HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03071995 - 1.23 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS S L Contra
FROM:. Phil Batchelor, County Administrator Costa
cilia i<
County
a..l.
March 1, 1995 ^.......s;- *°
DATE: �'u6ii'
SUBJECT: . LEGISLATION: AB 337 (Campbell) - EXEMPTS COUNTY SERVICE AREA P-6
FROM HAVING TO CONTRIBUTE TO THE PROPERTY TAX TRANSFER TO THE
SCHOOLS
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
ACKNOWLEDGE that the Board of Supervisors is the SPONSOR of AB 337
by Assemblyman Robert J. Campbell, which, as introduced, would
exempt CSA P-6, beginning in the 1995-96 fiscal year, from having
to contribute to the property tax transfer which was implemented by
the State in the 1992-93 fiscal year, thereby saving the County
about $1 . 6 million per year.
BACKGROUND:
Current law provides for a significant transfer of property tax
revenue from counties, cities and special districts to the schools
to assist the State in balancing its budget. This transfer began
in the 1992-93 fiscal year, was increased in the 1993-94 fiscal
year and will continue indefinitely into the future. .However, fire
districts and certain police services districts were exempted from
having to transfer a portion of their property tax to the schools .
This exemption did not extend to County Service - Area P-6 which
provides Sheriff ' s patrol services in the unincorporated area of
the County.
The Board of Supervisors established CSA P-6 shortly after the
passage of Proposition 13 in order to provide a mechanism to fund
the Sheriff ' s Patrol services . In most other counties, these
services are provided by the County General Fund. Having these
services provided by a CSA resulted - inadvertently, we believe -
with the transfer of the property tax. the Board of Supervisors had
allocated to P-61s to the schools . This has the affect of treating
P-6 differently than the fire districts which were exempted from
the transfer and differently from certain other police service
districts, which were likewise exempted from the property tax
transfer.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: ZZ&
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): C/// %�<
ACTION OF BOARD ON hhT1995 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED )" OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN,
ATTESTED MAR 7 1995
Contact: PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
cc: See Page 2 SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BYNDEPUTY
-2-
The Board of Supervisors has been trying since 1992-93 to get P-6
exempted from the property tax transfer so it is treated the same
as the fire districts . To date, we have been unsuccessful although
we have come very close to getting legislation onto the Governor's
Desk. This year, the Board of Supervisors has again included this
issue as a major portion of its 1995 Legislative Program.
Assemblyman Bob Campbell has agreed to carry legislation to
accomplish this exemption, which would provide an additional $6
million a year to the County.
In view of the importance of this matter to the County and the fact
that it is included in the Board' s 1995 Legislative Program, it is
recommended that the Board acknowledge that it is the sponsor of
AB 337 .
cc: County Administrator
Sheriff-Coroner
Auditor-Controller
George Roemer, Senior Deputy County Administrator
Les Spahnn, Heim, Noack, Kelly & Spahnn
Bank of California Center
770 L Street, Suite 960
Sacramento, CA 95814
CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE-1995-96 REGULAR SESSION
ASSEMBLY BILL No. 337
Introduced by Assembly Member Robert Campbell
February 9, 1995
An act to add Section 97.41 to the Revenue and Taxation
Code, relating to local government finance, and declaring the
urgency thereof, to take effect immediately.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 337, as introduced, R. Campbell. Local government
finance: property tax revenue shift: County of Contra Costa.
Existing property tax law requires that, for purposes of
determining property tax revenue allocations in each county
for the 1992-93 and 1993-94 fiscal years, the amounts of
property tax revenue deemed allocated in the prior fiscal year
to the county, cities, and special districts be reduced in
accordance with certain formulas. It requires that the
revenues not allocated to the county, cities, and special
districts as a result of these reductions be transferred to the
Educational Revenue Augmentation Fund in that county for
allocation to school districts, community college districts, and
the county office of education.
This bill would modify these reduction and transfer
provisions by requiring the auditor for the County of Contra
Costa, commencing with the 1995-96 fiscal year, to allocate
property tax revenues to a qualified county service area, as
defined, in that amount that would be determined if the
amount of the reduction and transfer calculated for that
county service area for the 1993-94 fiscal year had been
99
AB 337 — 2 —
reduced
2 —
reduced by a specified amount that was allocated, as provided,
to that county service area for the 1992-93 fiscal year for public
safety services. By imposing new duties in the allocation of
property tax revenues for the 1995-96 fiscal year, this bill
would impose a state-mandated local program.
This bill would also modify these reduction and transfer
provisions by requiring the auditor of any county that contains
a police protection district, as defined, commencing with the
1995-96 fiscal year, to allocate property tax revenues to that
district in those amounts that would be determined if the
amount of the reduction and transfer calculated for that
district in the 1993-94 fiscal year had been decreased by the
amount of the reduction and transfer calculated for that
district in the 1992-93 fiscal year. By imposing new duties upon
local tax officials in the allocation of property tax revenues for
the 1995-96 fiscal year, this bill would impose a
state-mandated local program.
This bill would make legislative findings as to the necessity
of a special statute.
The.California Constitution requires the state to reimburse
local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated
by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for
making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required
by this act for a specified reason.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately
as an urgency statute.
Vote: 2/3. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows.•
1 SECTION 1. Section 97.41 is added to the Revenue
2 and Taxation Code, to read:
3 97.41. (a) (1) Notwithstanding any other provision
4 of this article, commencing with the 1995-96 fiscal year,
5 the auditor for the County of Contra Costa shall, for any
6 qualifying county service area as defined in paragraph
7 (2) , allocate ad valorem property tax revenues to that
8 service area in that amount that would be determined if
99
- 3 — AB 337
1 the amount of the reduction calculated for that county
'.c 2 service area pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 97.3
)f 3 had been reduced by an amount that is equal to the
11 4 amount of revenue allocated to that county service area
5 from the county's Special District s Augmentation Fund
.r 6 for police protection activities in the 1992-93 fiscal year.
is 7 (2) For purposes of this subdivision, "qualifying
.e 8 county service area" means a county service area, the
it 9 governing body of which is the Contra Costa County
.e 10 Board of Supervisors, that is engaged in police protection
Lt 11 activities,as reported to the Controller for inclusion in the
.e 12 1989-90 Edition of the Financial Transactions Report
Lt 13 Concerning Special Districts under the heading of
n 14 "Police Protection and Public Safety."
,r 15 (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of this
a 16 article, commencing with the 1995-96 fiscal year, in any
17 county that contains a police protection district that was
y 18 formed pursuant to the County Service Area Law
19 (Chapter 2.2 (commencing with Section 25210.1) of Part
.e 20 2 of Division 2 of Title 3 of the Government Code) , the
d 21 auditor shall allocate ad valorem property tax revenue to
,r 22 that district in that amount that would be determined if
23 the amount of the reduction calculated for that district
d 24 pursuant to subdivision (c) of Section 97.3 for the 1993-94
25 fiscal year had been decreased by the amount of the
.y 26 reduction calculated for that district pursuant to
27 subdivision (c) of Section 97.2 for the 1992-93 fiscal year.
S. 28 SEC. 2. The Legislature finds and declares that a
29 special law is necessary and that a general law cannot be
30 made applicable within the meaning of Section 16 of
31 Article IV of the California Constitution because of the
32 unique difficulties being suffered by the County of
.e 33 Contra Costa in providing essential public safety services
34 as a result of the application of property tax revenue
n 35 allocation requirements.
r, 36 SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act
Ly 37 pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California
,h 38 Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred
it 39 by a local agency or school district are the result of a
if 40 program for which legislative authority was requested by
99 99
AB 337 — 4 -
1
4 -
1 that local agency or school district, within the meaning of
2 Section 17556 of the Government Code and Section 6 of
3 Article XIII B of the California Constitution.
4 Notwithstanding Section 17580 of the Government
5 Code, unless otherwise specified, the provisions of this act
6 shall become operative on the same date that the act
7 takes effect pursuant to the California Constitution.
8 SEC. 4. This act is an urgency statute necessary for the
9 immediate preservation of the public peace, health, or
10 safety within the meaning of Article IV of the
11 Constitution and shall go into immediate effect. The facts
12 constituting the necessity are:
13 . In order to prevent in a timely fashion the unwarranted
14 and unintended reduction of public safety services in
15 certain counties that would otherwise result from the
16 application of property tax revenue allocation
17 requirements enacted with respect to the 1993-94 fiscal
18 year, it is necessary that this act take effect immediately.
O
99