 1°31'55" west feet,8)southerly 251.38 feet west comer of Subdivision June 20, 1980,in Book 67 of
942.5 feet, to the northeast thenccurveealngtherc o feet, to the north right of way line MS 45-88 field February 28 Licensed Surveyor's Maps at
corner of Subdivision 3037 more or Tess,southwesterly te south- of Kinney Drive,being a non- 1990 in Book 145 of Parcel page 9, thence along the
recorded June 25, 1964 in tangent curve concave to the Mas at page 32; the b I
Book 99 of Maps at page 30; east comer of Subdivision MS south having a radius of 225 p p g oundary thereof as follows;
114-75 filed October 20 g along the boundary of Subdi- 1) south 0°27'37"east
thence along the boundary feet and 9) along the arc of vision MS 45-88 in a general
thereof in a general southerly 1976 in Book 49 of Parcel said curve, wester[y 70 feet; g 1,306.53 feet, 2 south
direction 1,532.28 feet to the Maps at page 19,also being thence crossin EI Curtola easterly direction 1,207.49 88°43'10"west 1,290.34 feet,
on the west right g feet to the most eastern cor- 3 south 0°15'06" east
north right of way line of Li- of way line Boulevard,southwesterly 110 ner thereof; thence south 1,303.04 feet, and 4) south
vorna Road;thence along lot of south Main Street(Shown feet, more or less, to the 70°40'17" east 21.72 feet, 88°52'39" west 513.17 feet,
lines of Subdivision 3037 as as Danville Boulevard on said northeast line of APN more or less, to the center- to the bounds of Rancho la-
follows: 1)in a general west- mainePl;thence along said west 185-330-006 described in the line of Castle Hill Ranch Road guns de los Palos Coloradan;
erly direction
?east 223.7 27 feet 2Idirec[ia general
feetm northwesterlyre or deed to Brueckner Trust re- (a private road)at the north- thence along said rancho
norfeet, 3 north 88°23'37"we less,to the iron pipe marked corded Janusry 28, 1994 as east comer of Lot"B"shown boundary, south 1°12'26"
feet,149.23feet4)south 1°"west R.C.F. 10319 heit shown on the Series #94025807; thence on the Record of Survey filed west 929.81 feet to rancho
along said northeast line, March 13,1984 in Book 74 of comer P.C.No.32 shown on
oest uth 72.3 20f west and
5) filed Novemberof on M 978 78 northwesterly 165 feet, more Licensed Surveyor's Maps at said map(67 LSM 9),thence
feet; thence crossing Trotter Boots: 71 of Parcel 19 sat or less, to the most eastern page 12 thence along said continuing along said rancho
g P comer of Lot 257(28 M 27); centerline in a general south- boundary, south 19°28'45"
Way, south 72°23'20" west page 33, thence along the thence along the southeast erly direction 907 feet, more west 3,547.16 feet to rancho
100
0th et,linof e or lessss,�o the MS northeast
line
and the northeast vision lines of Lots 257, 258, 259, or less,to the southwest cor- comer P.C.no.31 (67 LSM 9)
Subdivi-
thence continuin (99 sion lot line:3 Grumman Court in a 260 and 261 (28 M27),south- ner of PARCEL B In Subdivi-
9, g erwesterly 435 feet; thence sion MS 133-72 filed Sep- on the boundary common to
lines of subdivision 3037, general northwesterly direc- crossing Sunset Loop south- tember 7,1972 in Book 24 of Contra Costa and Alameda-
South 72°23'20'west 145.74 tion 638.88 feet to the east westerly 50 feet, to tfte east Parcel Maps at page 9; Counties; thence along said
feet, north 6019'31" west right of way line of Lancaster corner of Lot 237; thence thence along the south line of county boundary in a general
712.51 feet, and north Road (71 PM 33); thence along lot Tines of said subdivi- PARCEL B north 89°12'36" northwesterly direction
89°43'18" west 933.43 feet, along said east line in a gen- sion(28 M 27),southewester- east 259.78 feet, to the 56,700 feet, more or less to
to the south line of Subdivi- era) northwesterly direction ly 385.67 feet and in a gener- boundary of Subdivision MS Mount Diablo Base Line;
sion 4810 filed September 2,060 feet, more or less, to al southerly direction 921.19 58-75 recorded October 26, thence along said base line,
23,1976 In Book 189 of Maps the south right of way line Of feet, to the boundary of 1978 in Book 71 of Parcel easterly 2,600 feet, more or
at page 48,thence along said Lilac Drive, thence crdssing "Swanson Tract"recorded Maps at, page 23; thence less,to the east comer of Lot
south line and the south line Lilac Drive,westerly 165 feet, September 30 1946 In Book along said boundary as fol- 55 of said rancho,also being
of that 24.71 acre Assessor more or less,to the east cor- 31 of Maps at Wage 8;thence lows: 1) north 0°36' east the east comer of APN
Parcel Number (hereinafter ner of APN 184-211-027 de- along said at
in a gen- 41.92 feet,2)south 89°12'12" deed t EBR described in the
referred to as APN) scribed as PARCELS ONE erat southerly direction east 176.01 feet to the north- deed to EBRPD recorded July
187-160-013 described in AND TWO in the deed to the 373.55 feet to the boundary east comer thereof, 3) in a 24,1940 in Volume 541 of Of-
Parcel Three in
Creek re-the deed e- State of California recorded of Subdivision 5016 recorded general southerly direction ficial Records at page 271;
the City of WalJune 13, 1990 in Volume February 10, 1978 in Book 3,354 feet to the southeast thence along the northeast
corded July 5, 1984 in Vol- 1591 7 of Official Records at 207 of Mapggs at page 4the r1;; comer thereof, and 4 outh line of said
yy EBRPD parcel
ume cords1at867of page 965ialnorth page 559, also being on the common tthence oSubdivision5016 8hencelcontnuin" west 74a�7outh the feet 76 t2eX2
89°43'18"west 944.7f3 fee et, southiwest line of Interstate g REDWD.STAKE & TACK"
Freeway 680; thence along and "Swanson Tract"as fol- 87°05'11" west 300 feet to
Sur-
to the west line of Subdivision said southwest line, north lows:1)in a general southerly the centerlitne of Section 11 shown on the Record of Sur-
6468 recorded January 8, 57°21'31" west 820 feet, direction 256.07 feet and 2)in (r1 S,R2W);thence along said vey field October 3, Survey-
1982
1-
1982 in Book thence
of Maps at more or less, to the most a general easterly direction centerlilne and the centerline Book 51 of Licensed Survey-
page 41; thence along the northern corner of subdivi- 77 .7 feet to the west right of of Section 14, southerly ors Maes at page 23;thence
boundary thereof in a general sion MS 161-79 filed Sep- way line of Freeman Road 6,663.66 feet to the south- north 25°10'15" west 140.66
southerly direction 828.77 tember 3,1980 in Book 88 of being a non-tangent curve west comer of Subdivision feet and north 22°12'20"west
feet to the east right of way parcel Maps at page 50; concave to the east having a 6419'Alamo Ridge"filed Ju- 152.07 feet to the northwest
line of Interstate Freeway thence crossing Newell Ave- radius of 925 feet thence ly 28, 1988 in Book 323 of comer of PARCEL A" (51
680; thence along said east nue, westerly 92 feet, more along the arc of said curve, Maps at page 39; thence LSM 23) also being the
line in a general northwesterly or less,to the east comer of southerly 54.77 feet to the along the south line thereof, southwest comer of that 63.7
direction 2,259.08 feet; Lot Line Adjustment LL63-89 most eatem corner of Subdi- south 84°47'44" east acre APN 267-020-005 de-
thence crossing said free- shown on the Record of Sur- vision 5016; thence leaving 1,353.46 feet to the north- scribed in the deed to John-
way, south 53'47'20" west vey filed February 9, 1990 in the boundary thereof and fol- west comer of Subdivision son Orinda Ranch Inc. re-
We feet,more or less,to the Book 93 of Licensed Survey- towing the boundary shown MS 150-75 filed June 14, corded a 29 23,Official
in
-
west right of way line thereof; or's Mapps nape a 2;thence on the Record of Survey filed 1976 in Book 45 of parcel Volume 10294 of Official Re-
thence along said west line in north 52°02'55' west 880 July 26, 1982 in Book 71 of Maps at page 41; thence cords at page 858;thence in
a general northwesterly di- feet, more or less, to an an- Licensed Surveyor's Maps at along the boundary thereof a general northerly direction
rection 1,209.59 feet top the gle point on said freeway page 1 as follows:1)continu- as follows: 1 south 0°39'40" 3 132 feet, more or less,
mos[southeastern comer of right of way; thence north Ing along the arc of said east 1,233.72 feeet,2)(South along said west line thereof
APN 187-050-011 and 012 57°21'31" west 165 feet, curve,southerly 44.19 feet,to 84°17' east 2 622.91 feet, 3) and the west line of APN
described as parcel 1 In the more or less,to the point on a compound curve concave north 76°18'5b"east 481.39 267-020-004 described in the
deed to Edward Johannes- said freeway right of way; to the east having a radius of feet, and 4)north 63°16'east deed to Theordore S. Urban
sen and Juliet Johannessen thence north 576°2131 Y, 185.84 feet, 2)along the arc 193.73 feet to the northeast et a1 recorded December 24,
recorded
Revocable Living Trust more or less,to the northeast thereof, southerly 18.31 feet, comer of APN 109-180-007 1986 in Volume 12675 of Offi-
recorded March 22 1988 in cial Records at page 199,to
Volume 14228 of Official Re- right of way line of Paulson 3 non-tangent, south described as PARCEL TWO the northwest comer of said
cords at page 211; thence Lane;thence along said right 55°50'29"west 95.49 feet,4 In the deed to East Bay Re-
alon the souther) of way line in a general north- south 23°39'45" west 98.89 gional Park District(hereinaf- Urban parcel; thence con-
g y portion of westerly direction 400 feet, feet to the north right of way ter referred to as EBRPD)re- tinuing along the boundary of
the boundary [hereof in a more or less, to the south- line of Olympic
I m is Boulevard, corded spill 4, 1974, In said Urban property (12675
general westerly direction east right of way line of Olym- and 5), north 69°48'10"west Volume 7189 of Official Re- O.R.199)being common'with
1,494.46 feet, more or less, pic Boulevard; thence north- 63 feet along said north line, cords at page 183; thence the boundary of APN
to the west right of way line of wester) 62 feet, more or to the southeast corner of Lot along the northeast line of 267-030-020 conveyed by
Interstate Freeway 680; less, to the east comer of 1 in Subdivision 5016 (207, PARCEL TWO,also being the East Bay Water Company to
thence along said west line in Subdivision MS 212-76 filed 41); thence continuing along boundary of Rancho San Ra- EBMUD recorded December
a general northwesterly di- November 18, 1977 In Book sad north line((bein lot lines mon, southeasterly 4,4840 8 1 928 In Volume 163 of Offi-
,action 836 feet, more or 60 of Parcel Maps at page of Subdivision 5016)in a gen- fee[ more or less, to the clot Records at page 90 as
less,f the most eastern cor- 19, thence north eral wester[ direction 1,370 northwest comer of APN follows: 1) north 54°07+50
1.
ner of APN Parcel 11 in de- 57423'05"west 116.25 feet to feet more westerly
less, to the 199-010-012 described as east 3,208 feet, 2) south
scribed as Parcel 11 in the the east corner of the Record northeastern prolongation of PARCEL FIVE in said deed to 63°03' east 257.1 feet, 3)
Deed to Contra Costa County of Survey filed November 24, the northwest line of Terra EBRPD; thence along the north 54°07'50" east 478.5
Flood Control and Water 1962 In Book 20 of Licensed California Territorydescribed northeast line of PARCEL feet,and 4)south 30053'east
Conservation District record- Surveyor's Maps at page 47; in the Annexatioto the City FIVE in a general southeast- 998.4 to the most eatem cor-
ed December 20,Official
i- thence along the boundary of Lafayette Resolution 50-80 erty direction 1,207.59 feet to ner of APN 267-0 Urban ed
Volume 5520 of Official thence
thereof,north 58°33'23"west adopted May 12, 1980; the east line of that 13.19 scribed In said Urban deed
cords h page 451; thence 65 feet and north 66048'23" thence along said protonga- acre APN 199-010-011 ex- (12675 O.R. 199); thence
along the boundary of PAR- west 256.74 feet; thence tion,crossing Olympic Boule- cepted from PARCEL FIVE in leaving the boundary of said
CEL 11,south 64°16'18"west continuing north 66°48'23" void,southwesterly 200 feet, said deed to EBRPD and also Urban Property and continu-
northe feet and in a general west 18.30 feet to the north more or less, to the most described as PARCEL ONE in Ing along said EBMUD
northerly direction 1,036.02 right of wayline of Nicholson northern corner of said an- the deed to the United States boundary as follows:1 south
feet. to the northwest comer Road; thece along said nexation; thence along the of America recorded July 29, 30°53'east 99.2 feet, 2) in a
boundary thereof in a general 1980 In Volume 9930 of Offi- general northeasterly direc-
southeasterly direction cial Records at page 913; tion 2,000 feet,more or less,
1,787.43 feet to the east cor- thence along said east line in to the southwest right of way
ner thereof on the boundary a general southeasterly di- line of Camino Pablo,and 3)
of the Record of Survey filed rection 192.27 feet to an an- along said southwest line in a
gle point on the boundary of general northwesterly direc-
said PARCEL FIVE, thence tion 1,620 feet,more or less,
to an angle point; thence along said northeast line in a said west line; thence along
along the prolongation of said feet to the most southern general northwesterly direr- the boundary of Tract 2024,
southwest line,northwesterly corner of APN 365-180-004 tion 660 feat,more or less,to north 0°14'50" east 560.61
140 feet,more or less,to the described in the Final Order the northwest right of way tine feet loth 89°59'39" west
prolongation of the.northwest of Condemnation by EBRPD of Paso Nogal as said road is 79.41 feet and north
right of way line of Bear recorded March 15, 1965 In shown on the map filed Sep- 54°51'15"west 62.93 feet to
Creek Road; thence along Volume 4823 of Official Re- tember 30,1968 in Book 5 of the south comer of tract 2632
said prolongation and north- cards at page 139,also being Parcel Mas at page 41' recorded August 7, 1958 in
west line in a general north- on the east line of Rancho thence along said right 01 Book 70 of Maps at page 34;
easterly direction 1,450 feet, Boca de la Canada de Pinole' way In a general northeaster- thence along the boundary of
more or less, to the south- thence along the boundary of Nly and northerly direction 730 Tract 2632, north 54°51'15"
east comer of, APN said condemnation parcel feet more or less, to the west 50 feet and north
267-030-013 described as northerly 3198.15 feet and northeast comer of Parcel 24°23'13" west 305.28 feet,
PARCEL ONE in the deed to northeasteRy 3,061.66 feet, "B^(5 PM 41),also being the to the southwest comer of
EBMUD recorded February 9, to the southwest comer of southeast corner of Subdivi- Lot 87 in Tract 2024 (57 M
1990 in Volume 15650 of Offi- Sudivision MS 37-88 filed De- sion 4988,"Hillside Park"re- 26);thence along the bound-
ctal RecordNfggs at page 239- cember 14,1eral thence 8g989 In l Maps at Bthe BBpook 144 corded November 13, 1978 ary of tract 2024 in a general
thence ok 219 of Maps at page northerly direction 634.69
PARCEL
westerly, OnorthweE in s arty nand thereof the boundary o of enorth 0 59'55", east t line oage 14, iln off Subdivisi1; thence on 4988 nthe ortth feet arid north h east 25 83 feet to She south-
northeasterly
pth-northeasterly direction 3,900 1,459.Y3 feet and south 89^2720" west 412.2.4 feet, west comer of "Beckett
feet,more or less,to the west 88°50'38" east 511.03 feet to the northeast right of way Acres Unit No. 2" recorded
right of way line of Bear to the southwest comer 04 line of Alhambra Avenue; Aril 22, 1954 in Book 53 of
Creek Road; thence north- Subdivision 6769 filed Octo- thence along said northeast Maps at page 37; thence
easterly 40 feet,more or less, ber 13, 1988 in Book 326 of line in a general northwesterly along the boundary of"Beck-
to the east right of way line Maps at page 22; thence direction 4,900 feet,more or ett Acres Unit No. 2" In a
thereof; thence atong said along the boundary of Subdi- less,to the southeast comer general northerly direction
east line in a general north- vision 6769 , north 1°41'08" of the Record of Survey filed 1,397.65 feet to the south-
easterly direction 3,150 feet, east 865.96 feet and In a September 18, 1967 in Book west comer of APN
-•---- more or less,to the souther general northeasterly direr- 49 of Licensed Surveyor's 125-193-028 described in the
prolongation of the east line tion 2,532.69 feet; thence Maps at page 31; thence Partial Release and Recon-
of said EBMUD parcel (163 north 64°48'04"east 50 feet, along the boundary thereof veynce to Contra Costa
O.R. 90); thence along said more or less,crossing Reliez north 20'10'53' east 656.81 County Water District record-
prolongation and east line, Valley Road,to the southwest feet and north 61°08'20"west ed February 17,1961 In Vol-
t,
2,450 feel,more or line of the property delineat- 419.07 feet, to north comer ure 3807 at page 278;
less• to the northeast comer ed on the map filed April 28 thereof on the boundaryof thence along the west line
thereof on th eastline of Ran- 1978 in Book 65 of Parcel Subdivision 3556`Valley High thereof, northerly 44 feet;
cho EI Sobranta; thence Maps at page 19; thence Unit ll"filed August 21, 1968 thence crossingq Vine Hill
along the east line of saki along said southwest line in a in Book 122 of Maps at page Road,northerly 41 feet,more
Rancho, northerly 8,236.46 general-southeasterly-direr- 27;thence along the bound- or less,to the southwest cor-
feet, to the northwest comer tion 460 feet more or less,to ary of Subdivision 3556 north ner of that 2.25 acre APN
of APN 267-100-001, de- the most southern comer 21'29'51•• west 121.1 feet 1256-200-001 described as
scribed in the Final Order of theroef,also being the south- and north 47°22'59" east PARCEL 1 in the Final Order
Condemnation by EBMUD re- west corner of Subdivision 1,226.63 feet, to the most of Condemnation by the
corded January 6, 1964 in 3543 filed November 16, western comer of Subdivision State of California recorded
Volume 4525 of Official Re- 1966 in Book 113 of Maps at 5132 "Valley High Unit 22' March 20 1958, in Volume
cords at page 853,also beingp e 31; thence along the filed December 1, 1981 in 3137 of bfficai Records at
the southwest comer of"Gar- boundary of Subdivision 3543 Book 261 of Maps at page 7; page 554; thence along the
cla Ranch" filed December as follows: 1) north 0°47'14" thence along the boundary of northwest line thereof, north
10,1914 in Book 12 of Maps east 466.07 feet 2) north Subdivision 5132, north 33°40' east 372.4 feet;
at page 268r,y thence along 6o23'45"west 231.57 feet,3) 47°22'59' east 374.11 feet, thence along the City of Mar-
the
R nth asdfoilows: 1)alooga feeth4)4 soul 310 S 4 43`?e 511 j 322 16 891091341%,l, rid SouUi 250 feet,boundary,northeasterly less,to the
the north line of said EBMUD 352 52 feet, 5j north $hence easterly 86.28 fe to Rout enterline
thence StateHighway
parcel,easterly 2,008.42 feet, 79'51'46" feet, and 6 soul ng
to the northwest corner of id
19°26'31"east 1,052.81 feet, the northwest comer of Sub- centerline in a general east-
APN 267-110-005 described to the northeast comer of division 5126 'Diablo Valley arty direction 5,925 tet,
in the deed to John J.Naylor subdivision 5157 filed Sep- Estates Unit 1"filed February more or less to he centerline
at ux,recorded September 6, tember 21,1978 in Book 217 15 1978 in Book 208 of Maps of Walnut Creek Flood Con-
1981 in Volume 10481 of Offi- of Maps.at page 16;thence at page 1;thence along the trot Channel being a non-tan- _
tial Records at page 551, 2) along the east line of Subdivi- bounda thereof, south gent curve concave to the
along the north line thereof, sion 5157, south 19°25'03" g7°46'18' east 479.86 feet, southwest having a radius of
easterly 2,626 feet, more or est 255.64,to the northeast north 8.16 feet, and north 5,000 feet; hence along the
less to the northwest Gomer comer of Lot 28 in Subdivt- 89°44'06"east 1,227.72 feet; arG of said curve northwest-
of subdivision 118-76 filed Sion 3114" Walnut Hills thence easterly 537.41 feet a 460 feete,more or less,
January 26, 1977 in Book 51 Country Club Estates" re- to the north line of Subdivi- toll's terminous,distant north
of Parcel Maps at page 39,3 corded October 9, 1963 In sion MS-121-79 filed Sep- 56°15'04 east 208 feet from
along the north line hereof? Book 95 of Maps at pa a 33; tember 5,1980 1,,Book$9 of Contra Costa County Flood
north 89°39'09'est 6,743.17 thence along the boundary of parcel Maps. at pa a 6; Control and Water Conserve-
feet,to the boundary of APN Subdivision 3114 south 19 thence along said north Zine, tion District Monument
365-200-010 described in the *27'2sou h9" east 89°59'2074� feet est 217 7b easterly 725 feet, more or aloes said centerlence oetitu ng
deed to EBRPD recorded feet to the northwest comer less,to the southwest comer generai northerly direction
March 26 tial in Volume of Subdivision 4964 "Hidden 20 262 54 feet,to Its outfall in
5086 of official Records at of Subd vision y Cl "Pleas- Lakes Unit 3" filed July 9
page 467, 4) along said ant Hill Country Club" filed 1979 in Book 226 of Maps at Suisun Bay; thence north
boundary easterly 419.5 feet, July 30, 1992 In Book 362 of Pae 30; thence Ston the 23°28'34" 'Nest 1,150 feet,
no 558.81 feet, and Maps at page 36; thence boundary of Subdivision more or loss,to the boundary
easterly 784.67.feet, to the along the boundary of Subdi- 4964, north 89°37'28" east common to Contra Costa
southwest comer of APN vision 7243,south 89°59'east and Solano Counties;thence
365-200-002 described as 779.35 feet,to the northwest 598.94 feet and north along said boundary in a gen-
PARCEL TWO in the deed to comer of Subdivision 3812 1°04'01" north 1°04'01" east eral easterly direction 27 000
EBRPD recorded February 7, "Shannon Hills Unit 3" filed 682 feet, to the southeast feet,more or less to the F)pint
1966 in Volume 5052 of Offi- March 15, 1972 in Book 144 corner of Subdivision 6313 of Beginning
Gtal Records at gage 508,51 of Maps at page 45; thence Hidden Lakes Unit 8" filed Legal CCT 6046
Siong the west line thereof, along the north line of Subdi- June 6, 1983 in Book 270 of publish June 27,1995
northerly 723.83 feet, to the vision 3812 south 89°3746" Maps at page 20- thence
south corner of APN east 1,161 feet,to the north- along the east line of Subdivi-
365-200-001 described as west comer of Subdivision sion 6313, north 1°04'02"
PARCEL FOUR in said deed 3779 "Shannon Hills Unit 2" east 738 feet, to the north-
(50520 R.5081 and 6j song recorded November 13,1968 east comer; thence south
the boundary of PARCEL In Book 125 of Maps at page 88155105" east 170 feet to
FOUR in a enerai northerly 3i hence along he boundary the west right of way line of
direption2,061.71 feet,to the o Subdivision 3779 south Nigh Stret;thence Siong said
west comer thereof; thence 89°37'46" east 836. 9 feet west line, northerly 95 feet,
Eeaving he boundary of"Gar- and north 53°46'24" east more or less to the south
cia Ranch" and continuing 63.51 feet,to the west comer corner of PAI110EL 1 shown
along the boundary of said of Lot 2 in Subdivision 3274 on the Record of Survey field
PARCEL FOUR in a ,enerai corded September 7ef aps at 1969 page pageLicensed Surveyors'
al'M ps at
on Hills Unit 1" re- Jund 9, 1962 in Book 20 of
easterly direction 5,291.22
feet to he northwest came- 27;thence along the bound- tra Costa Canal right of way
Con-
of APN 365-2CEL O d n a of Subdivision 3274,north shown as U.S.A. (461 O.R.
scribed d PARCEL ONE In 53°46'24" east 78.11 feet 391) on said map, north
said deed(5052.O. R. ry of and north 36°07109" east 57'42' west 116.83 feet and
thence along the boundary of 90_P8 feet,to the most west- north 1°48' west 250.5 feet,
PARCEL ONE in a general em tamer of Subdivision to a concrete monument(20
easterly a direction 2,3ome 3313 recorded February 3, LSM 15); thence continuing
feet to the northwest comer 1965 in Book 102 of Maps at along said canal tight of way
s APN 365-CEL THREE
de- page 14; thence along the in a general northerly direc-
scribed as PARCEL THREE in boundary of Subdivision 3313 tion 813.41 feet to the south
said deed {5052 O.E. 508}; as fo'I.vs:1)north 28°54'55" right of way line of Center Av-
thence along the boundary of east 205.51 feet, 2) north enue; thence along said
PARCEL THREE in a general 0°08'52"east 172.84 feet,3) south line a general easterly
easterly direction 2,885.21 south 85°42'23" east 110.29 direction 970 feet, more or
feet to the northwest comer feet, and 4) north 54°29'37" less,to the southern prolon-
of APN 365-200-005 de- est 44.2 feet, to the north- ,anon of the west line of
scribed as PARCEL FIVE ); east comer thereof thence Tract 2024 recorded March
said deed { the O.R. ry of continuing north 54°29'37" 24,1955 in Book 57 of Maps
thence along the boundary of east 80 feet,more or less to at page�6;thence along said
PARCEL FIVE In a general the northeast right of way fine prolongation, north 0°14'50"
easterly dtrectlon 2,375.53 of Alhambra Avenue;thence east 80 feet,more or less,to
Ordinance No. 95 - 32
Central County Area of Benefit
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County ordains as follows:
SECTION I. SUMMARY. This ordinance provides for the formation of the Central County Area of
Benefit, and the adoption of fees to be collected from developments proposed in the Central County Area
of Benefit located in unincorporated Contra Costa County to fund road improvements.
SECTION II. REPLACEMENT. Within the new area of benefit, Ordinance No. 93-21, Ordinance 93-22,
Ordinance 93-23 and Ordinance 93-24 shall be repealed and replaced by this ordinance.
SECTION III. AUTHORITY. This ordinance is enacted, in part, pursuant to Government Code Section
66484 and Division 913, Title 9, of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code.
SECTION III. NOTICE AND HEARING. This ordinance was adopted pursuant to the procedure set forth
in Government Code Sections 54986, 65091, 66016, 66017 and 66484, and Division 913, Title 9, of the
Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, and all required notices have been properly given and public
hearings held.
SECTION IV. FEE ADOPTION. The following fees to fund road improvements are adopted for the
Central County Area of Benefit, as established by Resolution 95/ 273 dated June 13, 1995 and shall
apply to all development within the Fee Area:
Central County Area of Benefit:
Land Use Recommended Fee
Single Family Residential $2,972 per Dwelling Unit
Multiple Family Residential $2,641 per Dwelling Unit
Commercial $5.67 per Square Foot Gross Floor Area
Office $4.82 per Square Foot Gross Floor Area
Industrial $2.08 per Square Foot Gross Floor Area
Other $2,972 per peak hour trip
Fees shall be collected when building permits are issued in accordance with Section 913-4.204 of Title
9 (Subdivisions) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code.
SECTION V. FEE AREA. The Fee Area shall include all of the unincorporated area within the Central
County Area of Benefit with the following exception:
1. Any development required under conditions of approval to construct certain off-site road
improvements in lieu of fee payment
2. Areas in the Pacheco Area of Benefit
3. Areas in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Specific Plan Area
4. Areas in the Bates Avenue Assessment District
The boundaries of the Central County Area of Benefit as established by Resolution No. 95/ 273
adopted June 13, 1995 are described in Exhibit A attached to this ordinance.
SECTION VI. SENIOR HOUSING. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to abridge or modify
the Board's discretion, upon proper application for senior housing or congregate care facilities pursuant
to Government Code Section 65915, to adjust or to waive the fees provided for this ordinance.
SECTION VII. PURPOSE AND USE OF FEES. The purpose of the fees described in this ordinance is
to generate funds to finance improvements to certain bridges and major thoroughfares in the Central
County area. The fees will be used to finance the road improvements listed in the Development Program
Report. As discussed in more detail in said report, there is a reasonable relationship between the fees
and the types of development projects that are subject to the fees. These development projects will
generate additional traffic on bridges and major thoroughfares in the Central County area, creating a
need to expand, extend or improve existing bridges and major thoroughfares and a need to construct
new bridges and major thoroughfares to mitigate adverse traffic and infrastructure impacts that would
result from such development projects.
SECTION VIII. SEVERABILITY. If any fee or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unenforceable
by a court of competent jurisdiction, that holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the
remaining fees or provisions, and the Board declares that each part of this ordinance is valid, in and of
itself, irrespective of the validity of any other part.
SECTION IX. REVIEW OF FEES. Project cost estimates shall be reviewed periodically while the Central
County Area of Benefit is in effect. The fee schedule shall be adjusted annually to account for inflation
using the State of California Construction Cost Index as published annually by the California Department
of Transportation. At no time will the fee schedule be increased at a rate of more that 5% per year due
to inflation.
SECTION X. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective 60 days after passage, and
within 15 days of passage, shall be published once with the names of the Supervisors voting for and
against it in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation published in this County.
Pursuant to Section 913-6.026 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the Clerk of the Board shall
promptly file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Recorder.
SECTION XI. EXISTING FEE. The replacement of Ordinances No. 93-21, 93-22, 93-23, and 93-24 shall
not affect fees accrued thereunder prior to the effective date of this ordinance, and such fees shall
remain subject to payment and collection.
PASSED and ADOPTED on June 13, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Smith, Torlakson, Bishop
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisors Rogers, DeSaulnier
ABSTAIN: None
Attest: Phil Batchelor„ Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors
and County Administrator
By: 20
Deputy Board hair
HB/ds
C:CCaob0RD.t12
Attachments
Boundary Description
Central County Area of Benefit
EXHIBIT "A"
The central portion of Contra Costa County, California, bounded on the north by Solano County,
bounded on the southwest by Alameda County, and described as follows:
Beginning in Suisun Bay on the boundary common to Contra Costa and Solano Counties at the Point
of Beginning of"Eastern Contra Costa Sub-Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee Area" adopted
July 26, 1994 by Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 94/386, also being the
northwest corner of"West Pittsburg Area of Benefit" adopted December 10, 1991 by Contra Costa
County Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 91/779; thence from the Point of Beginning along the
boundary common to said adopted areas, southerly 7,410 feet, more or less, to the south right of way
line of Contra Costa Canal on the west line of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 1 West, Mount
Diablo Meridian; thence continuing along the boundary of"West Pittsburg Area of Benefit,"westerly,
southerly, southeasterly, and easterly 26,000 feet, more or less, to its intersection with "Eastern
Contra Costa Sub-Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee Area" on the east line of Section 17 (T2N,
R1 W); thence along the boundary of"Eastern Contra Costa Sub-Regional Transportation Mitigation
Fee Area" in a general southeasterly and southerly direction 80,000 feet, more or less, to the
southeast corner of Section 12, (T1 S, R1 W); thence along the south line of Section 12, westerly
4,400 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Mount Diablo Scenic Boulevard (South Gate Road);
thence along said centerline in a general northerly direction 6,700 feet, more or less, to the centerline
intersection of Summit Road and Mount Diablo Scenic Boulevard (North Gate Road); thence along
the centerline of North Gate Road in a general westerly direction 12,400 feet, more or less, to the
northwest line of Lot D, Rancho San Miguel Robert Allen Tract; thence along said northwest line,
southwesterly 3,100 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner of that 787.58 acre parcel shown on
the Record of Survey filed June 22, 1960 in Book 18 of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 39; thence
along the boundary of said parcel, south 87052'06" west 9,881.2 feet and north 6008'40" west
2,389.28 feet, to the most southern comer of the Record of Survey filed August 27, 1970 in Book 53
of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 13; thence along the south line thereof, also being the south
line of Rancho San Miguel, north 76053'13" west 1,445.41 feet, to the most southern corner'of
Subdivision 6743 "Stonegate Unit 1" filed June 9, 1987 in Book 313 of Maps at page 28; thence
along the boundary of Subdivision 6743, north 13051'48" west 5,687.22 feet, south 73016'01" west
4,566.44 feet, and south 21 °53'15" east 3,423.26 feet, to the southeast corner of Subdivision 4924
"Hill and Dale, Unit 6" recorded May 18, 1977 in Book 196 of Maps at page 28; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 4924 in a general westerly direction 2,879.25 feet to the northeast corner
of Subdivision 4402 recorded December 27, 1974 in Book 175 of Maps at page 25; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 4402, south 1044'25" west 1,527.78 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 37
in Subdivision 3973 recorded August 18, 1972 in Book 149 of Maps at page 20; thence along the
east line of Subdivision 3973, south 1044'25" west 1,015.1 feet, to the north right of way line of
Livorna Road; thence continuing south 1 044'25"west 41.96 feet to the centerline of said road; thence
along said centerline in a general westerly direction 890.41 feet to the southern prolongation of the
west line of said Subdivision 3973; thence along said prolongation and west line, north 1 032'10" east
1
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
967.1 feet, to the southwest corner of Subdivision 4402 (175 M 25); thence along the west line of
Subdivision 4402, north 1 032'10" east 1,063.35 feet, to the southeast corner of Subdivision 5931
recorded June 29, 1983 in Book 271 of Maps at page 21; thence along the boundary thereof, north
55022'55"west 537 Meet and in a general northwesterly direction 105.63 feet along Livorna Heights
Road right of way line, to the southeast comer of Subdivision 5366 recorded March 25, 1980 in Book
236 of Maps at page 7; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 5366 in a general westerly
direction 400.83 feet to the east line of Subdivision 3827 recorded June 11, 1969 in Book 126 of
Maps at page 38; thence along said east line, south 1 031'55"west 942.5 feet, to the northeast corner
of Subdivision 3037 recorded June 25, 1964 in Book 99 of Maps at page 30; thence along the
boundary thereof in a general southerly direction 1,532.28 feet to the north right of.way line of
Livorna Road; thence along lot lines of Subdivision 3037 as follows: 1) in a general westerly
direction 79.27 feet, 2) north 1 036'23"east 223.71 feet, 3) north 8802337"west 149.23 feet, 4) south
1 03623" west 275.72 feet, and 5) south 72°23'20"west 272.09 feet; thence crossing Trotter Way,
south 72°23'20"west 100 feet, more or less, to the south line of Lot 1 (99 M 30); thence continuing
along lot lines of Subdivision 3037, south 7202320" west 145.74 feet, north 6°19'31" west 712.51
feet, and north 8904318"west 933.43 feet, to the south line of Subdivision 4810 filed September 23,
1976 in Book 189 of Maps at page 48; thence along said south line and the south line of that 24.71
acre Assessor Parcel Number (hereinafter referred to as APN) 187-160-013 described in Parcel
Three in the deed to the City of Walnut Creek recorded July'5, 1984 in Volume 11867 of Official
Records at page 965, north 8904318"west 944.73 feet, to the west line of Subdivision 6468 recorded
January 8, 1982 in Book 286 of Maps at page 41; thence along the boundary thereof in a general
southerly direction 828.77 feet to the east right of way line of Interstate Freeway 680; thence along
said east line in a general northwesterly direction 2,259.08 feet; thence crossing said freeway, south
53047'20" west 290 feet, more or less, to the west right of way line thereof; thence along said west
line in a general northwesterly direction 1,209.59 feet to the most southeastern corner of APN 187-
050-011 and 012 described as Parcel 1 in the deed to Edward Johannessen and Juliet Johannessen
1987 Revocable Living Trust recorded March 22, 1988 in Volume 14228 of Official Records at page
211; thence along the southerly portion of the boundary thereof in a general westerly direction
1,494.46 feet, more or less, to the west right of way line of Interstate Freeway 680; thence along said
west line in a general northwesterly direction 836 feet, more or less, to the most eastern corner of
APN 187-040-007 described as PARCEL 11 in the deed to Contra Costa County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District recorded December 20, 1967 in Volume 5520 of Official Records at page
451; thence along the boundary of PARCEL 11, south 64016'18" west 239.65 feet and in a general
northerly direction 1,036.02 feet, to the northwest corner thereof; thence crossing Rudgear Road,
northerly 245 feet, more or less, to the west line of APN 183-093-023 described in the deed to East
Bay Municipal Utility District (hereinafter referred to as EBMUD) recorded January 5, 1968 in Volume
5530 of Official Records at page 93; thence along said west line, north 22053'01"west 33.76 feet,
to the southeast line of Southern Pacific Railroad right of way APN 183-093-031 described as
PARCEL THIRTY-ONE in the deed to Contra Costa County recorded December 9, 1985 in Volume
12652 of Official Records at page 570, being a non-tangent curve concave to the northwest having
a radius of 1,196 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, southwesterly 52 feet, more or less, to the
centerline of Danville Boulevard; thence non-tangent along said centerline, crossing Engineer's
Station 603+65, northerly 110 feet, more or less, to the northwest line of said County parcel, being
a non-tangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 1,096 feet and being concentric with
2
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
said southeast line; thence along the arc of said curve, southwesterly 52 feet, more or less, to the
southeast comer of Subdivision MS 114-75 filed October 20, 1976 in Book 49 of Parcel Maps at page
19, also being on the west right of way line of South Main Street (shown as Danville Boulevard on
said map); thence along said west line in a general northwesterly direction 2,400 feet, more or less,
to the iron pipe marked R.C.E. 10319 shown on the map of Subdivision MS 37-78 filed November
3, 1978 in Book 71 of Parcel Maps at page 33; thence along the northeast line of Subdivision MS 37-
78 and the northeast line of Grumman Court in a general northwesterly direction 638.88 feet to the
east right of way line of Lancaster Road (71 PM 33); thence along said east line in a general
northwesterly direction 2,060 feet, more or less, to the south right of way line of Lilac Drive; thence
crossing Lilac Drive, westerly 165 feet, more or less, to the east corner of APN 184-211-027
described as PARCELS ONE and TWO in the deed to the State of California recorded June 13, 1990
in Volume 15917 of Official Records at page 559, also being on the southwest line of Interstate
Freeway 680; thence! along said southwest line, north 57021'31" west 820 feet, more or less, to the
most northern corner of Subdivision MS 161-79 filed September 3, 1980 in Book 88 of Parcel Maps
at page 50; thence crossing Newell Avenue, westerly 92 feet, more or less, to the east corner of Lot
Line Adjustment LL 63-89 shown on the Record of Survey filed February 9, 1990 in Book 93 of
Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 2; thence north 52002'55"west 880 feet, more or less, to an angle
point on said freeway right of way; thence north 57021'31" west 165 feet, more or less, to the
northeast right of way line of Paulson Lane; thence along said right of way line in a general
northwesterly direction 400 feet, more or less, to the southeast right of way line of Olympic
Boulevard; thence northwesterly 62 feet; more or less, to the east corner of Subdivision MS 212-76
filed November 18, 1977 in Book 60 of Parcel Maps at page 19; thence north 57023'05" west 116.25
feet to the east corner of the Record of Survey filed November 24, 1962 in Book 20 of Licensed
Surveyors' Maps at page 47; thence along the boundary thereof, north 58033'23" west 65 feet and
north 66048'23"west 256.74 feet; thence continuing north 66048'23"west 18.30 feet to the north right
of way line of Nicholson Road; thence along said north line in a general northwesterly direction 1,000
feet, more or less, to a curve thereon having a radius of 45 feet; thence crossing Boulevard Way,
westerly 180 feet, more or less, to the north right of way*line thereof at the western terminus of a
curve thereon having a radius of 133 feet; thence tangent to said curve, south 73038'43"west 236.54
feet, more or less, to a non-tangent curve concave to the east having a radius of 50 feet on the east
line of Lot 11 in "White Orchard Estates" recorded August 28, 1941 in Book 25 of Maps at page 43;
thence along the arc of said curve, northerly 12.29 feet, to the south right of way line of State
Freeway 24; thence non-tangent along said south line in a general westerly direction 3,200 feet,
more or less, to the east line of Lot 62 in "Sun Valley Estates" recorded February 8, 1946 in Book
28 of Maps at page 27; thence along lot lines thereof as follows: 1) southerly 30.69 feet, 2)
southeasterly 308 feet, 3) southerly 247 feet, 4) southerly 455 feet, 5) southeasterly 273 feet, 6)
southerly 376.59 feet, 7) southwesterly 550.28 feet, 8) southerly 251.38 feet to the north right of way
line of Kinney Drive, being a non-tangent curve concave to the south having a radius of 225 feet, and
9) along the arc of said curve, westerly 70 feet; thence crossing EI Curtola Boulevard, southwesterly
110 feet, more or less, to the northeast line of APN 185-330-006 described in the deed to Brueckner
Trust recorded January 28, 1994 as Series #94025807; thence along said northeast line,
northwesterly 165 feet, more or less, to the most eastern corner of Lot 257 (28 M 27); thence along
the southeast lines of Lots 257, 258, 259, 260, and 261 (28 M 27), southwesterly 435 feet; thence
crossing.Sunset Loop, southwesterly 50 feet, to the east corner of Lot 237; thence along lot lines of
3
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit"N'
said subdivision (28 M 27), southwesterly 385.67 feet and in a general southerly direction 921.19
feet, to the boundary of"Swanson Tract" recorded September 30, 1946 in Book 31 of Maps at page
8; thence along said boundary in a general southerly direction 373.55 feet to the boundary of
Subdivision 5016 recorded February 10, 1978 in Book 207 of Maps at page 41; thence along the
boundary common to Subdivision 5016 and "Swanson Tract" as follows: 1) in a general southerly
direction 256.07 feet, and 2) in a general easterly direction 778.7 feet, to the west right of way line
of Freeman Road being a non-tangent curve concave to the east having a radius of 925 feet; thence
along the arc of said curve, southerly 54.77 feet, to the most eastern corner of Subdivision 5016;
thence leaving the boundary thereof and following the boundary shown on the Record of Survey filed
July 26, 1982 in Book 71 of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 1 as follows: 1) continuing along the
arc of said curve, southerly 44.19 feet, to a compound curve concave to the east_having a radius of
185.84 feet, 2) along the arc thereof, southerly 18.31 feet, 3) non-tangent, south 55050'29" west
95.49 feet, 4) south 23°39'45" west 98.89 feet to the north right of way line of Olympic Boulevard,
and 5) north 69048'10" west 63 feet along said north line, to the southeast corner of Lot 1 in
Subdivision 5016 (207 M 41); thence continuing along said north line (being lot lines of Subdivision
5016) in a general westerly direction 1,370 feet, more or less, to the northeastern prolongation of the
northwest line of Terra California Territory described in the Annexation to the City of Lafayette
Resolution 50-80 adopted May 12, 1980; thence along said prolongation, crossing Olympic
Boulevard, southwesterly 200 feet, more or less, to the most northern corner of said annexation;
thence along the boundary thereof in a general southeasterly direction 1,787.43 feet to the east
corner thereof on the boundary of the Record of Survey filed June 18, 1965 in Book 35 of Licensed
Surveyors' Maps at page 23; thence along said Record of Survey boundary in a general easterly
direction 1,286.93 feet, to the boundary of the Record of Survey filed April 1, 1965 in Book 33 of
Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 40; thence along said boundary (33 LSM 40) in a general
easterly direction 1,678.27 feet to the northwest corner of Subdivision 6815 "Del Valle" recorded
November 12, 1987 in Book 318 of Maps at page 3; thence along the north line of Subdivision 6815,
north 89036'27" east 639.9 feet, to the southwest right of way line of Tice Valley Boulevard; thence
along said right of way line in a general southeasterly and easterly direction 3,750 feet, more or less,
to the west line of Harlan Ranch shown on the Record of Survey filed September 8, 1939 in Book 7
of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 7; thence along the boundary thereof, southerly 552.56 feet,
southeasterly 1,221 feet, and easterly 379.04 feet, to the southwest corner of Tract 2304 recorded
November 29, 1955 in Book 61 of Maps at page 50; thence along the south line of Tract 2304, south
70°20'30" east 733 feet, to the southwest corner of Subdivision MS 45-88 filed February 28, 1990
in Book 145 of Parcel Maps at page 32; thence along the boundary of Subdivision MS 45-88 in a
general easterly direction 1,207.49 feet to the most eastern corner thereof; thence south 70040'17"
east 21.72 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Castle Hill Ranch Road (a private road) at the
northeast corner of Lot "B" shown on the Record of Survey filed March 13, 1984 in Book 74 of
Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 12; thence along said centerline in a general southerly direction
907 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of PARCEL B in Subdivision MS 133-72 filed
September 7, 1972 in Book 24 of Parcel Maps at page 9; thence along the south line of PARCEL B,
north 89012'36" east 259.78 feet, to the boundary of Subdivision MS 58-75 recorded October 26,
1978 in Book 71 of Parcel Maps at page 23; thence along said boundary as follows: 1) north 0°36'
east 41.92 feet, 2) south 89°12'12" east 176.01 feet to the northeast corner thereof, 3) in a general
southerly direction 3,354.5 feet to the southeast corner thereof, and 4) south 87°05'11"west 274.17
4
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
feet; thence continuing south 87°05'11" west 300 feet to the centerline of Section 11 (T1 S, R2W);
thence along said centerline and the centerline of Section 14, southerly 6,663.66 feet, to the
southwest comer of Subdivision 6419"Alamo Ridge"filed July 28, 1988 in Book 323 of Maps at page
39; thence along the south line thereof, south 84047'44" east 1,353.46 feet, to the northwest comer
of Subdivision MS 150-75 filed June 14, 1976 in Book 45 of Parcel Maps at page 41; thence along
the boundary thereof as follows: 1) south 0039'40"east 1,233.72 feet, 2) south 84°17' east 2,622.91
feet, 3) north 76018'50" east 481.39 feet, and 4) north 63016' east 193.73 feet, to the northeast
corner of APN 198-180-007 described as PARCEL TWO in the deed to East Bay Regional Park
District (hereinafter referred to as EBRPD) recorded April 4, 1974 in Volume 7189 of Official Records
at page 183; thence along the northeast line of PARCEL TWO, also being the boundary of Rancho
San Ramon, southeasterly 4,840 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of-APN 199-010-012
described as PARCEL FIVE in said deed to EBRPD; thence along the northeast line of PARCEL
FIVE in a general southeasterly direction 1,207.59 feet to the east line of that 13.19 acre APN 199-
010-011 excepted from PARCEL FIVE in said deed to EBRPD and also described as PARCEL ONE
in the deed to the United States of America recorded July 29, 1980 in Volume 9930 of Official
Records at page 913; thence along said east line in a general southeasterly direction 192.27 feet to
an angle point on the boundary of said PARCEL FIVE; thence along said boundary in a general
southerly direction 2,325.7 feet to the northeast corner of Section 25 (T1 S, R2W); thence along the
east line of Section 25, southerly 2,640 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Subdivision MS
53-81 filed March 28, 1985 in Book 115 of Parcel Maps at page 14; thence along the north line of
Subdivision MS 53-81, north 88043'43"west 3,035.66 feet, to the northeast corner of Subdivision MS
28-82 filed November 21, 1983 in Book 108 of Parcel Maps at page 11; thence along the north line
of Subdivision MS 28-82, north 88047'23"west 1,062.06 feet, to the northwest corner thereof; thence
north 8804305"west 1,063.84 feet, to the west quarter corner of said Section 25; thence along the
west line of Section 25, northerly 2,640 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Section 26 (T1 S,
R2W); thence along the north lines of Sections 26, 27, and 28 (T1 S, R2W), westerly 15,840 feet,
more or less, to the northwest corner of Section 28, also being the northeast corner of APN 258-310-
0n2 shown on the Record of Survey filed June 20, 1980 in Book 67 of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at
page 9; thence along the boundary thereof as follows: 1) south 0027'37" east 1,306.53 feet, 2) south
88043'10" west 1,290.34 feet, 3) south 0°15'06" east 1,303.04 feet, and 4) south 88052'39" west
513.17 feet, to the boundary of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Coloradas; thence along said rancho
boundary, south 1 °13'26" west 929.81 feet, to rancho corner P.C. No. 32 shown on said map (67
LSM 9); thence continuing along said rancho boundary, south 19028'45" west 3,547.16 feet, to
rancho corner P.C. No. 31 (67 LSM 9) on the boundary common to Contra Costa and Alameda
Counties; thence along said county boundary in a general northwesterly direction 56,700 feet, more
or less, to Mount Diablo Base Line; thence along said base line, easterly 2,600 feet, more or less,
to the east comer of Lot 55 of said rancho, also being the east comer of APN 267-010-009 described
in the deed to EBRPD recorded July 24, 1940 in Volume 541 of,Official Records at page 271; thence
along the northeast line of said EBRPD parcel, northwesterly 551.76 feet, to the "FOUND 2" x 2"
REDWD.STAKE & TACK" shown on the Record of Survey filed October 3, 1968 in Book 51 of
Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 23; thence north 2501015"15"west 140.66 feet and north 22'12'20"
west 152.07 feet to the northwest corner of PARCEL "A" (51 LSM 23), also being the southwest
corner of that 63.7 acre APN 267-020-005 described in the deed to Johnson Orinda Ranch Inc.
recorded April 23, 1981 in Volume 10294 of Official Records at page 858; thence in a general
5
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit °A"
northerly direction 3,132 feet, more or less, along said west line thereof and the west line of APN
267-020-004 described in the deed to Theodore S. Urban et al. recorded December 24, 1985 in
Volume 12675 of Official Records at page 199, to the northwest corner of said Urban parcel; thence
continuing along the boundary of said Urban property (12675 O.R 199), being common with the
boundary of APN 267-030-020 conveyed by East Bay Water Company to EBMUD recorded
December 8, 1928 in Volume 163 of Official Records at page 90, as follows: 1) north 54°07'50" east
3,208.3 feet, 2) south 63°03' east 257.1 feet, 3) north 54007'50" east 478.5 feet, and 4) south 30053'
east 998.4 feet, to the most eastern corner of APN 267-020-007 described in said Urban deed
(12675 O.R. 199); thence leaving the boundary of said Urban property and continuing along said
EBMUD boundary as follows: 1) south 30°53' east 99.2 feet, 2) in a general northeasterly direction
2,000 feet, more or less, to the southwest right of way line of Camino Pablo, and 3) along said
southwest line in a general northwesterly direction 1,620 feet, more or less, to an angle point; thence
along the prolongation of said southwest line, northwesterly 140 feet, more or less, to� the
prolongation of the northwest right of way line of Bear Creek Road; thence along said prolongation
and northwest line in a general northeasterly direction 1,450 feet, more or less, to the southeast
comer of APN 267-030-013 described as PARCEL ONE in the deed to EBMUD recorded February
9, 1990 in Volume 15650 of Official Records at page 239; thence along the boundary of PARCEL
ONE in a general westerly, northwesterly and northeasterly direction 3,900 feet, more or less, to the
west right of way line of Bear Creek Road; thence northeasterly 40 feet, more or less, to the east right
of way line thereof; thence along said east line in a general northeasterly direction 3,150 feet, more
or less, to the southern prolongation of the east line of said EBMUD parcel (163 O.R. 90); thence
along said prolongation and east line, northerly 2,450 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner
thereof on the east line of Rancho EI Sobrante; thence along the east line of said rancho, northerly
8,236.46 feet, to the northwest corner of APN 267-100-001 described in the Final Order of
Condemnation by EBMUD recorded January 6, 1964 in Volume 4525 of Official Records at page 853,
also being the southwest corner of "Garcia Ranch" filed December 10, 1914 in Book 12 of Maps at
page 268; thence along the boundary of"Garcia Ranch" as follows: 1) along the north line of said
EBMUD parcel, easterly 2,008.42 feet, to the northwest corner of APN 267-110-005 described in the
deed to John J. Naylor et ux. recorded September 8, 1981 in Volume 10481 of Official Records at
page 551, 2) along the north line thereof, easterly 2,626 feet, more or-less, to the northwest corner
of Subdivision 118-76 filed January 26, 1977 in Book 51 of Parcel Maps at page 39, 3) along the
north line thereof, north 89039'09" east 6,743.17 feet, to the boundary of APN 365-200-010 described
in the deed to EBRPD recorded March 28, 1966 in Volume 5086 of Official Records at page 467, 4)
along said boundary easterly 419.5 feet, northerly 558.81 feet, and easterly 784.67 feet, to the
southwest comer of APN 365-200-002 described as PARCEL TWO in the deed to EBRPD recorded
February 7, 1966 in Volume 5052 of Official Records at page 508, 5) along the west line thereof,
northerly 723.83 feet, to the south corner of APN 365-200-001 described as PARCEL FOUR in said
deed (5052 O.R. 508), and 6) along the boundary of PARCEL FOUR in a general northerly direction
2,061.71 feet, to the west corner thereof; thence leaving the boundary of "Garcia Ranch" and
continuing along the boundary of said PARCEL FOUR in a general easterly direction 5,291.22 feet
to the northwest corner of APN 365-200-003 described as PARCEL ONE in said deed (5052 O.R.
508); thence along the boundary of PARCEL ONE in a general easterly direction 2,310.11 feet to the
northwest comer of APN 365-200-004 described as PARCEL THREE in said deed (5052 O.R. 508);
thence along the boundary of PARCEL THREE in a general easterly direction 2,885.21 feet to the
6
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
northwest corner of APN 365-200-005 described as PARCEL FIVE in said deed (5052 O.R. 508);
thence along the boundary of PARCEL FIVE in a general easterly direction 2,375.53 feet to the most
southern corner of APN 365-180-004 described in the Final Order of Condemnation by EBRPD
recorded March 15, 1965 in Volume 4823 of Official Records at page 139, also being on the east line
of Rancho Boca de la Canada de Pinole; thence along the boundary of said condemnation parcel,
northerly 3,198.15 feet and northeasterly 3,061.66 feet, to the southwest corner of Subdivision MS
37-88 filed December 14, 1989 in Book 144 of Parcel Maps at page 14; thence along the boundary
thereof, north 0°59'55" east 1,459.73 feet and south 88050'38" east 511.03 feet, to the southwest
corner of Subdivision 6769 filed October 13, 1988 in Book 326 of Maps at page 22; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 6769, north 1041'08" east 865.96 feet and in a general northeasterly
direction 2,532.69 feet; thence north 64048'04" east 50 feet, more or less, crossing Reliez Valley
Road, to the southwest line of the property delineated on the map filed April 28, 1978 in Book 65 of
Parcel Maps at page 19; thence along said southwest line in a general southeasterly direction 460
feet, more or less, to the most southern corner thereof, also being the southwest corner of
Subdivision 3543 filed November 16, 1966 in Book 113 of Maps at page 31; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 3543 as follows: 1) north 0047'14" east 466.07 feet, 2) north 6023'45"west
231.57 feet, 3) north 47°51'23" east 222.37 feet, 4) south 10014'43" east 352.52 feet, 5) north
79°51'46" east 727.49 feet, and 6) south 19026'31" east 1,052.81 feet, to the northeast corner of
Subdivision 5157 filed September 21, 1978 in Book 217 of Maps at page 16; thence along the east
line of Subdivision 5157, south 19025'03" east 255.64 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 28 in
Subdivision 3114 "Walnut Hills Country Club Estates" recorded October 9, 1963 in Book 95 of Maps
at page 33; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 3114, south 19027'29" east 142 feet and south
89052'20"east 217.75 feet, to the northwest comer of Subdivision 7243 "Pleasant Hill Country Club"
filed July 30, 1992 in Book 362 of Maps at page 36; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 7243,
south 89059' east 779.35 feet, to the northwest corner of Subdivision 3812 "Shannon Hills Unit 3"
filed March,15, 1972 in Book 144 of Maps at page 45; thence along the north line of Subdivision
3812, south 89037'46" east 1,161.41 feet, to the northwest corner of Subdivision 3779 "Shannon
Hills Unit 2" recorded November 13, 1968 in Book 125 of Maps at page 3; thence along the boundary
of Subdivision 3779, south 89037'46" east 836.89 feet and north 53046'24" east 63.51 feet, to the
west corner of Lot 21 in Subdivision 3274 "Shannon Hills Unit 1" recorded September 26, 1969 in
Book 117 of Maps at page 27; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 3274, north 53046'24" east
78.11 feet and north 36007'09" east 90.28 feet, to the most western corner of Subdivision 3313
recorded February 3, 1965 in Book 102 of Maps at page 14; thence along the boundary of
Subdivision 3313 as follows: 1) north 28054'55" east 205.51 feet, 2) north 0008' 52" east 172.84 feet,
3) south 85042'23" east 110.29 feet, and 4) north 54029'37" east 44.2 feet, to the northeast corner
thereof; thence continuing north 54029'37" east 80 feet, more or less, to the northeast right of way
line of Alhambra Avenue; thence along said northeast line in a general northwesterly direction 660
feet, more or less, to the northwest right of way line of Paso Nogal as said road is shown on the map
filed September 30, 1968 in Book 5 of Parcel Maps at page 41; thence along said right of way in a
general northeasterly and northerly direction 730 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Parcel
"B" (5 PM 41), also being the southeast corner of Subdivision 4988 "Hillside Park" recorded
November 13, 1978 in Book 219 of Maps at page 11; thence along the south line of Subdivision
4988, north 89027'20" west 412.24 feet, to the northeast right of way line of Alhambra Avenue;
thence along said northeast line in a general northwesterly direction 4,900 feet, more or less, to the
7
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
southeast corner of the Record of Survey filed September 18, 1967 in Book 49 of Licensed
Surveyors' Maps at page 31; thence along the boundary thereof, north 20010'53" east 656.87 feet
and north 61008'20" west 419.07 feet, to north corner thereof on the boundary of Subdivision 3556
"Valley High Unit II" filed August 21, 1968 in Book 122 of Maps at page 27; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 3556, north 21 °29'51"west 121.1 feet and north 4702259" east 1,336.63
feet, to the most western corner of Subdivision 5132 "Valley High Unit 2" filed December 1, 1981 in
Book 261 of Maps at page 7; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 5132, north 47°22'59" east
374.11 feet, south 89°09'34" east 1,322.61 feet, and south 87°33'13" east 286.28'feet; thence
easterly 660 feet to the northwest corner of Subdivision 5126 "Diablo Valley Estates Unit 1" filed
February 15, 1978 in Book 208 of Maps at page 1; thence along the boundary thereof, south
87046'18" east 479.86 feet, north 8.16 feet, and north 89044'06" east 1,227.72 feet; thence easterly
537.41 feet to the north line of Subdivision MS 12-79 filed September 5, 1980 in Book 89 of Parcel
Maps at page 6; thence along said north line, easterly 725 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner
of Subdivision 4964 "Hidden Lakes Unit 3"filed July 9, 1979 in Book 226 of Maps at page 30; thence
along the boundary of Subdivision 4964, north 89037'28" east 598.94 feet and north 1004'01" east
682 feet, to the southeast corner of Subdivision 6313 "Hidden Lakes Unit 8" filed June 6, 1983 in
Book 270 of Maps at page 20; thence along the east line of Subdivision 6313, north 1004'02" east
738 feet, to the northeast corner; thence south 88055'05" east 170 feet to the west right of way line
of High Street, thence along said west line, northerly 95 feet, more or less, to the south corner of
PARCEL 1 shown on the Record of Survey filed June 9, 1962 in Book 20 of Licensed Surveyors'
Maps at page 15; thence along Contra Costa Canal right of way shown as U.S.A. (461 O.R. 391) on
said map, north 57°42' west 116.83 feet and north 1 ° 48' west 250.5 feet, to a concrete monument
(20 LSM 15); thence continuing along said canal right of way in a general northerly direction 813.41
feet to the south right of way line of Center Avenue; thence along said south line in a general easterly
direction 970 feet, more or less, to the southern prolongation of the west line of Tract 2024 recorded
March 24, 1955 in Book 57 of Maps at page 26; thence along said prolongation, north 0°14'50" east
80 feet, more or less, to said west line; thence along the boundary of Tract 2024, north 0°14'50" east
560.61 feet, south 89059'39" west 79.01 feet, and north 54°51'15" west 62.93 feet, to the south
corner of Tract 2632 recorded August 7, 1958 in Book 70 of Maps at page 34; thence along the
boundary of Tract 2632, north 5451'15" west 50 feet and north 24°23'13" west 305.28 feet, to the
southwest corner of Lot 87 in Tract 2024 (57 M 26); thence along the boundary of Tract 2024 in a
general northerly direction 634.69 feet and north 88028'58" east 25.83 feet to the southwest corner
of"Beckett Acres Unit No. 2" recorded April 22, 1954 in Book 53 of Maps at page 37; thence along
the boundary of "Beckett Acres Unit No. 2" in a general northerly direction 1,397.65 feet to the
southwest corner of APN 125-193-028 described in the Partial Release and Reconveyance to Contra
Costa County Water(District recorded February 17, 1961 in Volume 3807 at page 278; thence along
the west line thereof, northerly 44 feet; thence crossing Vine Hill Road, northerly 41 feet, more or
less, to the southwest corner of that 2.25 acre APN 125-200-001 described as PARCEL 1 in the
Final Order of Condemnation by the State of California recorded March 20, 1958 in Volume 3137 of
Official Records at page 554; thence along the northwest line thereof, north 33°40' east 271.4 feet;
thence along the City of Martinez boundary, northeasterly 250 feet, more or less, to the centerline
of State Highway Route 4; thence along said centerline in a general easterly direction 5, 925 feet,
more or less, to the centerline of Walnut Creek Flood Control Channel being a non-tangent curve
concave to the southwest having a radius of 5,000 feet; thence along the arc of said curve
8
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit °A"
northwesterly 460 feet, more or less, to its terminus, distant north 56015'04" east 208 feet from
Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Monument #68108; thence
continuing along said centerline in a general northerly direction 20,262.54 feet, to its outfall in Suisun
Bay; thence north 23028'34"west 1,150 feet, more or less, to the boundary common to Contra Costa
and Solano Counties; thence along said boundary in a general easterly direction 27,000 feet, more
or less, to the Point of Beginning.
LH:jlg:drg
g:Gericallexhibits\TFMA.ex
May 9,1995
9
o-A
C;X.
( 03-A
oA s
:oA
'o
C) wa
ol C)2, ® m (D
Q
S, 0%
CD
0)-
(P
co
r-9 �i IAOZ ya rn
(P a Q0 rt
-0 CD
O ;lo
Cl�
Co0 Wo iF-
,
ON 13 0 );1'—0 LA
iKv
P y 7d
co 9 -0,
r, :oA Zo
xvi
J3
Q
(ID t-) SO
Ovt� 0 W-A
03
p:z (o \1�4'F. '0 0 r)("0 ` T3-+
CD �
a) \ I (p m
vp !r� t�l C)C 0
Sy "S.-O
Of 0 1rt0
CD 0 0 %0 0
s
\ Z (P OJ3
0 0 n
0 O 07,
lop)
(-P 9r
ON N ;:AO
7::7A 0
"P lz
0
tO
-
0
0 -A M 0 O
-C O-A O� \ p O O O
O-A
tA
06
0
0
0F co
T
-Z
0
L-1 o 0
0 0
VP C5
1-0
�-s p
Ul
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
DATE: May 8, 1995
TO: Members Board of Supervisors
FROM: J. Michael Walford, Public Works Director �t
SUBJECT: Formation of the Central County Area of Benefit
Attached are board documents for the formation of the Central County Area of Benefit.
The proposed project list and fee schedule are the first revisions since the Countywide
Area of Benefit was formed in 1988. This item is tentatively scheduled to be presented
to the Board of Supervisors for consideration on June 6, 1995 at 11:00 a.m.
Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this matter, please call Martin
Lysons at 313-2295.
Existing Fee Proposed Fee
Single Family (per dwelling unit) $2,300 $2,972
Multi Family (per dwelling unit) $1,840 $2,641
Office (per square foot*) $3.68 $4.82
Industrial (per square foot*) $1.60 $2.08
Commercial (per square foot*) $5.75 $5.67
*per square foot of gross floor area
HB:ML:ds:eh
g:\transeng\ds\AOBSupvs.t5
Attachments
cc: M. Shiu, Deputy Public Works Director
J. Bueren,Assistant Public Works Director,Transportation
Ordinance No. 95 -
Central County Area of Benefit
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County ordains as follows:
SECTION I. SUMMARY. This ordinance provides for the formation of the Central County Area of
Benefit, and the adoption of fees to be collected from developments proposed in the Central County Area
of Benefit located in unincorporated Contra Costa County to fund road improvements.
SECTION II. REPLACEMENT. Within the new area of benefit, Ordinance No. 93-21, Ordinance 93-22,
Ordinance 93-23 and Ordinance 93-24 shall be repealed and replaced by this ordinance.
SECTION III. AUTHORITY. This ordinance is enacted, in part, pursuant to Government Code Section
66484 and Division 913, Title 9, of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code.
SECTION III. NOTICE AND HEARING. This ordinance was adopted pursuant to the procedure set forth
in Government Code Sections 54986, 65091, 66016, 66017 and 66484, and Division 913, Title 9, of the
Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, and all required notices have been properly given and public
hearings held.
SECTION IV. FEE ADOPTION. The following fees to fund road improvements are adopted for the
Central County Area of Benefit, as established by Resolution 95- dated June 6, 1995 and shall
apply to all development within the Fee Area:
Central County Area of Benefit:
Land Use Recommended Fee
Single Family (Residential $2,972 per Dwelling Unit
Multiple Family Residential $2,641 per Dwelling Unit
Commercial $5.67 per Square Foot Gross Floor Area
Office $4.82 per Square Foot Gross Floor Area
Industrial $2.08 per Square Foot Gross Floor Area
Other $2,972 per peak hour trip
Fees shall be collected when building permits are issued in accordance with Section 913-4.204 of Title
9 (Subdivisions) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code.
SECTION V. FEE AREA. The Fee Area shall include all of the unincorporated area within the Central
County Area of Benefit with the following exception:
1. Any development required under conditions of approval to construct certain off-site road
improvements in lieu of fee payment
2. Areas in the Pacheco Area of Benefit
3. Areas in the Pheasant Hill BART Station Specific Plan Area
4. Areas in the Bates Avenue Assessment District
The boundaries of the Central County Area of Benefit as established by Resolution No. 95-
adopted , 1995 are described in Exhibit A attached to this ordinance.
SECTION VI. SENIOR HOUSING. Nothing in this Ordinance shall be construed to abridge or modify
the Board's discretion, upon proper application for senior housing or congregate care facilities pursuant
to Government Code Section 65915, to adjust or to waive the fees provided for this ordinance.
SECTION VII. PURPOSE AND USE OF FEES. The purpose of the fees described in this ordinance is
to generate funds to finance improvements to certain bridges and major thoroughfares in the Central
County area. The fees will be used to finance the road improvements listed in the Development Program
Report. As discussed in more detail in said report, there is a reasonable relationship between the fees
and the types of development projects that are subject to the fees. These development projects will
generate additional traffic on bridges and major thoroughfares in the Central County area, creating a
need to expand, extend or improve existing bridges and major thoroughfares and a need to construct
new bridges and major thoroughfares to mitigate adverse traffic and infrastructure impacts that would
result from such development projects.
SECTION VIII. SEVERABILITY. If any fee or provision of this ordinance is held invalid or unenforceable
by a court of competent jurisdiction, that holding shall not affect the validity or enforceability of the
remaining fees or provisions, and the Board declares that each part of this ordinance is valid, in and of
itself, irrespective of the validity of any other part.
SECTION IX. REVIEW OF FEES. Project cost estimates shall be reviewed periodically while the Central
County Area of Benefit is in effect. The fee schedule shall be adjusted annually to account for inflation
using the State of California Construction Cost Index as published annually by the California Department
of Transportation. At no time will the fee schedule be increased at a rate of more that 5% per year due
to inflation.
SECTION X. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall become effective 60 days after passage, and
within 15 days of passage, shall be published once with the names of the Supervisors voting for and
against it in the Contra Costa Times, a newspaper of general circulation published in this County.
Pursuant to Section 913-6.026 of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code, the Clerk of the Board shall
promptly file a certified copy of this ordinance with the County Recorder.
SECTION XI. EXISTING FEE. The replacement of Ordinances No. 93-21, 93-22, 93-23, and 93-24 shall
not affect fees accrued thereunder prior to the effective date of this ordinance, and such fees shall
remain subject to payment and collection.
PASSED and ADOPTED on June 6, 1995 by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Attest: Phil Batchelor, Clerk
of the Board of Supervisors
and County Administrator
By:
Deputy Board Chair
HB/ds
C:CCaob0RD.t12
Attachments
APPENDIX "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ON JUNE 6, 1995
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM REPORT
FOR THE
CENTRAL COUNTY AREA OF BENEFIT
PROVIDING FUNDING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS
IN THE CENTRAL COUNTY AREA
0
PREPARED PURSUANT TO SECTION 913
COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENTS
11995
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM REPORT
FOR THE CENTRAL COUNTY AREA OF BENEFIT
PURSUANT TO THE BRIDGE CROSSING AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARES
FEE AREA POLICY
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The Central County Area of Benefit is a development program to maintain and improve the capacity
and safety of the arterial road network in the unincorporated area of Central Contra-Costa County.
This ordinance applies to the unincorporated areas of Central County in Contra Costa County, and
is required of all new development. This Development Program Report is required by the Board of
Supervisors Policy on Bridge Crossings and Major Thoroughfare Fees (adopted July 17, 1979) which
implements Division 913 of the County Ordinance Code and Section 66484 of the State Subdivision
Map Act.
One of the objectives of the County General Plan is to relate new development directly to the
provision of community facilities necessary to serve that development. In other words, development
cannot be allowed to occur unless a mechanism is in place to provide the funding for the
infrastructure necessary to serve that development. The Central County Area of Benefit is a means
of providing funds to construct road improvements to serve new residential, commercial and industrial
development. Requiring that all new development pay a road improvement fee will help ensure that
they participate in the cost of improving the road system in the Central County Area.
This report discusses the basis of the traffic mitigation fees, which is dependent on many factors.
These factors are the estimated Area of Benefit share of the total cost of the road improvements and
the development potential within the Area of Benefit.
BACKGROUND
The Countywide Area of Benefit was first adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 15, 1988
(Resolution 88/122 and Ordinance 88-27), to improve the capacity and safety of the arterial road
network in Contra Costa County through the establishment of a traffic mitigation fee. The
Countywide Area of Benefit was divided into seven regions. Some of the regions were further divided
into subareas. The seven regions were named West County, Central County, Lamorinda, Alamo,
South County, East County, and Bethel Island. The Central County region was further divided into
four subareas, named Briones, Martinez, South Walnut Creek, and Central County. The Central
County Area of Benefit involves two of these subareas, Briones and Martinez. There was a separate
fee schedule established for each region of the Countywide Area of Benefit. Fees collected within
each subarea are held in a separate trust fund account specific to that subarea.
In 1993, the Countywide Area of Benefit was replaced by seven Regional Areas of Benefit. These
seven Regional Areas of Benefit used the same boundaries, development potentials, projects, and
fees of the seven regions of the Countywide Area of Benefit formed in 1988. Ordinance 93-22
adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 9, 1993 repealed and replaced Ordinance 88-27. The
formation of separate Areas of Benefit Vm the subareas of the Regional Areas of Benefit will allow
Public Works Department staff to update and administer these individual subareas more efficiently.
The Area of Benefit fees will reflect the needs and potential development of the area and
2
Background (continued)
not of the region surrounding it.
The proposed Central County Area of Benefit has, over the past 7 years, experienced changes in
the area's traffic circulation needs and development potential. This has been reflected in a new
project list and fee ;schedule. There are also needed boundary modifications. One area being added
to the Central County Area of Benefit was formerly in the Marsh Creek subarea of the East County
Regional Area of Benefit. Much of this area is preserved for open space or has low-development
potential. The traffic generated by any development in this area would have an impact on the
infrastructure of Central Contra Costa County. Another area being added is a portion of the Briones
subarea of the Central County Regional Area of Benefit and all of the Lamorinda Regional Area of
Benefit. Most of this area is within Moraga or Orinda (and therefore not part of this area of benefit),
and the remainder is also either preserved for open space or has low development potential.
All areas of benefit "share" certain overhead costs (i.e., County Counsel review, environmental
review, trust fund management of the area of benefit program, etc.). There are times when the
revenue generated by fees collected in the existing Lamorinda Regional Area of Benefit does not
meet these overhead costs. Incorporating this area into another area of benefit will help cover these
costs, while still allowing for the addition of project of regional significance, from this area, to be
included in the project list.
AREA OF BENEFIT - LOCATION
Figure 1 shows the general location of the Area of Benefit within Contra Costa County.
AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY
The Area of Benefit boundary is shown in Figure 2 and described in Exhibit A.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 66001 (a) OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
1) PURPOSE OF THE FEE
The purpose of this area of benefit is to generate monies through the adoption of a traffic
mitigation fee to ensure a roadway network consistent with current and future transportation
needs. By adoption of this fee, the proposed road improvement system will be able to keep
pace with new growth.
2) USE OF THE FEES
The fees will be used to generate monies to pay for the road improvements described in
Exhibit B. This proposed Area of Benefit will only finance the minimum interim roadways
needed to meet traffic level of service and safety demands. Amenities which do not have a
direct effect on capacity, such as, general lighting, extensive longitudinal storm drain systems,
and sidewalks, are not included. These improvements are considered as frontage
improvements by the Board of Supervisors and as such are the responsibility of the owners
3
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 66001 (a) OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE (continued)
of the adjacent properties and may be provided through development conditions of approval,
or by other future means such as additional fees or assessment districts.
3) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN USE OF FEES AND TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
The road improvement projects for which the fees will be used are necessary for the
improvement of the safety and the capacity of the road network serving the unincorporated
Central County area as determined by future growth allowed for in the General Plan. The
road network is outlined in the Circulation Element of the General Plan.
4) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEED FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT
A peak trip generation factor has been associated for each type of development outlined in
this program report. These factors are industry standards obtained from the Institute of
Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 5th Edition. The proposed fee is based on
distributing the cost of the Area of Benefit road improvement program to new development in
proportion to the number of peak hour trips generated by the particular type of new
development. All new development will be required to pay a fee to fund the needed roadway
improvements.
GENERAL PLAN RELATIONSHIP
The basis for the Central County Area of Benefit is derived from the features of the County General
Plan and its amendments, and subscribes to the policies of the General Plan elements. The General
Plan and its various elements are available for review at the Community Development Department,
County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, during office hours.
ROAD NETWORK CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The road network capacity improvement program was developed using the Circulation Element, and
the development potential identified in the County General Plan. The road improvements will be
funded and constructed in conjunction with the development of property within the Area of Benefit.
The proposed projects however, are only partially funded by Central County Area of Benefit fees.
The rate of revenue generated in the Central County Area of Benefit is dependent on the rate of new
development. This affects the timing of the construction of an Area of Benefit project as it is
dependent on the total amount of fees collected less expenditures. Other sources of funding, such
as State or Federal aid, or local sources such as sales tax, gas tax, etc., will be pursued.
The proposed road plan will help to provide the capacity needed to serve the estimated potential
development and'Future traffic volumes in the Central County area. This Area of Benefit will finance
only the minimum interim roadways needed to meet traffic level of service and safety demands. The
road capacity improvement programs proposed by the Central County Area of Benefit will be
reviewed periodically to assess the impacts of changing travel patterns, the rate of new development,
and the adequacy of the estimated road improvement project costs.
4
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL WITHIN THE AREA OF BENEFIT
The development potential for the Area of Benefit was estimated by the County Public Works
Department using the General Plan and other resources provided by the County Community
Development Department. A summary of the potential new residential dwelling units, and
commercial, office„ and industrial development is shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Summary of Development Potential
Category Floor Area Or Units
Single Family Residential 252 Dwelling Units
Multi-Family Residential 9 Dwelling Units
Commercial 12,588 Square Feet
Office 36,400 Square Feet
Industrial 1,802,208 Square Feet
ESTIMATED COST OF ROAD NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS
The estimated Central County Area of Benefit contribution shown in Exhibit B is only a portion of the
total project cost. The area of benefit will not fund items which do not have a direct effect on safety
or capacity, such as general lighting, extensive longitudinal storm drain systems, and sidewalks. The
area of benefit will only finance the minimum interim roadways needed to meet traffic level of service
and safety demands.
The estimated Central County Area of Benefit contribution has been increased by approximately 2%
to cover the cost of administration. This includes the estimated staff time for fee collection,
accounting, and technical support to the community groups and traffic advisory committees. The total
estimated cost the Area of Benefit projects is approximately$20 million dollars. The proposed Central
County Area of Benefit has been estimated to generate approximately $4.7 million. The United
States Navy has contributed approximately $4 million for the Evora Road Extension project.
BASIS FOR FEE APPORTIONMENT
The concept of an area of benefit is the equitable distribution of road improvement costs to new
development from which future traffic impacts will arise. As traffic impacts are directly related to the
total number of vehicles on the road network, we are able to relate development road fees to the
number of vehicle trips associated with a particular category of development. To summarize, the 6
categories of land use for which a fee will be assessed in the Central County Area of Benefit, are :
single and multi-family residential, commercial, office, industrial and "other." The total project cost
is divided by the number of peak hour trips generated by each category.
In the residential categories, the cost is equally distributed between all dwelling units. In the non-
residential categories, the cost is distributed on the basis of each square foot of gross floor area.
For the"OTHER" category, the fee would be based on the number of peak hour trips generated by
the particular type of development. A traffic report prepared by a licensed engineer and reviewed
by the Public Works Department would be required to analyze the project's impact during the peak
5
BASIS FOR FEE APPORTIONMENT (continued)
traffic hours. The project would then be charged the peak hour trip rate for the Area of Benefit
multiplied by the number of peak hour trips identified in the traffic report.
The Board of SupE)rvisors' Bridge Crossing and Major Thoroughfares Fee Policy, adopted July 17,
1979, excluded areas designated in the County General Plan as Agricultural Preserve and Open
Space. This policy has been interpreted to exclude all properties zoned agricultural because minor
subdivisions and lot splits of such properties are often not for the purpose of new construction. Fees
will not be required of minor subdivisions in Agricultural Preserve or Open Space, but fees will be
charged on these !lands if a building permit for new construction is applied for.
CALCULATION OF FEES
The costs of the road improvement program have been distributed to the respective land use
category in proportion to the number of peak hour trips generated by that category.
The fee calculation is shown in Table 2.
Table 2
Central County Area of Benefit Fee Calculation
Land Use Units or Square Peak Hour Trips %Trips Cost Share Fee
Feet Factor
Single Family 252 1.0 252 15.7% $748,827 $2,972
Multi-Family 9 0.8 8 .05% $23,772 $2,641
Commercial 12,588 0.0019 24 1.5% $71,317 $5.67
Office 36,400 0.0016 59 3.7% $175,321 $4.82
Industrial 1,802,208 0.0007 1262 78.6% $3,750,079 $2.08
All Others 1.0 $2,972
TOTAL $4,769,316
RECOMMENDED FEES
The recommended fees for the Central County Area of Benefit, resulting from the above calculations,
are shown below.
Single Family Residential: $2,972 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential: $2,641 per dwelling unit
Commercial: $5.67 per SF of gross floor area
Office: $4.82 per SF of gross floor area
Industrial: $2.08 per SF of gross floor area
Other: $2,972 per peak hour trip
6
REVIEW OF FEES
Project cost estimates will be reviewed periodically while the Central County Area of Benefit is in effect.
The fee schedule shall be adjusted annually to account for inflation using the State of California
Construction Cost Index as published annually by the California Department of Transportation. At no
time will the fee schedule be increased at a rate of more that 5% per year for inflation.
COLLECTION OF FETES
Fees shall be collected when the building permit is issued in accordance with Section 913-4.204 of Title
9 (Subdivisions) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. Fees collected will be deposited in an
interest bearing account already established by the Board of Supervisors on March 15, 1988. This trust
fund account was set tip for the Central County subarea of the Central County Region of the Countywide
Area of Benefit.
INTEREST ON FEES
The interest accrued on the fees collected in the Central County Area of Benefit, shall continue to
accumulate in the trust account and shall be used for purpose of administration, design and construction
of the fee area improvements.
IN LIEU DEDICATION
A development may be required to construct a portion of the road improvements identified in Exhibit B.
In such a case the developer may be eligible to receive credit or reimbursement toward the Area of
Benefit fee. The developer should contact the Public Works Department prior to the commencement
of construction to determine the eligibility of the road improvement.
HJB/ML/ds
c:CCaobREP.t12
Attachments
7
1
dig
1t`
�Ort�
i
g
•
4f:
ggg
GOA
'L` D r It CY+1CA t
BAY
At
rxirr a f P1rEA • ��
1 WAS
ef
kto `x?` AMMO „�" "x
17
001,
• f::: PN R
/
EFRpM-
����t��R �S 2
c�k3o N
EX 0 NEF�C ID
GpRP- pF St,/`EN�
1>>� GN-Gp PtF� PR1 pr,,.SES �S�
'2)PP SPNI Nkk-L SESsoell
3}pLEA '4 1awS p,S
41 $P-SES .
Exhibit "A"
Legal Description
10
Exhibit "B"
Central County AOB Project List
Project/ Road Name Project Description Estimated Central
County Area of Benefit
Project Contribution
Taylor Boulevard Safety and capacity improvements $670,000
from Pleasant Hill Road to Boyd Road
Pleasant Hill Road/Taylor Safety and capacity improvements to $2,000,000
Boulevard existing intersection
Bailey Road Remove and replace existing bridge. $200,000
New bridge adequate for standard
two-lane arterial
Rudgear Road /San Miguel Safety Improvements $350,000
Drive/ Walnut Boulevard/
Mountain View Boulevard
San Pablo Dam Road/Bear Construct Signal (County share) $60,000
Creek Road
Paso Nogal/ Golf Club Road Improve intersection $70,000
Evora Road Extension Construct new road from Willow Pass $3,350,000
Road (Concord) to Port Chicago
Highway
Total Estimated Central County Area of Benefit Project Contribution = $6,700,000
Existing Unencumbered Central County Area of Benefit Balance = $2,024,200
Funding to be Generated by New Development = $4,675,800
2% Area of Benefit Administration = $93,516
Total Revenue Generated By New Development = $4,769,316
11
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY J.Michael Watford
Public Works Director
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
255 Glacier Drive Milton Kubicek
Deputy-Engineering
Martinez, CA 94553-4897
FAX: (510) 313-2333
Patricia RMaee
Deputy-Operations
Phone: (510) 313-2000
Maurice M.Shiu
Deputy-Transportation
S.Clifford Hansen
Deputy-Adrainistartion
LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL
To: Clerk of the Board Date: May 30, 1995
1st Floor, Room 106 Regarding: Central County Area of
Administration Building Benefit
Attn: Shirley File: June 6th Hearing I
WE ARE SENDING YOU THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
COPIES DESCRIPTION
1 Development Program Report to be on file with the Clerk of the Board for public
inspection. Notice appeared in newspaper on Friday, May 23, 1995. Hearing has
been set for 11:00 AM, June 6, 1995.
Remarks:
cc: Signed: G� r
Division: Transportation
Phone: 313-2264
r ,
ADOPTED BY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
ON JUNE 6, 1995
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM REPORT
FOR THE
CENTRAL COUNTY AREA OF BENEFIT
PROVIDING FU14DING FOR CONSTRUCTION OF
MAJOR THOROUGHFARE IMPROVEMENTS
IN THE CENTRAL COUNTY AREA
PREPARED PURSUANT TO SECTION 913
COUNTY ORDINANCE CODE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENTS
11995
DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM REPORT
FOR THE CENTRAL COUNTY AREA OF BENEFIT
PURSUANT TO THE BRIDGE CROSSING AND MAJOR THOROUGHFARES
FEE AREA POLICY
INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE
The Central County Area of Benefit is a development program to maintain and improve the
capacity and safety of the arterial road network in the unincorporated area of Central Contra
Costa County. This ordinance applies to all new development within the unincorporated area
of Central Contra Costa County. This Development Program Report is required by the Board
of Supervisors Policy on Bridge Crossings and Major Thoroughfare Fees (adopted July 17,
1979)which implements Division 913 of the County Ordinance Code and Section 66484 of the
State Subdivision Map Act.
One of the objectives of the County General Plan is to relate new development directly to the
provision of community facilities necessary to serve that development. In other words,
developmentcannot be allowed to occur unless a mechanism is in place to provide the funding
for the infrastructure necessary to serve that development. The Central County Area of Benefit
is a means of providing funds to construct road improvements to serve new residential,
commercial and industrial development. Requiring that all new development pay a road
improvement fee will help ensure that they Participate in the cost of improving the road system.
Each new development or expansion of an existing development will generate new traffic.
Where the existing road system is inadequate to meet future needs based on new development,
improvements are required to meet the new demand. The purpose of this program is to
determine improvements ultimately required by future development and to require developers
to pay a fee to fund these improvements. Because the fee is based on the relative impact on
the road system and the costs of the necessary improvements to mitigate this impact, the fee
amount is roughly proportional to the development impact. This report discusses the basis of
that fee amount.
BACKGROUND
The Countywide Area of Benefit was first adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 15,
1988 (Resolution 88/122 and Ordinance 88-27), to improve the capacity and safety of the
arterial road network in Contra Costa County through the establishment of a traffic mitigation
fee. The Countywide Area of Benefit was divided into seven regions. Some of the regions were
further divided into subareas. The seven regions were named West County, Central County,
Lamorinda, Alamo, South County, East County, and Bethel Island. The Central County region
was further divided into four subareas, named Briones, Martinez, South Walnut Creek, and
Central County. The Central County Area of Benefit involves two of these subareas, Briones
and Martinez. There was a separate fee schedule established for each region of the
Countywide Area of Benefit. Fees collected within each subarea are held in a separate trust
fund account specific to that subarea.
In 1993, the Countywide Area of Benefit was replaced by seven Regional Areas of Benefit.
2
BACKGROUND (continued)
These seven Regional Areas of Benefit used the same boundaries, development potentials,
projects, and fees of the seven regions of the Countywide Area of Benefit formed in 1988.
Ordinance 93-22 adopted by the Board of Supervisors on March 9, 1993 repealed and replaced
Ordinance 88-27. The formation of separate Areas of Benefit from the subareas of the Regional
Areas of Benefit will allow Public Works Department staff to update and administer these
individual subareas more efficiently. The Area of Benefit fees will reflect the needs and potential
development of the area and not of the region surrounding it.
The proposed Central County Area of Benefit has, over the past 7 years, experienced changes
in the area's traffic circulation needs and development potential. This has been reflected in a
new project list and fee schedule. There are also needed boundary modifications. One area
being added to the Central County Area of Benefit was formerly in the Marsh Creek subarea of
the East County Regional Area of Benefit. Much of this area is preserved for open space or has
low development. potential. The traffic generated by any development in this area would have
an impact on the infrastructure of Central Contra Costa County. Another area being added is
a portion of the Briones subarea of the Central County Regional Area of Benefit and all of the
Lamorinda Regional Area of Benefit. Most of this area is within Moraga or Orinda (and therefore
not part of this area of benefit), and the remainder is also either preserved for open space or has
low development potential.
All areas of benefit"share" certain overhead costs (i.e., County Counsel review, environmental
review, trust fund management of the area of benefit program, etc.). There are times when the
revenue generated by fees collected in the existing Lamorinda Regional Area of Benefit does
not meet these overhead costs. Incorporating this area into another area of benefit will help
cover these costs„ while still allowing for the addition of project of regional significance, from this
area, to be included in the project list.
AREA OF BENEFIT - LOCATION
Figure 1 shows the general location of the Area of Benefit within Contra Costa County.
AREA OF BENEFIT BOUNDARY
The Area of Benefit boundary is shown in Figure 2 and described in Exhibit A.
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 66001 (a) OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE
1) PURPOSE: OF THE FEE
The purpose of this area of benefit is to generate monies through the adoption of a traffic
mitigation fee to ensure a roadway network consistent with current and future
transportation needs. By adoption of this fee, the proposed road improvement system
will be able to keep pace with new growth.
3
COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 66001 (a) OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE (continued)
2) USE OF THE FEES
The fees will be used to generate monies to pay for the road improvements described in
Exhibit B. This proposed Area of Benefit will only finance the minimum interim roadways
needed to meet traffic level of service and safety demands. Amenities which do not have
a direct effect on capacity, such as, general lighting, extensive longitudinal.storm drain
systems, and sidewalks, are not included. These improvements are considered as
frontage improvements by the Board of Supervisors and as such are the responsibility
of the owners of the adjacent properties and may be provided through development
conditions of approval, or by other future means such as additional fees or assessment
districts.
3) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN USE OF FEES AND TYPE OF DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
The road improvement projects for which the fees will be used are necessary for the
improvement of the safety and the capacity of the road network serving the
unincorporated Central County area as determined by future growth allowed for in the
General Plan. The road network is outlined in the Circulation Element of the General
Plan.
4) RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN NEED FOR ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AND TYPE OF
DEVELOPMENT
A peak trip generation factor has been associated for each type of development outlined
in this program report. These factors are industry standards obtained from the Institute
of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation, 5th Edition. The proposed fee is based
on distributing the cost of the Area of Benefit road improvement program to new
development in proportion to the number of peak hour trips generated by the particular
type of new development. All new development will be required to pay a fee to fund the
needed roadway improvements.
GENERAL PLAN RELATIONSHIP
The basis for the Central County Area of Benefit is derived from the features of the County
General Plan and its amendments, and subscribes to the policies of the General Plan elements.
The General Plain and its various elements are available for review at the Community
Development Department, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street, Martinez, during
office hours.
ROAD NETWORK; CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
The road network capacity improvement program was developed using the Circulation Element,
and the development potential identified in the County General Plan. The road improvements
will be funded and constructed in conjunction with the development of property within the Area
of Benefit. The proposed projects however, are only partially funded by Central County Area
4
ROAD NETWORK CAPACITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN (continued)
of Benefit fees. The rate of revenue generated in the Central County Area of Benefit is
dependent on the rate of new development. This affects the timing of the construction of an
Area of Benefit project as it is dependent on the total amount of fees collected less expenditures.
Other sources of funding, such as State or Federal aid, or local sources such as sales tax, gas
tax, etc., will be pursued.
The proposed road plan will help to provide the capacity needed to serve the estimated potential
development and future traffic volumes in the Central County area. This Area of Benefit will
finance only the rninimum interim roadways needed to meet traffic level of service and safety
demands. The road capacity improvement programs proposed by the Central County Area of
Benefit will be reviewed-periodically to assess the impacts of changing travel patterns, the rate
of new development, and the adequacy of the estimated road improvement project costs.
DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL WITHIN THE AREA OF BENEFIT
The development potential for the Area of Benefit was estimated by the County Public Works
Department using the General Plan and other resources provided by the County Community
Development Department. A summary of the potential new residential dwelling units, and
commercial, office, and industrial development is shown in Table 1.
Table 1
Summary of Development Potential
Category Floor Area Or Units
Single Family Residential 252 Dwelling Units
Multi-Family Residential 9 Dwelling Units
Commercial 12,588 Square Feet
Office 36,400 Square Feet
Industrial 1,802,208 Square Feet
ESTIMATED CO:iT OF ROAD NETWORK IMPROVEMENTS
The estimated Central County Area of Benefit contribution shown in Exhibit B is only a portion
of the total project cost. 'The area of benefit will not fund items which do not have a direct effect
on safety or capacity, such as general lighting, extensive longitudinal storm drain systems, and
sidewalks. The area of benefit will only finance the minimum interim roadways needed to meet
traffic level of service and safety demands.
The estimated Central County Area of Benefit contribution has been increased by
approximately 2% to cover the cost of administration. This includes the estimated staff time for
fee collection, accounting, and technical support to the community groups and traffic advisory
committees. The total estimated cost the Area of Benefit projects is approximately $20 million
dollars. The proposed Central County Area of Benefit has been estimated to generate
approximately $4.7 million. The United States Navy has contributed approximately $4 million
for the Evora Road Extension project.
5
•
BASIS FOR FEE APPORTIONMENT
The concept of an area of benefit is the equitable distribution of road improvement costs to new
development from which future traffic impacts will arise. As traffic impacts are directly related
to the total number of vehicles on the road network, we are able to relate development road fees
to the number of vehicle trips associated with a particular category of development. To
summarize, the 6 categories of land use for which a fee will be assessed in the Central County
Area of Benefit, are: single and multi-family residential, commercial, office, industrial and "other."
The total estimated Area of Benefit share of the project costs is divided by the number of peak
hour trips generated by each category.
In the residential categories, the cost is equally distributed between all dwelling units. In the
non-residential categories, the cost is distributed on the basis of each square foot of gross floor
area. For the "other" category, the fee would be based on the number of peak hour trips
generated by the particular type of development. A traffic report prepared by a licensed
engineer and reviewed by the Public Works Department would be required to analyze the
project's impact during the peak traffic hours. The project would then be charged the peak hour
trip rate for the Area of Benefit multiplied by the number of peak hour trips identified in the traffic
report.
The Board of Supervisors' Bridge Crossing and Major Thoroughfares Fee Policy, adopted July
17, 1979, excluded areas designated in the County General Plan as Agricultural Preserve and
Open Space. This policy has been interpreted to exclude all properties zoned agricultural
because minor subdivisions and lot splits of such properties are often not for the purpose of new
construction. Fees will be charged on these lands if and only if a building permit for new
construction is applied for.
CALCULATION OF FEES
The costs of the road improvement program have been distributed to the respective land use
category in proportion to the number of peak hour trips generated by that category.
The fee calculation is shown in Table 2 below.
Table 2
Central County Area of Benefit Fee Calculation
Land Use Units or Peak Hour Trips %Trips Cost Share Fee
Square Factor
Feet
Single Family 252 1.0 252 15.7% $748,827 $2,972
Multi-Family 9 0.8 8 0.5% $23,772 $2,641
Commercial 12,588 0.0019 24 1.5% $71,317 $5.67
Office 36,400 0.0016 59 3.7% $175,321 $4.82
Industrial 11802,208 0.0007 1262 78.6% $3,750,079 $2.08
All Others 1.0 $2,972
TOTAL $4,769,316
6
RECOMMENDED FEES
The recommended fees for the Central County Area of Benefit, resulting from the Table 2, are
shown below.
Single Family Residential: $2,972 per dwelling unit
Multi-Family Residential: $2,641 per dwelling unit
Commercial: $5.67 per SF of gross floor area
Office: $4.82 per SF of gross floor area
Industrial: $2.08 per SF of gross floor area
Other: $2,972 per peak hour trip
REVIEW OF FEES
Project cost estimates will be reviewed periodically while the Central County Area of Benefit is
in effect. The fee schedule shall be adjusted annually to account for inflation using the State
of California Construction Cost Index as published annually by the California Department of
Transportation. At no time will the fee schedule be increased at a rate of more that 5% per year
for inflation.
COLLECTION OF FEES
Fees shall be collected when the building permit is issued in accordance with Section 913-4.204
of Title 9 (Subdivisions) of the Contra Costa County Ordinance Code. Fees collected will be
deposited in an interest bearing account already established by the Board of Supervisors on
March 15, 1988. This trust fund account was set up for the Central County subarea of the
Central County Region of the Countywide Area of Benefit.
INTEREST ON FEES
The interest accrued on the fees collected in the Central County Area of Benefit, shall continue
to accumulate in the trust account and shall be used for purpose of administration, design and
construction of the fee area improvements.
IN LIEU DEDICATION
A development may be required to construct a portion of the road improvements identified in
Exhibit B. In such a case the developer may be eligible to receive credit or reimbursement
toward the Area of Benefit fee. The developer should contact the Public Works Department
prior to the commencement of construction to determine the eligibility of the road improvement.
HJB/MUds
c:CCaobREP.t12
Attachments
7
r
1_ o �r t
t « a� rt
LL
w a
z
W
IJL
CO
cy
in.
t � -
W
t -
f o �
� o t
CENTRAL COUNTY AREA OF BENEFIT
CROCKETT`
(T CH1CA •` �- -�•
eo � � .. `•_ ' K�� ;..:.tics: O<AW - -
BAYPOINT
HERCULES MARTINEZ :
CONCORD= $ PITTSBURC
a
-PLEASANT
::- HILL CLAYTON
v
WALNUT CREEK ?s
` t i Z. AFA
ORINDA
R ROSSMORAGA
LAmo
fr
DANVILLE
_ ffiM Tc
PROPOSED BOUNDARY
SAN RAMON '
EXCLUDING THEREFROM:
oR
1) INCORPORATED CITIES 4� a
2) PACHECO AREA OF BENEFIT
3) PLEASANT HILL BART ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
4) BATES AVENUE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT FIGURE 2
9
Boundary Description
Central County Area of Benefit
EXHIBIT "A"
The central portion of Contra Costa County, California, bounded on the north by Solano County,
bounded on the southwest by Alameda County, and described as follows:
Beginning in Suisun Bay on the boundary common to Contra Costa and Solano Counties at the Point
of Beginning of"Eastern Contra Costa Sub-Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee Area" adopted
July 26, 1994 by Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 94/386, also being the
northwest corner of"West Pittsburg Area of Benefit" adopted December 10, 1991 by Contra Costa
County Board of Supervisors' Resolution No. 91/779; thence from the Point of Beginning along the
boundary common to said adopted areas, southerly 7,410 feet, more or less, to the south right of way
line of Contra Costa Canal on the west line of Section 8, Township 2 North, Range 1 West, Mount
Diablo Meridian; thence continuing along the boundary of"West Pittsburg Area of Benefit," westerly,
southerly, southeasterly, and easterly 26,000 feet, more or less, to its intersection with "Eastern
Contra Costa Sub-Regional Transportation Mitigation Fee Area" on the east line of Section 17 (T2N,
R1 W); thence alone the boundary of"Eastern Contra Costa Sub-Regional Transportation Mitigation
Fee Area" in a general southeasterly and southerly direction 80,000 feet, more or less, to the
southeast corner of Section 12, (T1 S, R1 W); thence along the south line of Section 12, westerly
4,400 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Mount Diablo Scenic Boulevard (South Gate Road);
thence along said centerline in a general northerly direction 6,700 feet, more or less, to the centerline
intersection of Summit Road and Mount Diablo Scenic Boulevard (North Gate Road); thence along
the centerline of North Gate Road in a general westerly direction 12,400 feet, more or less, to the
northwest line of Lot D, Rancho San Miguel Robert Allen Tract; thence along said northwest line,
southwesterly 3,100 feet, more or less, to the southeast corner of that 787.58 acre parcel shown on
the Record of Survey filed June 22, 1960 in Book 18 of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 39; thence
along the boundary of said parcel, south 87052'06" west 9,881.2 feet and north 6008'40" west
2,389.28 feet, to the most southern comer of the Record of Survey filed August 27, 1970 in Book 53
of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 13; thence along the south line thereof, also being the south
line of Rancho San Miguel, north 76053'13" west 1,445.41 feet, to the most southern corner of
Subdivision 6743 "Stonegate Unit 1" filed June 9, 1987 in Book 313 of Maps at page 28; thence
along the boundary of Subdivision 6743, north 13051'48"west 5,687.22 feet, south 73016'01"west
4,566.44 feet, and south 21°53'15" east 3,423.26 feet, to the southeast corner of Subdivision 4924
"Hill and Dale, Unlit 6" recorded May 18, 1977 in Book 196 of Maps at page 28; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 4924 in a general westerly direction 2,879.25 feet to the northeast corner
of Subdivision 4402 recorded December 27, 1974 in Book 175 of Maps at page 25; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 4402, south 1 044'25" west 1,527.78 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 37
in Subdivision 397:3 recorded August 18, 1972 in Book 149 of Maps at page 20; thence along the
east tine of Subdivision 3973, south 1044'25" west 1,015.1 feet, to the north right of way line of
Livorna Road; thence continuing south 1 044'25"west 41.96 feet to the centerline of said road; thence
along said centerline in a general westerly direction 890.41 feet to the southern prolongation of the
west line of said Subdivision 3973; thence along said prolongation and west line, north 1°32'10" east
10
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
967.1 feet, to the southwest corner of Subdivision 4402 (175 M 25); thence along the west line of
Subdivision 4402, north 1032'10" east 1,063.35 feet, to the southeast corner of Subdivision 5931
recorded June 29, 1983 in Book 271 of Maps at page 21; thence along the boundary thereof, north
55022'55"west 537 feet and in a general northwesterly direction 105.63 feet along Livorna Heights
Road right of way line, to the southeast corner of Subdivision 5366 recorded March 25, 1980 in Book
236 of Maps at page 7; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 5366 in a general westerly
direction 400.83 feet to the east line of Subdivision 3827 recorded June 11, 1969 in Book 126 of
Maps at page 38; thence along said east line, south 1 031'55"west 942.5 feet, to the northeast corner
of Subdivision 3037 recorded June 25, 1964 in Book 99 of Maps at page 30; thence along the
boundary thereof in a general southerly direction 1,532.28 feet to the north right of way line of
Livorna Road; thence along lot lines of Subdivision 3037 as follows: 1) in a general westerly
direction 79.27 feet, 2) north 1°36'23" east 223.71 feet, 3) north 88023'37"west 149.23 feet, 4) south
1°36'23" west 275.72 feet, and 5) south 72°23'20" west 272.09 feet; thence crossing Trotter Way,
south 7202320"west 100 feet, more or less, to the south line of Lot 1 (99 M 30); thence continuing
along lot lines of Subdivision 3037, south 72023'20" west 145.74 feet, north 6019'31"west 712.51
feet, and north 89043'18"west 933.43 feet, to the south line of Subdivision 4810 filed September 23,
1976 in Book 189 of Maps at page 48; thence along said south line and the south line of that 24.71
acre Assessor Parcel Number (hereinafter referred to as APN) -187-160-013 described in Parcel
Three in the deed to the City of Walnut Creek recorded July 5, 1984 in Volume 11867 of Official
Records at page 965, north 8904318"west 944.73 feet, to the west line of Subdivision 6468 recorded
January 8, 1982 in Book 286 of Maps at page 41; thence along the boundary thereof in a general
southerly direction 828.77 feet to the east right of way line of Interstate Freeway 680; thence along
said east line in a general northwesterly direction 2,259.08 feet; thence crossing said freeway, south
53°47'20" west 290 feet, more or less, to the west right of way line thereof; thence along said west
line in a general northwesterly direction 1,209.59 feet to the most southeastern corner of APN 187-
050-011 and 012 described as Parcel 1 in the deed to Edward Johannessen and Juliet Johannessen
1987 Revocable Living Trust recorded March 22, 1988 in Volume 14228 of Official Records at page
211; thence along the southerly portion of the boundary thereof in a general westerly direction
1,494.46 feet, more or less, to the west right of way line of Interstate Freeway 680; thence along said
west line in a general northwesterly direction 836 feet, more or less, to the most eastern corner of
APN 187-040-007 described as PARCEL 11 in the deed to Contra Costa County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District recorded December 20, 1967 in Volume 5520 of Official Records at page
451; thence along the boundary of PARCEL 11, south 6401618"west 239.65 feet and in a general
northerly direction 1,036.02 feet, to the northwest corner thereof; thence crossing Rudgear Road,
northerly 245 feet, more or less, to the west line of APN 183-093-023 described in the deed to East
Bay Municipal Utility District(hereinafter referred to as EBMUD) recorded January 5, 1968 in Volume
5530 of Official Records at page 93; thence along said west line, north 2205301"west 33.76 feet,
to the southeast line of Southern Pacific Railroad right of way APN 183-093-031 described as
PARCEL THIRTY-ONE in the deed to Contra Costa County recorded December 9, 1985 in Volume
12652 of Official Records at page 570, being a non-tangent curve concave to the northwest having
a radius of 1,196 feet; thence along the arc of said curve, southwesterly 52 feet, more or less, to the
centerline of Danville Boulevard; thence non-tangent along said centerline, crossing Engineer's
Station 603+65, northerly 110 feet, more or less, to the northwest line of said County parcel, being
a non-tangent curve concave to the northwest having a radius of 1,096 feet and being concentric with
11
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
said southeast line; thence along the arc of said curve, southwesterly 52 feet, more or less, to the
southeast comer of Subdivision MS 114-75 filed October 20, 1976 in Book 49 of Parcel Maps at page
19, also being on the west right of way line of South Main Street (shown as Danville Boulevard on
said map); thence along said west line in a general northwesterly direction 2,400 feet, more or less,
to the iron pipe marked R.C.E. 10319 shown on the map of Subdivision MS 37-78 filed November
3, 1978 in Book 71 of Parcel Maps at page 33; thence along the northeast line of Subdivision MS 37-
78 and the northeast line of Grumman Court in a general northwesterly direction 638.88 feet to the
east right of way line of Lancaster Road (71 PM 33); thence along said east line in a general
northwesterly direction 2,060 feet, more or less, to the south right of way line of Lilac Drive; thence
crossing Lilac Drive, westerly 165 feet, more or less, to the east corner of APN 184-211-027
described as PARCELS ONE and TWO in the deed to the State of California recorded June 13, 1990
in Volume 15917 of Official Records at page 559, also being on the southwest line of Interstate
Freeway 680; thence along said southwest line,.north 57°21'31" west 820 feet, more or less, to the
most northern corner of Subdivision MS 161-79 filed September 3, 1980 in Book 88 of Parcel Maps
at page 50; thence crossing Newell Avenue, westerly 92 feet, more or less, to the east corner of Lot
Line Adjustment LL 63-89 shown on the Record of Survey filed February 9, 1990 in Book 93 of
Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 2; thence north 52002'55"west 880 feet, more or less, to an angle
point on said freeway right of way; thence north 57021'31" west 165 feet, more or less, to the
northeast right of way line of Paulson Lane; thence along said right of way line in a general
northwesterly direction 400 feet, more or less, to the southeast right of way line of Olympic
Boulevard; thence northwesterly 62 feet, more or less, to the east corner of Subdivision MS 212-76
filed November 18, 1977 in Book 60 of Parcel Maps at page 19; thence north 57023'05" west 116.25
feet to the east corner of the Record of Survey filed November 24, 1962 in Book 20 of Licensed
Surveyors' Maps at page 47; thence along the boundary thereof, north 58033'23"west 65 feet and
north 66048'23"west 256.74 feet; thence continuing north 66048'23"west 18.30 feet to the north right
of way line of Nicholson Road; thence along said north line in a general northwesterly direction 1,000
feet, more or less, to a curve thereon having a radius of 45 feet; thence crossing Boulevard Way,
westerly 180 feet, more or less, to the north right of way line thereof at the western terminus of a
curve thereon having a radius of 133 feet; thence tangent to said curve, south 73038'43"west 236.54
feet, more or less, to.a non-tangent curve concave to the east having a radius of 50 feet on the east
line of Lot 11 in "White Orchard Estates" recorded August 28, 1941 in Book 25 of Maps at page 43;
thence along the arc of said curve, northerly 12.29 feet, to the south right of way line of State
Freeway 24; thence non-tangent along said south line in a general westerly direction 3,200 feet,
more or less, to the east line of Lot 62 in "Sun Valley Estates" recorded February 8, 1946 in Book
28 of Maps at page 27; thence along lot lines thereof as follows: 1) southerly 30.69 feet, 2)
southeasterly 308 feet, 3) southerly 247 feet, 4) southerly 455 feet, 5) southeasterly 273 feet, 6)
southerly 376.59 feet, 7) southwesterly 550.28 feet, 8) southerly 251.38 feet to the north right of way
line of Kinney Drive, being a non-tangent curve concave to the south having a radius of 225 feet, and
9) along the arc of said curve, westerly 70 feet; thence crossing EI Curtola Boulevard, southwesterly
110 feet, more or less, to the northeast line of APN 185-330-006 described in the deed to Brueckner
Trust recorded January 28, 1994 as Series #94025807; thence along said northeast line,
northwesterly 165 feet, more or less, to the most eastern corner of Lot 257 (28 M 27); thence along
the southeast lines, of Lots 257, 258, 259, 260, and 261 (28 M 27), southwesterly 435 feet; thence
crossing Sunset Loop, southwesterly 50 feet, to the east corner of Lot 237; thence along lot lines of
12
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
said subdivision (28, M 27), southwesterly 385.67 feet and in a general southerly direction 921.19
feet, to the boundary of"Swanson Tract" recorded September 30, 1946 in Book 31 of Maps at page
8; thence along said boundary in a general southerly direction 373.55 feet to the boundary of
Subdivision 5016 recorded February 10, 1978 in Book 207 of Maps at page 41; thence along the
boundary common to Subdivision 5016 and "Swanson Tract" as follows: 1) in a general southerly.
direction 256.07 feet, and 2) in a general easterly direction 778.7 feet, to the west right of way line
of Freeman Road being a non-tangent curve concave to the east having a radius of 925 feet; thence
along the arc of said curve, southerly 54.77 feet, to the most eastern corner of Subdivision 5016;
thence leaving the boundary thereof and following the boundary shown on the Record of Survey filed
July 26, 1982 in Book 71 of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 1 as follows: 1) continuing along the
arc of said curve, southerly 44.19 feet, to a compound curve concave to the east having a radius of
185.84 feet, 2) along the arc thereof, southerly 18.31 feet, 3) non-tangent, south 55050'29" west
95.49 feet, 4) south 23039'45" west 98.89 feet to the north right of way line of Olympic Boulevard,
and 5) north 69048'10" west 63 feet along said north line, to the southeast corner of Lot 1 in
Subdivision 5016 (207 M 41); thence continuing along said north line (being lot lines of Subdivision
5016) in a general westerly direction 1,370 feet, more or less, to the northeastern prolongation of the
northwest line of Terra California Territory described in the Annexation to the City of Lafayette
Resolution 50-80 adopted May 12, 1980; thence along said prolongation, crossing Olympic
Boulevard, southwesterly 200 feet, more or less, to the most northern corner of said annexation;
thence along the boundary thereof in a general southeasterly direction 1,787.43 feet to the east
corner thereof on the boundary of the Record of Survey filed June 18, 1965 in Book 35 of Licensed
Surveyors' Maps at page 23; thence along said Record of Survey boundary in a general easterly
direction 1,286.93 feet, to the boundary of the Record of Survey filed April 1, 1965 in Book 33 of
Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 40; thence along said boundary (33 LSM 40) in a general
easterly direction 1,678.27 feet to the northwest corner of Subdivision 6815 "Del Valle" recorded
November 12, 1987 in Book 318 of Maps at page 3; thence along the north line of Subdivision 6815,
north 89036'27" east 639.9 feet, to the southwest right of way line of Tice Valley Boulevard; thence
along said right of way line in a general southeasterly and easterly direction 3,750 feet, more or less,
to the west line of Harlan Ranch shown on the Record of Survey filed September 8, 1939 in Book 7
of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 7; thence along the boundary thereof, southerly 552.56 feet,
southeasterly 1,221 feet, and easterly 379.04 feet, to the southwest corner of Tract 2304 recorded
November 29, 1955 in Book 61 of Maps at page 50; thence along the south line of Tract 2304, south
70020'30" east 733 feet, to the southwest corner of Subdivision MS 45-88 filed February 28, 1990
in Book 145 of Parcel Maps at page 32; thence along the boundary of Subdivision MS 45-88 in a
general easterly direction 1,207.49 feet to the most eastern corner thereof; thence south 70040'17"
east 21.72 feet, more or less, to the centerline of Castle Hill Ranch Road (a private road) at the
northeast corner of Lot "B" shown on the Record of Survey filed March 13, 1984 in Book 74 of
Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 12; thence along said centerline in a general southerly direction
907 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner of PARCEL B in Subdivision MS 133-72 filed
September 7, 1972 in Book 24 of Parcel Maps at page 9; thence along the south line of PARCEL B,
north 89012'36" east 259.78 feet, to the boundary of Subdivision MS 58-75 recorded October 26,
1978 in Book 71 of Parcel Maps at page 23; thence along said boundary as follows: 1) north 0036'
east 41.92 feet, 2) south 89°12'12" east 176.01 feet to the northeast corner thereof, 3) in a general
southerly direction 3,354.5 feet to the southeast corner thereof, and 4) south 87°05'11" west 274.17
13
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
feet; thence continuing south 87°05'11" west 300 feet to the centerline of Section 11 (T1 S, R2W);
thence along said centerline and the centerline of Section 14, southerly 6,663.66 feet, to the
southwest comer of Subdivision 6419"Alamo Ridge"filed July 28, 1988 in Book 323 of Maps at page
39; thence along the south line thereof, south 84047'44" east 1,353.46 feet, to the northwest corner
of Subdivision MS 150-75 filed June 14, 1976 in Book 45 of Parcel Maps at page 41; thence along
the boundary thereof as follows: 1) south 0039'40"east 1,233.72 feet, 2) south 84017' east 2,622.91
feet, 3) north 76°18'50" east 481.39 feet, and 4) north 63°16' east 193.73 feet, to the northeast
corner of APN 198-180-007 described as PARCEL TWO in the deed to East Bay Regional Park
District(hereinafter referred to as EBRPD) recorded April 4, 1974 in Volume 7189 of Official Records
at page 183; thence along the northeast line of PARCEL TWO, also being the boundary of Rancho
San Ramon, southeasterly 4,840 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of APN 199-010-012
described as PARCEL FIVE in said deed to EBRPD; thence along the northeast line of PARCEL
FIVE in a general southeasterly direction 1,207.59 feet to the east line of that 13.19 acre APN 199-
010-011 excepted from PARCEL FIVE in said deed to EBRPD and also described as PARCEL ONE
in the deed to the United States of America recorded July 29, 1980 in Volume 9930 of Official
Records at page 913; thence along said east line in a general southeasterly direction 192.27 feet to
an angle point on the boundary of said PARCEL FIVE; thence along said boundary in a general
southerly direction 2,325.7 feet to the northeast corner of Section 25 (T1 S, RM); thence along the
east line of Section 25, southerly 2,640 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Subdivision MS
53-81 filed March 28, 1985 in Book 115 of Parcel Maps at page 14; thence along the north line of
Subdivision MS 53431, north 88043'43"west 3,035.66 feet, to the northeast corner of Subdivision MS
28-82 filed November 21, 1983 in Book 108 of Parcel Maps at page 11; thence along the north line
of Subdivision MS 28-82, north 88047'23"west 1,062.06 feet, to the northwest corner thereof; thence
north 8804305"west 1,063.84 feet, to the west quarter corner of said Section 25; thence along the
west line of Section 25, northerly 2,640 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Section 26 (T1 S,
R2W); thence along the north lines of Sections 26, 27, and 28 (T1 S, R2W), westerly 15,840 feet,
more or less, to the northwest corner of Section 28, also being the northeast corner of APN 258-310-
002 shown on the Record of Survey filed June 20, 1980 in Book 67 of Licensed Surveyors' Maps at
page 9; thence along the boundary thereofas follows: 1) south 0027'37" east 1,306.53 feet, 2) south
88°43'10" west 1,290.34 feet, 3) south 0°15'06" east 1,303.04 feet, and 4) south 88052'39" west
513.17 feet, to the boundary of Rancho Laguna de los Palos Coloradas; thence along said rancho
boundary, south 1"13'26" west 929.81 feet, to rancho corner P.C. No. 32 shown on said map (67
LSM 9); thence continuing along said rancho boundary, south 19028'45" west 3,547.16 feet, to
rancho corner P.C. No. 31 (67 LSM 9) on the boundary common to Contra Costa and Alameda
Counties; thence along said county boundary in a general northwesterly direction 56,700 feet, more
or less, to Mount Diablo Base Line; thence along said base line, easterly 2,600 feet, more or less,
to the east corner of Lot 55 of said rancho, also being the east corner of APN 267-010-009 described
in the deed to EBRPD recorded July 24, 1940 in Volume 541 of Official Records at page 271; thence
along the northeast line of said EBRPD parcel, northwesterly 551.76 feet, to the "FOUND 2" x 2"
REDWD.STAKE 8, TACK" shown on the Record of Survey filed October 3, 1968 in Book 51 of
Licensed Surveyors' Maps at page 23; thence north 2501015"15" west 140.66 feet and north 22012'20"
west 152.07 feet to the northwest corner of PARCEL "A" (51 LSM 23), also being the southwest
corner of that 63.7 acre APN 267-020-005 described in the deed to Johnson Orinda Ranch Inc.
recorded April 23, 1981 in Volume 102.94 of Official Records at page 858, thence in a general
14
•
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
northerly direction-3,132 feet, more or less, along said west line thereof and the west line of APN
267-020-004 described in the deed to Theodore S. Urban et at. recorded December 24, 1985 in
Volume 12675 of Official Records at page 199, to the northwest corner of said Urban parcel; thence
continuing along the boundary of said Urban property (12675 O.R 199), being common with the
boundary of APN 267-030-020 conveyed by East Bay Water Company to EBMUD recorded
December 8, 1928 in Volume 163 of Official Records at page 90, as follows: 1) north 54°07'50" east
3,208.3 feet, 2) south 63°03' east 257.1 feet, 3) north 54007'50" east 478.5 feet, and 4) south 30053'
east 998.4 feet, to the most eastern corner of APN 267-020-007 described in said Urban deed
(12675 O.R. 199); thence leaving the boundary of said Urban property and continuing along said
EBMUD boundary as follows: 1) south 30°53' east 99.2 feet, 2) in a general northeasterly direction
2,000 feet, more or less, to the southwest right of way line of Camino Pablo, and 3) along said
southwest line in a general northwesterly direction 1,620 feet, more or less, to an angle point; thence
along the prolongation of said southwest line, northwesterly 140 feet, more or less, to the
prolongation of the northwest right of way line of Bear Creek Road; thence along said prolongation
and northwest line in a general northeasterly direction 1,450 feet, more or less, to the southeast
corner of APN 267-030-013 described as PARCEL ONE in the deed to EBMUD recorded February
9, 1990 in Volume 15650 of Official Records at page 239; thence along the boundary of PARCEL
ONE in a general westerly, northwesterly and northeasterly direction 3,900 feet, more or less, to the
west right of way line of Bear Creek Road; thence northeasterly 40 feet, more or less, to the east right
of way line thereof, thence along said east line in a general northeasterly direction 3,150 feet, more
or less, to the southern prolongation of the east line of said EBMUD parcel (163 O.R. 90); thence
along said prolongation and east line, northerly 2,450 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner
thereof on the east line of Rancho EI Sobrante; thence along the east line of said rancho, northerly
8,236.46 feet, to the northwest corner of APN 267-100-001 described in the Final Order of
Condemnation by EBMUD recorded January 6, 1964 in Volume 4525 of Official Records at page 853,
also being the southwest corner of"Garcia Ranch" filed December 10, 1914 in Book 12 of Maps at
page 268; thence along the boundary of"Garcia Ranch" as follows: 1) along the north line of said
EBMUD parcel, easterly 2,008.42 feet, to the northwest corner of APN 267-110-005 described in the
deed to John J. Naylor et ux. recorded September 8, 1981 in Volume 10481 of Official Records at
page 551, 2) along -the north line thereof, easterly 2,626 feet, more or less, to the northwest corner
of Subdivision 118-76 filed January 26, 1977 in Book 51 of Parcel Maps at page 39, 3) along the
north line thereof, north 89039'09" east 6,743.17 feet, to the boundary of APN 365-200-010 described
in the deed to EBRPD recorded March 28, 1966 in Volume 5086 of Official Records at page 467, 4)
along said boundary easterly 419.5 feet, northerly 558.81 feet, and easterly 784.67 feet, to the
southwest corner of APN 365-200-002 described as PARCEL TWO in the deed to EBRPD recorded
February 7, 1966 in Volume 5052 of Official Records at page 508, 5) along the west line thereof,
northerly 723.83 feet, to the south corner of APN 365-200-001 described as PARCEL FOUR in said
deed (5052 O.R. 508), and 6) along the boundary of PARCEL FOUR in a general northerly direction
2,061.71 feet, to the west corner thereof; thence leaving the boundary of "Garcia Ranch" and
continuing along the boundary of said PARCEL FOUR in a general easterly direction 5,291.22 feet
to the northwest corner of APN 365-200-003 described as PARCEL ONE in said deed (5052 O.R.
508); thence along the boundary of PARCEL ONE in a general easterly direction 2,310.11 feet to the
northwest corner of APN 365-200-004 described as PARCEL THREE in said deed (5052 O.R. 508);
thence along the boundary of PARCEL THREE in a general easterly direction 2,885.21 feet to the
15
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
northwest corner of APN 365-200-005 described as PARCEL FIVE in said deed (5052 O.R. 508);
thence along the boundary of PARCEL FIVE in a general easterly direction 2,375.53 feet to the most
southern corner of APN 365-180-004 described in the Final Order of Condemnation by EBRPD
recorded March 15, 1965 in Volume 4823 of Official Records at page 139, also being on the east line
of Rancho Boca de la Canada de Pinole; thence along the boundary of said condemnation parcel,
northerly 3,198.15 feet and northeasterly 3,061.66 feet, to the southwest corner of Subdivision MS
37-88 filed December 14, 1989 in Book 144 of Parcel Maps at page 14; thence along the boundary
thereof, north 0°59'55" east 1,459.73 feet and south 88050'38" east 511.03 feet, to the southwest
comer of Subdivision 6769 filed October 13, 1988 in Book 326 of Maps at page 22; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 6769, north 1041'08" east 865.96 feet and in a general northeasterly
direction 2,532.69 feet; thence north 64048'04" east 50 feet, more or less, crossing Reliez Valley
Road, to the southwest line of the property delineated on the map filed April 28, 1978 in Book 65 of
Parcel Maps at page 19; thence along said southwest line in a general southeasterly direction 460
feet, more or less, to the most southern corner thereof, also being. the southwest corner of
Subdivision 3543 filed November 16, 1966 in Book 113 of Maps at page 31; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 3543 as follows 1) north 004T1 4" east 466.07 feet, 2) north 6023'45" west
231.57 feet, 3) north 47051'23" east 222.37 feet, 4) south 10014'43" east 352.52 feet, 5) north
79051'46" east 727.49 feet, and 6) south 19026'31" east 1,052.81 feet, to the northeast corner of
Subdivision 5157 filed September 21, 1978 in Book 217 of Maps at page 16; thence along the east
line of Subdivision 5157, south 19025'03" east 255.64 feet, to the northeast corner of Lot 28 in
Subdivision 3114"Walnut Hills Country Club Estates" recorded October 9, 1963 in Book 95 of Maps
at page 33; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 3114, south 19027'29" east 142 feet and south
89°52'20"east 217.75 feet, to the northwest corner of Subdivision 7243 "Pleasant Hill Country Club"
filed July 30, 1992 in Book 362 of Maps at page 36; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 7243,
south 89059' east 779.35 feet, to the northwest corner of Subdivision 3812 "Shannon Hills Unit 3"
filed March 15, 1972 in Book 144 of Maps at page 45; thence along the north line of Subdivision
3812, south 89037'46" east 1,161.41 feet, to the northwest corner of Subdivision 3779 "Shannon
Hills Unit 2" recorded November 13, 1968 in Book 125 of Maps at page 3; thence along the boundary
of Subdivision 3779, south 89037'46" east 836.89 feet and north 53046'24" east 63.51 feet, to the
west corner of Lot 2 in Subdivision 3274 "Shannon Hills Unit 1" recorded September 26, 1969 in
Book 117 of Maps at page 27; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 3274, north 53046'24" east
78.11 feet and north 36007'09" east 90.28 feet, to the most western corner of Subdivision 3313
recorded February 3, 1965 in Book 102 of Maps at page 14; thence along the boundary of
Subdivision 3313 as follows: 1) north 28054'55" east 205.51 feet, 2) north 0008' 52" east 172.84 feet,
3) south 85042'23" east 110.29 feet, and 4) north 54029'37" east 44.2 feet, to the northeast corner
thereof; thence continuing north 54029`37" east 80 feet, more or less, to the northeast right of way
line of Alhambra Avenue; thence along said northeast line in a general northwesterly direction 660
feet, more or less, to the northwest right of way line of Paso Nogal as said road is shown on the map
filed September 30, 1968 in Book 5 of Parcel Maps at page 41; thence along said right of way in a
general northeasterly and northerly direction 730 feet, more or less, to the northeast corner of Parcel
"B" (5 PM 41), also being the southeast corner of Subdivision 4988 "Hillside Park" recorded
November 13, 1978 in Book 219 of Maps at page 11; thence along the south line of Subdivision
4988, north 89027''20" west 412.24 feet, to the northeast right of way line of Alhambra Avenue,
thence along said northeast line in a general northwesterly direction 4,900 feet, more or less, to the
16
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
southeast corner of the Record of Survey filed September 18, 1967 in Book 49 of Licensed
Surveyors' Maps at page 31; thence along the boundary thereof, north 20"10'53" east 656.87 feet
and north 61'08'20" west 419.07 feet, to north corner thereof on the boundary of Subdivision 3556
"Valley High Unit II" filed August 21, 1968 in Book 122 of Maps at page 27; thence along the
boundary of Subdivision 3556, north 21029'51"west 121.1 feet and north 47022'59" east 1,336.63
feet, to the most western corner of Subdivision 5132 "Valley High Unit 2" filed December 1, 1981 in
Book 261 of Maps at page 7; thence along the boundary of Subdivision 5132, north 47°22'59" east
374.11 feet, south 89009'34" east 1,322.61 feet, and south 87°33'13" east 286.28 feet; thence
easterly 660 feet to the northwest corner of Subdivision 5126 "Diablo Valley Estates Unit 1" filed
February 15, 1978 in Book 208 of Maps at page 1; thence along the boundary thereof, south
87046'18" east 479.86 feet, north 8.16 feet, and north 89044'06" east 1,227.72 feet; thence easterly
537.41 feet to the north line of Subdivision MS 12-79 filed September 5, 1980 in Book 89 of Parcel
Maps at page 6; thence along said north line, easterly 725 feet, more or less, to the southwest corner
of Subdivision 4964"Hidden Lakes Unit 3"filed July 9, 1979 in Book 226 of Maps at page 30; thence
along the boundary of Subdivision 4964, north 89037'28" east 598.94 feet and north 1°04'01" east
682 feet, to the southeast corner of Subdivision 6313 "Hidden Lakes Unit 8" filed June 6, 1983 in
Book 270 of Maps at page 20; thence along the east line of Subdivision 6313, north 1004'02" east
738 feet, to the northeast corner; thence south 88°55'05" east 170 feet to the west right of way line
of High Street; thence along said west line, northerly 95 feet, more or less, to the south corner of
PARCEL 1 shown on the Record of Survey filed June 9, 1962 in Book 20 of Licensed Surveyors'
Maps at page 15; thence along Contra Costa Canal right of way shown as U.S.A. (461 O.R. 391) on
said map, north 57°42' west 116.83 feet and north 1° 48' west 250.5 feet, to a concrete monument
(20 LSM 15); thence continuing along said canal right of way in a general northerly direction 813.41
feet to the south right of way line of Center Avenue; thence along said south line in a general easterly
direction 970 feet, more or less, to the southern prolongation of the west line of Tract 2024 recorded
March 24, 1955 in Book 57 of Maps at page 26; thence along said prolongation, north 0°14'50" east
80 feet, more or less, to said west line; thence along the boundary of Tract 2024, north 0'14'50" east
560.61 feet, south 89059'39" west 79.01 feet, and north 54051'15" west 62.93 feet, to the south
corner of Tract 2632 recorded August 7, 1958 in Book 70 of Maps at page 34; thence along the
boundary of Tract 2632, north 5451'15" west 50 feet and north 2423'13" west 305.28 feet, to the
southwest corner of Lot 87 in Tract 2024 (57 M 26); thence along the boundary of Tract 2024 in a
general northerly direction 634.69 feet and north 88028'58" east 25.83 feet to the southwest corner
of"Beckett Acres Unit No. 2" recorded April 22, 1954 in Book 53 of Maps at page 37; thence along
the boundary of "Beckett Acres Unit No. 2" in a general northerly direction 1,397.65 feet to the
southwest corner of APN 125-193-028 described in the Partial Release and Reconveyance to Contra
Costa County Water District recorded February 17, 1961 in Volume 3807 at page 278; thence along
the west line thereof, northerly 44 feet; thence crossing Vine Hill Road, northerly 41 feet, more or
less, to the southwest corner of that 2.25 acre APN 125-200-001 described as PARCEL 1 in the
Final Order of Condemnation by the State of California recorded March 20, 1958 in Volume 3137 of
Official Records at page 554; thence along the northwest line thereof, north 33°40' east 271.4 feet,
thence along the City of Martinez boundary, northeasterly 250 feet, more or less, to the centerline
of State Highway Route 4; thence along said centerline in a general easterly direction 5, 925 feet,
more or less, to the centerline of Walnut Creek Flood Control Channel being a non-tangent curve
concave to the southwest having a radius of 5,000 feet; thence along the arc of said curve
17
Central County Area of Benefit
Exhibit "A"
northwesterly 460 feet, more or less, to its terminus, distant north 56°15'04" east 208 feet from
Contra Costa County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Monument #68108; thence
continuing along said centerline in a general northerly direction 20,262.54 feet, to its outfall in Suisun
Bay; thence north 23°28'34"west 1,150 feet, more or less, to the boundary common to Contra Costa
and Solano Counties; thence along said boundary in a general easterly direction 27,000 feet, more
or less, to the Point of Beginning.
LH:jlg:drg
g:clerical\exhibfts\TFMA.ex
May 9,1995
18
Exhibit "B"
Central County AOB Project List
Project/ Road Name Project Description Estimated Central
County Area of Benefit
Project Contribution
Taylor Boulevard Safety and capacity improvements $670,000
from Pleasant Hill Road to Boyd Road
Pleasant Hill Road/ Taylor Safety and capacity improvements to $2,000,000
Boulevard existing intersection
Bailey Road Remove and replace existing bridge. $200,000
New bridge adequate for standard
two-lane arterial
Rudgear Road /San Miguel Safety Improvements $350,000
Drive/Walnut Boulevard/
Mountain View Boulevard
San Pablo Dam Road/Bear Construct Signal (County share) $60,000
Creek Road
Paso Nogal/ Golf Club Road Improve intersection $70,000
Evora Road Extension Construct new road from Willow Pass $3,350,000
Road (Concord) to Port Chicago
Highway
Total Estimated Central County Area of Benefit Project Contribution = $6,700,000
Existing Unencumbered Central County Area of Benefit Balance = $2,024,200
Funding to be Generated by New Development = $4,675,800
2% Area of Benefit Administration = $93,516
Total Revenue Generated By New Development = $4,769,316
19