Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05241994 - 1.15 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD,PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: May 241994 SUBJECT: LEASE AGREEMENT WITH EXS, INC., d.b.a. CAFFINO AND CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FOR A GOURMET COFFEE/ESPRESSO BUSINESS AT BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the Public Works Director, or his designee, to execute on behalf of the County, a Lease Agreement between EXS, Inc., d.b.a. Caffino and County for a gourmet coffee/espresso business located on unincorporated land owned by Contra Costa County at 2301 Meridian Park Blvd., Concord,California, 94520, Concord area.. II. Financial Impact: Beginning June 1, 1994,monthly rent of$1,545.00 will be added to the Airport Enterprise Fund.. III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: Project provides for a five-year lease with EXS, Inc., for a 150 sq. ft. drive-thru coffee shop on Buchanan Field Airport. This location was identified as the site for a 10,000 sq. ft. full-service walk-in restaurant in the EIR prepared for the Airport Master Plan adopted by the Board of Supervisors September 1990. This project was reviewed for conformity with CEQA in April 1994 by P&D Aviation, and it was determined that the proposed project and project impacts fell within the scope of the Airport Master Plan EIR. Staff concludes that the attached addendum complies with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines. The basis for this determination is in the fact that the proposed restaurant is much smaller, and would result in a less intensive use of the' site than the proposed restaurant studied in the EIR. Continued on Attachment: SIGNATUR _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ICECOMMENDA7_011 OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE _OTHER r SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD 1,7APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED_4_OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: HEW:TW:rs I hereby certify that this is a true and correctcopy of c: 11t4.doc an action taken and entered on the minutes of the / Board of Supenij ors on the date shown. ATTESTED: &bu 1!j�, /9 t`� Orig.Div.:Airport-Contact:H.Wight(510)646-5722 PHIL BATCHEI R.Cierk of the Boar cc: County Administrator of Supervisors and County Administrator Public Works Director By. c Deputy Public Works Accounting �---- -- . Auditor/Controller Aviation Advisory Committee Federal Aviation Administration EXS,Inc. .-- ' MRY 9 194 15:59 FROM PD SFO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE . 003 l r/ AIyALySIS OF pRopOSM.ESPHM0 P•SS DJ 'E-1 U "SrAURAM and ADDFADU I'ro An ORT A"SI%R PLAN Em At lBucbamn Meld AYrprt Submito C40ta Couaty Airports Pry by P�c7CA'l�eau�aga+�s 400 Sri.*M Camino ReAl Suite Soo San matw, CA 94402 (425)343-OIQS i MAY 9 194 16: 00 FROM PD SFO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE . 004 �. EMODIQCUON This mport presents an analysis of the potential environmental impscb of a proposed "drive thru- commercial retall specialty coffeelespresso shop at Buanan Hield. The technisad data and other ini menation in this report, or as inoorporated herein by refer- mce, are to document and suet the conclusion that the proposed project would not have any significant adve m on the eutvironm ent, and as a consequence, "re- quire the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental enviaai impact report. In accordance with Section 15164 et seq., of the CFQA Guidelines, this report represents an addendum to the Final Elft prepared for the Buchanan Field "Airport Mester Plan Update,.Airport Access Plan Ane adment, elf Cine Lease; General Plan. Aro m,eut, Circulation Irnprovenmts and Related Implementation.*1 ts. uz&Lzw8 marl OF PRrROJE :T Tlae following sectims set forth the nature and extent of the proposed project; 1. 1Pxat �. ti The proposed�lett is iodated on owned by Contra Costa County at Bu an Field Airport at the intersdction of Concord Avenue and Meridian.Park Boulevard. Buchanan.Field AarpaA is located on approximately 500 acres of unin- corporated nityc:orporated territory in north ccnhul Contra Costa County. The proposed project is at the southerly egad of the airpoft between the Buchanan T�elds Calf Course and Sher- at=HOW(see attached Project Location A69). Concord Avenue•scp®rates the unin- corporated airport site from the adjoining City of Concord. 2, 1C'Yerre014Dal himumfim a, KWt=d Address caf DMT or Project S,gnsor. The proposed project is - sored by'ft'County of C ontrat Costa, as owner and operator of Buchanan Field Airport (the proposed less). The address of she sponsor is: Conga Costa County Airports 550 W Ri&Drive Ccrn+oard, CA 44520 b- Address, The"osed project wdl be located on the Bucham Field Air- pan. The project address is.thd same as above. r (�rrro,t M1irg-maats and Other istthlir. Apmry AnnrMalir Reouired for r Prdect. i. s clots Cosec Co . The County has dctrrmivad Ilml dw,lumu of IM4 aAd construction of a re n stare on the site is a project under CRQ►A. A draft E1R for the Airpolrt Master Plan and related projexds(utcluding,a WOPO ed restaunmt OR the project 1. Coot=Cotta Cmmty,.DWwftmwt of Public Woda, "Fiml Eri.�.'4i=xmW kgNxt RO- p "womeffial As t(EMEA), ek .t M_W ftLFI,.LTA CiwWafiVLb=Wv=watL lir- part A.Flan Aawdomt,Golf mose I..ease u ,Cc=W Plea AWMdMwt amd R mentation for Burhenne Fief," The]Gush MJEA was cesufied by the Cocotte Cowft Cumty lt4=t8 of supervisms is Dmobw 1990 and the Air M Mir Play was sab 9 gPWOd- 1 �tAY q ' 94 16:01 FROM PD SFO T4 CONTRA CCR PAGE.005 sine)was prepa�a�+x�amra tya�. iuc s.�,was c:uc:u�aetu l�ti pui:�c��ugraaLp m� view and omnment and was subsequently cerdfed by the Comm Costa Cbimty Burd of Supervisors in 1990. The Final EM is hereby incorporated by reference as the basis for approval of this project, and any other subsequent actions as may be required. CBQA Ci►Aidallnm require thitk the City prepare an addendum to the existing Final SIR. However, the addendum.-need not be circulated for public renew but can be included.ia or attached to ft.find E R.Z 711 Dora f',,Wa �Msift Perm on s. The Ailgwt Master Plan identified certain parcels of land on the airport that were not -.1-11 - t- 11 , I If ii e I 111 in Iuill on Poses. TW pwPosed use is c nistent with the County's Ge=al Plan and Airport Master.Platt ER in this regard-in,that the priest sire is designated for "airport con merciar uses. The site was rwommeaded for a golf"pro-shop' and restaurant. Since the EIR anal Airpwt Maser Pln were approwd, a new po4W bas been developed on the site,but the anUcipat+ed stand alone restaurant was never construed. The pra- ponod prWoot nopnoawfr a much less intunvive nia rot the site than was anWpAW is tk Air VW Tex 1Pba fit. 4. tAie The proposed prat includca'�,the development of.239 acres of land at the northwest corner,of the interv=t=of Conc eW Avenue and Park Medan Bold d, The p perry is to be leased to a private developer(EXS, line.) for the construe- tiara of 15' x10' dnve thm coffee shop. The proposed structame will be 13' high and samtiar to a "FotoomaC but(std attached site plan and elevations)_ The proposed Inse term is five years. Site p oa will include grading aid paving of access and parldng areas as depicted t atter site.plan. 'i"ha ou-site pax�ng sPaoes will be provided for edgAeycCs- Tfte pmgc�sed cr►�ai stere vb►ilI! located in the cwter of the Iot and is de- signetl to am�nod$ dtive�Eltru customers. Cu�stoiners are expected to remain on the 3lte Ai10�14}re to t�ralinait�e.4: Site accaesg/egress is froth the sac at the end of Fatrk$� A twedt foot wide strip frvntwg Contra Costa Avenue has been re- served for i the 'tttuxe g of this screed Utilities required to serve-the proposed use include water and eleehicity, which are available.m the area: We baf�om&a ilities are.anticipated at#his time. tither pro- posed improvements will Wude security lighting, a trash enclosure, and lmtadscaping. 2. State CEQAGurdsihpe -Smll a 15164. 2 D4n1.t ❑ 104 . 1 c l ❑❑ rnnti nD CFO TO CO11Tnn cc_n nncc _ sac C. FNVIROA?dEN lCAL Cdr Buchanan Pild and the area immediately adiamut to the proposed parried c*inp=the areas directly affected by the project, and as such wnstitute the project's environmental setting. i. As noted above, the pressed prajed will be located on existing Airport property. The am ummunding the project is,almost comptetely urbanized.ant costing land cases in the vicinity of the pray inc ude the Sheraton Hotel to the north, the gulf pro-shop and golf courses to the southwest, and a acture of csm merc iallof lases tci the east Md southeast affaas ConcoTd Avenue (see attached land use map). Thm are no nearby res%t=W areas or areas having rare or unique environmental qualities that would be adversely Wed,by the proposed project. 2. As noted abovrc, the proposed project is consistent with the Contra Costa Cvugq Gen- eral plan, local Zuni]*and ft Airpmj Ala=Plan. As part of the approved A>�d Master.Pian land.we deligation of"airport con atl,0 the proposed pro] also be con=tent wI&the(:ostia.Caste County Airport Land'Use Comumsslon's Air- port Land Use Poficy]Pian. D. DISCUSSION.OF POTENTIAL E19VIRONMENTAL EFF=TS Jim section sets forth an over ww of potential project,impacts and discusses dwar po- teaW to crew ignificant adverse environmental impacts: i. Earth IL The propmedj, ct wHI nal molt in unstable earth conditions or in significant comes to gwlepc ssabstru+ctu s. No sgificant impact. b. The proposed prcdea wiil..mquire same grading and this in turn will re,uta in khml- ized man,-ftlamment,.gx8paction and overcovering of site soils for puepo�sea of vonstruc&g the proposed:bait and parldng lot. LiessAhan-significant impact. c. Guding for the project will result ju only minor lorali;=d changes in topography and ground =fwe AUef features. less t -sign fimt impact. d. BeMuse of the lam Uzcd hors sof the pruica site and the limited area iR which oon- structioa wit take place, the proposed paeject will not result in the destruction, cov- criag,or mocHcadon of any.unique geology or physical features. No si t im- Fact C. only minor dKwt term wind and water erosion may take place during ccnsbu:tim. No sipffi tat iagact. f. Given its sit smle,it Is'highly unlikely that the project will result in siltation, de- pontion pr=6=significant enough to anvdafy any local me=channel or lake bed. No sfguificant impact. 3 - MRY 9 ' 94 16: 02 FROM PD SFO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE . 007 g. No portion of rile"posed project site is honied within anAlquist-Priola Act Spe- cial.Studies Zane. It is unlibeiyy that the proposed ect will result in the exposure of people or property to geologic hazards such as�quaJ=, landslide, mudslides, or ground Mune. 140 significant impact. 2. Ak a. Tlm primary imld of the propos Project on regional air quality will be from motor vehicle pollutant emissions. These emissions will be substantially less than dw asa med in the Wxyva-rabTwced Airport Master Plan lam. Less-than-significant im- pact- b. The paposed pared will not result in the creatioa of Objectionable odors: Such odors as ffiay be creaked am stent with other'uses in the area (e.g., other restau- rants "W faud.shops). No dgnifimt impact. c. The proposed project will not result in the alteration of air movement, mwgum or temperature, or any.change in climes. No significant impact. d. The pimposed pgiW will not expose area relents to severe air pollution condi tions. No significant Wit. 3, Wt .a. The primed prujoa will wt Maori in changes in currents, or the cm=or di rection of wamr,movenmentL No significant impact. b. T'ie pwpowd project will am result in sipifimt changes to absorption.rakes, drainage patterns, and the raw and amounts of surface water runoff. However, addi- ttorW pavimi and lot coverage will result in localized impervious conditions causing minor Les&4mn-sl&If cant impact. a. The proposedproject Wild alter the course or flaw of floodwaters. No signifi cant impact. d. The proposed project will.not change the amount of surfam amber is any outer body. He:scant impact. e. The prposed preyed will not result in any significant discharge into surfim waters, or in any altemtaon to surface ver quality. No significmt impact. L Jim pressed project will,wt alter the direction or rate of Raw of ground water No significant impm. g ' Proposed prc►ject.v�l not change the quantity of ground waters through eW= direct additions or wfthdrawah� or through the mtercTtion of an aquifer. No sig- nificant impact. h. Theproject w l*M result in any significam reduction to.the amount of water odwproposed xwm available for public water supplies. No significant ImPwL L The propead projea will be located on Airport property in an area least subject to potentmi flooding and is rant vndun a designated flood hazard area. No SIgnIficant xm- PaCL 4 - MAY 9 '94 16: 03 FROM PD SFO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE , 000 j. The purposed poect will riot have any cffect ors surfam thermal springs, since such Springs do not exist In tbe.pxoject area. No significant int. 4_ JjWt Life a. Tfw projW site cmic tly exists in a rough-graded state, and as such does not pro- vide gpuficaut habitat for plant or animal spedes. No significant impact b. Them am no federally di*nated rade or endangered plants on.thepraaj'ect site ao- eordzRg to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's lest of"Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants." No 9gnt impact. c. The proposed.project will,resch in the introduction of anew plant spccies into the arca as a resait of project.landsoaping, but these plants will be consistettt with approved laa,dsc maters for the atearul , will not represent esotmic or other Vocies whiff v� result in an mountable harrier to the normal r+epleWA meat of existing species in the area. No significant it*wt. d. The proposed plrodect will not result in the reduction of=e4p devoted to the pto- ductim of Agricul:u'ai crops. ''So*pdficaut impact. 5. a. It is umlikAY that the Pupps e d project would result in any s_4nifimt ef€ect on the nummb=or variety of animal species in the area, particularly since the area is largely developed already and the site does not represent suitable habitat. No sigini&ant im- p b. Thm are no docaamtented.pare or mWangered animal specks inbabiting the pwposed Project site. Na int uhpact. c, 'I a pmapased pmject weWd not result in the intnducWn of'now species of animds into the area, or 4Wdy impair the replenishmnt of existing sped. No signifi- cant impac't. d. ne Amposed project site sloes not serve as habitat to any vertebrate animals. No slgi rkunt impact. fi_ tn a. The panpased �je a wiY. result in only short term increases in noise levels due to Construction acti,vstieL The=bient noise level will not be incma� as a r+esalt of any Project acl�vities. Pica signiii�c�t�t impact. b. ne;yropoa d project wiU not result in the exposure of people to severe noise mels. No ggp fiicant impam 7. ,�and Gim a. The proposed pWject will result in new hepta cm sd ms froin the structure and mu- zity IWWng. Bec-usroe of the r pmximity to the Airport runway cm1 , 1nJed ang I ,Mbe designed to be t�ncpatible with airport operatiws('zee,, no director un- sheeided bright Aghts or&re). rw skWflcani#mpw:t. 5 MAY 9. ' 94 19:20. FROM PD SFC? TO CONTRA CCR PAGE- 001 b. The proposed project will not ned.iuce star suOght of adjacwt propaties dne to shade 8tidr~l sha". No s4 ificaat impact. g- � a. no pfd p viect is c onsastent with the planned land use for the site. No sig_ nifieant impact. 9. NdUw a. Becaum of its scale, the proposed-project will not result in a signific nt i=m w in the use of natural reams. leo significant impatct. b. The proposed erect will wt result in the depletion of any non-rewwabte re- trces. No Signif1cwt impacts. 10. a. The prgmed pivjm wM not result in the risk of a iosioa or the rehcae of hu- amus,subswncaes 3n the event of an accident or mergency upwt. So signifwant im- PWL at. Ilia ploposet3 project.willr4t require the relocation or disprlacment of any pins. NO sign><faa ant imp b. The pt-0-posed prw4egt w�haat result in any changes to the+disttribution, density, or 9wwth rate of 66 hul�an papulation of the area_ No significant impam 12. a. The proposed progeet wM.am affect emsting housing, suck, or cmde a demand for additional.bousing, W dgnsfmt impact. b. 'qvw 1�,u�p�M wall otat hn-va an impuat on.the w2ibbility of rtrnbl,, Wising in the cotw ty, we ooftc mt impact. c. The sed `est will not result in the demolition, rolocatiapn or remodeling of range aaf I3-£1 in the futrue.� Since#hen, comma passeanger service at the aa�= S, v 11.-1-d.-E MAY 9 194 16: 22 FROM PD SFO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE . 001 port has ceased and the propxwed project represents a less intense restaurant use. As a result, the potential impact of the project Would be less-than-significant b. As a predominady die-fru restaurant, the proposed PieJect would not have any siignifiemt effects on fisting parking facilities, car generate sigrdfieat demand for now parlmng. the Proposed project provide adequate on-sate circWatim and parking for its needs. No significant impact. c. The proposed project would have no significant impact an existing transportation systems. d. Thi prop*W project-will not significantly alter existing p mans for the movement of people andfor goods, given.ti'tat it is adjacent to an mstmg street system. No sig- t impar-L e. The prupnsed project will not alter waterborne, rail or air traffic. No significant impact. L The proposed project will not result in a meas=ble incased hamrd to motor vehi- cles,bicyclists, or pedestrians.. No significant impact. 14. Foblic Seri a. The pt ed prqect will not require new or altered fire prote�cm services. No signifrt ant Impact, b. The proposed pn4eet will-hot have an effect on, or result in the need for additional police smic es. Nor sigWficalnt•impact. G. The proposed WW.have no effect on local schools. No significant impact. d. The proposed projed.will-t1;rat effect any parks or recreational areas. No significant impart. e..��((TheeTproposed project will snot require maintenance and uPbwp by any Fu c qg� 1 je& No ftafficaza impact. F. rnor. f%%q nmmht lh% �t antedaiffla haffi.hien�i eut'ne.ele'ei inbqeeat,ub eek leer 6n3Yt6iite4ledIL Aid- Vices. propprUj@ C WM Ux re"re alieralion or addidom w, or ttie mend for now qty syst- as, cl-adang:sphere of m#lure or airport bouuladary changes, wit , sewer, flood control or solid waste facslitles. No significant impact. 15. a. The ptosed project mill:riot res&in the use of e=eptional amounts of fuel or en- . No siert impact. Igg Thr Prom�will 17th result in ;%0ficant inermad algid ort cxist en- �11■�4 MAY 9 194 16: 23 FROM PD SFOs TO CONTRA CCR PRGE . 002 i I 16. UIE ffim I a. The Vivposed project will not,result in a need for new power or natural gas systems. No S*Wfi nt impact. b. The proposed project Will sort require new or altered communicaticros systcros_ NO sant impact- c.. Thep uposed pt+oject will not require new orsignificantly modified water systems. No sipificant impact. J d. The pmpcose+d project will not require sewer or septic tank amnections. No Opifi cant impact. C. The proposed pivqect will not require alterations to existing solid waste disposal sites or f roes: N6*nafiearat impact. 17. ��ealth a_ The proposed project will trot result in the mon of any health hazard or potenW health hazard: No significant.mnpacL b. The proposed projout ,'not result in the exposure of people to polenUal kwalth baud:, No ft fk ant ice. a. The proposed project will oot obstruct any public scenic vista or view. No siOfi- QVA impact. b. The proposed.project wW'not create aro aesthetically offensitvc site open to public view, or produce significant new light Qr glare, No significant impact. c. The proposed project does not have the potential to destroy a stand of fids, a rock outcropping or odkr locally r*gnized desirable aesthetic natural,feature. ND slp i- carat int. d. The pwPosed pvr jcct should not result in any negative aestbetic Vis. No me- nificant rmpaot. 19. s. The proposed prstject will Put impact the quality or.quaratity of c)isiirag recaeauanal oppartuiddes. Nostgnifit nt aratpact. 20. CaftnUmmues a. The proposed,erect should not result in the alteration or destruction of a prda"is- toric or histo ambaeolegical site. No significant impact b. The project vvM not result in an pby"changes to cultural wzourc a s,. There are no neafy registered histo.sem t would be adversely impacted by the proposed project; No sIvdf=nt in%%ct. 8 MAY 9 '94 16: 24 FROM PD SFO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE . G_1F c- 710 XoPOSed Pyqea dog not have the pial to cause a physical chaff which would affect unique ethnic or cultural values. No significant impact, d• The Proposed project:will M restrict=sting religious or sacred ups. No signiffi- eattt impact. E. GROWTH UG E"AC TS In and of itWf, else propio ted,project wt`n not directly induce gam. Growth in the area will Carne about as a result of on-and off-airport development in the p3'o- je+ct arm F. AEMGATItONOFENAiRONM7KNi—ALFYFECTS Given that no significant:envirminental impacts are anticipted as a remit of project approval and ii4plemmtation no specific mitigation is required for the project. G. CCt Ti TCrY TM•IMTING ZONING, PLANS, AND OTUM Imo? The p�pwjert is cont Wath approved local zoning and land use plans, in- cluding the+County Genezal'Pliin and Airport Master Plan- No amendment to the Air- port lay"Paan will be required. E. FMINGS Eased on tha inf=udon der-loped as part of the project description,and from the Aint'Master Fbn Eli as in tmpmated herein.by refer, the following firAngs am a. The pv4x*W ' don not have the potential to degrade the quality of the envi ronmen, axstantiagy reduce ft habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife sir=s population tcs drop below self-sustaining levels, or.restrict the rmge of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of Califomia has•- twy or prehistory. b- The proposi6d project dries..=bave the potential to achieve sbmt:tm envargn- nzental goals to the disadvaraage of long-term environmental goals. c. The prWosed project does.nom,have the potential f*r impacts wbich are i"viduaUy hudwd,but,cttt u4svely considerable. d. TMepvposedpiviect doftMt have the,potential for causing environmental imps&= which will cause substantial adverse impacts,on human beings,either directly or hada recay. c Thci�.=MasW Plaut EIR.adequately assessed the pote tial onviron- mental mpacts of p project and no further environmental review rand. as war- MAY 9 ' 94 16: 25 FROM PD 5FO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE . 004 L SNS PREPARING OR PARTICIPATING IN THE PREPARA1110N OF THE SAY ne fc Uowi tg individuals participated in the preparation of the study. Mr. l3arold E. Vftht, Manger©f Airp= Ms. Tracy WAlims, Assistant Manager Mr. Barb Drake,,Senior Planner P{4 Y?�echnAWN Mr.Vic} R. McClintock, AICP, Assoc. V-P. Mr. KICH Corda,Ph== 10 MAY 9 194 16,25 FROM PD SFO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE . 005 PzajwA Lomf=MV it • PlAy 9 ' 94 1.6: 26 FROM .PD SFO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE.006 Attachumt 2 Site Fiala and S[evadow MAY 9 ' 94 16: 26 FROM PD SFO TO CONTRA CCR PAGE . 007 Amehment 3 Vicinity Land Ilse Map 13 TOTAL PAGE . 007 **