Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06081993 - 1.136 1, 136 nd �el�yeied RECEIVED WM. WALTER FOSKETT, III 100 VERNAL DRIVE MAY 2 61993 ALAMO, CA 94507-1230 (510) 935-0741 CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. May 26, 1993 The Honorable Tom Torlakson, Chair Members of the Board of Supervisors Contra Costa County c\o Clerk of the Board County Administration Building 651 Pine Street, Room 106 Martinez, CA 94553-1293 Re: Item H.7 - Calendar for the Board of Supervisors, Contra Costa County, May 18, 1993 . Hearing on recommendation of the Contra Costa County Planning Commission on a County initiated General Plan Amendment (2-93-CO) for the Marsh Canyon Landfill site. The proposed project is to change the County General Plan land use designation for the subject site from Landfill to Agricultural Lands. The plan amendment would also require related changes to Chapter 7 of the County General Plan-Public Facilities/Services Element, Marsh Creek Road area. Dear Chairman Torlakson: The purpose of this letter is to request a rehearing on the above referenced matter. The bases for this request are enumerated in my letter of May 12 , 1993 , my speech at the Planning Commission meeting on April 6, 1993 and my speech at the Board of Supervisors meeting on May 18, 1993 . As you know an agreement was reached last year to settle a lawsuit between litigants in the Marsh Canyon Landfill site matter that included the possible removal of the site from the general plan as a landfill site. That portion of the agreement was to study the possibility of such a change, not to make the change. In fact the study in support of the change was extremely brief and did not do a comprehensive review of the question at hand. In conducting the study in that manner and subsequently removing our land from the General Plan as a landfill site, you have violated our due process rights as granted by the United States Constitution and the Constitution of the state of California. It is noteworthy that your staff never even contacted me for a meeting to discuss this matter. That no mention was made in the study of the objective data that formed the basis for placing our land in the General Plan as a landfill site and how those data cc: COARD MEMBERS (Provided) changed in the mean time to require the present change. That no discussion of the legal ramifications of the change were discussed in staff report. That there is no justification in the staff report relative to the need for the change to promote the public health, safety, morals or general welfare of the people of Contra Costa County. That there is no mention of the fact that County bureaucrats have been looking in Utah and Washington for a landfill site because Keller Canyon does not work due to its expense. That there is no mention of the fact that your Planning Commission rejected this change in the General Plan. That there is no discussion of the recent cases that allow waste disposal companies to haul waste across county lines and thereby possibly greatly reducing the life span of Keller Canyon Landfill Site. In short the entire process has been nothing but a sham that benefits the large garbage companies to the detriment of the Foskett family and the people of our county. Will you kindly instruct your staff to conduct a proper study in this matter so that a decision can be make based on objective land use determinants. incereT4 l //�� �Q�l- /J r V" - W liam Wa er Foskett I