Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04061993 - 2.2 a. 121 THE BOARD OR SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on April 6, 1993 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Smith, Bishop, McPeak, Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Issues Associated with Helicopter Adventures at Buchanan Field Airport The Board received from J. Michael - Walford, Public Works Director, the Interim Report regarding issues associated with Helicopter Adventures at Buchanan Field Airport. A copy of the report is attached and included as a part of this document. Speakers commented on the need to promote business at Buchanan Field Airport; on the Airport as a valuable asset to Contra Costa County; on support for noise testing equipment with the results interpreted by professionals; on care to not damage the County's relationship with the Federal Aviation Authority; on banning Helicopter Adventures from training out of Buchanan Field; on restrictive use of the Airport; on the responsibility of pilots in the area for safety as well as noise control; on the fears of residents living in the vicinity of the airport; on safety as the primary concern; and on aircraft not within their correct flight zones and possible recourse. Those speaking were: J. A. Alvarenga, 208 Carolos Drive, Pacheco; Jack Reichel, Esprit Technology Inc. , 144-A Mayhew Way, Walnut Creek 94596; Jed Ziegler, 2055 Commerce Avenue, Concord; Harry York, Chamber of Commerce, 2151-A Salvio Street, Concord; Ron Sorenson, 1124 Jamie Drive, Concord; Will Price, 220 La Espiral, Orinda; Carolee Birka, 211 Aria Drive, Pacheco; Gerry Greth, Mt. Diablo Pilots Association, 288 Buchanan Field Road, #6, Concord; Maureen Bell, Pacific States Aviation, 157 Saddle Oaks Court, Walnut Creek; Kennard Cole, Mt. Diablo Pilots Association, 2420 Towar Court, Pinole; Elaine Yeary, 323 Camelback Road, Pleasant Hill; Phil Groman, Meadowood Apartments, Concord; Tom Kearns, Sheraton Hoten, John Glenn Drive, Concord; John Jackson, Civil Air Patrol, Buchanan Field, Concord; Camillus Byrne, Helicopter Adventures, 1051 Green Point Court, Concord; Patrick Corr, Helicopter Adventures, 81 John Glenn Drive, Concord; Russell M. Row, General Aviation Pilots Association, 2121 Walnut Street, Martinez; Donna J. Davidson, 1000 Temple Drve, Pacheco; Don Mount, People Over Planes, 1309 Gregg Lane, Concord; Barry C. Lloyd, FAA Designated Pilot Examiner, 3591 Dormer Avenue, Concord; Gene Whitt, 324 Rheem Boulevard, Moraga; Ward Steiner, 557 Mt. Dell, Clayton; Paul Jacobsohn, 1950 Olivera Road, Concord; Al McNabney, 1161 Leisure Lane, #7, Walnut Creek; Lunne McWilliam, 5718 Marlin, Byron; Al Maas, 2354 Pinnacle Drive, Martinez; and Robert Barker, Toxicologist, (no address given) . Following discussion of Board members, the Board took the following actions: 1. INSTRUCTED County Counsel to proceed with the process of amending the County's existing noise ordinance, and DIRECTED County Counsel to terminate the agreement with outside counsel providing assistance in this regard. 2 . DIRECTED County Counsel to cease all work on an ordinance attempting to regulate helicopter training flight patterns. 3. DIRECTED the Public Works Director and Manager of Airports to continue to study various off-airport sites for helicopter training touch-and-go flights with a report to the Internal Operations Committee on May 10, 1993; 4. ACKNOWLEDGED that Buchanan Field Airport is and will continue to be an important general aviation airport in the region; 5. ACCEPTED the offer of the Concord Chamber of Commerce to assist the Board in resolving problems associated with helicopter training flights and other issues related to improving the climate for business in and around Buchanan Field Airport; and 6. REFERRED back to the Internal Operations Committee the draft letter to the County's Congressional delegation with the request the the Committee determine the most appropriate way to communicate with the County's Congressional delegation and the FAA as well as to define more precisely what it is that is to be communicated and what the Board should ask the County's Congressional delegation to do. 'ieretyy certify that IhIs is a fruit and ConvOt COPY of action taken and entered on the minutes of the ,ard of Supervisors an ft date shown. 41FESTED: — &1,L 4 . I�f j - - PHIL BATCHELOR.Clerk of the Board of Supwvbm and C*unty Administrator DOP4 cc: Public Works Director Aviation Adv. Cte. FAA County Administrator 2 -2 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: April 6, 1993 SUBJECT: INTERIM REPORT REGARDING ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH HELICOPTER ADVENTURES AT BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMAIENDATION(S) &BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: Accept Report. II. Financial Impact: None III. Reasons for Recommendations and Backnround: On Tuesday March 9, 1993, the Board of Supervisors accepted the report of the Public Works Director regarding alternate training patterns for Helicopter Adventures, Inc. (HAI),requesting an update on April 6, 1993 regarding HAI's cooperation in identifying alternate flight paths, information on the off-site investigation process,initiating Fixed Base Operator(FBO)negotiations for HAI as a priority, and other related issues. The following is a status report on some of these issues. Alternate flight paths: On March 5, 1993, Airport staff met with HAI and the FAA to continue discussions regarding the feasibility of establishing alternate flight patterns to mitigate issues associated with the existing traffic patterns. HAI pledged their continued cooperation towards reaching an acceptable solution. The FAA reaffirmed that their paramount concern with any new pattern would be to ensure that safety is not compromised. After much discussion, it was determined that three alternatives existed (with a possible fourth alternative if an agreement could be reached for a touch down site on Tosco's property). The patterns would have to be flown before any of the alternative routes could be evaluated and approved by the FAA. ;The;demonstr tion test of these three routes was Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: -1 _RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE _APPROVE _OTHER ' SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VO>(ABSENT _ ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: JMW:rs c:6.t4 Orig Div: Airports - H. Wight ) 646-5722 cc: County Administ or Public Wor Irector Public W rks Accounting Auditor/Controller Aviation Advisory Committee Federal Aviation Administration SUBJECT: INTERIM REPORT REGARDING ISSUES .ASSOCIATED WITH HELICOPTER ADVENTURES AT BUCHANAN FIELD AIRPORT April 6, 1993 Page 2 conducted later that day. Patrick Corr, President of Helicopter Adventures, piloted the R-22, with Hal Wight, Manager of Airports, on board. Tracy Williams, Assistant Manager of Airports, was stationed on the ground closest to the nearest residential area for each of the routes to determine the visual and noise impacts. The air traffic control tower personnel also participated by coordinating and separating traffic. The first two alternate patterns were immediately eliminated because while they appeared feasible during the discussions, operationally they proved too dangerous to pursue further. The attached letter (Exhibit "X), dated March 19, 1993, from Fred Davis, Manager of Concord Tower, lists safety related concerns primarily associated with the third alternate route which, at the time, seemed the most viable. Due to the seriousness of Mr. Davis' concerns, staff recommends against implementation of any of these three alternative patterns. Off-site investigation process: Tosco - Prior to conducting any pattern that would involve property owned by Tosco, permission to land would be necessary. Harold Wight has arranged a meeting with representatives of Tosco. An update on his progress will be provided at the Internal Operations meeting on May 10, 1993. Byron - On February 22, 1993, the position of the Pacheco Municipal Advisory Committee on this matter was reviewed. Specifically, the position was voiced by PMAC as follows: "We decided unanimously to terminate the search for any alternate training site, do what we can to modify training flight patterns and wait until all or some of the training flights can be directed to the Byron Airport." Although this position was not adopted, the Board of Supervisors directed the Public Works Director to write to each of those individuals and organizations who have complained to the County since March 1, 1992, regarding the operations of helicopters at Buchanan Field Airport, forwarding the written position of the PMAC, and requesting comments on that position. 102 letters were mailed March 17, 1993 (see Exhibit 'B"). A report on comments received will be submitted to the Internal Operations Committee on May 10, 1993. Mr. Corr stated to the Board of Supervisors on February 22, 1993, that of all airports in the Bay area, Byron would be last on his list of desirable locations for his business. Therefore, staff is of the opinion that any further investigation of Byron as an alternative site for HAI's business would not appear productive. On March 25, 1993, Virginia Schaefer, Chairman of the Aviation Advisory Committee, Harold Wight, and Tracy Williams, met with the Byron Municipal Advisory Council (BMAC) at the direction of Chairman Torlakson, to update them on the issue of helicopter operations and how this matter may affect the Byron Airport. The BMAC indicated that they would send a letter to the Board of Supervisors if they form an opinion. FBO negotiations: We attempted to resume negotiations with HAI. They have provided us with a letter dated March 23, 1993, (Exhibit "C") declining to enter into negotiations at present time for the reasons stated in their letter. Status of meetings with federal elected representatives and the FAA: Letters to the County's Congressional delegation (Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senator Barbara Boxer, Congressman George Miller III, and Congressman William P. Baker) as well as Congressman Norman Y. Mineta are being forwarded as directed by the Board. . ,2..,, �1 BUCHANAN AIRPORT U.S.Department of Transportation Concord Control Tower Federal Aviation 201 John Glenn Drive Administration Concord, CA. 94520 March 19, 1993 Mr. Harold E. Wight Manager of Airports Contra Costa County Airports 510 Sally Ride Drive Concord, California 94520 Dear Mr. Wight: Recently, Helicopter Adventures conducted a flight to determine the feasibility of establishing alternate flight patterns when conducting closed traffic at Buchanan Field. Of the three test patterns flown, information received from HAI would indicate that, from a flight characteristics standpoint, only one of the patterns would appear to be a viable alternative. The proposed pattern would be utilized when runways 19 are in use. The takeoff/landing spot was located at the intersection of taxiways bravo and charlie. Takeoff was to the southwest, with a turn to the south, so as to parallel runway 19 left while overflying the area between taxiway alpha and the ramp taxiway. At the south airport boundry, a turn was made to the east, followed by a turn to the north which places the aircraft on a downwind. After passing the extended centerline of runway 32 right and when off the northeast boundry of the airport, the aircraft turned to the southwest to make the final approach to the landing spot. The proposal referenced the establishment of up to three landing spots on taxiway bravo, in the vicinity of taxiway charlie. . ( See Attachment 1 ) This is to inform you that after observing the aircraft fly the proposed pattern and evaluating the current flight and ground movement traffic flows, I will be unable to endorse the establishment of this pattern. This decision is based on two factors. The first and foremost is safety, and the second is a matter of controllability. The existing helicopter patterns were established with two goals in mind. Based on the runway configuration in use, the present patterns and the associated takeoff/landing spots, allow for helicopter and fixed wing operations to be conducted simultaneously, with minimal operational impact on one another. This is - true for both operations on the ground as well as in the air. The proposed pattern achieves neither of these goals. Instead of geographically separating aircraft activities, this pattern concentrates aircraft activity on Exhibit "A" 2 and over the east side of the airport, where it is estimated that more than eighty percent of present aircraft operations originate and/or terminate. The location of the takeoff/landing spots on taxiway bravo would eliminate one of the two primary taxi routes used by all aircraft taxiing to or from the east ramp parking area. In addition, the potential of helicopters overflying taxiing aircraft is greatly increased due to the close proximity of taxiway bravo in relation to taxiways Juliet, alpha, and the ramp taxiway. These are the primary taxi routes used by aircraft on the east side of the airport taxiing to runways 19. Even more of a concern, is the impact that this pattern would have on airborne operations. The upwind leg of this pattern parallels runway 19 left and passes almost directly over the top of the two primary helicopter arrival and departure pads. The downwind, base, and final of the pattern could potentially conflict with the missed approach procedures for aircraft conducting instrument approaches. The pattern would most certainly conflict with the three primary arrival routes used by helicopters landing at pad one and two .when runways 19 are in use ( See Attachment 2 ) . Due to the number of potential "built in" conflictions, I am quite concerned that while a controller is occupied resolving one of these situations, other conflicts may arise. Should this pattern be established, I feel that the benefit derived would be far outweighed by the potential impact on safety. If you have further questions or comments, please do not hesitiate to contact me. Sincerely, Frederick Davis Manager, Concord Tower Attachments ,�- oa W_ H I ° - r ori 1 11 itil� 1 t,,, ri i C Runways 19 Active � I t Proposed New Helicopter 0 Pattern nO of Cil ------ �� , o o� o 0 CD US d o ATTAMtENT 1 0 0 QQ o Inbound From �-- / Bus Depot J � _W I \ Q Runway 19 Activez \ \ Q ® Proposed New = \ \ Helicopter U \ \ C Pattern with :D \ \ present helicopter arrival routes depicted Inbound from Buffalo Hill wi CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AIRPORTS TELEPHONE: (510)646-5722 * FAX:(510)646-5731 -Public Works 510 Sally Ride Drive * Concord,CA 94520-5550 Buchanan Airport Department Byron Airport Michael Watford March 17, 1993 Harold E. Wight Director Manager of Airports DOROT Ey 33, S S A LUCLCL CT A r C 3 Z ASANT HILL CA 94523 I am writing this letter under the direction of the Internal Operations Committee of the Board of Supervisors. We are soliciting comments from those who have complained to the County since March 1, 1992, regarding the operation of helicopters at Buchanan Field Airport. W4 ,- are also asking that you comment on the position of the Pacheco Municipal Advisory Council which follows: At the meeting on February 22, 1993, the Pacheco Municipal Advisory Council (PMAC) and Pacheco Town Council agreed that the Board of Supervisors should abandon further efforts to locate an alternative site for helicopter training flights in central county. Specifically, this position was voiced by PMAC as follows: "We decided unanimously to terminate the search for any alternate training site, do what ive can to modify training flight patterns and wait until all or some of the training flights can be directed, to the Byron airport." Sincerely, Harold E. Wight for J. Michael Walford Public Works Director JMW:TLW:rs cbc.0 I Concur 11 1 Do Not Concur 0 Comment: Please respond by April 23, 1993 Exhibit "B" 3LLO MYRTLE ALM VaLLOW ST 2868 LOMA VISTA AV .QHECO CA 94553 CONCORD CA 94520 MMY ANDERSON PAMELA ANSELMI GOETHALS CT 1122 MORELLO AVE. AYTON CA 94517 MARTINEZ, CA 94553 )HN" ANTCZAK NAOMIANTUNA 7 MADIGAN AVE. 723 WEST BOYD RD- DNCORD, CA 94520 PLEASANT HILL, CA 94523 �M BALLARD DEBRA BASS '4 SUDAN LOOP 203 FREDA DR kCHECO CA 94520 PACHECO CA 94553 VONNE BECKER MR BENNE-T-F )26 SPRINGLAKE, DR 992 ARGENTA CT [ARTINEZ CA 94553 PACHECO CA 94553 FEVE BERCHDORF MARILYN BISHOP 10 RILEY DR 150 SO BUCHANAN CIR ACHECO CA 94553 PACHECO CA 94553 10NNA BORLAND SUNNE BRADSHAW )53) HIGHLAND DR 183 MEDINA DR 'ONCORD CA 94520 PACHECO CA 94553 'EGGY BURRIS LUISA CARNATHAN 378 HEARTWOOD CT 376 CHRISTEN DR 'ONCORD CA 94521 PLEASANT HILL CA 94523 'ALVIN CHIN JOHN CHUHAK 518 E WOODBURY LN 2152 SHASTA DR MARTINEZ CA 94553 MARTINEZ Ca 94553 OYCE CHURCH KAREN CONNELL '.120 MORELLO AV .357 PANTANO CIR ,ILEASANT HILL CA 94523 PACHECO CA 94553 ANNA DAVIDSON CATHY EASTMAN QO TEMPLE DR 2356 SWEETWATER DR �CHECO CA 94553 MARTINEZ CA 94553 )HN EGGERS DOROTHY ELSENIUS 135 TRINITY AVE 799 YELLOWSTONE DR. 'ALNUT CREEK CA 94596 VACAVILLE, CA 95688 ETTY ENGEN MR. ERICKSON 51 TANBOR WY 163 MARICOPA CT ACHECO CA 94553 PLEASANT HILL CA 94523 DANT EVANS CLINT FERBER SIREN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL 1136 TEMPLE DR :ONCORD CA 94520 PACHECO CA 94553 ,RUCE FITCH DOROTHY FOLEY 61 SKYHARBOR LN 33 SANTA LUCIA CT ITTSBURG CA 94565 PLEASANT HILL CA 94523 ,ICKY FREEMAN SCOTT FRYER 07 PATRICK DR 1235 TEMPLE DR ACHECO CA 94553 PACHECO CA 94553 :ON GARCIA MARY GIRSCH 6 TEMPLE CT 281 SUDAN LOOP 'ACHECO CA 94553 PACHECO CA 94553 EFF GLASSAUER MRS GOMEZ 954 WALLACE DR 306 VIA PERALTA 'LAYTON CA 94517 PACHECO CA 94553 HARLOTTE GREENBERG DIANE HAZELTON .4 DONEGAL CT. 1831 FLORENCE LN 'LEASANT HILL, CA 94523 CONCORD CA 94520 -ESSICA HENRY JAMES HIGH )85 TEMPLE DR 3682 HILLSBOROUGH )ACHECO CA 94553 CONCORD CA 94520 -FORGE HOESER MIRA HOLCOMB )3 BROWN DR 102 BARRY DR ACHECO CA 94553 PACHECO CA 94553 AVID HOUSTON DAVID HUNTER L36 ST FRANCIS DR 2441 UPLAND DR ONCORD CA. 94518 CONCORD CA 94520 IR ISAKSON MRS EDWARD JOHANNESEN ) ACORN CT 30 LOS RANCHITOS IALNUT CREEK CA 94595 WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 AUL KARAICA SANDRA KARAICA 30 AVENIDA FLORES 330 VISTA DEL RIO ACHECO CA 94553 PACHECO CA 94520 IRS LAIRD ROGER LAMB 00 VIA PERALTA 1219 GRANDVIEW AV ACHECO CA 94553 MARTINEZ CA 94523. ANDRA LANG ROGER LANGE 9 DALTON CT 1276 CHELSEA ACHECO CA 94553 CONCORD CA 94520 ZARION LANPHEAR DAVID LEE 12 HARVARD DR 110 BUXTON CIR 'LEASANT HILL CA 94523 PLEASANT HILL CA 94523 AR. LODIN ANNA LOY •951 CHESTNUT AV 4758 BLUM RD :ONCORD CA 94520 MARTINEZ CA 94553 3LAINE MATHESON ALICE MCMILLAN '018 OLYMPIC DR 2685 RICHARD AV MARTINEZ CA 94553 CONCORD CA 94521 .lILLARY MENDONCA RANDY MERCURIO 396 PANTANO CR 134 CHIANTI PL. ?ACHECO CA 94553 PLEASANT HILL CA 94523 REN MOORE DON MOUNT 9 TEMPLE DR 1309 GRAGG LN CHECO CA 94553 CONCORD CA 94518 \RLENE MUNN JOHN NEJEDLY ") ARGENTA DR 400 MONTECELL0 DR -CHECO CA 94523 WALNUT CREEK CA 94595 CKIE NESS RONALD NOLAN I CAMELBACK PL 5739 ROANWOOD WY .EASANT HILL CA 94523 CONCORD CA 94520 )UGLAS O'BRYANT NORM-AN PANCER I ASPEN DR #5 203 FREDA DR LCHECO CA 94553 PACHECO CA 94553 LL PARSONS COLETTE PHILLIPS 8 CAMELBACK PLACE 3625 VILLAGE RD ,EASANT HILL CA 94523 CONCORD CA 94520 DM POPP BARBARA POWER 3 TEMPLE DR 321 ADA DR - kCHECO CA 94553 PACHECO CA 94553 .RS. RICHARDS PAT RICKERT 14 VIA VALENCIA 302 SUNTREE LN NCHECO CA 94553 PLEASANT HILL CA 94553 UDY RODRIQUEZ OLIVER RUSSO )9 CAMELBACK RD 1717 DUCKER CT LEASANT HILL CA 94523 CONCORD CA 94520 -.A. RUTHERFORD TERRENCE SAISEREK )0 SUDAN LOOP 501 SUN TREE LN ACHECO, CA 94553 PLEASANT HILL CA 94523 )OROTHY SAKAZAKI JOYCE SCHEIDIG 37 CENTRAL AVE 2340 TICE VALLEY BLVD fARTINEZ CA 94553 WALNUT CREEK CA 94595 tURIAI. SHARP JEWEL SHEVLIN A VIA VALENCIA 23 BRUCE CT ACHECO CA 94553 PLEASANT HILL CA 94523 OHN TANNER ANDREW 'THOMAS 72 AVENIDA FLORES 2219 CONCORD DR ACHECO CA 94553 PITTSBURG CA 94565 1ARJORIE TUNSTAD TIM TYE 77 AMONTE DR 14 CASEY GLENN CT ACHECO CA 94553 CLAYTON CA 94517 TORDON VALOUGH MARTHA VANDERLINDEN 45 ARIA DR. 55 ADOBE DR ACHECO CA 94553 CONCORD CA 94520 ;EVERLY VENTURINI ED VOMUND 52 SAHARA DR 119 LINDA LN 'ACHECO CA 94553 PLEASANT HILL CA 94523 FALTER VOORES PELLO WALKER 10 ARIA DR 1239 RAYMOND DR 'ACHECO CA 94553 PACHECO CA 94553 'HELMA WHEELER JAMES WHITE 290 BAYWOOD CT 5943 WALLACE DR :ONCORD CA 94520 CLAYTON CA 94517 .VALLY WIGGS GREG WILEY .87 FREDA DR 3002 EUCLID AVE 'ACHECO CA 94553 CONCORD CA 94519 NILLIAM YOULES SHERRY ZARA '.0. BOX 127 989 TEMPLE DR 3ENICIA CA 94510 PACHECO CA 94585 k ZROLItA LINDA BRUCE 1819 SHUEY AVE 4169 CABRILHO DR. WALNUT CREEK CA 94596 MARTINEZ, CA 94553 Helicopter Adventures Inc. March 24, 1993 Mr. Dick Awenius Manager of Leases Contra Costa County Airports 510 Sally Ride Drive Concord, CA 94520 Dear Mr. Awenius, Thank you for your phone call of yesterday asking for a meeting to discuss an FBO agreement with HAI. As you may know it has been our ambition for many years to build our own facility here at Buchanan Field. Two years ago we did hold discussions with County Staff on this issue. At that time we went so far as to draw up preliminary plans and cost estimates but negotiations were suspended by the County Board of Supervisors pending a resolutuin of the noise issue. a' I understand that the County would now like to re-activate these discussions. In the time since our original meetings two obstacles have developed which make it = imprudent for HAI to return to the negotiations at present. Both of them are practical issues which are outside our control. The first of these is the proposed ordinances which are being considered by the Board of Supervisors. The Board is proposing to severely restrict the ability of this company to operate at Buchanan Field. The ordinances under discussion would be specific to HAI even though there are many other helicopter users of this airport, and two other companies providing helicopter flight training. I feel that the County is holding a gun to our head through these unfair and discriminatory ordinances. Because of this, the County can not be considered to be negotiating in good faith. Therefore I think we must resolve the issue of this proposed legislation before we can proceed. The second obstacle is an even more practical one. The construction of an FBO will involve an investment of at least three million dollars. Our bank manager, like most readers of the Contra Costa Times has received a very unfavorable impression of our status in the local business community and has indicated that the bank would be unwilling to fund any new investment for HAI in the present political climate. There can be little doubt that other lenders would react similarly. ■ 81 John Glenn Drive 0 Concord,CA 94520 ❑ 510/686-2917 ❑ Fax 510/686-2986 March 24, 1993 Mr. Dick Awenius Page 2 Before I accept the financial risk associated with an investment of this magnitude I need to know that Buchanan Field and Contra Costa County will provide a stable base of operations for my company over the period of the lease. The current actions of the Internal Operations Committee seem to indicate otherwise. Therefore I feel it is better that we resolve the fundamental issues before we return to negotiation of the FBO agreement. Sinc rely, Patrick Corr President V LU -2:fes: P� IBUCHANAN t - U.S.Department AIR PORT of Transportation Concord Control Tower Federal Aviation 201 John Glenn Drive Administration Concord, CA. 94520 March 19, 1993 Mr. Harold E. Wight Manager of Airports Contra Costa County Airports 510 Sally Ride Drive Concord, California 94520 Dear Mr. Wight: Recently, Helicopter Adventures conducted a flight to determine the feasibility of establishing alternate flight patterns when conducting closed traffic at Buchanan Field. Of the three test patterns flown, information received from HAI would indicate that, from a flight characteristics standpoint, only one of the patterns would appear to be a viable alternative. The proposed pattern would be utilized when runways 19 are in use. The takeoff/landing spot was located at the intersection of taxiways bravo and charlie. Takeoff was to the southwest, with a turn to the south, so as to parallel runway 19 left while overflying the area between taxiway alpha and the ramp taxiway. At the south airport boundry, a turn was made to the east, followed by a turn to the north which places the aircraft on a downwind. After passing the extended centerline of runway 32 right and when off the northeast boundry of the airport, the aircraft turned to the southwest to make the final approach to the landing spot. The proposal referenced the establishment of up to three landing spots on taxiway bravo, in the vicinity of taxiway charlie. ( See Attachment 1 ) j This is to inform you that after observing the aircraft fly the proposed pattern and evaluating the current flight and ground movement traffic flows, I will be unable to endorse the establishment of this pattern. This decision is based on two factors. The first and foremost is safety, and the second is a matter of controllability. The existing helicopter patterns were established with two goals in mind. Based on the runway configuration in use, the present patterns and the associated takeoff/landing spots, allow for helicopter and fixed wing operations to be conducted simultaneously, with minimal operational impact on one another. This istrue for both operations on the ground as well as in the air. The proposed pattern achieves neither of these goals. Instead of geographically separating aircraft activities, this pattern concentrates aircraft activity on Exhibit "A" 2 and over the east side of the airport, where it is estimated that more than eighty percent of present aircraft operations originate and/or terminate. The location of the takeoff/landing spots on taxiway bravo would eliminate one of the two primary taxi routes used by all aircraft taxiing to or from the east ramp parking area. In addition, the potential of helicopters overflying taxiing aircraft is greatly increased due to the close proximity of taxiway bravo in relation to taxiways Juliet, alpha, and the ramp taxiway. These are the primary taxi routes used by aircraft on the east side of the airport taxiing to runways 19. Even more of a concern, is the impact that this pattern would have on airborne operations. The upwind leg of this pattern parallels runway 19 left and passes almost directly over the top of the two primary helicopter arrival and departure pads. The downwind, base, and final of the pattern could potentially conflict with the missed approach procedures for aircraft conducting instrument approaches. The pattern would most certainly conflict with the three primary arrival routes used by helicopters landing at pad one and two when runways 19 are in use ( See Attachment 2 ). Due to the number of potential "built in" conflictions, I am quite concerned that while a controller is occupied resolving one of these situations, other conflicts may arise. Should this pattern be established, I feel that the benefit derived would be far outweighed by the potential impact on safety. If you have further questions or comments, please do not hesitiate to contact me. Sincerely, Frederick Davis Manager, Concord Tower Attachments o" 0 0 r V LIJ \ Ll- I \ \ fY1 114 p I ' � / Runways 19 Active i Proposed New Helicopter Pattern r i 'J;r / -�� o \ rCD j• -- V ATTACH?ANT 1. O � UQ Inbound From C) �-- Bus Depot J W LL- � z Runway 19 Activez \ \ Proposed New = \ \ Helicopter U \ \ / Pattern with ::D \ \ present helicoptGQ arrival routes depicted IV I I � Inbound from Buffalo Hill w"Ith I o �i altitude restrict min to cross actives midfield ;<— / U 103 i Q o 0 0 � . o Inbound from the "Y" nmmnrunnFnim 2 . & Z 2 t The Board of SupervisorsContra Phil Batchelor Clerk of the Board and County Administration BuildingCota County Administrator J 651 Pine St., Room 106 s (510)646-2371 Martinez, California 94553 Count U Tom Powers,1st District J Jeff Smith,2nd District e i Gayle Bishop,3rd District Sunne Wright McPeak 4th District Tom Torlakson,5th District C' April 5, 1993 The Honorable Diane Feinstein Senator Elect 1700 Montgomery Street Suite 305 San Francisco, CA 94111 Dear Senator Feinstein: The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County requests your assistance in resolving some problems which the County is having with the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Contra Costa County owns and operates Buchanan Field Airport, a general aviation airport lying between the cities of Concord, Pleasant Hill, and Martinez, in central Contra Costa County. For a number of years now, Buchanan Field has ranked among the twenty busiest general aviation airports in the United States. As you can imagine, operating such a busy airport in such close proximity to three major cities, while trying to maintain a reputation as a good neighbor, has been a challenging task. We have developed and adopted an aggressive noise control ordinance, which has been quite successful in controlling noise levels due to aircraft, and keeping the noisier and more disruptive aircraft from utilizing Buchanan Field. In March, 1987, the Board of Supervisors initiated an airport noise compatibility study under the provisions of Part 150 of the Federal Aviation Regulations (FAR Part 150). This two year comprehensive study was one of the first FAR Part 150 studies of a general aviation airport in the United States. Following completion of the study in 1989, the Board of Supervisors has worked with the Federal Aviation Administration to implement the recommendations which came out of the FAR Part 150 study, and to operate the airport in a manner consistent with the assumptions contained within the study. During the past five years, Buchanan Field has experienced a very significant increase in helicopter training activities. What started out as a small activity has evolved into a very significant part of the airport's operations. The helicopter operators as well as FAA personnel in the airport control tower, have been very cooperative in attempting to minimize noise disturbance from the helicopter training in the adjacent community. Despite their best efforts, however, the airport is receiving a large number of complaints on a regular basis regarding helicopters, and most of them relate to the training operations. CXNi13/ T .� Senator Feinstein April 5, 1993 Page Two Our problem is that the FAA has preempted the control of all aircraft in the air, thereby thwarting the Board of Supervisors' attempts to keep helicopters away from particularly noise sensitive areas. As you may have read in the paper, one of these training helicopters recently crashed into a park adjacent to a school in Martinez, killing both the pilot and his passenger. We believe that helicopters should be prohibited from flying over schools and other sensitive areas. If we cannot control where the training helicopters fly, then we feel the only alternative is to prohibit touch-and-go helicopter training on Buchanan Field Airport. Again, however, we run up against FAA regulations which say that we cannot discriminate between helicopters and fixed wing aircraft. If we wish to prohibit touch-and-go helicopter training, then we must also prohibit touch-and-go training by fixed wing aircraft. Since we have long term leases with three fixed base operators at Buchanan Field which allow them to provide flight training, it is virtually impossible for us to prohibit touch-and-go flights for the fixed wing aircraft. We believe that there are enough differences between helicopters and fixed wing aircraft, related to their flight characteristics,their noise characteristics,the lower altitudes at which helicopters are allowed to fly, and other significant differences, that we should be able to adopt rules--including prohibition of training--which are different for helicopters than for fixed wing aircraft. We hereby request that you, and 'ff possible other members of the County's congressional delegation, join us in meeting with appropriate FAA officials in an effort to resolve these issues. The County will set up the meeting with the FAA and will advise you of the time and place. We are looking forward to your positive response and assistance so we can continue to operate Buchanan Field as both an asset and a good neighbor to the community which surrounds it. Very truly yours, Tom Torlakson, Chair Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors lT:djh a:cong-Rr.t4 cc: Senator Barbara Boxer Congressman George Miller Congressman William P.Baker Congressman Norman Y.Mineta Members-Board of Supervisors P. Batchelor,County Administrator J.M.Watford, Public Works Director H.Wight, Manager of Airports FAA To the Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors From Will Price, Orinda 4/6/93 I am Will Price representing over 100 members of the Buchanan chapter of the Experimental Aircraft Association. I'm here this morning for one obvious reason; my concern for Buchanan Field. There are many comments that I might make. I could refer to the Times article about the Board being bogged down in a public relations morass. Specifically, I could address Supervisor Smith's remark: "It undermines the county's credibility, and the real basic value of government is credibility." Believe me, I could launch into a real tirade about credibility relative to Buchanan Field. Or I could refer to county counsel Westman's remark: "We've been trying to remove the impression that we're trying to hide things. We're trying to establish a new relationship that's more positive." Excellent objective!! But when I put that in the context of Buchanan Field, my reaction is: "Oh come on, give me a break." But what I want to address is very simple-minded--it relates to pride in the diversity our Contra Costa County community. I see an intelligent and skilled work force and good jobs. I see a fine community college. I see great facilities for the arts, beautiful parks, and vital open space. AND I SEE AN OUTSTANDING AIRPORT! We have an airport that is a key element in the regional transportation network. It is a vital link in the 'county emergency response plan. It is an airport that contributes to the economic diversity of our community with its direct and indirect employment. It is an airport from which Civil Air Patrol volunteers are ready to step forth in an instant when help is needed. It is an airport from which were flown hundreds of volunteer relief flights to Watsonville after the Loma Prieta earthquake. It is an airport with an excellent safety record. It is an airport whose tenants have put forth a real and honest effort to be good neighbors. I call on the Board to begin with Buchanan Field in helping reverse the anti-business climate prevalent throughout the state that is driving quality businesses to other states. I call on the Board appreciate and acknowledge the contribution of our airport to our diverse community. And finally, I call on the Board to involve us, the users and tenants of the airport, in improving and promoting our airport. Thank you. NOTE: The following paragraph is omitted from the oral presentation to the Board in the interest of brevity. I feel compelled to make a comment about my organization, the EAA. The word "experimental"tends to disturb many people. . After all, one would think that experimental aircraft belong at places like the Mojave Desert, not Buchanan Field. Allow me to correct this gross misunderstanding regarding our aircraft. Every member of our group who has built has constructed a proven, time-tested design, many of them from high quality kits available from established companies. In general, the quality of our construction exceeds that of conventional certified aircraft. The label "experimental"which is designated by the FAA, is indeed a misnomer as admitted by the FAA itself. We in the EAA are hoping that a more descriptive classification such as"custom built"will be designated by the FAA. SUBJECT SPEAKER KENNARD E. COLE LETTER TO FEDERAL DELEGATION 2420 couRr •:•, PINOLEv CCAAL. 94564 As a result of the Board order of March 9th, 1993 the County staff has been directed to write to our Senators and Congressmen requesting that they lobby the FAA to allow the Board to ban Helicopter Adventures, Inc, from training at Buchanan Field. I consider this to be a totally inappropriate action by the Board. First of all, I am embarrassed that, as a citizen of this county, the Board would even consider wasting the time and energy of our federal delegation on such a trivial matter. At a time when our Senators and Congressmen are working hard to prevent base closures and loss of jobs, we are asking them to help us cripple a thriving local business. I also find it objectionable that one company has been singled out for this attack, and that the Board purports to be speaking for the majority of citizens of this county on this issue. The message this sends out is that if there is something you don't like in this county just get a couple of people to complain every day and your Board of Supervisors will go to Capitol Hill, if necessary to give you what you want. Frankly, I would be embarrassed to be the person who had to lobby our federal delegation on this issue and if I were a California Senator who received this letter I know where I would file it! I urge the Board to reconsider this decision and to abandon the idea of involving our federal delegation in what is basically nothing more than a neighborhood dispute. DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM /�A (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) 1 '' Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: o A) �'r7� D M p ti PHONE: ADDRESS: �9, 0 7 -D0 tie q14 4 WA. as CITY:. I am speaking formyself ✓ OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGAN17iTlOti) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # -z, My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of Al o r k a �� I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. Noise, bevels Al gacku#,ow At c, held 4o Lcve-l.s Ajvd 0^1- )N ND `A✓A-H -IOC 1jo -�D� �fan'S At1- p0n4,k As /E P,, UOQ Mr49t,�E L r pruc�' ►C � IyGI.St� �� a�,cti�� Nf ��.>`a�'►U�S �h � (/'e��{ ��.►�glyP: DATE: REgUEST TO .SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) ° i� ✓ Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressin the Board. NAME. O r e C � fi PHONE. ADDRESS: 7�i / P!/l�pC� C.:i7 DCITY: /qc il�c.ca I am speaking formyself tOR organization: 0 d / Check one: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. 6LL,o,oTeW ' FZ.,'9h7- 76+1k Ku 1,3-T l3 F �1 t DATE: T REgvEST To SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum .before addressing the B d. NAME: 1Jjf1`� oLr PHONE: Jap"`71(y ADDRESS: A11 6:�4,d ., //I'( CITY: /7- I zI am speaking formyself OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANV-XT10%) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against V/ I wish to speak on the subject of r' I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: 129 AJA 10 J. 04127 62 PHONE: qYq' /CI SS ADDRESS: 2,51q MoA1, xk Cr CrIY: 6o#e..ye17- �G I am speaking formyself X OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANV-XTION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # 2` Z. My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of X I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. 1r Jcin,P,9/tr y a g -4v1,gnoA) OmputAIM iA/ ®PPas1r70-A) -a nfCr- T,VTn2,vAc� �p 2rq-T'ic� m �FTi )0:rCQA .A.9r?J D)?-"6'0s IZ66,42r'1-VA) i DATE: �L- 6 -93 REgvEsT To SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: &ZOL-- I-f PHONE: /a 117-`l 1i ADDRESS:J99�- Crry: I am speaking formyself OR organization: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # �. My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. I DATE: G REQUEST To SPEAK FORm (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the/ )Board. NAME: Z- D V /�� PHONE: O s 1-2 ADDRESS: .S�f ( � CrIY: I am speaking formyself OR organization: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) ~'- Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # . . My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: c �.�.� l6 ,,,�e,jz PHONE:.4 7l _9'�P7. ADDRESS: 03 7 (J mac. S 71AJ ZJ/Q `/ CITY: I am speaking formyself OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANI/.-XTION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # 2 'Z My comments will be: general for against I'wish to speak on the subject of V I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. aAcyx� DATE: h' REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: /�" C4 ¢01 PHONE: 115 ADDRESS: l 7 3 L'r.1/1 C�C�/JaCI /��` CITY: G�GO?- I am speaking formyself_(ZOR organization: (NAME OF ORGANf7_Nl'IOti) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # 2 -2— My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: '•.- .'---�I�� REgvEsT To SPEAK FORM ' THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board/.A NAME: / ���'/ , APHONE: �— ADDRESS: /17� l�r %cc !'L I"� S CITY: I am speaking formyself OR organization: Check one: NAME OF ORCANII-\TION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # -C 2-- My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of — I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: .. ! REgLTEST TO .SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: PHONE: ADDRESS: Z 2 4-70 s,_ w CITY: C"y �j9 c- I am speaking formyself X OR organization: Check one: (NAME of ORCANILVION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # 2, z.. . My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to.consider. - nL ,, Q Ifri e%,dS� w Jan u G a-r % Gc l jr 0jtp jlj- P 1 b t�-e-- Q,V�c, a-kj JO_ 14,,f- DATE: RF.QI ST To SPEAK FORm (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. U NAME: Z r) a. ; (� r(i� // PHONE: ADDRESS: ` 9 i�Ff.--� �f ;/, �� 7` `��� i' Cn y: I am speaking formyself OR organization: CheckOIIC: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider.. �-� 6 u c�1•z_i�y�, �i�i-by _ S Ar .r7`� 1.-C7 h !7�G.�l /tom'✓` DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: ,�J/1'1v�/7� /9� i� G'�� PHONE: ADDRESS: ITy�YT S Z& Crry: �C So7�'T�'9 v I am speaking formyself OR organization: �y-P(Co ;�-S Check one: (NAME OF ORGANIZV 10%) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for ,against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: ,D /� PHONE: (11 S ADDRESS: / CITY: & �� I am speaking formyself _ OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # ? My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of _ I do of wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. D Dig 2v W -P DSC ,'e- DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK '' ORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: 'F—RV %N PHONE: ADDRESS: 3a04 NIptAWCMFRS DR Crry: AWV1Qr,14 I am speaking formyself ✓ OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANI7.NT10N) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # a :a My comments will be: general for against T subject of Q cmc H a A til A1�,�o Fid ✓ I. not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. tAc%A1f,5 c0Kt4E14T "SNE MEIN RE.SQoNsQ Zo AQPPKcr1? L%.e(in AM-TY a ApVkcE of OF I05-11-T �'tIOq -F)-\ 6,k4l r\S,5'19\1CI Iot�6 Al yvACNA0%0 8��a0414CY CouNSEL.. 15 AMOTtVS1K ?0L%-T1CAtF-XAMPL-IF OF- Kb(45C of Vov3E0, ANP ARRnGAOC-Lr/ DwTE: 9,3 REgUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. // )) -18z DWS NAME: E/C'/t L✓Al�D N PHONE: .610 ADDRESS: '268 Crry: 1277 I am speaking formyself OR organization: 4 /0�sJ�• Check one: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of l_ I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. DATE: J REQUEST To SPEAK FORM THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) .Complete this form and place it in the box. near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: / 0, PHONE: q 0 4,51 ADDRESS: D CITY: 0,4)I)CBq I am speaking formyself OR organization: NAME OF ORCA Check one: !VIl.�1'IOti) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # . My comments will be: general : for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. J i fill 9�, ` A, b -k Pee412 QuoWK L,,-�4 pct t • P w. a,X„a..nI 1 4 11 DATE: 4- REQUESTTo SPEAK '' ORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: Wt4 ei PHONE: alt I ADDRESS: 8 GID ) Jv�1 CITY: 0 r- in Jam I am speaking formyself OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANIZNTION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against .�� I wish to speak on the subject of n i ,n✓'rl,n��, u �A t x V� I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. 4 iv-f y1h w -47 C-4 1*V 14 C1 1 IIN ; L e� Q ,j �l Q. 9j( 's�",�n c !�a c ! h 7, 1_ �'e• DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK '' ORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. PHONE: NAME: ��.. 7GlL ✓G�% ��- ADDRESS: �- L•r' l"_t'/ycE/ CITY: l I am speaking formyself-- OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANIZkTION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: ' general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. /✓�Jtif LS //L aG2// L�eJ�./11�1L/lGz/ * G. r .. VQ �%?v/�,.. ..%J �/� u �;if/d�/''-Gc�ir.i �n t' �1LL'. I��✓i0r3 C'�iJ o< .:.:7.r:'•'.LLJ `.�:, �.s' ,.:v3`. DATE: 2 REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE umrr) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: L 0 r L e- 4,�v✓ro PHONE: ZZ8 -Z 9 7 2- ADDRESS: 9 / d Vi-f) Pel P,,aJ1g CrIY: r/a rr7ih�z I am speaking formyself_ OR organization: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. X4 b OG1 V7� IM OT T,,;l �e 7 I yr oy7 JJ I bV)4o d(/.hT 1lu ,S"y l d h oy- 2 DATE: +16 zcit REgUEST TO SPEAK '' ORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. r'�i NAME: O Q f 4 0 WZ 65 PHONE: &5C( S-y[ J"I ADDRESS: 2l& G�VAM w001 �i 1 Cn-Y: Co I�G ! © )ZiD I am speaking formyself X OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGA.YI%-\PION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # 2 .2 My comments will be: general for against X I wish to speak on the subject of - I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. 1�IILA M �:L\6T w 0 V4 M1 t,��krd oru," r,,C7�64 A e L.6 Aftv V\A-O a-a 40 Q &Z i WI.O'f�1 b fl C?,S �tNI�RG LSI C- V�F}Ic L-ES Ai&Y A c �e o9Rva04 5 AV6 P*4: 8K kvf- (gw Cvvolg 5, ( ! fka cc(Y C-ov rn Kue- --,v AT 18c)Lc 4a�A-rd DATE: 173 REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: f�t9Zk `►-l4tl/ PHONE: C707� 7 y7 - ,5 7)9 ADDRESS: S7S ' 'WR5 CQyRT CITY: -B6NKI A e A. I am speaking formyself OR organization: (N Check one: OF ORGA.yI/.al'(Oti) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. -7 f iRST LeARN&D -'6 fly Al avclvwo,&J r%611> ? YEARS AL:bjg&�1 flyr mwi-t1ty kE E 6 a wT RF, t5 A wf -t�E RftCRA'�-r Noist 3 L%veiD ��l��sw7 ilt -� S �ed►es -.4*k% rk� bEle� � fi1► T �P,-aCRN :1 L0\361? -1u v%MCL �E � ACES -4661 -- '; i ► Vw utts As E'/V we 9 L- t'�Pk o p -a boto lj--►q . i woukk'D 4 O j>e -Tti3On £ t�6v a I�At 1Ae Fa [bM R&A, "."t -kF- I�oiSE 5�nn�!y �a u E -h� 17[�f�`�dfinlT �°XbE ESC CG LA\�6 1vt,VG. -10 0&1tALRhCC'IA . N e-i KAUy T'6&(657 -4 111E DATE: REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. / NAME: 1�� ► �i ",3cl e u, f-� ,�s PHONE: 7 a"81 ADDRESS: S qSV, "e, 4-L4 C 1 A q CITY: I am speaking formyself ✓ OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGA.Niz-�Tlo%) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. 4� -LO �,Ozq �<P DATE: ; -a3 REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM �. (THREE (3) MINUTE umrr) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: C% t b'V-vim- (1M -V-T Vi PHONE: 2 153 Q ADDRESS: foby VSTVk` W 1 Cmt: I am speaking formyself OR organization: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments.will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. K-:0 N 4b;i p, 0 W. , SNFtom", 2uN \R-kmct lie=q A-rL�c• N a-t- Qe-�R R C�f.a)T�-c 4 e- 0 C� SPEAKERS I. Deposit the "Request to Speak" form (on the reverse side) in the box next to the speakers' microphone before your item is,to be considered. 2. You will be called to make your presentation. Please speak into the microphone. 3. Begin by stating your name and address: whether you are speaking for yourself or as a representative of an organization. 4. Give the Clerk a copy of your presentation or support documentation. if available. 5. Please limit your presentation to three minutes. Avoid repeating Comments made by previous speakers. (The Chair may limit'length of presentations so all persons may be heard.) kC DATE: REQUEST TO .SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMrr) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. NAME: 55 PHONE: &�Jl-I 1710 ADDRESS: a/ -5;1�-,z/ ;,0/-5 44AP CrrY: u) L AiyT G/ i I am speaking formyself OR organization: Check one: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for .against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. �-� . SPEAKERS 1. Deposit the "Request to Speak" form (on the reverse side) in the box next to the speakers' microphone before your item is to be considered. 2. You will be called to make your presentation. Please speak into the microphone. 3. Begin by stating your name and address: whether you are speaking for .yourself or as a representative of an organization. 4. Give the Clerk a copy of your presentation or support documentation. if available. 5. Please limit your presentation to three minutes. Avoid repeating Comments made by.previous speakers. (The Chair may limit-length of presentations so all persons may be heard.) DATE: (o Ar X13 --r REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE LIMIT) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. CI NAME: ` CJ nl I l�-f�m I nJ� PHONE: ADDRESS: CLQ ( Am k A CITY: K-f�nJS i A✓q 1 d hJ I am speaking formyself OR organization: (NAME OF ORGANI%al'IOti) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of _y/ I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. /arm CE S I nJ Tti O F F-16 A,7 S 4 1 v Lo, -I ►o N5 A) — P-o /ZTy s-e.. Aiw Q e=:-=4 v 1--A T[0 Av 5 a) A► ►� Tri s �II o nTATi o rJ S A (0 IU A TI )AJ W I olo , u N I FwA-� i 'i� o f FL l ti 1 Aw Le-5 A%,1 A",v LA SPEAKERS 1. Deposit the "Request to Speak" form (on the reverse side) in the box next to the speakers' microphone before your item is to be considered. 2. You will be called to make your presentation. Please speak into the microphone. 3. Begin by stating your name and address: whether you are speaking for yourself or as a representative of_an organization.. 4. Give the Clerk a copy of your presentation or support documentation, if available. 5. Please limit your presentation to three minutes. Avoid repeating comments made by previous speakers. (The Chair may limit'length of presentations so all persons may be heard.) 3,� 7�+-� SM�-L L� N vi'�l �-c� o I-' C-d�l�'I P Lse►�i!S ��M '�+-e: S l���. ►��P-e. O o IvoT- .J v--I FL1 /� ,,j Ge v�v?j AC-rl o n.), �-- A I r`r o K-T A r-T►v I T L1 51^a v L j 6-c� cW C--v2 A -C A S i9-N e-c-�o^i. IC, STi wl v Lv6 -ro '7-,kis /4fLt^ C,e-- M a n/ 5. 5 ) NJ co I -,e 5 7 h aA T iF Ljo v L v-. /t t.� A,^j A 12- �0 A FI-i C h T (iia LI O U C.A;Aj -QAC r e cX /�I C.i►t�e F T Nut Se AS LI G U ���'�,c�T A-vTO tit d b I Le- /v v 1— LI U u Li.Ve-, e.I-f-� A f 5eeewl �) s � r�v M R,".CQ s A s P�T v r0s / c e i b . � � a N o 1.S'Ci U F /N1 d L-! F-�. S A \Are- N1 U 5 T X91 9-P L Aft r.S l DATE: RF.QIMST To .SPEAK FORM (THREE (3) MINUTE umrr) Complete this form and place it in the box near the speakers' rostrum before addressing the Board. / NAME: //40rNL 111 PHONE: � 35-3 3 ADDRESS: 3'44s G,9 YA6,'C- /9 Vef- CrrY: PIV0,16-- I am speaking formyself X OR organization: (NAME OF ORGANIZATION) Check one: I wish to speak on Agenda Item # My comments will be: general for against I wish to speak on the subject of I do not wish to speak but leave these comments for the Board to consider. C .�IGu T SPEAKERS 1. Deposit the "Request to Speak" form (on the reverse side) in the box next to the speakers' microphone before your item is to be considered. 2. You will be called to make your presentation. Please speak into the microphone. 3. Begin by stating your name and address: whether you are speaking for yourself or as a representative of an organization. 4. Give the Clerk a copy of your presentation or support documentation, if available. 5. Please limit your presentation to three minutes. Avoid repeating comments made by previous speakers. (The Chair may limirlength of presentations so all persons maybe heard.) 6'ev"e, j U 16 ace Wad&' Cl ,, .e a V Y \ California Shock/Trauma Air Rescue March 31, 1993 Tom Powers, Supervisor CONTRA COSTA COUNTY 100 37th Street, Room 270 Richmond, CA 94805 Dear Supervisor Powers: I have heard that a member of the Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County is preparing an ordinance to restrict helicopter useage of the Concord Airport and possibly to restrict airspace in Contra Costa County. As the Chief Executive=0fficer..L.of-the Qnly...helicopter-=1 ambulance based in). . the County, I would like to vol:ce my strong opposition to this proposal.. :_: ..._.... California Shock Trauma Acue,-(`CALSTAR). is a not-for-profit ocimumin ty service; based at"_ Concord Airport. The organization's purposegis to provide an is�umediateresponse remerg6ic helicopter ambulance to the _- - citizens of .Contra:Costa-County:_... This service--isY ssential to-.ensure rapid access 'to;the' County'. Traiutia iCenter- at John Muir- Med_ica__l-Center for ,-- citizens injured� n�the-more, riewdb parts- of._the-Cqunty This ordinance would-:.adversely-effec& CALSTAR's ability to-serve Contra Costa County,..°resulting':�m- longer response, and transport times for patients or even.�tt e corrplete(removal of,helicopter ambulance..ysery Longer response-and transport times'will<'result 'iri a-higher mor-tal ty rate for trauma tients-.and.-increased liability to the County. In the last twelve mohbhs.=C-ALSTAR_has transported over 200 critically injured patients to the Trauma-Center at John Muir. Many of these patients would not survive if transported by ground ambulance services. For many patients, helicopter transport has been the difference between tife and death. Aircraft noise complaints generally came from people with homes near the airport. Their property values can be expected to increase if aviation services to the county should be limited or denied. There are many camqDanies at the airport that pay taxes, provide jobs and other important services to the community. I hope that the Board realises that limiting) aviation services at Buchanan Field or the Byron Airport is not in the best interest of the citizens of Contra Costa County. �'�Z,3468�8�0 Sincerely yours, >>� 1�ed � a eph F. Cook '� °; President A Non-Profit Community Service ZZ�Z� 20876 Corsair Blvd., Suite B Hayward, California 94545 (510) 3 Mr-- O ® RECEIVED PEOPLE OVER PLANES, INC. April 2, 1993 A - 2 CLERK BOARD OF 5l-p2RV1 Opc a z� CONTRA COSTA CO. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Dear Board of Supervisors: At the March 9, 1993, Board of Supervisors meeting, I stated that we were encouraged by the scope of discussions regarding the helicopter problem but that there are concerns regarding the intentions of staff versus the Board's directives. Regarding Supervisor Torlakson's directive that the people of Byron be consulted about the possibility of increased helicopter training at Byron Hal Wight and Tracy Williams appeared at the BMAC's March meeting. Wally Wiggs, of the PMAC was to attend that meeting but was informed by Mike Walford that Board member(s) felt it was unnecessary to do so. Mr. Walford and Mr. Wiggs were to attend the meeting together. When Mr. Walford declined, he failed to mention that Hal and Tracy would be there, and so Mr. Wiggs was led to believe there would be no presentation by the County and, therefore, saw no reason to attend. It appears that a standard shell game was run on Mr. Wiggs, and to no one's surprise; lately, we read about these tactics almost daily in the Contra Costa Times and have experi- enced the same problem for years. The report we received about Mr. Wight's presentation at the March BMAC is not encouraging. Apparently, he stated that it was unlikely that Helicopter Adventures would train at Byron because there are no hotels, restaurants or car rentals in the area. The current scenario under discussion would have HAI based at Buchanan and flying to Byron for lessons, and then back to Buchanan. CC: WARD itf`ii=�iiitF;;i (P�0v:datl) ���P.O. Box 2336 • Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 • (415) 689-5652 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors -2- April 2, 1993 Hotels, restaurants, etc., are irrelevant to that scenario. We wonder if anything relevant was discussed at the Byron meeting and assume that Mr. Wight will give a report at the April 6, 1993, Board of Supervisors meeting. On March 9, 1993, at the Board of Supervisors, Mr. Wight and Mr. Walford implied that wildlife mitigation at Byron Airfield was far from resolved. At a March AAC meeting held at Byron Airfield regarding the hangar relocations, Mr. Shut, of the engineering firm Hodges & Shut, stated that the bulk of wildlife mitigation would be completed in approxi- mately two months. Before the Board on March 9, 1993, a gentleman from the Aircraft Pilots Association employed the old scare tactic of "airport red-lining," as it pertains to disclosure during real estate transactions. There appears to be concern among fixed-wing pilots that if helicopter mitigation is successful, an unfavorable precedent would occur that might affect their interests. Our current focus is on the helicopter problem. Noise characteristics unique to helicopters, as well as the frequency and repetitive nature of helicopter training, makes it a nuisance to the point of insult. Authorities in Waco, Texas, are using helicopter overflights of the Davidian Branch compound:as a psychological weapon. They did the same thing in Panama to force Noriega's surrender. We hope that a representative from the FAA will attend the IOC meeting on May 10, 1993, and that our federal representatives have been contacted by staff as directed by the Board. Given that a response from those representatives is unlikely to occur before April 6, 1993, we hope that the Board does not act prematurely in such a way that might render impotent any new or creative approaches that may be forthcoming. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors -3- April 2, 1993 While everyone is anxious for movement on this issue, our view is that significant input from various sources has not occurred. We are early in this particular phase. We also stress that in the event of failure to sub- stantially mitigate this problem, the County should not enter into an FBO agreement with HAI that would preclude implementation of new develop- ments that could be forthcoming from various directions. Sincerely, Don Mount, President , ~ ' REtEIVED MR 3 0 GO UERK BOARD OF SUPE ISORS Contra Costa County CONTRA COSTVA CO. Board of Supervisors 651 Pine St. Martinez , Ca. 94553 March 24, 1993 Dear Elected Officials: Regarding: Proposed Airport Ordinance/Helicopter 's Your job is not an easy one ! The county is experienceing a dramatic short fall in revenue and businesses are leaving the area, thus making the future very perilous. In light of the county's financial problems, I 'm courious about your decisions to drive away corporate aircraft with more and more restrictions upon those doing business in this county. Airport records show that only 5 people are responsible for the major number of complaints. To pass a "performance based noise ordinance" BEFORE you have actual data, from noise monitoring equipment , (yet to be installed) is very frivolous, unprofessional and dangerous. Please consider how foolish you, as public officials, will appear. All airports are governed by Federal Air Regulations, to disregard them, in favor of YOUR OWN REGULATIONS, will surely terminate all Federal funding , and further financially impact the county because of "payback" for previous funds received. The county under State and Federal law must not discriminate against the lawful use of the airport , yet , as the Board of Supervisors you have singled out one company, Helicopter Adventures, Inc. to make demands on them, that other company's on the field will not be subject to. How do you plan on distinguishing between other Buchanan based heli- copters, visitor helicopters and Helicopter Adventure's aircraft? People are tired of county money being spent foolishly. The pilots who use Buchanan Field are safety conscious, courteous taxpaye�rs who want to be treated fairly. Sincerely, L..'f-Luis M. Ellis D. . S. 1718 Via del Verdes Concord , Ca. 94521 (510) 682-0737 From: Friends of Buchanan Field To: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear Supervisors: The time has come for me to speak up in the interest of Buchanan Field and of the many services It provides including availability in case of emergency. I am aware that a handful of people from Pacheco and Pleasant Hill have driven you not to like the Airport. However, we must consider the fact that the Airport was here long before we were. It is convenient not only for the public, but for the many businesses that have purposely moved here because of it. You should also take Into consideration that the Airport is about the only business that generates revenue for the county while costing the taxpayer nothing. Just think of the extra money you will have to spend on frivolous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend lawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne McPeak is talking about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. If she wishes to defend it, let her and her supporters provide the finances. After all, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you, the Supervisors, represent the majority of the people (including me), and not the minority, as you seem to be doing. Let's hope sooner or later the people realize that the Airport is self-sufficient, an asset to the county, and a good business to keep going. California in general cannot afford the loss of any more income. Instead of the "Tax 'em to death" syndrome, let's support more income-generating businesses like Buchanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Na Address: ( � Ja14,-) Q0.4,X br. City: r-OACOrs CA c/jaa From: Friends of Buchanan Field To: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear Supervisors: . The time.has come for me to speak up In the Interest of Buchanan'Field and of the . many services It provides Including availability In case of emergency. l am aware that a handful of people from Pacheco and Pleasant Hlll have driven you not to like the Airport. However, we must consider.the fact that the Airport was here long before we were. It Is convenient not only for the public', but for the many businesses that have purposely moved here because of it. You should also take Into consideration that the Airport is about the only business that generates revenue for.the county while costing the taxpayer nothing. Just think of the extra money you will have to spend on frivolous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend lawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that. Sunne McPeak Is talking about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. If she wishes to defend It, let her and her supporters provide the finances. After all, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you; the Supervisors, represent the majority of the people (including me), and not the minority,as you.seem to be doing. Let's hope sooner or later-the people realize that the Airport Is self-sufficient, an asset to the county, and a good business to keep going. California In general cannot afford the loss of any. more Income. Instead of the "Tax 'em to death" syndrome, let's support more Income-generating businesses like Buchanan Field.. Thank you so much for your time. Name: Address: /rte fig' O/M 0 vi, city: wa-/n u O rc e(� c/Jaa. From: Friends of Buchanan Field To: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear Supervisors: The time has come for me to speak up in the interest of Buchanan Field and of the many services it provides including availability in case of emergency. 1 am aware that a handful of people from Pacheco and Pleasant Hill have driven you not to like the Airport. However, we must consider the fact that the Airport was here long before we were. it is convenient not only for the public, but for the many businesses that have purposely moved here because of it. You should also take into consideration that the Airport Is about the only business that generates revenue for the county while costing the taxpayer nothing. Just think of the extra money you will have to spend on frivolous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend lawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne McPeak is talking about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. If she wishes to defend It, let her and her supporters provide the finances. After all, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you, the Supervisors, represent the majority of the people (including me), and not the minority, as you seem to be doing. Let's hope sooner or later the people realize that the Airport is self-sufficient, an asset to the county, and a good business to keep going. California In general cannot afford the loss of any more income. Instead of the "Tax 'em to death" syndrome, let's support more income-generating businesses like Buchanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Name: 2.o¢d �Yo1os C)V- CZ Address: City: G`C- c/Jaa From: Friends of Buchanan Field To: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear Supervisors: The time has come for me to speak up in the interest of Buchanan Field and of the many services it provides including availability in case of emergency. 1 am aware that a handful of people from Pacheco and Pleasant Hili have driven you not to like the Airport. However, we must consider the fact that the Airport was here long before we were. It is convenient not only for the public, but for the many businesses that have purposely moved here because of it. You should also take Into consideration that the Airport Is about the only business that generates revenue for the county while costing the taxpayer nothing. Just think of the extra money you will have to spend on frivolous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend lawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne McPeak is talking about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. If she wishes to defend it, let her and her supporters provide the finances. After all, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you, the Supervisors, represent the majority of the people (including me), and not the minority, as you seem to be doing. Let's hope sooner or later the people realize that the Airport is self-sufficient, an asset to the county, and a good business to keep going. California in general cannot afford the loss of any more income. Instead of the "Tax 'em to death" syndrome, let's support more income-generating businesses like Buchanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Flame � Address:Inz City: c/J'aa From: Friends of Buchanan Field To: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear Supervisors: The time has come for me to speak up in the interest of Buchanan Field and of the many services it provides including availability in case of emergency. 1 am aware that a handful of people from Pacheco and Pleasant Hill have driven you not to like the Airport. However, we must consider the fact that the Airport was here long before we were. It is convenient not only for the public, but for the many businesses that have purposely moved here because of it. You should also take into consideration that the Airport is about the only business that generates revenue for the county while costing the taxpayer nothing. Just think of the extra money you will have to spend on frivolous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend lawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne McPeak is talking about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. If she wishes to defend It, let her and her supporters provide the finances. After all, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you, the Supervisors, represent the majority of the people (including me), and not the minority, as you seem to be doing. Let's hope sooner or later the people realize that the Airport is self-sufficient, an asset to the county, and a good business to keep going. California in general cannot afford the loss of any more income. Instead of the 'Tax 'em to death" syndrome, let's support more income-generating businesses like Buchanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Name: l� Address: City: Wnwr, CA c/J'aa From: Friends oil- Buchanan F:ieid To- Contra Costa County Supervisors Thia 4tifne has come for rue to speak lip ii, the interest of Bucizanan Frield and of the marry Services at provides infuding a%.,-aflabillity in case of, emerge" "tcy. I ail; aware Ulaf. 'Ian-d-M Of 1-f-" pie fi-G M. FlPeand Pieasant iff-d! have driv ri yo.; to hate However. we must consider the fact tha+ the Airport was here !on.-" bcfcre we -were. it is coilvenieiit not only for Uh e- pub lic. but for the ixiany businesses that have pur;.-Os1Y nfdved here because of it You should also take into consideration that -t-thc Airport -eve nue for the caunty M.-ile cos"n- about Vle anis business that generates taxpayer nothing. Just think of the exira-money you will have to spend art frivoleNUS things suclin as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend iawsuits whiere you end up settifing ou'r of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne 'McPeak- is talsking about a lawsuit Irani the FAA with county Ifunds. It she wishes to defend 'It, 'get her and her supporters provide the finances. After al.i. the county has no money left to waste. Remember you. the Supervisors. represent the majority of the people 'Pinck-ding- Esser. and not 'rhe minority. as you seem to be doing. Let's hope sconer or iaier rhe peopie realize ifiai the Airport is serr-sufficient, ar asset to ct:'Lyand a good business to keep .31"U U Lit _going. CaNfornfia ark z.;-erterai cartnotL i ' -rJ the loss of any znore incorne. Instead of the "Tlax 'em to death".syn"dro-me. ict"S sui)port more incarne-generatin,-, busiresses like Buchanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Name: Address: 539 A A/6 C.rJr'C 'b r city: Oct In 44-- 6 From: Friends of Buchanan Field To: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear Supervisors: The time has come for me to speak up in the interest of Buchanan Field and of the many services it provides including availability in case of emergency. I am aware that a handful of people from Pacheco and Pleasant Hill have driven you not to like the Airport. However, we must consider the fact that the Airport was here long before we were. It is convenient not only for the public, but for the many businesses that have purposely moved here because of it. You should also take into consideration that the Airport is about the only business that generates revenue for the county while costing the taxpayer nothing. Just think of the extra money you will have to spend on frivolous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend lawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne McPeak is talking about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. If she wishes to defend It, let her and her supporters provide the finances. After all, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you, the Supervisors, represent the majority of the people (including me), and not the minority, as you seem to be doing. Let's hope sooner or later the people realize that the Airport is self-sufficient, an asset to the county, and a good business to keep going. California in general cannot afford the loss of any more Income. Instead of the 'Tax 'em to death" syndrome, let's support more income-generating businesses like Buchanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Name: Address: d T� 1/l. Clty: e c/,jaa From: Friends of Buchanan Field To: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear Supervisors: The time has come for me to speak up in the interest of Buchanan Field and of the many services it provides including availability in case of emergency. 1 am aware that a handful of people from Pacheco and Pleasant Hill have driven you not to like the Airport. However, we must consider the fact that the Airport was here long before we were. It is convenient not only for the public, but for the many businesses that have purposely moved here because of it. You should also take Into consideration that the Airport is about the only business that generates revenue for the county while costing the taxpayer nothing. Just think of the extra money you will have to spend on frivolous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend lawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne McPeak Is talking about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. If she wishes to defend It, let her and her supporters provide the finances. After all, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you, the Supervisors, represent the majority of the people (including me), and not the minority, as you seem to be doing. Let's hope sooner or later the people realize that the Airport is self-sufficient, an asset to the county, and a good business to keep going. California In general cannot afford the loss of any more income. Instead of the "Tax 'em to death" syndrome, let's support more income-generating businesses like Buchanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Name: Address: !�/ C.�C /'L- City.- c/Jaa From: Friends of Buchanan Field To: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear Supervisors: The time has come for me to speak up in the interest of Buchanan Field and of the many services it provides including availability in case of emergency. 1 am aware that a handful of people from Pacheco and Pleasant Hill have driven you not to like the Airport. However, we must consider the fact that the Airport was here long before we were. it is convenient not only for the public, but for the many businesses that have purposely moved here because of it. You should also take into consideration that the Airport Is about the only business that generates revenue for the county while costing the taxpayer nothing. Just think of the extra money you will have to spend on frivolous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend lawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne McPeak is talking about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. If she wishes to defend It, let her and her supporters provide the finances. After all, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you, the Supervisors, represent the majority of the people (including me), and not the minority, as you seem to be doing. Let's hope sooner or later the people realize that the Airport is self-sufficient, an asset to the county, and a good business to keep going. California In general cannot afford the loss of any more income. Instead of the "Tax 'em to death" syndrome, let's support more income-generating businesses like Buchanan Field. Thank you P)mu for y time. � Blame: 7.0 � � Address: City: c/jaa From: Friends of Buchanan Fieid A o: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear SuPervisers: The ti.—ne has cairte for me -';a speak, jjp ;n the int-arest of Field and, all Che ag av- in case Of I ain aware that a many Serv­&­ oludi. ailabill Pacheco and Pieasant Hill have dri a you to hiatc filo PIl " However. we must consider the fact that the Airport was here long -b-c-fore W.e,were, it is conyeni_-nt ;iot or.i, or dhe i3tublic, but for the i-ipany that 4-:1 V e purposely tviaved here because of it. You should also take into consideration -that the Airport is about the only business that generates revenue for the county Millie costing then taxpayer nothing. just thlrok oi-the extra money you viii have te-Spe ld an friyalous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to deiend iawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne I'AcPeak is talkaig about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. :f she vdishes to defend 1191, 'set iter and her supporters provide the finances. After allf, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you, the Supervisors, represent the majority of; Che people (including me!, anid not the minority, as you seem to be doing. Let's -tape sooner or icier ihe people raalize Thai the Airpori is seff-suffi.cient., anassei #.-a the city, and a good business to keep going. California in genera! cannot afford the !ass 0; an.y more incam.e. histead of the **7ax lent to death" syn."drome, let's support nore income-generatic.; businesses like Buchanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Name: Address: ity. rrc-M: r-ienas C' Buchanan SuPeT Visers iZaar Carne-veene.e• The tIiS!2 tiiuS 4vni foi c.i2 v spe-a�. up :ia she laze:—est of :a is L!?4 fib{! i'iTc"'ici ands ii: ii"tc ma l Y:L'E= t' on-n- ides :fAli.iilti�`,�? ,�.l{{2t'ti .^.2a iiltj in case 3Y �'i�:?t 5�ii`•..J'/. i aft. .'.moi ai-e u{.:}2 jr41,t1 .�''ricllGcv �:l�i ii . asaai; ili hg 'i1 yoi: 4o iiG«C: However we must t'-c-icider t e $wet thaf fine Ain-ort was here li=c`'` swerv-- of o .y ' r the ? l.i S>i i ; f. t � � i � a-.. ses that k, u :{ oO _.. :3 not nf, �^i _ r _'tom, )_l� ^r 7 ta'tari, i} 1..'tn s- .:iaY'U' �:.::; ryf ved- z:ere beGae:se- Jf it. °:vf# s=iculd also take into consideration th,J{ aS?out It'ie e niv husiness ti ;generates revenue fcr t-he cvi:rtty Willie costiia� '_i`•? i3X:S,?r iaGt ei1i ', Justzhirsk CSF the exiraa honey you ?+Bili have to spend or Trivolcus Inings such as exorbitani: lawyers fees fo defend i:.-wSUits WiiBre yOti and Up 01i r z Ga nm� a. talking di a Ot CUsYt 3Cijr'Si'cp'. ti<�e are iallra!'e 1.1131 3uilrae i�nt,`r'�e8:l. is Luil+lilg a�t,}fSii► u@i0iitilr.5 8 iaWSt#:t 4-3- iiie PAA`r's'ills county iiS.ia'is. :11 sh,e wishes to deferid- it-, let her and her sizp'po er s provide the finances. miter aii. the county rias no money left to waste. Remember you. t',,;e Suaer`,`Sors. rertresen ti r alaiority o: the people l,"incl-a-ding Iliac. and not the minority, as you seem to be doin,. Let's ,lope sr,::ner or ;ate: L:?e Jeopie reai1Ze 'Gnat � e Airport; is sell'^S€1TTiCi=�llt, ar, asset to e e City. and a good basiness to keep ;oily :a seiierat cannot affard the ivss a any rnor cc mcame. instead of iil2 '�an a3're`i; iG c�2at 2� �jt::u` ^^. le.t'S S:3 I}+Gi`i -C businesses like Bue`lanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Name: Address: iq c 'Rol Q1 Ciiy: 'moi, ate, iQAak 7 'A From: Friends of Buchanan Field To: Contra Costa County Supervisors Dear Supervisors The time has come for me to speak up in the interest of Buchanan Field and of the many services it provides including availability in case of emergency. 1 am aware that a handful of people from Pacheco and Pleasant Hill have driven you not to like the Airport. However, we must consider the fact that the Airport was here long before we were. It is convenient not only for the public, but for the many businesses that have purposely moved here because of it. You should also take into consideration that the Airport is about the only business that generates revenue for the county while costing the taxpayer nothing. Just think of the extra money you will have to spend on frivolous things such as exorbitant lawyers fees to defend lawsuits where you end up settling out of court anyway. We are aware that Sunne McPeak is talking about defending a lawsuit from the FAA with county funds. If she wishes to defend It, let her and her supporters provide the finances. After ali, the county has no money left to waste. Remember you, the Supervisors, represent the majority of the people (including me), and not the minority, as you seem to be doing. Let's hope sooner or later the people realize that the Airport is self-sufficient, an asset to the county, and a good business to keep going. California in general cannot afford the loss of any more Income. Instead of the "Tax 'em to death" syndrome, let's support more income-generating businesses like Buchanan Field. Thank you so much for your time. Name: Address: 'C D d T City: c/jaa OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR C O N T R A C 0 S T A C 0 U N T Y Administration Building . 651 Pine Street, 11th Floor Martinez, California 94553 DATE: April 8, 1993 TO: CITIZENS CONCERNED WITH THE FUTURE OF HELICOPTER TRAINING FLIGHTS AT B CHANAN FIELD AIRPORT FROM: Claude L. Van Marte , sistant County Adm-�nist-mator.._ SUBJECT: ACTIONS TAKEN BY THEBOARD OF SUPERVISORS ON APRIL 6, 1993 Following the receipt of some three hours of testimony on April 6, 1993, it is our understanding that the Board of Supervisors took the following actions (all actions were approved unanimously except as noted) : 1 . The Board agreed to proceed with the process of amending the County' s existing noise ordinance, recognizing that there are many steps involved and that it will take many months to obtain the data from the new noise monitoring equipment which will make it possible to formulate a legally defensible single-event, performance-based provision in the noise ordinance. This will be discussed again at the meeting of the Board's Internal Operations Committee (Supervisor Sunne Wright McPeak and Supervisor Jeff Smith) on May 10, 1993. This discussion is also to include the formulation of a workplan and timetable for the adoption of a noise ordinance. 2 . The Board acknowledged that Buchanan Field Airport is and will continue to be an important general aviation airport in the region. The Board also acknowledged that Buchanan Field Airport is an important economic and job-creating resource in the region and that the Board should promote its economic capabilities. In this regard, the Board agreed to call on business leaders in the area to -help advise the Board on how to improve the aviation business capability of Buchanan Field Airport. The Board acknowledged and reaffirmed the language in the Airport Master Plan addressing the economic importance of Buchanan Field Airport. 3 . The Board directed the Public Works Director and Manager of Airports to continue to study various off-airport sites for helicopter training touch-and-go flights and to bring information regarding any identified feasible sites back to the Internal Operations Committee on May 10, 1993 and as they are identified. -2- 4 . The Board directed the County Counsel to terminate any and all agreements with outside counsel regarding the preparation of or research into the feasibility of an amendment to the noise ordinance or any other ordinance. County Counsel was also directed to prepare a final report on this subject including the research from outside counsel and present it to the Internal Operations Committee on May 10, 1993 . 5 . The Board directed County Counsel to cease all work on an Ordinance attempting to regulate helicopter training flight patterns which might have been presented to the FAA in an effort to obtain the FAA's concurrence for the County _to _ impose such regulations in this County. (This motion was approved on a 4 : 1 vote with Supervisor McPeak opposed] . 6 . The Board referred back to its Internal Operations Committee 'the draft letter to the County's Congressional delegation with the request that the Committee determine the most appropriate way to communicate with the County's Congressional delegation and the FAA as well as to define more precisely what it is that is to be communicated and what the Board should ask the County's Congressional delegation to do. The emphasis here should be to request a dialogue with the FAA and to request their assistance in solving problems, not in getting into a confrontation with the FAA or our Congressional delegation. 7 . The Board agreed to accept the offer of the Concord Chamber of Commerce to assist the Board in any way possible to resolve the problems associated with helicopter training flights and to improve the climate for business in and around Buchanan Field Airport. The Board of Supervisors also reaffirmed its previous order that the draft ordinances be reviewed in advance by the Aviation Advisory Committee in order to provide a forum for broad input from the aviation community and general public. Information regarding this meeting can be obtained from Buchanan Field Airport by calling 646-5722 . The Internal Operations Committee of the Board will consider these and other related issues, as` follows: Monday, May 10, 1993 10:00 A.M. Board of Supervisors ' Chambers - Room 107 651 Pine Street, Martinez 1'X'y�J -3- You are welcome to attend this meeting and offer your comments and recommendations regarding any of the matters which are under consideration by the Committee. We will attempt to provide you in advance with any written staff reports which are available to us by May 6, 1993. CLVM:amb van4-24-93 cc: Supervisor Tom Torlakson Supervisor Tom Powers & pe visor- Jeff Smith- Supervisor Gayle Bishop Supervisor Sunne Wright McPeak J. Michael Walford, Public Works Director Victor J. Westman, County Counsel Hal Wight, Manager of Airports w its Zr ® RECEIVED PEOPLE OVER PLANES,INC. April 2, 1993 AM - 2 I9M CLERK 6�;.r;,7 c. Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street Martinez, California 94553 Dear Board of Supervisors: At the March 9, 1993, Board of Supervisors meeting, I stated that we were encouraged by the scope of discussions regarding the helicopter problem but that there are concerns regarding the intentions of staff versus the Board's directives. Regarding Supervisor Torlakson's directive that the people of Byron be consulted about the possibility of increased helicopter training at Byron, Hal Wight and Tracy Williams appeared at the BMAC's March meeting. Wally Wiggs, of the PMAC was to attend that meeting but was informed by Mike Walford that Board member(s) felt it was unnecessary to do so. Mr. Walford and Mr. Wiggs were to attend the meeting together. When Mr. Walford declined, he failed to mention that Hal and Tracy would be there, and so Mr. Wiggs was led to believe there would be no presentation by the County and, therefore, saw no reason to attend. It appears that a standard shell game was run on Mr. Wiggs, and to no one's surprise; lately, we read about these tactics almost daily in the Contra Costa Times and have experi- enced the same problem for years. The report we received about Mr. Wight's presentation at the March BMAC is not encouraging. Apparently, he stated that it was unlikely that Helicopter Adventures would train at Byron because there are no hotels, restaurants or car rentals in the area. The current scenario under discussion would have HAI based at Buchanan and flying to Byron for lessons, and then back to Buchanan. CIPP ���P.O. Box 2336 • Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 • (415) 689-5652 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors -2- April 2, 1993 Hotels, restaurants, etc., are irrelevant to that scenario. We wonder if anything relevant was discussed at the Byron meeting and assume that Mr. Wight will give a report at the April 6, 1993, Board of Supervisors meeting. On March 9, 1993, at the Board of Supervisors, Mr. Wight and Mr. Walford implied that wildlife mitigation at Byron Airfield was far from resolved. At a March AAC meeting held at Byron Airfield regarding the hangar relocations, Mr. Shut, of the engineering firm Hodges & Shut, stated that the bulk of wildlife mitigation would be completed in approxi- mately two months. Before the Board on March 9, 1993, a gentleman from the Aircraft Pilots Association employed the old scare tactic of "airport red-lining," as it pertains to disclosure during real estate transactions. There appears to be concern among fixed-wing pilots that if helicopter mitigation is successful, an unfavorable precedent would occur that might affect their interests. Our current focus is on the helicopter problem. Noise characteristics unique to helicopters, as well as the frequency and repetitive nature of helicopter training, makes it a nuisance to the point of insult. Authorities in Waco, Texas, are using helicopter overflights of the Davidian Branch compound as a psychological weapon. They did the same thing in Panama to force Noriega's surrender. We hope that a representative from the FAA will attend the IOC meeting on May 10, 1993, and that our federal representatives have been contacted by staff as directed by the Board. Given that a response from those representatives is unlikely to occur before April 6, 1993, we hope that the Board does not act prematurely in such a way that might render impotent any new or creative approaches that may be forthcoming. 4 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors -3- April 2, 1993 While everyone is anxious for movement on this issue, our view is that significant input from various sources has not occurred. We are early in this particular phase. We also stress that in the event of failure to sub- stantially mitigate this problem, the County should not enter into an FBO agreement with HAI that would preclude implementation of new develop- ments that could be forthcoming from various directions. Sincerely, Don Mount, President Con�s;c�2r wakk a• 2 RECEIVED MAR 3 0 X83 CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra Costa County CONTRA COSTA CO. Board of Supervisors 651 Fine St. Martinez , Ca. 94553 March 24, 1993 Dear Elected Officials: Regarding: Proposed Airport Ordinance/Helicopter 's Your job is not an easy one ! The county is experienceing a dramatic short fall in revenue and businesses are leaving the area, thus making the future very perilous. In light of the county's financial problems, I 'm COuriOLls about your decisions to drive away corporate aircraft with more and more restrictions upon those doing business in this county. Airport records show that only 5 people are responsible for the major number of complaints. To pass a "performance based noise ordinance" BEFORE you have actual data, from noise monitoring equipment , (yet to be installed) is very frivolous, unprofessional and dangerous. Please consider. how foolish you, as public officials, will appear. All airports are governed by Federal Air Regulations, to disregard them, in favor of YOUR OWN REGULATIONS, will surely terminate all Federal funding , and further financially impact the county because of "payback:" for previous funds received. The county under State and Federal law must not discriminate against the lawful use of the airport , yet , as the Board of Supervisors you have singled out one company, Helicopter Adventures, Inc. to make demands on them, that other company's on the field will not be subject to. How do you plan on distinguishing between other Buchanan based heli- copters, visitor helicopters and Helicopter Adventure's aircraft'? People are tired of county money being spent foolishly. The pilots who use Buchanan Field are safety conscious, courteous taxpayemrs who want to be treated fairly. Si ncer-el y, � e�D . L Luis M. E1 i s D. S. 1718 Via del Verdes Concord , Ca. 94521 (51 0) 68'2-073-1