The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 04191994 - H.4 H. 4 •; Contra TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS nt - Costa '' = s County FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ° oosra `r'l oPyti DATE: March 22 , 1994 Loux SUBJECT: Hearing On Bellecci & Associates (Applicant) - North State Development & Kenneth & Mary Crockett (Owner) To Rezone Approximately 16.91 Acres Of Land From A-2 (General Agriculture) to P-1 (Planned Unit Development) (County File #2982-RZ) and To Develop 85 Single Family Residential Units On A Smaller 14.3 Acre Site And Two Residences And Various Out Buildings On The Remaining Crockett Property (County File #3004-92) , In The Oakley Area. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Accept the environmental documentation prepared for this project as being adequate. 2 . Approve rezoning with preliminary development plan application #2982-RZ and Final Development Plan #3004-92 with the Conditions modified by the East County Regional Planning Commission. 3 . Approve the East County Regional Planning Commission's findings contained in Resolution #12-1994 of the East County Regional Planning Commission as the basis for the Board's action. 4. Introduce the ordinance giving effect to the Rezoning #2982- RZ, waive reading and set date for adoption of same. 5. Direct staff to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. FISCAL IMPACT None. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATUR Z,,r�14 RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMME ON OFf B ARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON April 19 , 1994 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER _x See Addendum for Board action . VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT I TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Contact:Art Beresford 646-2031 ATTESTED April 19 , 1994 cc: Community Development Department PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Bellecci & Associates THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS North State Development AND COU71 ADMINISTRATOR Public Works-Mitch Avalon Kenneth & Mary Crockett BY , DEPUTY AB:df Page Two RECOMMENDATION OF OMAC The Oakley Municipal Advisory Committee recommended approval of this development with recommended Conditions of Approval. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS The East County Regional Planning Commission first heard this application at their November 1, 1993 hearing. The application's hearing was continued to December 6, 1993 and to January 10, 1994. At the January 10, 1994 hearing after taking testimony of neighbors regarding fencing between their property and the development and general concerns over the density of the development the East County Regional Planning Commission voted to recommend approval of #2982-RZ and DP #3004-92 subject to recommended Conditions of Approval. The companion Subdivision #7590 was approved with conditions matching the recommended conditions for DP #3004-92 and #2982-RZ. The present General Plan for the site is Single Family Residential High Density (5 to 7.2 du/net acre) . With 85 lots the proposal is at the absolute maximum density for the area. Property south and west of the site is designed Single Family Residential Low Density (1 to 2 .0 du/net acre) . Property north and east of the site is designated Single Family Residential High Density. There is a pending P-1 development (#2986-RZ, DP #3007-92 and Sub #7660 for 85 lots) north of the site of #2982-RZ, DP# 3004-92 and Subdivision 7590. Because of the High Density of the development relative to the General Plan designations, the East County Regional Planning Commission is recommending an additional $100. 00 per lot contribution toward development of the park on Empire Avenue. ADDENDUM TO HA APRIL 19, 1994 On April 12, 1994, the Board of Supervisors continued to this date the hearing on the recommendation of the East County Regional Planning Commission on the request by Bellecci and Associates (applicant) and North State Development and Kenneth and Mary Crockett (owners)to rezone 16.91 acres of land from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Planned Unit District (P-1) (2982-RZ), for approval of a final development plan to develop the site with 85 single family residential lots (DP 3004-92), and for approval of a vesting tentative map to subdivide the 14.3 acre site of Subdivision 7590 into 85 residential lots in the Oakley area. Dennis Barry, Community Development Department, presented the staff report on the matter and the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval with conditions and he advised of a meeting between the applicant and neighbors relative to a soundwall as opposed to wood fencing which is a condition of approval. Supervisor Torlakson commented on the work that had been done by the applicant and the neighbors, and buffering and landscaping issues that have been resolved, as well as the soundwall issue. The following persons presented testimony: Richard Sestero, representing North State Development, spoke on compromises that had been worked out with the neighbors, and on the masonry wall that would be placed along the south boundary, and the improvements along Tate Lane and the masonry wall on Tate Lane. Mr. Sestero advised of requested modifications to conditions of approval for Amberwood 2 and Amberwood 8 as attached. The Board discussed the matter. The public hearing was closed. Supervisor Torlakson commended all the parties that had worked together on this proposal and he moved approval of the project with amended conditions. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that staff recommendations 1, 2 with amended conditions, 3, 4, and 5 are APPROVED; and Ordinance No. 94-30, giving effect to the rezoning is INTRODUCED, reading waived, and April 26, 1994, is set for adoption of same. r� Modified Conditions of Approval Subdivision 7590, Rezoning 2982-RZ Amberwood 2 1. This approval is based upon the exhibits received by the Community Development Department listed as follows: A. Exhibit A - Revised Vesting Tentative Map dated received November 18, 1993 for 2982-RZ, Development Plan 3004-92,.and SUB 7590 for 91 Single Family Residential Lots on the 14.3 acre site together with a preliminary grading plan for the site,on the same sheet. This approval is for 91 lots on the 14.1 acre site. The P-1 rezoning of the site includes the Crockett property for a total area of approximately 16.91 acres. 4. At least 45 days prior to filing a Final Map, issuance of grading permits or issuance of a building permit, a revised site/grading plan and related documents shall be submitted for the review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. The submitted plan shall provide for 91 lots maximum. A low treated wood retaining wall shall be developed along the north side of the Wulf property, if necessary, to eliminate the need for a fill slope on the site or on the Wulf property. 6. Any revision of internal circulation plan and lot layout shall be subject to review and approval of the Zoning Administrator. Prior to recording the Final Map, submit for review and approval of the Zoning Administrator a site plan showing detailed house locations, driveway locations, fencing plans, and street tree locations. Six additional lots may be added for a total of 91 lots provided no lots are added along the southeely property line. 22-G Fence design and location shall be shown on landscaped plans. The fencing shall be designed to stand up in the sandy soil of the site by use of suitably spaced cement pilasters, wood and metal poles, pressure treated cement encased poles, or some other method acceptable to the Zoning Administrator. Fencing shall be established along all sides of the site that do not front upon streets. The property line along the Wulf and Crockett property shall be fenced with a suitable cyclone fence ambwd8\tatelane with wood or plastic slats. The Mikula property line shall be fenced with a precast concrete or masonry wall at the developer's option. If the neighboring property owners want a wood fence it shall be a solid wood fence with 6" treated wood columns on 8' centers with 2" x 6" fencing boards. If necessary, the fence along the Wulf property shall be developed on top of a low treated wood retaining wall designed to hold the fill in that area within the site. The fences along the Crockett, Wulf and Mikula properties can be placed upon those respective properties 4 agreeable to the adjoining property owners. 30. Delete. See Advisory Notes G and I. ambwd8\tatelane