Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07131993 - H.6 H. 6 8 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS `''. C ntra FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ur OrTA CU-.xS�.• DATE: 18 June 1993 SUBJECT: Rezoning Application #2997-RZ, Jonathan Sing Lee (Applicant & Owner) - Requesting to rezone 2.09 acres from General Agri- cultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District (R-40) - (Parcel #138-110-004 & 005) -Walnut Creek area. ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- ------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Approve rezoning application #2997-RZ, Jonathan Sing Lee (Appli- cant. & Owner) , as recommended by the County Planning Commission on May 18, 1993 . 2 . Adopt the Planning Commission's findings as set forth in its resolution #23-1993 , as the basis for your Board's decision. 3 . Accept the environmental review documentation as being adequate. 4. Introduce the ordinance giving effect to the rezoning; waive reading and set date for adoption of same. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATUR ��6 RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATMON OF MAltb COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON July 13 , 1993 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER This is the time heretofore noticed by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors for hearing on the above matter. Dennis Barry, Community Development Dept. , presented the staff recommendations . The public eharing was opened and no one appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed. Supervisor Bishop moved approval of the staff recommendations . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that recommendations 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 are APPROVED:.' and Ordinance No. 93-41 , giving effect o•t the rezoning, is INTRODUCED, reading waived, and July 20 , 1993 is set for adoption of same. VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT I TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Orig:, Community Development Department ATTESTED July 13 ,1993 cc: 'Rose Marie Pietras Jonathan Sing Lee PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF Public Works THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Assessor AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. Consolidated Fire Protection District BY I AA, , DEPUTY REZONING - .2997-RZ JONATHAN SING LEE (APPLICANT & OWNER) REQUESTS APPROVAL TO REZONE 2109.ACRES CONSISTING OF TWO LEGAL PARCELS FROM GENERAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (A-2) TO SIDLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (R-40) , SUBJECT PROPERTY FRONTS APPROXIMATELY 300±. FEET OP; THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH GATE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,000-FEET SOUTH OF THE B9D IP NORTH GATE ROAD, SITE ADDRESS IS ##830 NORTH GATE ROAD, WALNUT CREEK AREA, BCARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA.COSTA. COUNTY 13 .JULY 1995 _ 2:00 P'.M. NOTIFICATION LIST - Jonathan Sing Lee (A/0) - 2997-RZ - Page #1 Jonathan & Helen Sing Lee Chris N. & Margaret L. Borba 830 Northgate Road 720 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598 Richard Mudgett, Tre Alice I. Applegate, Tre 842 Gail Court 801 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598 I Roland & Susanne Bueche Charles H. & Susan M. Shea 676 Northgate Road 760 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, California 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598 Edward F. , & Nancy Lamp Inez N. Riemer 850 Northgate Road 830 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598 Walton Hunt Huston Raymond D. Boyer 900 Northgate Road 875 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598 Torsten P. , & Tineke Jacobsen 765 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, California 94598 John W. Robinson 755 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, California 94598 Alejandro Vargas Gailvan 701 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Gail A. Landis 851 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, California 94598 Clyde E. & Mary G. Davidson 800 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, California 94598 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON r Costa DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCDLinty C J DATE: 18 June 1993 SUBJECT: Rezoning Application #2997-RZ, Jonathan Sing Lee (Applicant & Owner) - Requesting to rezone 2.09 acres from General Agri- cultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District (R-40) - (Parcel #138-110-004 & 005) -Walnut Creek area. ------------------------ ----------------------- SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Approve rezoning application #2997-RZ, Jonathan Sing Lee (Appli- cant & Owner) , as recommended by the County Planning Commission on May 18, 1993. 2. Adopt the Planning Commission's findings as set forth in its resolution #23-1993, as the basis for your Board's decision. 3. Accept the environmental review documentation as being adequate. 4. Introduce the ordinance giving effect to the rezoning; waive reading and set date for adoption of same. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATUR _ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDA ON OF COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED cc: Rose Marie Pietras Jonathan Sing Lee PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR. BY , DEPUTY Resolution No. 23-1993 RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMEN- DATIONS - ON THE REQUESTED CHANGE IN ZONING BY JONATHAN SING LEE (APPLICANT & OWNER) , (2997-RZ) , IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE WALNUT CREEK AREA OF SAID COUNTY. WHEREAS, a request by JONATHAN SING LEE (Applicant & Owner) , (2997-RZ) , to rezone 2.09 acres consisting of two legal parcels in the Walnut Creek area from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District (R-40) , was received by the Community Development Department on November 13, 1992; and WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance was completed and posted on March 30, 1993, determining that the proposed project would not have a significant effect on the envir- onment; and WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been lawfully given, a public hearing was held by the County Planning Commission on Tues- day, May 18, 1993, whereat all persons interested therein might appear and be heard; and WHEREAS, the County Planning Commission having fully reviewed, considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted in this matter; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Planning Comm- ission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, that the rezoning request of JONATHAN SING LEE (Applicant & Owner) , (2997-RZ) , to rezone 2.09 acres from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District (R-40) , be APPROVED as is indicated on the findings map entitled: PAGE M-16 OF THE COUNTY'S ZONING MAP, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for this recommend- ation are as follows: 1. The requested change in zoning is consistent with the County General Plan. 2 . The requested change from A-2 to R-40 is consistent with the North Gate Specific Plan adopted June 25, 1991. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairwoman and Secretary of this Planning Commission will sign and attest the certified copy of this resolution and deliver the same to the Board of Supervisors all in accordance with the Government Code of the State of California. Resolution No. 23-1993 The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this resolution was given by motion of the Commission on Tuesday, May 18, 1993, by the following vote: AYES: Commissioners - Terrell, Accornero, Sakai, Woo, Clark, Frakes. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - Carmen Gaddis. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None. I, Helene T. Frakes, Chairwoman of the Planning Commission of the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the law on Tuesday, June 8, 1993, and that this resolution was duly and regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commiss- ion: AYES: Commissioners - Terrell, Clark, Woo, Accornero, Sakai, Frakes. NOES: Commissioners - None. ABSENT: Commissioners - None. ABSTAIN: Commissioners - Carmen Gaddis. v Chairwoman of the Planning Commission of Contra Costa County, State of California. ATTEST: Secr a y of th 1 ning Commission, Cont osta Cou State of California. Findings Map i - - r------ A-4 LT' Rezone From A -Z To�---440 )ALA)W . Area 1, 14rLx--mE T. 'FtZa%:LL=S , Chairwoman of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning t Commission in the matter of Z[-)h)p njA M c l t� t a _ ZCP-7- 2Z Chair of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission,State of California ATTES ecr t ry of t e ntra Costa County inQLRkrr'fnCommis on, State of Calif. California Environmental Quality Act NOTICE OF Completion of Environmental Impact Report xxx Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 651 Pine Street North Wing - 4th Floor- Martinez, California 94553-0095 Telephone: (510) 646-2091 Contact Person Rose Marie Pietras Project Description and Location: JONATHAN SING LEE (Armlicant-& Owner), County File #2997-RZ: The applicant requests approval to rezone 2.09 acres from A-2 to R-40. A variance is requested to allow for a minimum width of 118.6 for Lot 004, 140 feet required. Subject property fronts approximately 300 ± feet on the east side of Northgate Road, approximately 2,000 + feet south of the bend in Northgate Road. Site address is #830 Northgate Road, in the Walnut Creek area. (A-2) (ZA:M-1 6) (CT 3553.02) (Parcel #138-110-004 & 005). THIS IS A NOTICE OF STAFF'S DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE ABOVE PROJECT. YOU WILL BE FURTHER NOTIFIED OF THE PROJECT'S HEARING DATE WHERE YOU CAN COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION AND THE PROJECT IF YOU WISH. The Environmental Impact Report or Justification for Negative Declaration is available for review at the address below: Contra Costa County Community Development Department 4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Building - 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553-1229 Review Period for Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration: ,3 3 thru 17 AP 9 R 12/89 By Community Development Department Representative s QATT E ti co r J m O co5 ^I r OD A I � I " O w n O 0 O' Ovc a+. z d D f A O O � N ��- •A A c.•. p D' _ Agenda Item #3 Community Development Contra Costa County CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION TUESDAY, MAY 18, 1993 - 7:30 P.M. I. INTRODUCTION JONATHAN SING LEE (Applicant & Owner), County File #2997-RZ: The applicant requests approval to rezone 2.09 acres consisting of two legal parcels from General Agriculture, A-2 to Single Family Residential, R-40. Subject property fronts approximately 300:t feet on the east side of North Gate Road, approximately 2,000 feet south of the bend in North Gate Road. Site address is #830 North Gate Road, in the Walnut Creek area. (A-2) (ZA: M-16) (CT 3553.02)(Parcel #138-110-004 &-005). 11. RECOMMENDATION Adopt a motion recommending to the Board of Supervisors approval of 2997-RZ. Ill. GENERAL INFORMATION A. General Plan: General Plan designation is Single Family Residential-Very Low Density. B. Zoning: A-2 5-acre minimum per parcel. C. CEbA Status: A Negative Declaration was posted on March 30, 1993. D. Regulatory Programs': Subject site is within Zone C of minimal flooding. It is within an active earthquake fault zone; it is not within a 60 dBA noise control zone. Subject site is not within a redevelopment area. Prior Applications: 1. ZC 372: Contra Costa County Director of Community Development approved Certificates of Compliance as requested by the previous owner. The County determined that Lot 4 and Lot 5 are separate legal sites. lV_ SITE DESCRIPTION The subject property is characterized by gentle slopes covered with natural vegetation and some palm trees. it is located at the toe of Mt. Diablo. The property has an existing home with a detached guest room/storage building with a garage. V. AREA DESCRIPTION The subject property is located in a rural area. The characteristic of the area is slowly developing into 1-acre lots with estate_like_homes.. VI. AGENCY COMMENTS A. Advance Planning: Memorandum sated November 30, 1992. See provisions of N.G.S.P., ie.: 1. See North Gate Specific Plan for Road Improvements for North Gate Road. 2. Building permits need approval of the Zoning Administrator. 3. Design requirements of homes propo-Sed along North Gate Road: •40' setback from edge of raw; •20' height limit; -Houses must face roadway: •Frontyard fencing regulation of 23'/cpen rail design. 4. Contact City of Walnut Creek for corrments. B. Contra Costa Water District: Mernorandurr. dated December 3, 1992. No comments. C. City of Walnut Creek: Letter dated Decemb=r 4, 1992. See attachment. D. California Archaeoloqy Inventory: Memorandum dated December 4, 1992. There is a low possibility of archaeological sitas. Further study for archaeologi- cal resources is not recommended. E. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District: Memo-andurn dated December 8, 1992. See attachment. F. Health Services Department, Environmental Health Division: Memorandum dated December 10, 1992: 1. Sewage Disposal a. All wastewater shall be dispt)sed of into an existing sewer system. Sewer servile shall tie from the Contra Costa County Sanitary District sewer system. b. All structures shall connect to Vie sewer system which will serve the project. 3 2. Water-Supply a. Domestic water supply shall be from an existing public water system. Water supply shall be from the East Bay Municipal Utility District water system. b. All structures shall connect to the public water system which will serve the project. 3. Other a. Any on-site wells, underground irrigation pipes, and septic systems shall be destroyed in accordance with Health Services Department, Environmental Health Division, regulations. b. Environmental Health Division permit and inspections for this work shall be obtained. G. Contra Costa County Fire Protection District: Letter dated December 15, 1992. See attachment. VII. STAFF CONSIDERATIONS The applicant is requesting to rezone 2.09 acres from A-2 to R-40, which is consistent with the North Gate Specific Plan. The North Gate Specific Plan was adopted on June 25, 1991 detailing development guidelines for the area and designating lots sizes depending on the topography of the parcet. The applicant has submitted a written agreement that he will comply with the design guidelines with the North Gate Specific Plan (see attachment). He is also willing to dedicate 10 feet of frontage for the required roadway improvements on North Gate Road specific in the North Gate Specific Plan at the building stage. The project site is located in an Active Fault Zone. A geological report at the building *stage might be required. RMP/aa RZXIX/2997-RZ.RP 5/7/93 .n Inut City `�`�r'DEPT gy December 4; 1992 Ms. Rosemarie Pietras C mtza Costa C=ity Camxamity Development Department 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553-0095 SUBJBCr: 2997 RZ, 830 North Cute Road Dean' Ms. Piet,ras, Tie City of Walnut C".reek does not object to the rawest to rezone this property from A-2 to R-40 provided that the lots, if subdivided, contain a net area of 40,000 square feet after land is dedicated for the widening of North Gate Road. If the zcnirrg is approved rxw, and the lot size requireax tts cannot be met, then a lot that does not cyonfa m to property devel cpamit standards will halve been created. Mue total area of the site, as sham on the sutmi-ttat documents,ants, is 2.09 acres. According to the North Gate Specific Plan, all lots shall-be a net size of 40,000 squame feet after all dedications. Can this parcel be subdivided into two, 40,000 square foot lots? Please can me if you would like to die azss this further. very truly yours, Marge Kinmerer Associate Planner P.O. Box 8039 ♦ 1666 North Main Street + Walnut Creek California 94596 e (510) 943-5800 Central Contra Costa Sanitary District ROGER 1.DOL" General Amager Chief Engineer KENTON L.Al-41 Counsel for the District (510)938-1430 JOUCE E.MURP111- December 8, 1992 Secretary ofthe D4*ict V_J Contra Costa County C1. _el Community Development Department cL J��o 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor C> 0 Martinez, CA 94553-0095 -0 ATTENTION: R.P. Gentlemen: A DEVELOPMENT REVIEW REZONE OF 2.09 ACRES FROM A-2 TO R-40 830 NORTHGATE ROAD, WALNUT CREEK APN: 138-110-004 & 005 WS: 27 THOMAS BROS. LOC.: 5007 The above-referenced project has been reviewed by this office. 1. SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY AND GENERAL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS 1.1 The project site is within the CCCS1D sphere of influence, but annexation is necessary before sewer service can be provided. Annexation will require the approval of both the CCCSD Board of Directors and the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO). This issue must be addressed during the CEQA process. 1.2 The plans submitted for District review do not show the I proposed project sewers. The developer should be aware that District policy requires gravity sewers in preference to pumped systems and the location 'of public sewers in public streets rather than in off-street locations to the extent possible. Variances from this policy are discouraged. However, the District will consider alternatives on a case-by-case basis where the project engineer justifies such alternatives to the District's satisfaction. Re�-ded Peter IiOB R.P. Page 2 December 8, 1992 1.3 Specific requirements are: Gravity Service. Sewers are to be designed to operate under gravity flow to the District's existing sanitary sewer system. 'The use of sewage pumps for individual lots will not be permitted unless it is economically impractical to construct a main sewer to provide gravity service. Section 4-01 .A.10.b of the District's Standard Specifications, 1986 Edition, provides criteria for allowing the use of sewage pumps at individual lots. Location in Streets. As a minimum, an 8-inch public sewer must be extended by the developer to serve each parcel (residential or commercial lot, townhouse unit, condominium building, or apartment complex, as appropriate). New sewer systems are to be designed with the maximum ,amount of public sewers located in streets. If public sewers proposed for this project are to be located in an off-street location, the project engineer must justify such location to the satisfaction of the District. Easements. An exclusive public sewer easement must be established over the alignment of each public sewer in an off-street or private street location to provide access for future maintenance. The following criteria are used to determine the public sewer easement width: • The sewer easement width shall be 15 feet where the public sewer is less than 12 inches in diameter and the depth is 9 feet or less. • The sewer easement width shall be 20 feet where the public sewer is 12 inches and larger in diameter or the! depth is greater than 9 feet. • If new public sewers are being installed across properties where existing improvements will remain in place adjacent to the new public sewers, sewer easement width may be reduced at the discretion of the District, but in no case can the width be less than 10 feet. In addition, all-weather access for the District's maintenance vehicles to all manholes and rodding inlets in off-street locations is required. All-weather access typically consists of a 10-foot wide cross section with a surface course of turf-block, 2 inches of asphalt concrete, or other equivalent all- R.P. Page 3 December 8, 1992 weather surface acceptable to the District, over 6 inches of aggregate base. The use of sanitary sewer easement surfaces shall be limited to paving, shrubbery, gardens, and other landscaping, excluding trees. Parallel surface drainage ways and permanent structures including, but not limited to, buildings, swimming pools, decks, and retaining walls are not permitted within the easement area. 2. SOURCE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS The District has reviewed this project for source control requirements. Base wastewater flow from this project appears to be domestic wastewater such as from residential, office, or church sources. Specific source control requirements are normally not applicable to domestic wastewater. However, materials such as gasoline, oil, sand, paint, pesticide residues, or other toxic substances are prohibited from being introduced into the District's sewer System. 3. SEWER CAPACITY The District has completed a limited analysis for the sewer system downstream of the proposed project. This analysis consisted of a review of District records for capacity deficiencies and a determination that the proposed project will generate less wastewater than our "trigger" for further analysis. The existing main sewer is adequate for the additional wastewater which will be generated by this project, but District facilities farther downstream do not have adequate flow carrying capacity under the District's current design criteria for ultimate conditions. Improvements to correct the deficiencies are in the District's Capital Improvement Plan. Improvements to the District's existing facilities that are required as a result of new development will be funded from applicable District fees and charges. The developer will be required to pay these fees and charges at the time of connection ,to the sewer system. 4. PRIVATE SEWERS The proposed project includes side sewers. A side sewer is defined as a private sewer which is owned and maintained by the.property owner and which connects the plumbing system of the building to the main sewer. The side sewer begins at the point of connection to the building plumbing system 2 feet outside the foundation line or building wall and terminates at the point of connection to the main sewer. District policy requires that the developer be responsible for installation of the side sewer,and the property owner be responsible for operation and maintenance of the side sewer. District review of the design and inspection of the work on the side sewer shall in no way constitute our acceptance of any responsibility for R.P. Page 4 December 8, 1992 maintenance or damage to property due to construction and subsequent operation and maintenance of the side sewer. The design intent of the typical side sewer details included in the CCCSD "Standard Specification," 1986 Edition, and presented in Sections 32-43 through 32-48 inclusive, is to reduce the amount of rainfall and groundwater that will infiltrate the,sewer, thereby avoiding unnecessary pumping and treatment costs. The typical side sewer details are not intended to meet the geotechnical, structural, or drainage requirements of special situations. 5. HILLSIDE AND CREEK AREA POLICIES The District has a Hillside and Creek Area Sewer Policy which addresses the design and installation of sewers in hillsides or unstable areas. The requirements of this policy must be followed' when construction plans are prepared. For your convenience, a copy of the policy is enclosed. The Sanitary District must review and approve any construction plans involving work on the public sewer system prior to the developer's applying for a building permit. The District's Permit Section will receive and process the construction plans. Sincerely, Russell B. Leavitt Planning Assistant RBL/ls Attachment c: Jonathan Sing Lee 830 Northgate Road Walnut Creek, CA 94598 CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED -FOR DESIGNING SEWERS TO BE LOCATED IN HILLSIDE AND CREEK AREAS 1. Soils reports will be required where: a. Slopes of hills - where sewers are proposed for installation exceed IS percent. b. Sewers are proposed for installation within fifty feet of creekbeds. C. Sewers are proposed for installation within the range of influence of a possible landslide from adjacent hill . do Sewers are proposed for install-ation in historical slide locations. 2. A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer practicing In Geotechnical Engineering must be submitted by the job engineer which covers the proposed -project. 3. If the project geotechnical report provided does not cover an off-road sewer alignment, the District may require a supplementary report. This report, at a minimum, must address the following: a. Supplementary geological setting, general. soils and bedrock conditions along the proposed sewer alignment, and recommended set backs from slides and creeks. b. Stability or instability of selected sewer alignment. C. Potential ground water problems. do Effect of trenching on slope stability (negative impacts on slope). e. Special backfill, special trenching requirements, or special supports that may be recommended. f. Erosion potential of soils around sewer near water courses. go Recommended corrections if an instability exists or may develop. 4. Installation of sewers in unrepaired slide areas is to be avoided. a. If an acceptable gravity route is feasible around the unrepaired slide, the sewer must be installed around the slide. b. If the only feasible gravity route is through a slide area, a complete study of the slide must be made by a Geotechnical Engineer. The Geotechnical Engineer must: propose a solution which is satisfactory to-the--District. -The normal solution is---- the s---the repair of the slide. C. If a satisfactory gravity solution does not exist, the pumping of sewage from individual homes will be considered. 5. The Project Engineer must furnish a map which shows existing creeks or swales which may convey water in the vicinity of any proposed sewer main alignments. 6. Sewers shall not be designed to be located in the bottom of swales or creeks. 7. For sewers which will be parallel to swales or creeks, the sewer must be designed far enough away from the drainageway to eliminate the possibility of future eroding around the sewer. A Geotechnical Engineer shall review the proposed alignment and furnish recommendations regarding long-term erosion potentials. a. If it is unfeasible to locate sewer mains on the downslope side of future homes and maintain a safe distance from drainage ways, consideration will be given to installing the sewers in street areas which may result in the installation of residential sewage pumps on individual .homes. 8. For sewers which cross creeks or swales, the crossing shall be as .nearly perpendicular to the drainageway as feasible. a. Bank and bottom protection shall be designed per the recommendation of a Geotechnical Engineer and shall . be_ installed in the drainageway as a part of the overhead or underground crossing. b. The Project Engineer shall pay particular attention to designing adequate support foundations and protection for the foundation. 9. An access easement (minimum width of ten feet) shall be granted by the developer from the nearest public street to the creek crossing structure along the route of the sewer main, if possible, for future maintenance. 10. The attached design standards shall be used by the Project Engineer . when designing sewers in hillside and/or creek areas. l DESIGN STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO SEWERS WHICH ARE TO BE LOCATED IN HILLSIDE AND CREEK AREAS 1. Sewers to be installed across hillside slopes (generally parallel to contours) shall be ductile iron (no bedding) if the cross slope of the hill exceeds 25 percent. 2. Sewers to be installed parallel to defined creeks shall be located no closer than twenty feet from the top of the bank if the creek bank is defined; if not, no closer than thirty feet from the centerline of the creek. 3. Sewers to be installed parallel to defined creeks from twenty to fifty feet away from the top of the bank shall be ductile iron (no bedding) . 4. Manholes to be installed on either ends of creek crossings shall be located no closer than twenty feet from the top of the creek bank. F r CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT 2010 GEARY ROAD PLEASANT HILL,CA 94523-4694 (510) 930-5500 BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION December 15, 1992 3 rT1 Contra Costa County rn C-; C> C> Community Development Department C> County Administration Building co 651 Pine Street, 4th Floor, North Wing Martinez, CA 94553-0095 ro rn Attn: Rose Marie Pietras Subject: 2997-RZ 830 North Gate Road Walnut Creek, CA Dear Ms. Pietras: We have reviewed the rezoning application to establish a single family residence at the subject location. This project is regulated by codes, regulations and ordinances administered by this Fire District and/or the State Fire Marshal's Office. If approved by your office, the following shall be required: 1. The developer shall submit two (2) complete sets of plans and specifications of the subject project, including built-in fire protection systems (when required) , to this office for review and approval prior to construction to insure compliance with minimum requirements related to fire and life .$afety. Plan review fees will be assessed at that time. (2.202, 10.202)CFC 2. The developer shall provide an adequate and reliable water supply for fire protection with a minimum fire flow of 1,000 GPM. Required flow shall be delivered from not more than 1 hydrant flowing while maintaining 20 pounds residual pressure in the main. (10.401, 10.402, 10.403)CFC 3. Provide access roadways with all-weather driving surfaces of not less than 16 feet unobstructed width, and not less than 131611 of vertical clearance, to within 150 feet of travel distance to all portions of the exterior walls of every building. Access roads shall not exceed 201% grade, shall have a minimum inside turning radius of 32 feet, and must be capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus (20 tons) . (10.203 , 10.204, 10.206)CFC C.C.C. Community Development Dept. Subject: 2997-RZ December 15, 1.992 Page 2 NOTE: Access roads of 16 feet unobstructed width shall have "No PARKING" signs posted. 4. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 feet long shall be provided with approved provisions for the turning around of fire departmqnt apparatus. (10.204d)CFC 5. Access roads and hydrants shall be installed and in service prior to combustible construction. (10. 502)CFC 6. Approved premises identification shall be provided. Such numbers shall contrast with their background and be readily visible fromthestreet. (10.301)CFC 7. A pro-rata fee of $300.00 per house shall be assessed to partially offset initial expenditures for additional necessary fire service resources. (CCC Ord. 87/98) 8. The developer shall provide roof coverings with a minimum Class C rating. Untreated wood shake or shingles are not allowed. (3203)CAC It is requested that a copy of the conditions of approval for the subject project be forwarded to this office when compiled by the planning agency. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the undersigned. Sincofely, Steven +K. April Fire Inspector SKA:vw cc: C.C.C. Public Works Department Attn: Road Engineering/Mitch Avalon Jonathan Sing Lee File SKA/2997-RZ.92