HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04251995 - 1.14 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: April 25, 1995
SUBJECT: Approve Plans and Specifications and Advertise for bids for the Johnston Road Bridge
Replacement Project.
Project No. 0662-6R4143-90, CP # 94 - 28.
Specific Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background & Justification
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
APPROVE the Plans and Specifications for the Project and
ADVERTISE for bids to be received on Thursday, May 25, at 2:00 p.m.
DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to publish the Notice to Contractors in accordance with Section
20392 of the Public Contract Code, and
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The estimated contract cost of the project is $484,000 funded by Federal Bridge Replacement
Funds (80%) Road Funds (20%).
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND:
The project is needed to replace a structurally deficient bridge.
The Public Works Director has filed with the Board of Supervisors the Plans and Specifications
for the project.
Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON G f" a-5) 1,01115 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_OTHER_
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
✓✓ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT )
AYES: NOES:
ABSENT: ABSTAIN:
NL:jlg
g:\Design\BO\BO25.t4
1 hereby certify that this Is a hue and correct Copy of
Orig.Div: Public Works(Design Division) an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Contact: Neil Leary,313-2363 Board of Supervisors co the dabs ehwm% _
cc: County Administrator
Attn: E.Kuevor ATTESTED: 0 as
Auditor-Controller PHIL BATC OR,Clerk OHM Board
PW Accounting of Supervisors and County Administrator
Construction
Community Development
By Deputy
Jol`�nston Road Bridge Replacement
April 25, 1995
Page Two
The general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid on this project,
have been filed with the Clerk of the Board and copies will be made available to any interested
party upon request.
The Board reviewed and approved the project on September 13, 1994, and found, on the basis
of the initial study and all comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect on the environment and adopted the Negative Declaration in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act. A Notice of Determination was filed
with the County Clerk on September 19, 1994.
IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION:
If the project is not approved for advertising, it will not be constructed and HBRR participating
funds could be lost.