HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07131993 - H.6 H. 6
8
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS `''. C ntra
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ur
OrTA CU-.xS�.•
DATE: 18 June 1993
SUBJECT: Rezoning Application #2997-RZ, Jonathan Sing Lee (Applicant &
Owner) - Requesting to rezone 2.09 acres from General Agri-
cultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District
(R-40) - (Parcel #138-110-004 & 005) -Walnut Creek area.
------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
------------------------------------------------------------ ----------
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Approve rezoning application #2997-RZ, Jonathan Sing Lee (Appli-
cant. & Owner) , as recommended by the County Planning Commission
on May 18, 1993 .
2 . Adopt the Planning Commission's findings as set forth in its
resolution #23-1993 , as the basis for your Board's decision.
3 . Accept the environmental review documentation as being adequate.
4. Introduce the ordinance giving effect to the rezoning; waive
reading and set date for adoption of same.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATUR
��6
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATMON OF MAltb COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON July 13 , 1993 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
This is the time heretofore noticed by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors
for hearing on the above matter. Dennis Barry, Community Development Dept. ,
presented the staff recommendations . The public eharing was opened and no one
appearing to speak, the public hearing was closed. Supervisor Bishop moved
approval of the staff recommendations . IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that
recommendations 1 , 2 , 3 , and 4 are APPROVED:.' and Ordinance No. 93-41 , giving
effect o•t the rezoning, is INTRODUCED, reading waived, and July 20 , 1993
is set for adoption of same.
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT I TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Orig:, Community Development Department ATTESTED July 13 ,1993
cc: 'Rose Marie Pietras
Jonathan Sing Lee PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
Public Works THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Assessor AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR.
Consolidated Fire Protection District
BY I AA,
, DEPUTY
REZONING - .2997-RZ
JONATHAN SING LEE (APPLICANT & OWNER)
REQUESTS APPROVAL TO REZONE 2109.ACRES CONSISTING OF TWO LEGAL PARCELS
FROM GENERAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT (A-2) TO SIDLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
DISTRICT (R-40) ,
SUBJECT PROPERTY FRONTS APPROXIMATELY 300±. FEET OP; THE EAST SIDE OF
NORTH GATE ROAD, APPROXIMATELY 2,000-FEET SOUTH OF THE B9D IP NORTH
GATE ROAD, SITE ADDRESS IS ##830 NORTH GATE ROAD,
WALNUT CREEK AREA,
BCARD OF SUPERVISORS
CONTRA.COSTA. COUNTY
13 .JULY 1995 _ 2:00 P'.M.
NOTIFICATION LIST - Jonathan Sing Lee (A/0) - 2997-RZ - Page #1
Jonathan & Helen Sing Lee Chris N. & Margaret L. Borba
830 Northgate Road 720 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598
Richard Mudgett, Tre Alice I. Applegate, Tre
842 Gail Court 801 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598
I
Roland & Susanne Bueche Charles H. & Susan M. Shea
676 Northgate Road 760 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, California 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598
Edward F. , & Nancy Lamp Inez N. Riemer
850 Northgate Road 830 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598
Walton Hunt Huston Raymond D. Boyer
900 Northgate Road 875 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598 Walnut Creek, California 94598
Torsten P. , & Tineke Jacobsen
765 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, California 94598
John W. Robinson
755 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, California 94598
Alejandro Vargas Gailvan
701 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, Calif. 94598
Gail A. Landis
851 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, California 94598
Clyde E. & Mary G. Davidson
800 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, California 94598
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON
r Costa
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENTCDLinty
C
J
DATE: 18 June 1993
SUBJECT: Rezoning Application #2997-RZ, Jonathan Sing Lee (Applicant &
Owner) - Requesting to rezone 2.09 acres from General Agri-
cultural District (A-2) to Single Family Residential District
(R-40) - (Parcel #138-110-004 & 005) -Walnut Creek area.
------------------------ -----------------------
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Approve rezoning application #2997-RZ, Jonathan Sing Lee (Appli-
cant & Owner) , as recommended by the County Planning Commission
on May 18, 1993.
2. Adopt the Planning Commission's findings as set forth in its
resolution #23-1993, as the basis for your Board's decision.
3. Accept the environmental review documentation as being adequate.
4. Introduce the ordinance giving effect to the rezoning; waive
reading and set date for adoption of same.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATUR
_ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDA ON OF COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Orig: Community Development Department ATTESTED
cc: Rose Marie Pietras
Jonathan Sing Lee PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR.
BY , DEPUTY
Resolution No. 23-1993
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE COUNTY OF CONTRA
COSTA, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, INCORPORATING FINDINGS AND RECOMMEN-
DATIONS - ON THE REQUESTED CHANGE IN ZONING BY JONATHAN SING LEE
(APPLICANT & OWNER) , (2997-RZ) , IN THE ORDINANCE CODE SECTION
PERTAINING TO THE PRECISE ZONING FOR THE WALNUT CREEK AREA OF SAID
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, a request by JONATHAN SING LEE (Applicant & Owner) ,
(2997-RZ) , to rezone 2.09 acres consisting of two legal parcels in
the Walnut Creek area from General Agricultural District (A-2) to
Single Family Residential District (R-40) , was received by the
Community Development Department on November 13, 1992; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance
was completed and posted on March 30, 1993, determining that the
proposed project would not have a significant effect on the envir-
onment; and
WHEREAS, after notice thereof having been lawfully given, a
public hearing was held by the County Planning Commission on Tues-
day, May 18, 1993, whereat all persons interested therein might
appear and be heard; and
WHEREAS, the County Planning Commission having fully reviewed,
considered and evaluated all the testimony and evidence submitted
in this matter; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the County Planning Comm-
ission recommends to the Board of Supervisors of the County of
Contra Costa, State of California, that the rezoning request of
JONATHAN SING LEE (Applicant & Owner) , (2997-RZ) , to rezone 2.09
acres from General Agricultural District (A-2) to Single Family
Residential District (R-40) , be APPROVED as is indicated on the
findings map entitled: PAGE M-16 OF THE COUNTY'S ZONING MAP, which
is attached hereto and made a part hereof; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the reasons for this recommend-
ation are as follows:
1. The requested change in zoning is consistent with the
County General Plan.
2 . The requested change from A-2 to R-40 is consistent with
the North Gate Specific Plan adopted June 25, 1991.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Chairwoman and Secretary of
this Planning Commission will sign and attest the certified copy of
this resolution and deliver the same to the Board of Supervisors
all in accordance with the Government Code of the State of
California.
Resolution No. 23-1993
The instruction by the Planning Commission to prepare this
resolution was given by motion of the Commission on Tuesday, May
18, 1993, by the following vote:
AYES: Commissioners - Terrell, Accornero, Sakai, Woo,
Clark, Frakes.
NOES: Commissioners - None.
ABSENT: Commissioners - Carmen Gaddis.
ABSTAIN: Commissioners - None.
I, Helene T. Frakes, Chairwoman of the Planning Commission of
the County of Contra Costa, State of California, hereby certify
that the foregoing was duly called and held in accordance with the
law on Tuesday, June 8, 1993, and that this resolution was duly and
regularly passed and adopted by the following vote of the Commiss-
ion:
AYES: Commissioners - Terrell, Clark, Woo, Accornero, Sakai,
Frakes.
NOES: Commissioners - None.
ABSENT: Commissioners - None.
ABSTAIN: Commissioners - Carmen Gaddis.
v
Chairwoman of the Planning Commission of
Contra Costa County, State of California.
ATTEST:
Secr a y of th 1 ning Commission,
Cont osta Cou State of California.
Findings Map
i
- - r------ A-4
LT'
Rezone From A -Z To�---440 )ALA)W . Area
1, 14rLx--mE T. 'FtZa%:LL=S , Chairwoman of the Contra Costa County
Planning Commission, State of California, do hereby certify
that this is a true and correct copy of
indicating thereon the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning
t
Commission in the matter of Z[-)h)p njA M c l t� t a _
ZCP-7- 2Z
Chair of the Contra Costa County
Planning Commission,State of California
ATTES
ecr t ry of t e ntra Costa County
inQLRkrr'fnCommis on, State of Calif.
California Environmental Quality Act
NOTICE OF
Completion of Environmental Impact Report
xxx
Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
651 Pine Street North Wing - 4th Floor- Martinez, California 94553-0095
Telephone: (510) 646-2091 Contact Person Rose Marie Pietras
Project Description and Location:
JONATHAN SING LEE (Armlicant-& Owner), County File #2997-RZ: The applicant requests
approval to rezone 2.09 acres from A-2 to R-40. A variance is requested to allow for a
minimum width of 118.6 for Lot 004, 140 feet required. Subject property fronts
approximately 300 ± feet on the east side of Northgate Road, approximately 2,000 + feet
south of the bend in Northgate Road. Site address is #830 Northgate Road, in the Walnut
Creek area. (A-2) (ZA:M-1 6) (CT 3553.02) (Parcel #138-110-004 & 005).
THIS IS A NOTICE OF STAFF'S DETERMINATION OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT OF THE ABOVE PROJECT. YOU WILL
BE FURTHER NOTIFIED OF THE PROJECT'S HEARING DATE WHERE YOU CAN COMMENT ON THIS DETERMINATION AND THE
PROJECT IF YOU WISH.
The Environmental Impact Report or Justification for Negative Declaration is available for review at the address below:
Contra Costa County Community Development Department
4th Floor, North Wing, Administration Building
- 651 Pine Street
Martinez, CA 94553-1229
Review Period for Environmental Impact Report or Negative Declaration: ,3 3
thru 17
AP 9 R 12/89 By
Community Development Department Representative
s
QATT E
ti
co
r
J m O
co5
^I r
OD
A
I �
I "
O
w n
O 0
O' Ovc a+. z
d
D f A O O � N ��-
•A A c.•. p
D' _
Agenda Item #3
Community Development Contra Costa County
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
TUESDAY, MAY 18, 1993 - 7:30 P.M.
I. INTRODUCTION
JONATHAN SING LEE (Applicant & Owner), County File #2997-RZ: The applicant
requests approval to rezone 2.09 acres consisting of two legal parcels from General
Agriculture, A-2 to Single Family Residential, R-40. Subject property fronts
approximately 300:t feet on the east side of North Gate Road, approximately 2,000
feet south of the bend in North Gate Road. Site address is #830 North Gate Road, in
the Walnut Creek area. (A-2) (ZA: M-16) (CT 3553.02)(Parcel #138-110-004 &-005).
11. RECOMMENDATION
Adopt a motion recommending to the Board of Supervisors approval of 2997-RZ.
Ill. GENERAL INFORMATION
A. General Plan: General Plan designation is Single Family Residential-Very Low
Density.
B. Zoning: A-2 5-acre minimum per parcel.
C. CEbA Status: A Negative Declaration was posted on March 30, 1993.
D. Regulatory Programs': Subject site is within Zone C of minimal flooding. It is
within an active earthquake fault zone; it is not within a 60 dBA noise control
zone. Subject site is not within a redevelopment area.
Prior Applications:
1. ZC 372: Contra Costa County Director of Community Development
approved Certificates of Compliance as requested by the previous
owner. The County determined that Lot 4 and Lot 5 are separate legal
sites.
lV_ SITE DESCRIPTION
The subject property is characterized by gentle slopes covered with natural vegetation
and some palm trees. it is located at the toe of Mt. Diablo. The property has an
existing home with a detached guest room/storage building with a garage.
V. AREA DESCRIPTION
The subject property is located in a rural area. The characteristic of the area is slowly
developing into 1-acre lots with estate_like_homes..
VI. AGENCY COMMENTS
A. Advance Planning: Memorandum sated November 30, 1992. See provisions
of N.G.S.P., ie.:
1. See North Gate Specific Plan for Road Improvements for North Gate
Road.
2. Building permits need approval of the Zoning Administrator.
3. Design requirements of homes propo-Sed along North Gate Road:
•40' setback from edge of raw;
•20' height limit;
-Houses must face roadway:
•Frontyard fencing regulation of 23'/cpen rail design.
4. Contact City of Walnut Creek for corrments.
B. Contra Costa Water District: Mernorandurr. dated December 3, 1992. No
comments.
C. City of Walnut Creek: Letter dated Decemb=r 4, 1992. See attachment.
D. California Archaeoloqy Inventory: Memorandum dated December 4, 1992.
There is a low possibility of archaeological sitas. Further study for archaeologi-
cal resources is not recommended.
E. Central Contra Costa Sanitary District: Memo-andurn dated December 8, 1992.
See attachment.
F. Health Services Department, Environmental Health Division: Memorandum
dated December 10, 1992:
1. Sewage Disposal
a. All wastewater shall be dispt)sed of into an existing sewer
system. Sewer servile shall tie from the Contra Costa County
Sanitary District sewer system.
b. All structures shall connect to Vie sewer system which will serve
the project.
3
2. Water-Supply
a. Domestic water supply shall be from an existing public water
system. Water supply shall be from the East Bay Municipal
Utility District water system.
b. All structures shall connect to the public water system which will
serve the project.
3. Other
a. Any on-site wells, underground irrigation pipes, and septic
systems shall be destroyed in accordance with Health Services
Department, Environmental Health Division, regulations.
b. Environmental Health Division permit and inspections for this
work shall be obtained.
G. Contra Costa County Fire Protection District: Letter dated December 15, 1992.
See attachment.
VII. STAFF CONSIDERATIONS
The applicant is requesting to rezone 2.09 acres from A-2 to R-40, which is consistent
with the North Gate Specific Plan. The North Gate Specific Plan was adopted on June
25, 1991 detailing development guidelines for the area and designating lots sizes
depending on the topography of the parcet. The applicant has submitted a written
agreement that he will comply with the design guidelines with the North Gate Specific
Plan (see attachment). He is also willing to dedicate 10 feet of frontage for the
required roadway improvements on North Gate Road specific in the North Gate Specific
Plan at the building stage.
The project site is located in an Active Fault Zone. A geological report at the building
*stage might be required.
RMP/aa
RZXIX/2997-RZ.RP
5/7/93
.n
Inut
City `�`�r'DEPT gy
December 4; 1992
Ms. Rosemarie Pietras
C mtza Costa C=ity
Camxamity Development Department
651 Pine Street
Martinez, CA 94553-0095
SUBJBCr: 2997 RZ, 830 North Cute Road
Dean' Ms. Piet,ras,
Tie City of Walnut C".reek does not object to the rawest to rezone this
property from A-2 to R-40 provided that the lots, if subdivided, contain
a net area of 40,000 square feet after land is dedicated for the
widening of North Gate Road. If the zcnirrg is approved rxw, and the lot
size requireax tts cannot be met, then a lot that does not cyonfa m to
property devel cpamit standards will halve been created.
Mue total area of the site, as sham on the sutmi-ttat documents,ants, is 2.09
acres. According to the North Gate Specific Plan, all lots shall-be a
net size of 40,000 squame feet after all dedications. Can this parcel
be subdivided into two, 40,000 square foot lots?
Please can me if you would like to die azss this further.
very truly yours,
Marge Kinmerer
Associate Planner
P.O. Box 8039 ♦ 1666 North Main Street + Walnut Creek California 94596 e (510) 943-5800
Central Contra Costa Sanitary District
ROGER 1.DOL"
General Amager
Chief Engineer
KENTON L.Al-41
Counsel for the District
(510)938-1430
JOUCE E.MURP111-
December 8, 1992 Secretary ofthe D4*ict
V_J
Contra Costa County C1. _el
Community Development Department cL
J��o
651 Pine Street, 4th Floor C>
0
Martinez, CA 94553-0095
-0
ATTENTION: R.P.
Gentlemen: A
DEVELOPMENT REVIEW
REZONE OF 2.09 ACRES FROM A-2 TO R-40
830 NORTHGATE ROAD, WALNUT CREEK
APN: 138-110-004 & 005
WS: 27
THOMAS BROS. LOC.: 5007
The above-referenced project has been reviewed by this office.
1. SEWER SERVICE AVAILABILITY AND GENERAL DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS
1.1 The project site is within the CCCS1D sphere of influence, but annexation is
necessary before sewer service can be provided. Annexation will require
the approval of both the CCCSD Board of Directors and the Local Agency
Formation Commission (LAFCO). This issue must be addressed during the
CEQA process.
1.2 The plans submitted for District review do not show the I proposed project
sewers. The developer should be aware that District policy requires gravity
sewers in preference to pumped systems and the location 'of public sewers
in public streets rather than in off-street locations to the extent possible.
Variances from this policy are discouraged. However, the District will
consider alternatives on a case-by-case basis where the project engineer
justifies such alternatives to the District's satisfaction.
Re�-ded Peter IiOB
R.P.
Page 2
December 8, 1992
1.3 Specific requirements are:
Gravity Service.
Sewers are to be designed to operate under gravity flow to the District's
existing sanitary sewer system. 'The use of sewage pumps for individual
lots will not be permitted unless it is economically impractical to construct
a main sewer to provide gravity service. Section 4-01 .A.10.b of the
District's Standard Specifications, 1986 Edition, provides criteria for
allowing the use of sewage pumps at individual lots.
Location in Streets.
As a minimum, an 8-inch public sewer must be extended by the developer
to serve each parcel (residential or commercial lot, townhouse unit,
condominium building, or apartment complex, as appropriate). New sewer
systems are to be designed with the maximum ,amount of public sewers
located in streets. If public sewers proposed for this project are to be
located in an off-street location, the project engineer must justify such
location to the satisfaction of the District.
Easements.
An exclusive public sewer easement must be established over the alignment
of each public sewer in an off-street or private street location to provide
access for future maintenance. The following criteria are used to determine
the public sewer easement width:
• The sewer easement width shall be 15 feet where the public sewer
is less than 12 inches in diameter and the depth is 9 feet or less.
• The sewer easement width shall be 20 feet where the public sewer
is 12 inches and larger in diameter or the! depth is greater than 9
feet.
• If new public sewers are being installed across properties where
existing improvements will remain in place adjacent to the new public
sewers, sewer easement width may be reduced at the discretion of
the District, but in no case can the width be less than 10 feet.
In addition, all-weather access for the District's maintenance vehicles to all
manholes and rodding inlets in off-street locations is required. All-weather
access typically consists of a 10-foot wide cross section with a surface
course of turf-block, 2 inches of asphalt concrete, or other equivalent all-
R.P.
Page 3
December 8, 1992
weather surface acceptable to the District, over 6 inches of aggregate base.
The use of sanitary sewer easement surfaces shall be limited to paving,
shrubbery, gardens, and other landscaping, excluding trees. Parallel surface
drainage ways and permanent structures including, but not limited to,
buildings, swimming pools, decks, and retaining walls are not permitted
within the easement area.
2. SOURCE CONTROL REQUIREMENTS
The District has reviewed this project for source control requirements. Base
wastewater flow from this project appears to be domestic wastewater such as
from residential, office, or church sources. Specific source control requirements
are normally not applicable to domestic wastewater. However, materials such as
gasoline, oil, sand, paint, pesticide residues, or other toxic substances are
prohibited from being introduced into the District's sewer System.
3. SEWER CAPACITY
The District has completed a limited analysis for the sewer system downstream of
the proposed project. This analysis consisted of a review of District records for
capacity deficiencies and a determination that the proposed project will generate
less wastewater than our "trigger" for further analysis. The existing main sewer
is adequate for the additional wastewater which will be generated by this project,
but District facilities farther downstream do not have adequate flow carrying
capacity under the District's current design criteria for ultimate conditions.
Improvements to correct the deficiencies are in the District's Capital Improvement
Plan. Improvements to the District's existing facilities that are required as a result
of new development will be funded from applicable District fees and charges. The
developer will be required to pay these fees and charges at the time of connection
,to the sewer system.
4. PRIVATE SEWERS
The proposed project includes side sewers. A side sewer is defined as a private
sewer which is owned and maintained by the.property owner and which connects
the plumbing system of the building to the main sewer. The side sewer begins at
the point of connection to the building plumbing system 2 feet outside the
foundation line or building wall and terminates at the point of connection to the
main sewer.
District policy requires that the developer be responsible for installation of the side
sewer,and the property owner be responsible for operation and maintenance of the
side sewer. District review of the design and inspection of the work on the side
sewer shall in no way constitute our acceptance of any responsibility for
R.P.
Page 4
December 8, 1992
maintenance or damage to property due to construction and subsequent operation
and maintenance of the side sewer.
The design intent of the typical side sewer details included in the CCCSD
"Standard Specification," 1986 Edition, and presented in Sections 32-43 through
32-48 inclusive, is to reduce the amount of rainfall and groundwater that will
infiltrate the,sewer, thereby avoiding unnecessary pumping and treatment costs.
The typical side sewer details are not intended to meet the geotechnical, structural,
or drainage requirements of special situations.
5. HILLSIDE AND CREEK AREA POLICIES
The District has a Hillside and Creek Area Sewer Policy which addresses the design
and installation of sewers in hillsides or unstable areas. The requirements of this
policy must be followed' when construction plans are prepared. For your
convenience, a copy of the policy is enclosed.
The Sanitary District must review and approve any construction plans involving work on
the public sewer system prior to the developer's applying for a building permit. The
District's Permit Section will receive and process the construction plans.
Sincerely,
Russell B. Leavitt
Planning Assistant
RBL/ls
Attachment
c: Jonathan Sing Lee
830 Northgate Road
Walnut Creek, CA 94598
CENTRAL CONTRA COSTA SANITARY DISTRICT
PROCEDURES TO BE FOLLOWED -FOR
DESIGNING SEWERS TO BE LOCATED IN HILLSIDE AND CREEK AREAS
1. Soils reports will be required where:
a. Slopes of hills - where sewers are proposed for installation
exceed IS percent.
b. Sewers are proposed for installation within fifty feet of
creekbeds.
C. Sewers are proposed for installation within the range of
influence of a possible landslide from adjacent hill .
do Sewers are proposed for install-ation in historical slide
locations.
2. A soils report prepared by a registered Civil Engineer practicing In
Geotechnical Engineering must be submitted by the job engineer which
covers the proposed -project.
3. If the project geotechnical report provided does not cover an
off-road sewer alignment, the District may require a supplementary
report. This report, at a minimum, must address the following:
a. Supplementary geological setting, general. soils and bedrock
conditions along the proposed sewer alignment, and recommended
set backs from slides and creeks.
b. Stability or instability of selected sewer alignment.
C. Potential ground water problems.
do Effect of trenching on slope stability (negative impacts on
slope).
e. Special backfill, special trenching requirements, or special
supports that may be recommended.
f. Erosion potential of soils around sewer near water courses.
go Recommended corrections if an instability exists or may
develop.
4. Installation of sewers in unrepaired slide areas is to be avoided.
a. If an acceptable gravity route is feasible around the
unrepaired slide, the sewer must be installed around the slide.
b. If the only feasible gravity route is through a slide area, a
complete study of the slide must be made by a Geotechnical
Engineer. The Geotechnical Engineer must: propose a solution
which is satisfactory to-the--District. -The normal solution is----
the
s---the repair of the slide.
C. If a satisfactory gravity solution does not exist, the pumping
of sewage from individual homes will be considered.
5. The Project Engineer must furnish a map which shows existing creeks
or swales which may convey water in the vicinity of any proposed
sewer main alignments.
6. Sewers shall not be designed to be located in the bottom of swales
or creeks.
7. For sewers which will be parallel to swales or creeks, the sewer
must be designed far enough away from the drainageway to eliminate
the possibility of future eroding around the sewer. A Geotechnical
Engineer shall review the proposed alignment and furnish
recommendations regarding long-term erosion potentials.
a. If it is unfeasible to locate sewer mains on the downslope side
of future homes and maintain a safe distance from drainage
ways, consideration will be given to installing the sewers in
street areas which may result in the installation of
residential sewage pumps on individual .homes.
8. For sewers which cross creeks or swales, the crossing shall be as
.nearly perpendicular to the drainageway as feasible.
a. Bank and bottom protection shall be designed per the
recommendation of a Geotechnical Engineer and shall . be_
installed in the drainageway as a part of the overhead or
underground crossing.
b. The Project Engineer shall pay particular attention to
designing adequate support foundations and protection for the
foundation.
9. An access easement (minimum width of ten feet) shall be granted by
the developer from the nearest public street to the creek crossing
structure along the route of the sewer main, if possible, for future
maintenance.
10. The attached design standards shall be used by the Project Engineer .
when designing sewers in hillside and/or creek areas.
l
DESIGN STANDARDS
APPLICABLE TO
SEWERS WHICH ARE TO BE LOCATED IN HILLSIDE AND
CREEK AREAS
1. Sewers to be installed across hillside slopes (generally parallel to
contours) shall be ductile iron (no bedding) if the cross slope of
the hill exceeds 25 percent.
2. Sewers to be installed parallel to defined creeks shall be located
no closer than twenty feet from the top of the bank if the creek
bank is defined; if not, no closer than thirty feet from the
centerline of the creek.
3. Sewers to be installed parallel to defined creeks from twenty to
fifty feet away from the top of the bank shall be ductile iron (no
bedding) .
4. Manholes to be installed on either ends of creek crossings shall be
located no closer than twenty feet from the top of the creek bank.
F
r
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
2010 GEARY ROAD PLEASANT HILL,CA 94523-4694
(510) 930-5500
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
December 15, 1992
3
rT1
Contra Costa County rn C-;
C>
C>
Community Development Department C>
County Administration Building co
651 Pine Street, 4th Floor, North Wing
Martinez, CA 94553-0095 ro
rn
Attn: Rose Marie Pietras
Subject: 2997-RZ
830 North Gate Road
Walnut Creek, CA
Dear Ms. Pietras:
We have reviewed the rezoning application to establish a single
family residence at the subject location. This project is
regulated by codes, regulations and ordinances administered by
this Fire District and/or the State Fire Marshal's Office. If
approved by your office, the following shall be required:
1. The developer shall submit two (2) complete sets of plans and
specifications of the subject project, including built-in
fire protection systems (when required) , to this office for
review and approval prior to construction to insure
compliance with minimum requirements related to fire and life
.$afety. Plan review fees will be assessed at that time.
(2.202, 10.202)CFC
2. The developer shall provide an adequate and reliable water
supply for fire protection with a minimum fire flow of 1,000
GPM. Required flow shall be delivered from not more than 1
hydrant flowing while maintaining 20 pounds residual pressure
in the main. (10.401, 10.402, 10.403)CFC
3. Provide access roadways with all-weather driving surfaces of
not less than 16 feet unobstructed width, and not less than
131611 of vertical clearance, to within 150 feet of travel
distance to all portions of the exterior walls of every
building. Access roads shall not exceed 201% grade, shall
have a minimum inside turning radius of 32 feet, and must be
capable of supporting the imposed loads of fire apparatus (20
tons) . (10.203 , 10.204, 10.206)CFC
C.C.C. Community Development Dept.
Subject: 2997-RZ
December 15, 1.992
Page 2
NOTE: Access roads of 16 feet unobstructed width shall have
"No PARKING" signs posted.
4. Dead-end fire department access roads in excess of 150 feet
long shall be provided with approved provisions for the
turning around of fire departmqnt apparatus. (10.204d)CFC
5. Access roads and hydrants shall be installed and in service
prior to combustible construction. (10. 502)CFC
6. Approved premises identification shall be provided. Such
numbers shall contrast with their background and be readily
visible fromthestreet. (10.301)CFC
7. A pro-rata fee of $300.00 per house shall be assessed to
partially offset initial expenditures for additional
necessary fire service resources. (CCC Ord. 87/98)
8. The developer shall provide roof coverings with a minimum
Class C rating. Untreated wood shake or shingles are not
allowed. (3203)CAC
It is requested that a copy of the conditions of approval for the
subject project be forwarded to this office when compiled by the
planning agency.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
the undersigned.
Sincofely,
Steven +K. April
Fire Inspector
SKA:vw
cc: C.C.C. Public Works Department
Attn: Road Engineering/Mitch Avalon
Jonathan Sing Lee
File
SKA/2997-RZ.92