HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05031994 - 1.44 1,44
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
FROM: Eileen K. Bitten, Acting Director of Personnel Costa
County
DATE: April 27, 1994 aiy
SUBJECT: Status of Report to the Grand Jury On the County Review of the Personnel
Management Regulations Against the Memoranda of Understanding
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)6 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION
Acknowledge receipt of status report on comparison of the provisions of the Personnel
Management Regulations against those contained in the Memoranda of Understanding.
BACKGROUND
The Personnel Department has been requested to provide a status report to the Board of
Supervisors on progress made to date on implementing the recommendations contained in the
Grand Jury's Report on the Contra Costa County Merit System. The information provided
below outlines the steps that have been taken by the Personnel Department.
In accordance with the recommendations contained in the Grand Jury's report on the Merit
System, Personnel Department staff have been comparing the Personnel Management
Regulations against the various Memoranda of Understanding to identify differences in
language between the two documents. Once substantive differences are identified, changes
can be initiated in either the Memoranda of Understanding or Personnel Management
Regulations, subject to meet and confer requirements.
At the time that this review was undertaken, it was believed that it would be a relatively
simple, straightforward task to identify the differences that existed in wording between the
provisions in the Personnel Management Regulations and those contained in the Memoranda
of Understanding. However, in order to make this comparison, each Memorandum of
Understanding had to be reviewed to determine which provisions contained language that
pertained to any of the provisions covered in the Personnel Management Regulations. Once
this language was identified, it had to be compared, word for word, so that any differences
between the Personnel Management Regulations and the Memorandum of Understanding could
be ascertained. This task has proven to be a very labor intensive effort for a number of
reasons. The Personnel Management Regulations contain 53 pages of regulations while each
of the Memoranda of Understanding range from 50 to 100 pages in length. The location of the
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: L""d--w
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE (S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON MAY R 1994
_ APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ASSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CONTACT: Bill Ray (6-4064) -MAY 3
cc: Personnel Department ATTESTED
County Administrator PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
County Counsel SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
M382 (10/88)
BY -�(f_�/J ^ DEPUTY
Board of Supervisors Page 2 April 27, 1994
provisions in the Memoranda of Understanding that pertain to the provisions in the Personnel
Management Regulations vary between the Memoranda of Understanding making them difficult
to find. Moreover, parts of provisions found in the Personnel Management Regulations may
be found in the various sections of the Memoranda of Understanding. Finally, the location
of the sections in the Memoranda of Understanding that deal with provisions contained in the
Personnel Management Regulations differs between the Memoranda of Understanding.
A considerable amount of staff time and resources have been expended on this effort. The
differences in wording between the provisions found in Personnel Management Regulations
and the Memoranda of Understanding have been entered into a database so that the
information can be generated in a format which facilitates the comparative analysis. All of
the Memoranda of Understanding have now been compared against the Personnel Management
Regulations.
FUTURE ACTIONS TO COMPLETE THE PROJECT
• Work completed to date is being checked and any necessary corrections are being made.
• Substantive differences in language between the provisions contained in the Personnel
Management Regulations and the Memoranda of Understanding are being identified.
• Recommendations will be made as to whether the Personnel Management Regulations or
Memoranda of Understanding should be changed once the substantive differences are
identified.
• Meet and confer sessions will need to be held with all employee organizations before any
changes can be initiated.
Staff in the Personnel Department are continuing to work on this project while at the same
time maintaining our efforts with regard to our responsibilities to provide personnel services
to the operating departments, employees and the public.