Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03301993 - 1.12 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORSra Cont FROM: Phil Batchelor, County Administrator Costa �. County 9'Trw DATE: March 23, 1993 SUBJECT: LEGISLATION: SB 672 (Greene) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: Acknowledge that the Board of Supervisors is the SPONSOR of SB 672 by Senator Greene which adjusts the method of maintaining the tax losses reserve fund and provides for an alternative method of calculating the amount which must be maintained in the fund. BACKGROUND: The Board' s 1993 Legislative Program includes the following proposal : 19 . Permanent reform of "Teeter Plan" regarding distribution of property taxes - Sponsor legislation to provide a permanent solution to "Teeter Plan" provisions which allow for access to unneeded funds in the Tax Losses Reserve Fund while maintaining the fiscal integrity of the Fund. Each year, a tax roll is prepared in every county. This tax roll includes levies for each jurisdiction within the county boundaries . These "jurisdictions" include cities, schools, special districts and the county itself . Once the tax roll is prepared and the tax bills are mailed out, individual taxpayers begin making payments. In non-"Teeter Plan" counties, the County Auditor periodically determines the actual cash collected on behalf of each jurisdiction and remits that amount to the jurisdiction. Generally, within every jurisdiction, there is some percentage of taxpayers who do not pay their taxes on time and, as a result, the jurisdictions receive less than their levy amount. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: i�//� RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE l APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): &Q&Jdz [sem& ACTION OF BOARD ON Mar 13. 30, 1993 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _,G� OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE k UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS THE DATE SHOWN. 36 /99 3 ATTESTED Contact: See Page 3 . PHIL BATCHELOR.CLERK OF THE BOARD OF CC: SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY DEPUTY -2- By contrast, in "Teeter Plan" counties, the County Auditor allocates (pays out) to all jurisdictions 100% of the amount levied on their behalf . Responsibility for the delinquencies of all jurisdictions is assumed by the County. In order to facilitate the operation of the "Teeter Plan" , all "Teeter Plan" counties have, by law, established a Tax Losses Reserve Fund (TLRF) . The TLRF can be viewed as an insurance fund which ultimately guarantees that taxes advanced from the county treasury to all jurisdictions will be recovered, either by collecting the taxes due from taxpayers or by making up any shortfalls from the TLRF. Furthermore, it is the cash in the TLRF which makes it possible for "Teeter Plan" counties to advance 100% of taxes levied prior to their actual collection. There are three sources of income for the TLRF: 1 . Penalties collected from delinquent taxpayers . 2 . Interest assessed against delinquent tax bills . 3 . Gains on the sale of tax defaulted property. In the 1991-92 fiscal year, 1/3 ( $1, 378,000) of the TLRF income came from penalties and 2/3 ( $2, 627,000) came from interest. None came from the sale of property. The advantages of the "Teeter Plan" would seem to be obvious . First, each jurisdiction has a predictable property tax revenue stream. Second is the cash flow advantage for all jurisdictions . Jurisdictions which maintain their funds in the county treasury (schools, the county and many special districts) are given "credit" for the full amount of their tax levy. Thus, beginning each July 1, these jurisdictions can begin paying their vendors even though property tax cash collections have not been received in the county treasury. Finally, the administration of the tax roll in "Teeter Plan" counties is somewhat easier in that the accounting systems that are required are less complex. Historically, if the property tax delinquency rate remained below 3% for three consecutive years, the County was allowed to withdraw any surplus funds from the Tax Losses Reserve Fund for any legitimate County purpose. However, if in any year the property tax delinquency rate went above 3%, the County was punished by losing the opportunity to withdraw the surplus funds until the delinquency rate was again below 3% for three more consecutive years . Since Contra Costa County currently is able to withdraw about $4 million a year in surplus funds from the Tax Losses Reserve Fund, this amounts to a $12 million penalty for exceeding the 3% delinquency rate. In 1992, Contra Costa County was successful in getting this penalty provision waived on a one-time basis by moving the delinquency figure at which the penalty is imposed from 3% to 4% . However, it appears prudent to make some permanent changes to this formula which will not penalize a County for three consecutive years thereafter for exceeding the 3% figure occasionally and slightly. This is a singularly unique Contra Costa County situation since, of the "Teeter Plan" counties, Contra Costa County is the only county that has recently been below a 3% delinquency rate or has any prospect of being below 3% again in the foreseeable future. An alternative mechanism for maintaining the Tax Losses Reserve Fund has been designed in conjunction with the Auditor-Controller and Treasurer-Tax Collector' s staff. The alternative leaves in place the current 3% delinquency rate system described above. Each county choosing to become a "Teeter Plan" county could choose to continue to be governed by the existing system or could opt to be covered instead by the alternative system. This alternative system would require that the county maintain the tax losses reserve fund -3- at not less than 50% of the value of the total delinquent secured taxes and assessments . Any money in the TLRF above this level could be transferred to the General Fund. The decision to select this alternative system must have the approval of the Auditor- Controller. The Board of Supervisors adopts a Resolution selecting this alternative system, rather than the basic system in use currently. This selection must be made by July 15, of any fiscal year, except that for the 1993-94 fiscal year, the selection may be made as late as January 15, 1994 , since the legislation will not take effect until January 1, 1994 . This alternative has the advantage of eliminating the problem with the delinquency rate "spiking" occasionally, since the total value of the delinquencies on the secured roll becomes the measure of how large the tax losses reserve fund must be. Since a permanent revision of the "Teeter Plan" legislation is a part of the Board's 1993 Legislative Program, it is appropriate for the Board to acknowledge that it is the SPONSOR of SB 672, which Senator Greene has introduced for this purpose. cc: County Administrator Auditor-Controller Treasurer-Tax Collector County Counsel Les Spahnn; Heim, Noack, and Spahnn CALIFORNIA LEGISLATUR&-1993-94 REGULAR SESSION ASSEMBLY BILL BILL No. 1034 Introduced by Assembly Member Campbell March 11 1993 An act to amend Sections 25135.3, 25135.6, and 25135.7 of, and to amend and renumber Section 25135.75 of, the Health and Safety Code, relating to hazardous waste. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST AB 1034, as introduced, Campbell. Hazardous waste management plans: Existing law authorizes a county to prepare a county hazardous waste management plan for the management of all hazardous waste produced in the county. Existing law authorizes. a council of governments to prepare a regional hazardous waste management plan. Existing law requires a county to submit the final county hazardous waste management plan and a council of governments to submit the final regional hazardous waste management plan to the Department of Toxic Substances Control pursuant to a specified schedule, for review and approval, if specified determinations are made, or disapproval. This bill would extend the deadlines for the submission of the draft plan from December 31, 1987, to April 1, 1994,for the department's review of the draft plan from March 31, 1988, to June 1, 1994, for submission of the final plan from October 1, 1988..to July 1, 1994, and for the department's review of the final plan from December 31, 1988, to September 1, 1994. The bill would make related legislative findings and declarations and make conforming changes. Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes. State-mandated local program: no. 99 90 AB 1034 -- — The people of the State of California do enact as follows: 1 SECTION 1. (a) The Legislature hereby finds and 2 declares all of the following: 3 (1) In some cases, counties or regional jurisdictions 4 have submitted hazardous waste management plans in 5 accordance with Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 6 25135) of Chapter 6.5 of Division 20 of the Health and . 7 Safety Code, except that: the submissions were not fully 8 in accordance with the deadlines established in that .9 Article 3.5. j 10 (2) In other cases, jurisdictions have. prepared, 11 revised,or amended hazardous waste management plans 12 but have failed to submit them to the Department of 13 Toxic Substances Control.because the deadlines provided 14 for .these submissions had already been exceeded. 15 (3) As a result, the Department of Toxic Substances 16 Control has draft hazardous waste management plans, 17 final hazardous waste management plans, and revised 18 hazardous waste management plans on which the 19 department believes it cannot act. because of 20 noncompliance with those deadlines. 21 (4) In addition, counties and regional agencies .have 22 hazardous waste management plans which they are j 23 prepared to submit to the Department of Toxic 24 Substances Control or which could be ready. for 25 submission in a very short: time but which they have been 26 reluctant to submit because they have been told that the 27 . :...:..:.....:..:..: department could no longer review the plans. i 28 (5) The failure to submit hazardous waste 29 management plans because of those deadlines, and the 30 inability of the Department of Toxic Substances Control 31 to review and approve hazardous waste management 32 plans because of noncompliance with the deadlines, ' 33 thwarts the original legislative purposes for which Article 34 3.5 (commencing with Section 25135) of Chapter 6.5 of 35 Division 20 of the Health and Safety Code was enacted 36 and has been amended. 37 (b) The Legislature therefore declares that it 38 continues to be in the public interest to establish a state 99 120 i l — 3 — AB 1034 S. 1 policy that has the objective of ensuring that safe, 2 effective, and economical facilities for the management and 3 of hazardous wastes are available when they are needed, 4 and that these facilities are of a type, and are operated tions 5 and monitored in a manner, which protects public health is in 6 and safety and the environment. :tion 7 (c) The Legislature further declares that this state and . 8 policy cannot be fully implemented without a fully 9 comprehensive set of hazardous waste management that 10 plans from all jurisdictions in the state and that it is, . 11 therefore, essential to allow the submission of those plans tred,. 12 to the Department of Toxic Substances Control, dans 13 notwithstanding the original deadlines which were it of 14 established in Article 3.5 (commencing with Section ided 15 25135) of Chapter 6.5 of Division 20 of the Health and 16 Safety Code. nces 17 SEC. 2. Section 25135.3 of the Health and Safety Code lans, 18 is amended to read: ►ised 19 25135.3. The Association of Bay Area Governments, the >' 20 the Southern California Association of Governments, the of t 21 Sacramento Area Council of Governments, and the 22 Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments may, at. nave 23 the discretion of their governing boards, prepare a are 24 regional hazardous waste management plan to serve as a 'oxic A. 25 resource document and . to identify hazardous waste for 26 management issues, needs, and solutions at the regional )een 27 level. A council of governments specified in this t the 28 subdivision shall include in the regional plan additional 29 counties affected by the regional plan, at the request of ►aste I 30 the councils of governments.for those counties. A council . the 31 of governments shall prepare the regional plan pursuant itrol 32 to the following procedure: Rent 33 (a) A council of governments specified in this hes, 34 subdivision may apply to the department for funding ticle 35 pursuant to paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) of Section .5 of 36 25135.8. cted 37 (b) On or before Deeember &I! 4987 April 1, 1994, a 38 council of governments which receives funding from the t it ! 39 department shall prepare a draft regional hazardous ;tate 40 waste management plan and submit the draft plan to the 120 99 150 i AB 1034 -- 1 department. if a eetmei1 of goventments skews the 2 Elepartm Owt A hes made 3 the Eke regietted hetze&deus waste 4 management p1em eed needs additiefteA die to e 5 the draft regietteA plait; Oke departm fafty e3ftend to 6 Mareh 34r; 1958;the deAe b)� whieh the dtaft regional Oem 7 is required t:e be mbwAtte The council of governments 8 shall involve the public with the preparation of the draft 9 plan, to the fullest extent: possible, by public hearings, 1.0 informational meetings, and other appropriate forums 11 that offer the public the opportunity to respond to clearly 12 defined alternative objectives, policies, and actions. 13 (c) From jantiary 4; R.N3 tre Mareh 31-,- 4988 April 2, 14 1994, to June 1, 1994, et-, if the departin hes given the 15 eetmeil of et tie perstiant 'to 16 {"U'VI , ORI—M- before Jtme 39; 1985; the council of 17 governments shall conduct hearings on the draft regional 18 hazardous waste management plan, in the number 19 determined .appropriate. by the council of governments. 20 The council of governments shall provide affected local 21 jurisdictions, the public, industry, business.organizations, 22 and the hazardous waste management industry with a 23 full opportunity to comment orally and in writing on the 24 draft plan. 25 (d) On or before Mareh 31-; 1988,er;if the departm 26 has given the eeemei4 of geverrAnents a time E�mtemi 27 ptw9ttwA_ to stibElMsion or before ane 34; 4988 i 28 June 1, 1994, the department shall review the draft plan , 29. and provide the council of governments with comments 30 on the draft plan. 31. (e) After conducting the review and comment perled 32 required by subdivision (c), the council of governments 33 shall revise, as appropriate, the draft regional hazardous 34 waste management plan. 35 (f) On or before 8eepte 39; 1988; er; ee er befere 36 Janttary34; 1989; 1€the eeee ail of go-vermneitts, is given a 37 #tee extensiett perstiant to sebdi-�4si +g}July 1, 1994, i 38 the council of governments shall complete and adopt the ; 39 plan. 40 (g) On .or before Getel 4, 4988 July 1, 1994, the 99 160 -5 — AB 1034 t 1 council of governments shall submit the final regional the - 2 hazardous waste management plan adopted by its armee 3 governing board to the department for review and AetPaste4 approval. 4 e eetmeil e€ s the e 5 the eetmeil e€ made d; e 6 substanfieJ pregress tem eemple the regi gents ` 7 ham e and needs mere ,.e 8 t-e the per; the Elepartm ffmy emtend Ohis craft 9 cue to September 4; 1989. The department shall approve cgs' 10 the regional plan if the department determines that all of guns 11 the following requirements are met: ply 12 (1) The regional plan is consistent with the guidelines rg 2, 13 for the preparation of regional hazardous waste t the 14 management plans adopted by the department. tt .te 15 (2) The regional plan applies the methods, techniques, mil of 16 and policies established by the department to analyze the .onal 17 waste stream and to determine whether there is a need . f 18 for additional or expanded hazardous waste facilities to .iter 19 safely manage and properly dispose of the hazardous local ' :i; ;:i' ?; 20 waste produced within the region. ions, ,v 21 (h) Throughout the process of preparing a regional th a 22 hazardous waste management plan, a council of the 23 governments shall cooperate and , consult with . 24 representatives and staff.of affected counties and cities. ; l ( 25 (i) Notwithstanding subdivisions (a) to (h), inclusive, lent 26 of this section, if, pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing 27 with Section 6500) of Division 7 of Title 1 of the Y." 28 Government Code, a joint powers agreement provides .Ian; 29 for the creation of the Southern California Hazardous ants 30 Waste. Management Authority, the .Southern California 31 Association of Governments shall, if it has elected to ants 32 prepare a regional hazardous waste management plan 33 pursuant to this section, transfer the responsibility for Sous ( >. 34 preparing the regional hazardous waste management fore 35 plan and all funds received pursuant to subdivision (b) of eft 36 Section 25135.8 to the authority, if the governing board of & 37 the authority requests the transfer by the adoption of a �1994., 38 resolution. If the transfer takes place, the authority shall the 39 comply withthis section in the same manner as this 40 section applies to the association. If the transfer of the ., 160 99 180 AB 1034 1 responsibility and funds authorized by this subdivision 2 takes place and the authority is dissolved at any time 3 before the regional hazardous waste management plan is 4 approved by the department, the association shall 5 prepare the regional hazardous waste.management plan 6 and any remaining funds received pursuant to 7 subdivision (b) of Section 25135.8 shall be transferred 8 back to the association. 9 SEC. 3. Section 25135.6 of the Health and Safety Code . 10 is amended to read: 11 25135.6. (a) A county shall prepare, review, and .12 adopt the county hazardous waste management plan 13 pursuant to the schedule specified in this section. 14 (b) On or before Deeember a4 4987 April 1, 1994, 15 each county, with the cooperation of affected local 16 jurisdictions and the advisory committee established 17 pursuant to Section 25135.2, shall prepare a draft county 18 hazardous waste management plan and submit the.draft 19 plan to the department. H a eek shews le the 20 departmeitt giat the eaunty has made substemSal 21 eemplimee tewards eempleting the 22 hazard wetste memagement plem amd needs additietteJ 23 . time to eemplete the dfttft plan, the 24 extend to Mareh x;19%the dftte by Leh the draft plem 25 is reed re be The county shall involve the 26 public with the preparation of the draft plan, to the fullest . 27 extent possible, by public hearings, informational 28 meetings, and other appropriate forums that offer the 29 public the 'opportunity to respond to clearly defined 30 alternative objectives, policies, and actions. 31 (c) On or before Mare r 34;1988;e4-,if the departm 32 hae gree the eek a time extension ptwstiont to 33 sttbdM . *b)-, on or be€+sre Jtme 3G-, 1988 June 1, 1994, 34 the county shall conduct hearings on the draft county 35 hazardous waste management plan, in the number 36 determined appropriate by the county. The county.shall 37 provide affected local jurisdictions, the public, industry, 38 business organizations, and the hazardous waste 39 management industry with the full opportunity to 40 comment orallyand in writing on the draft coup I. g county _ l 99 No - 7 — AB 1034 ivision 1 hazardous waste management plan. time 2 (d) On or before Marek 34;1988;et,if the departm plan is 3 hay.M.given the ee" a ttee emtensiett purstiant to shall 4 Ji4 *b)-, oft ew before Jtme ae; 4988 June 1, 1994, it plan 5 the department shall review the draft plan, and provide at to 6 each county with comments which specify the changes or ferred jP (4, 7 additions which are required to be made to the draft plan 8 to result in a final plan which can be approved by the Code 9 department pursuant to Section 25135.7. 10 .(e) After conducting the review and comment peried and 11 required by subdivision (c), each county shall revise, as t plan 12 appropriate, the draft county hazardous waste 13 management plan. 1994) 14 (f) The revised county hazardous waste management local 15 plan shall be approved by a majority of the cities within dished 16 the county which contain a majority of the population of ,ounty 17 the incorporated area of the county, subject to ;.draft 18 subdivision (g). :e the 19 (g) The revised county hazardous waste management 20 plan shall be submitted to each city within the county for hetmty .. � 21 their approval. Each city shall act upon the revised itiefteA 22 county hazardous waste management plan within 90 days t- fit fty 23 after the city has received the plan. If a city fails to act Ft plem 24 upon the plan within 90 days of receiving the plan, the ve the IJ 25 city shall be deemed to have approved the plan as fullest 26 submitted. ttional 27 (h) On or before 58;,1988, et;ee or before er the 28 Nky a1-,- 1989,if the eery is give em emtensien perstimA efined 29 to sttbdMse t of Seetien M139.7 July 1, 1994, the 30 county shall adopt the revised county hazardous waste 31 management plan as the final county hazardous waste Mt 32 management plan. 4F the eeumt-y is given an additieftal 19943P �� .,, , 33 6me extensiett to S 4; 1989, perste to ;ounty (` 34 sebdMsie -(.a+ e€Beetieft 25135.7, the eek shad adept .amber 35 the remised eek hetzardei waste memagement phm as y.shall 36 the fifiel eek . waste management plat by iustry, 37 August a1; 1989. waste 38 .: SEC. 4:: Section 25135.7 of the Health and Safety Code ity to _ 39 is amended to read: �ounty 40 25135.7. (a) A county shall submit the final county . 99 200 99 220 AB 1034 —8 -- ��1 A1 hazardous waste management plan adopted by the 2 county to the department for review and approval on or 3 before getter I;4988 July 1, 1994. If a eek shows the 4 departm that the eeitty has made substemSed 5 progress towards eempletkif;the eek hazardees waste 6 memagement plem and eeeds mere time to the - 7 plem, the extend this date to june 4-, 8 1989. If the se ads eeemnens ae the draft 9 eek hazardous waste memetgeme p1m to a eewity 10 after jtme aO; 1988, the deparratment ffmy emtend the dtfe 1' 11 cute for subwAtted of the fiaeJ eekwaste 1 12 Phm fer that eek to September 4-, 1989. 1; 13 The department shall, on or before Peeer'nb r 34-, 1988, 1� 14 er ear er=before Ne-y.._... ber g� 1989,if the eek igrveft 1' 15 a.tie emtensien Septembej� 1, 1994, review and either P 16 approve or disapprove the county hazardous waste b 17 management plan. If apt addiNetted time e3fteesiee ij 1' 18 gree to Seer- 4; 1989, perseaet to this sebdMsieft-, P 19 the depaf tm shah resew and either .appr-e-ve er 1`• 20 disappre the eek hazardous waste f 21 21 p6n on or be€ere Feb = 28; 1990. The department � 2- 22 shall approve the county hazardous waste -management 2% 23 plan if the department makes all of. the following 2kf 24 determinations: 25 (1) The plan substantially complies with the s.. _� L� 24D 26 guidelines for the preparation of hazardous. waste 2( 27 management plans adopted by the department. 2 ri 28 (2). The plan applies the methods, techniques, and 2f 29 policies established by the. department to analyze the 2E 30 waste stream and to determ Ine whether there is a need 31 31 for additional or expanded hazardous waste facilities to 31 32 safely manage and properly dispose of the hazardous 3� 33 waste generated within the county. 3 11 ff � 34 (3) If the plan contains a determination pursuant to ..,J 1. 34 35 paragraph (5) of subdivision (d) of Section 25135.1 that j 35 36 there is a need for additional or expanded hazardous ' 36 37 waste facilities, the plan proposes general areas, or, as 37 38 determined appropriate by fhe county, proposes specific j 3E 39 sites which may be suitable . locations for a . facility. 39 40 However, if the plan instead contains siting criteria for 4o P g _�i .�. 99 230 -9 — AB 1034 by the �' 1 selecting sites for new hazardous waste facilities, the plan al one 2 shall propose general areas where the criteria might be e or 3 applicable. )sem 4 .(4) If the county preparing the plan has entered into is waste . 5 a formal agreement with other counties to manage lete the 6 hazardous waste, the agreement.is documented. � , 7 (b) Within 180 days after the department approves a J e e 8 county hazardous waste management plan, the county raft 9 shall either incorporate the applicable portions of the eounty the dte 10 plan, by reference, into the county's general plan, or s waste 11 enact an ordinance which requires that all applicable, 4-, 1989. 12 zoning, subdivision, conditional use permit, and variance 4-, 1988, 13 decisions are consistent with the portions of the county is giYen 14 hazardous waste management plan which identify I either 15 specific , sites or siting criteria for hazardous waste waste 16 facilities. f1sieft ie 17 (c) Within 180 days after receiving written Ryisiefl; 18 notification from the county that the county hazardous Peye or 19 waste management plan has been approved, each city Er-: 20 within. that county shall do one of thefollowing: gement irtment tz �(`, 21 (1) Adopt a city hazardous waste management plan gement 22containing all of the elements required by subdivision ►llowing 23 (d) of Section 25135.1 which shall be consistent with the 24 approved county hazardous waste management plan. 25 2 Incorporate the applicable portions of the th the �. ' �: ( ) � PP � waste 26 approved county plan, by reference, into the city's 27 general plan. tes, .and 28 (3) Enact an ordinance which requires that all yze the 29 applicable zoning, subdivision, conditional use permit, a need 30 and variance decisions are consistent with the portions of lilies to 31 the approved county plan which identify general areas or zardous 32 siting criteria for hazardous waste facilities. r 33 (d) This section does not limit the authority of any city quant to ..1 34 to attach appropriate conditions to the issuance of any ,;ua that 35 land use approvalfor a hazardous dous waste facility in order zardous 36 to protect thepublic health , and safety , or wfie the s, or, as 37 environment, and does not limit the authority of a city to specific 38 establish more stringent planning requirements or siting facility. 39. criteria than those specified in the county hazardous :eria for ��� l 40 waste management plan. i. ,- 99 2M 99 2M AB 1034 — 10 -- I (e) Any amendment to an adopted county hazardous 2 waste management plan requires the approval of the 3 department, the county, and a majority of the cities . 4 within the county which contain a majority of the 5 population of the incorporated area of the county. 6 SEC. 5. Section 25 25135.7.5 of the Health and 7 Safety Code is amended and renumbered to read: . 8 M135.75. ' 9 25135.75. (a) If the .department disapproves a county 10 hazardous waste management plan pursuant to 1 11 subdivision (a) of Section 25135.7, or a regional hazardous 1 12 waste management plan pursuant to Section 25135.3, the 1 13 department shall provide the county or regional council 1 14 of governments, in writing and at the time of disapproval, 1' 15 with a detailed description of its reasons for disapproval 1 16 of the plan. A county or regional council of governments 1 17 with a disapproved hazardous waste management plan 1 18. may submit a revised plan to the department one time 1 19 only. A revised county or regional hazardous waste 1 20 management plan shall be submitted to the department 2 21 widtia M dwfe of the e&ei i e dote of the aet adding#mss 22 see4en, or within 270 days of plan disapproval if the plan 2 23 is disappre laythe depar after the eff eeS a date 2 24 of the set adding thisseetien. A county or regional council 2 25 of governments shall .notify the . department of their 2 26 intent to revise and resubmit a disapproved plan within 2 27 45 days of the effeetive dete`e the aet adding tis seefien, 2 28 et � 49 �s of plan disapproval ; if the i 2 2' .29 disappre after the e€€ee0ve cue e€the aet adding#-is 30 seetien. A resubmitted county or regional plan shall 31 31 contain detailed . responses to all of the reasons for 3 32 disapproval of the plan described by the department. The 3. 33 department shall provide counties with informational 3 34 guidelines on developing an approvable plan. 3' 35 (b) Before a county submits a revised 3' 36 county hazardous waste management plan to the 3' 3' 37 department pursuant to this. section, the revised plan 38 shall be approved by a majority of the cities`within the 3' 39 county which contain a majority of the population of the 3. 40 incorporated area of .the county, as specified in 99 270 i — 11 — AB 1034 rdous !! 1 subdivisions (f) and (g) of Section 25135.6. A city which -f the 2 fails to act upon a county plan revised pursuant to this cities 3 section within 90 days after the plan has been submitted F the 4 to the city by the county shall be deemed to have 5 approved the revised plan. i and ,_ 6 (c) The department shall review and either approve 7 or disapprove a county or regional hazardous waste 8 management plan revised pursuant to subdivision (a) )Unty 9 within 180 days of receiving the revised plan. t to 10 (1) The department shall approve a revised county -dous 11 hazardous waste management plan if the department 3, the 12 makes all of the determinations in paragraphs (1), (2), uncil 13 (3), and (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 25135.7. If the -oval, 14 department approves a revised county hazardous waste roval 15 management plan pursuant to this section, the county :lents ! 16 shall comply with subdivision (b) of Section 25135.7, and plan 17 each city within that county shall comply with 18 subdivision (c) of Section 25135.7. vastetime 19 (2) The department shall approve a revised regional ment 20 hazardous waste management plan if the department Hent �f;._.:.,�, f , g P P °. . 1 21 makes all of the determinations in subdivision (g) of 22 Section 25135.3. Plaft dace 23 ' (d) . A county which did not submit its plan to the until 24 department within the due dates for plan submittal ththeir :'..> � 25 established by subdivision (a) of Section 25135.7, or a. eir i r 26 county whose plan was not formally acted upon by the. 27 department by the Februffirx$S;4999 September 1, 1994, an is 28 deadline, may submit their plan to the department for Os 29 review and approval or disapproval pursuant to the shall 30 provisions. governing the resubmittal of revised plans for 1. 31 established by this section. The 32 (e) A council of governments which did not submit its ional 33 plan to the department within the due dates for plan j 1 34 submittal established by Section 25135.3, or whose plan vrised 35 has not been formally acted upon by the department, the 36 may submit their plan to the department for review and plan 37 approval or disapproval pursuant to the provisions i the 38 governing the resubmittal of revised plans established by f the 39 this section. I in O Q 270 99 290 . ,� . ' �. r""`�,'' ; , . .. �` ,` `, �. ��� 1 ', 1 `� '� i � f '':_ ,� _ _.�1r,� `; :. ;` '�`�� ,: