Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05101994 - 1.9 4 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on May 10, 1994 , by the following vote: AYES: SUPERVISORS SMITH. BISHOP, DESAULNIER, TORLAKSON AND POWERS: NOES: NONE ABS ENT: NONE ABSTAIN: NONE SUBJECT: In the matter of approving ) Settlement Stipulation in ) Williams v. Contra Costa ) County, Superior Court ) action No. C93-01922 ) Upon the recommendation of the County Counsel and the Social Service Director, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the Settlement Stipulation between counsel for the plaintiffs and County Counsel on behalf of the defendants dated April 29 , 1994 , in Leroy Williams et al. , v. Contra Costa County, et al. , Superior Court action No. C93- 01922, is approved. 1 hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on the date shown. ATTESTED: `__3L4 a. 1 -C) , I q�j / PHIL BATCHELC ,Clerk 6f the Board Of Supervisors and County Administrator By l a Q .e�, ) Deputv Orig. Dept: County Counsel cc: County Administrator Social Service Director AWW/f jb fb5c a:\aww\b0\wi11iams.stp 19 COUNTY COUNSEL'S OFFICE CONTRA COSTA COUNTY MARTINE4 CALIFORNIA Date: May 2, 1994 To: . Phil Batchelor, County Administrator From: Victor J. Westman, County Counsel By: Arthur W. Walenta, Assistant County Counsel Re: Williams v. County Enclosed is the stipulated settlement in the Williams case, and a proposed Board of Supervisors ' order approving it. AWW:fjb cc: Perfecto Villarreal, Social Service Director fb5c a:\aww\memos\wi11iams.stp 1 Ralph Murphy, #104140 Philip J. Bertenthal, #108762 2 Contra Costa Legal Services Foundation 3 1017 Macdonald Avenue, P.O. Box 2289 4 Richmond CA 94802 Telephone: (510) 233-9954 5 Tom Weathered, #115207 6 202 Louisburg San Francisco CA 94112 7 Telephone (415) 333-9714 8 Robert Newman, #86534 Western Center on Law and 9 Poverty 3701 Wilshire Blvd., Ste. 208 10 Los Angeles CA 90010 Telephone: (213) 487-7211 11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs 12 Arthur W. Walenta, SB 31482 13 Assistant County Counsel Victor J. Westman, SB 34044 14 County Counsel Contra Costa County 15 County Administration Bldg. 651 Pine Street, 9th Flr. 16 Martinez CA 94553 Telephone: (510) 646-2070 17 Attorneys for Defendants 18 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA 19 COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA 20 21 LEROY WILLIAMS, et al. , ) CASE NO. : C93-01922 22 Plaintiffs, ) SETTLEMENT STIPULATION 23 V. ) 24 CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, et al. , ) 25 Defendants. ) 26 27 In full and final settlement of the above-entitled action, 28 plaintiffs and defendants, by their respective counsel of record, 1 stipulate as follows: 2 1. The terms of this stipulation are subject to approval by 3 the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, and shall be 4 incorporated into a proposed judgment which may be signed and file 5 by the court after notice to the class and hearing and approval by 6 the court. 7 I. Terms previously agreed to in the . Interim Stipulation 8 2'. In applying the provisions for aid discontinuance or 9 sanction under Welfare and Institutions Code Section 17001.5, the 10 Contra Costa County ("The County") Department of Social Services 11 ("The Department") shall be responsible for showing that a failure 12 or refusal to comply with General Assistance ("GA") program 13 requirements occurred. 14 3. The GA recipient who alleges that he or she has good 15 cause for his or her failure or refusal to comply with program 16 requirements shall be responsible for showing that good cause 17 exists. 18 4. The Board of Supervisors' ("The Board") GA standards and 19 the Department Manual shall not contain provisions regarding burden 20 of proof on sanction issues. 21 5. The Department Manual shall provide that there is no 22 presumption that failure to follow program requirements is willful 23 or non-willful. 24 6. Neither the Board GA standards nor the Department Manual 25 shall contain the presumptions stated in Evidence Code §664 and 26 §665. 27 7. The Department shall have no obligation to determine 28 willfulness or lack of good cause before sending warning notices, -2- 1 failure to comply notices, or notices of proposed action. 2 8. The Department Manual shall provide that non-willfulness 3 is good cause for a failure or refusal to comply with a program 4 requirement, subject to rebuttal by the Department. 5 9. The Department Manual shall provide that, twice only, 6 negligence shall be good cause, and that thereafter negligence 7 shall be subject to evaluation. 8 10. The Department Manual shall provide that a failure or 9 refusal to comply with a program requirement which occurs on to account of an individual's disability shall be for good cause. 11 11. The following procedure shall be followed by the 12 Department when determining whether to give notice of a proposed 13 sanction or discontinuance for failure to comply with a GA program 14 requirement: 15 a) The first failure or refusal to comply with a program 16 requirement shall result in a warning notice in lieu of a sanction. 17 This warning notice shall advise of the failure to comply and stat 18 that: 19 i) Future failures to comply without good cause shall 20 be subject to sanction. 21 ii) The Department shall clear the warning notice if 22 the recipient contacts the responsible staff person within ten days 23 and shows good cause. Not more than twice, the Department shall 24 clear a warning notice if the recipient arranges for a new 25 opportunity to comply with the program requirement and complies 26 with the program requirement. 27 iii) If the warning notice is cleared, the recipient 28 shall be entitled to another warning notice in lieu of sanction for -3- 1 the next failure to comply. 2 b) Once a recipient has an uncleared warning notice, furthe 3 failures to comply will be subject to sanction, but before a notice 4 of proposed action may be sent, a failure to comply notice will be 5 given, offering the recipient the opportunity within ten days to 6 contact the responsible staff person and clear the noncompliance b 7 showing good cause. 8 c) If one year has elapsed since the end of the last period 9 of discontinuance or ineligibility, without the initiation of 10 procedures for a failure to comply with a program requirement which it result in sanctions, the process for imposing sanctions shall begin 12 again as stated in subparagraph (a) above. 13 12. On the date that is the earlier of March 1, 1995 or the 14 day the Department has made its proposed automation plan fully 15 operational, the Department shall disregard any previous failures 16 or sanctions for all GA recipients, and begin the procedure stated 17 in (11) (a) above. 18 II. Notices and information concerning sanctions 19 13. The warning notice, the failure to comply notice, the 20 notice of action discontinuing aid or imposing a sanction because 21 of a failure to comply with program requirements, and any 22 informational documents on GA program requirements routinely 23 provided to recipients shall be created or modified to comply with 24 the judgment. Notices shall clearly advise GA recipients of their 25 rights. 26 III. Persons with Disabilities 27 14. For purposes of this stipulation and the judgment, 28 "disability" shall mean those disabilities covered by the Americans -4- 1 with Disabilities Act ("ADA") . In order to identify GA applicants 2 and recipients with disabilities, the Department shall take the 3 following actions. When information received or behavior observed 4 by Social Service Department staff indicates a possible mental 5 disability, the GA applicant or recipient shall be referred with 6 reasonable promptness for a competent evaluation concerning such 7 disability; but staff will have no duty to observe behavior for 8 disability. The County will study the feasibility of administering 9 to all GA applicants a recognized mental disability screening 10 device and will implement such screening if it can be carried out 11 in conjunction with the SASSI screening test without substantial 12 additional cost. If the results of the test indicate a possible 13 mental disability, the individual shall be referred for a competent 14 evaluation concerning such disability. The evaluation shall 15 include a form, to be reviewed by plaintiffs' counsel prior to 16 being put into use, evaluating the individual's abilities to 17 fulfill the following recipient's responsibilities: 18 a) Ability to understand requirement that recipient appear 19 at scheduled places and times for program activities; 20 b) Ability to use available public transportation to reach 21 places for program activities; 22 c) Ability to participate in simple work assignments under 23 direction; 24 d) Ability to explain failure to comply with a program 25 requirement; 26 e) Ability to keep appointments at scheduled places and 27 times for program activities; 28 f) Ability to obtain information and mail or submit to the -5- 1 Department forms such as the monthly reporting form and forms 2 requesting eligibility information and other required documents. 3 The evaluation results shall be made a part of the 4 individual's record, and the record shall be flagged and program 5 requirements shall be modified or waived, in whole or in part, as 6 necessary, to make a reasonable accommodation for the individual's 7 disability when a mental disability sufficient to affect the 8 application of general assistance program requirements is found. 9 All recipients who have been referred by the Social Services 10 Department for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) coverage and 11 whose claim is, in major part, based on a mental disability shall 12 be considered mentally disabled to the extent required for a 13 flagged case record. As soon as the Department has the capacity t 14 do so, and in no event latter than March 1, 1995, recipients with 15 flagged records shall also have their computer file coded to show a 16 mental disability. 17 15. When a general assistant applicant or recipient is found 18 to be physically disabled, the disability status shall be made a 19 part of the person's record, and the record shall be flagged and 20 program requirements shall be modified or waived, in whole or in 21 part, as necessary, to make a reasonable accommodation for the 22 individual's disability when a physical disability sufficient to 23 affect the application of general assistance program requirements 24 is found. As soon as the Department has the capacity to do so, an 25 in no event latter than March 1, 1995, recipients with flagged I i 26 records shall also have their computer file coded to show a 27 disability. 28 16. Flagged mental or physical disabilities shall be -6- 1 1 considered whenever disabled persons fail or refuse to follow i 2 general assistance program requirements. Prior to 'the issuance of 3 one of the notices listed in paragraph "11", a flagged case record 4 shall be reviewed. If it appears from the case record that a 5 failure or refusal likely occurred on account of the disability, 6 the recipient shall not be sanctioned. A copy of all notices of 7 actions sent to individuals with case records flagged for mental 8 disabilities discontinuing aid or imposing a sanction for program 9 requirements shall be sent at the same time to Contra Costa Legal 10 Services Foundation. The sending of the notice to Contra Costa 11 Legal Services Foundation shall not be construed as a) providing 12 constructive notice to the individual or b) imposing a 13 responsibility by that organization to represent the individual or 14 take any action on the individual's behalf. 15 IV. Implementation of Sanction Policies 16 17. Within 90 days after the filing of the judgment the 17 County shall submit to the Defendants' counsel for review drafts of 18 Board orders, Manual Change Letters and other documents 19 implementing the judgment. Prior approval of the documents by 20 plaintiffs shall not be required. However, plaintiffs may move to 21 enforce the judgment if they believe the documents do not comply 22 with the judgment. 23 18. With regard to failure to follow program requirements, 24 "Willful" shall be defined to mean a purpose or willingness to 25 commit the act or make the omission in question, and does not 26 require an intent to violate program requirements. "Nonwillful" 27 shall be defined to mean an accidental or involuntary violation of 28 a program requirement or an intentional act not reasonably -7- 1 foreseeable to result in violation of a requirement. Conduct which 2 meets the definition of "non-willful" shall not be considered to b 3 "willful". 4 19. The Department shall consider the ten days to establish 5 good cause or request an opportunity to comply to begin on the date 6 of the notice or the date the notice's envelope is postmarked, 7 whichever is later. If the tenth day falls on a non-business day, 8 the individual shall have through the next business day to 9 establish good cause or request an opportunity to comply. A timely 10 request to establish good cause or to receive an opportunity to 11 comply may be made by telephone message to a responsible staff 12 person's voice mail or to any person receiving the worker's 13 telephone calls. In requesting an opportunity to comply, the 14 recipient must only request the opportunity within the ten days an 15 comply at the earliest available opportunity. 16 20. A recipient's attempt to establish good cause shall be '17 recorded in the case record. Up to ten days before the first 18 appeal hearing date, a recipient may request a good cause 19 determination from the responsible staff person if such 20 determination has not already been made. 21 21. The general assistance standards and Social Services 22 Department Manual provisions shall provide that aid discontinuance 23 or sanctions may be imposed where an individual fails or refuses 24 without good cause to comply with a program requirement. 25 22. The provisions of the judgment shall be implemented by 26 the Department no later than September 1, 1994. By October 1, 1994 27 the Department shall provide to its staff training on the changes 28 in policies set forth in the judgment. -8- 1 23. For the effective period of the judgment, the County 2 shall continue to collect the data it currently collects for its 3 Case Data System concerning GA discontinuances and rescinds and the 4 data it collects for the CAOGA. . .XLS reports. In addition, as soon 5 as the County has implemented the appropriate codes and no latter 6 than July 1, 1995, the County shall collect on a monthly basis the 7 number of persons referred as a result of mental disability 8 screening for a mental disability evaluation, the number of cases 9 coded as physically or mentally disabled and the number of 10 sanctions imposed on mentally disabled and non-mentally disabled 11 persons each month and prepare a quarterly report on this data. 12 Copies of all of these reports shall be provided to Contra Costa 13 Legal Services Foundation on a quarterly basis. 14 24. The County shall notify Contra Costa Legal Services 15 Foundation and provide copies of any changes in policies or 16 documents concerning GA sanctions at least seven days prior to the 17 issuance of those policies or documents, or action by the Board of 18 Supervisors. 19 V. Effect of the Judgment 20 25. Nothing in this stipulation or the judgment shall 21 prevent the County's GA sanction policies from being modified 22 consistently with this stipulation or the judgment or from being 23 modified in accordance with new or amended statutes. 24 26. The provisions of the judgment shall only be effective 25 for six years after the filing of the judgment; thereafter, the 26 terms of this stipulation and the judgment shall not foreclose 27 claims concerning the scope or requirements of the Welfare and 28 Institutions Code or the Americans With Disabilities Act. The -9- 1 court shall retain jurisdiction during that time to enforce the 2 terms of the judgment. 3 VI. Attorneys fees and costs 4 27. The plaintiffs reserve the right to apply to the court 5 for attorneys fees and costs. 6 VII. Notice to the class, hearing and approval of Judgment 7 by the court 8 28. Within thirty days of the signing of this stipulation 9 the Defendants shall submit to plaintiffs' counsel a proposed order 10 providing for notice to the class and a hearing on the settlement. it If the parties can agree on the terms of the order, the order shall 12 be submitted to the court within forty days of the signing of this 13 stipulation. If the parties cannot agree, each party shall submit 14 its own proposed order to the court within forty days of the 15 signing of this stipulation. The necessity and manner of post- 16 judgment notice to the class shall be reserved for determination b 17 the court, if the parties cannot agree. 18 19 Dated: April 29, 1994 Ralph 'Murphy 20 Attorney for 4aint-iffs 21 22 Dated: April 29, 1994 Arthur W. Walenta 23 Assistant County Couns Attorney for Defendan s 24 25 26 27 28 -10-