HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05041993 - 2.4 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: Costa
Phil Batchelor, County Administrator
County
DATE: May 4 1993
SUBJECT: KPMG Peat Marwick Audit Services Contract Extension
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
APPROVE and AUTHORIZE the County Administrator or designee to
execute a contract amendment with KPMG Peat Marwick for the
provision of audit services of the County' s finances, internal
operations, and federal financial assistance programs (single
audit) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 1993 .
BACKGROUND:
The current contract with KPMG Peat Marwick for the annual
financial audit of County records for FY 1991792 has expired. In
February the Grand Jury advised of their intention to no longer
participate. They expressed their desire to be considered
independent with respect to the annual financial audit, and they
believe the Grand Jury/Board of Supervisors joint contract does not
satisfy other areas of -the Penal Code with respect to auditing with
which they may be required to comply.
In order to proceed with this year' s audit, the County
Administrator recently met with KPMG Peat Marwick to discuss a one-
year extension of the current contract. KPMG Peat Marwick has
performed the annual audit of County financial affairs admirably
for several years and we believe a one-year extension is both cost
effective and beneficial . KPMG Peat Marwick has consistently
provided Contra Costa County a competitive rate and has included an
MBE/WBE sub contract component.
While we believe this extension is warranted in order to proceed in
a timely fashion, it is our intent to issue a Request For Proposals
for auditing services for FY 1993-94 .
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: XA
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): y
ACTION OF BOARD ONywa4k o- z 9f.2 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED /rN OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS / ^
v \ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS. THE DATE SHOWN. g
ATTESTED
Contact: Dean Lucas 646-4077 PHIL BATCHEL ,CLERKOFTHEBOARDOF
M. County Administrator SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Auditor-Controller
KPMG Peat Marwick
BY //ADEPUTY
2,
' Peat Marwick
Certified Public Accountants
2121 No. California Blvd., Suite 840 Telephone 510 943 1555 Telefax 510 946 0371
Walnut Creek, CA 94596-7304
April 30, 1993
Board of Supervisors
Contra Costa County
Martinez, California
This letter summarizes our proposal to perform an annual audit of the County's general
purpose financial statements and federal financial assistance programs as of and for the
year ending June 30, 1993. We have provided audit services to the County for several
years and we are prepared to extend our current contract. This letter includes our
proposed:
• Scope,
♦ Engagement Team,
♦ Reporting,
♦ Professional Fees, and
• MBE)WBE Plan
Scope
We will conduct our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards;
Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the.United States;
the Single Audit Act of 1994; and the provisions of OMB Circular A-128,Audits of State
and Local Governments, with the primary objective of issuing our opinions on the
County's Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) and federal financial
assistance programs (Single Audit) at the conclusion of our audits. It should be
understood that County management has responsibility for representations contained in
the financial statements and schedule of federal financial assistance programs and we will
require that a letter be furnished to us by members of the County's management near the.
completion of our audits. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedules based on our audits.
solo
8av Area Pracoce
Member rF;rm of,.,... r•._.,..,,..... .. .. _ .. _
• 1
K Peat Marwick
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PAGE 2
In conducting our audits, we will perform tests of the accounting records and such other
procedures as we consider necessary in the circumstances to form our opinion about
whether the CAFR is free of material misstatement and to report on whether management
has complied with laws and regulations and has established and maintained an internal
control structure.
An audit in accordance with the above standards is not designed to provide absolute
assurance that there are no misstatements in the County's financial statements or any
noncompliance with laws and regulations resulting from errors or irregularities. The
County's internal control structure should provide assurance, although not absolute
assurance, against the possibility of such errors and irregularities.
We understand that all records, documentation, and information we request in connection
with our audit will be made available to us.
Engagement Team
The engagement team for these audits will be comprised of the following individuals:
CAFR Single
Audit Audit
Lead Partner Lou Miramontes Lou Miramontes
Engagement Partner Jack Lynn Jack Lynn
Manager Jesse Takahashi Kwi Lee
In-Charge John Mosunic Olivia Choi
Lou Miramontes is a partner and resident in our Walnut Creek office and has seventeen
years experience at servicing governmental entities. He has served as the County's
engagement partner for the past six years.
Jack Lynn is designated as a government services specialist and has twenty years
experience at serving governments. Jack previously served as concurring review partner
for the County.
Jesse Takahashi will function as the engagement manager of the CAFR audit. He has
been the in-charge accountant for the past two years and is very familiar with detail
aspects of the County's operations.
Kwi Lee will again serve as engagement manager for the single audit. She serves several
governments in this capacity.
RMS Peat Marwick
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PAGE 3
Timing
We anticipate that the timeline for conducting the audits and the delivery of our reports
will be as follows:
Joint pre-planning meeting on audit procedures.......................................May 25, 1993
Planning and preliminary audit.procedures ....................................................June 1993
Commence final audit procedures.....................................................September 7, 1993
Status meeting.......................................................................................October 6, 1993
Finalize drafts of the CAFR with Office of October 29 to
Auditor/Controller and County Administrator.....................................November 12
Present to the County Administrator the draft financial
statements and audit findings...........:....................................................November 12
Issued opinion on CAFR...........................................................................November 19
Finalize draft management letter with County
Administrator.........................................................................................December 10
Deliver management letter to County Administrator.................................December 20
Issue single audit opinions.........................................................................December 20
Audit exit conference.................................................................................January 1994
The above-noted meetings will be focused at communicating the audit plan, obtaining
input on such plan, communicating the status of the performance of our auditing
procedures and preliminary findings based upon the results of our application of auditing
procedures and reviewing draft financial statements and management letter.
Reporting
At the conclusion of our audit,we plan on issuing the following reports:
1. Our opinion on the Comprehensive Audited Financial Report (CAFR)
2. Our opinions on the Schedule of Federal Financial Assistance and Related
Reports on Internal Control and Compliance
AMP Peat Marwick
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PAGE 4
3. Management letters which will communicate recommendations and observations
on internal control and operating matters noted during the conduct of our audit
procedures.
It should be understood that our audit may not reveal all errors, irregularities, or illegal
acts which may have occurred during the year. However, please be advised that it is our
responsibility to ensure that management is informed of any significant illegal acts that
we become aware of during our audit. If the illegal act involves funds from other
governmental entities, it is the County's responsibility to inform the other governmental
entities of these acts. If the County's management and audit committee are involved in
the illegal act or do not report to the other governmental entities on a timely basis, we, as
auditors, will be obligated to report the illegal acts to these other governmental entities.
Professional Fees
Our proposed fees for the audits are based upon our estimates of professional time
required to conduct our procedures at billing rates applicable to governments. The
proposed fees are as follows:
CAFRAudit............................................................$ 72,000
Single Audit ............................................................$ 60,500
K�IVI Peat Marwick
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY PAGE 5
MBE/WBE Plan
We are aware of the County's policy regarding Minority Business Enterprises (MBE) and
Women Business Enterprises (WBE). We service many governments which have similar
policies and as a result, we have developed professional relationships with MBE and
WBE firms in the Bay Area. In certain cases, we have entered into subcontractor
relationships with MBE/WBE firms who provide services to governments under our
direction. We would like to discuss a specific MBE/WBE plan for this audit with County
representatives.
Attached to this letter is our Firm's Bay Area Practice Work Force summary, which
provides information concerning our employee make up.
In summary we are pleased to respond to your request to submit this proposal letter to
provide professional audit services to Contra Costa County. We look forward to
discussing this letter with County representatives.
Very truly yours,
KPMG Peat Marwick
Louis P. Miramontes
Partner
Q\\
VAr
A N\\
r
r
N ``A
cn
cri
oo\\
cci
cn
cn
o
1