HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05161995 - 1.7 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: May 16, 1995
SUBJECT: Approve Plans and Specifications and Advertise for bids for the Pittsburg Avenue
Extension Project.
Project No. 0662-6R4237-94, CP # 94 - 63.
Specific Request(s) or Recommendations) & Background &Justification
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
APPROVE the Plans and Specifications for the Project and
ADVERTISE for bids to be received on Thursday, June 15, 1995, at 2:00 p.m.
DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to publish the Notice to Contractors in accordance with Section
20392 of the Public Contract Code, and
11. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The estimated contract cost of the project is $250,000, funded by Measure C - Return to Source
(100°/x). (To be reimbursed by North Richmond Area of Benefit and North Richmond
Redevelopment:)
111. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND:
The project is needed to improve traffic circulation in the area .
The Public Works Director has filed with the Board of Supervisors the Plans and Specifications
for the project.
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE:
_RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
=RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE /
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON-ft)071 Ips 1995 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_OTHER_
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT )
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
JF:kd
g:\Design\BO\BO16 b.t5
Orig. Div: Public Works(Design Division)
Contact: J. Fahy, 313-2283 I hereby certify that this M a true and correct copy of
cc: County Administrator an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Attn: E. Kuevor Board of Supervisors an the date shown.
Auditor-Controller ATTESTEM `711')s.. 11.1 1919-5
PW Accounting ML BATCHRft CMA of the Board
Construction of Wd Gwjb Adminlistretw
Community Development .,
By _ --(---).A- .Deputy
PittsbAg Avenue Extension Project
May 16, 1995
Page Two
The general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project,
have been filed with the Clerk of the Board and copies will be made available to any interested
party upon request.
The Board reviewed and approved the project on January 10, 1994, and found, on the basis of
the initial study and all comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the project
will have a significant effect on the environment and adopted the Negative Declaration in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. A Notice of Determination was filed
with the County Clerk on January 12, 1994.
IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the project is not approved for advertising, it will not be constructed.