HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03161993 - 1.62 1 -62
TO: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FROM: Phil Batchelor
Executive Director
DATE: March 16, 1993
SUBJECT: Pleasant Hill BART Child Care Response Program
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Acknowledge receipt of correspondence from the California Council on
Partnerships encouraging nomination of the Pleasant Hill BART Child
Care Response Program for future Partnership Awards competitions.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The Pleasant Hill BART Station Child Care Response Program was
nominated for the California Council on Partnerships "Partnership
Awards '93" (attached) . The Redevelopment Agency did not receive the
award this year because quantified results were not. yet available.
The proposal was considered excellent, and the Agency was encouraged
to submit for future Partnership Awards when results are quantified.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: J
RECOMMENDATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECO DATION O AGENCY CO TEE
APPROVE OTHER
. .
SIGNATURE(S)
ACTION OF AGENCY ON Marsh 16 , 199"1 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF COMMISSIONERS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
x UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY ON THE DATE SHOWN.
Contact: Jim Kennedy
646-4076 ATTESTED March 16 , 1993
orig: Redevelopment Agency PHIL BATCHELOR,
CC: CAO GEN% SECRE Y
Community Development
m8khildcanbos BY , DEPUTY
CALIFORNIA
COUNCIL J
ON PARTNERSHIPS J J f
1100 K Street, Suite 101 • Sacramento, CA 95814-3941 • (916) 327.7507
t'1
February 16, 1992
Mr. James Kennedy
Redevelopment Director
Contra Costa County Community Development Agency
651 Pine Street, 4th Floor, N Wing
Martinez, California 94553
Dear Mr. Kennedy:
Thank you for submitting your application for the Partnership Awards '93 competition.
While your project was an excellent one,there were projects that more clearly reflected the criteria
established and more readily quantified results. We intend to continue this recognition process
in the years ahead and welcome your submitting your project in the future.
In the immediate future,the Council and CSAC will profile these streamlining efforts in newsletters
and magazines in an effort to share.successful ideas among all local government jurisdictions.
Again, thank you and congratulations on your actions to create positive change in addressing
California communities' problems.
Sincerely,
Muriel Stacp oole
Director
cc: Harvey Bragdon
ANN C.WALSH
Pacific Gas d Electric
Co-Chair
TOM ROGERS Initiated by
Supervisor,sans Barbara count'
Co-Chair the County Supervisors rc�
MURIEL STACFOOLE Association of California
Director Public Relations and Citizen Education
Pacific Visions Communications
S
+ .J
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Statement of the Challenge and the Solution
Contra Costa County/Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Child Care Response Program
A. Problems/Challenge
The Contra Costa County General Plan guides decisions on future growth, development and the conservation of resources through
the year 2005. The Public Facilities/Services includes child care goals and policies designed to assist and encourage the development
of adequate, affordable and quality child care that maximize parental choice for child care. The County believes that children need
and have a right.to a safe, healthy and caring environment. To implement its child care policies, the County has adopted a Child
Care Facilities Ordinance that encourages the participation of parents, child care providers, public officials and employers in the
planning and provision of child care facilities.
In the mid-1980's,the County adopted a Specific Plan and a Redevelopment Plan for the Pleasant Hill BART Station area in Central
Contra Costa County. This 140 acre area surrounding the Pleasant Hill Station of the Bay Area Rapid Transit District (BART)
provides an opportunity to locate development next to a regional transportation hub. The Pleasant Hill BART Station area is an
emerging model for the development of suburban employment/housing centers next to transportation facilities. Planners and
environmental interests have advocated this type of development for years. The Pleasant Hill BART Station plan included a strong
growth management element in which public infrastructure was provided concurrent with or prior to development. Included in the
growth management program was the requirement for a proactive child care program.
B. Solution
Survey results in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area have consistently found that employees desired high quality and affordable
child care services. With those survey results in mind, the County was successful in getting all developers to participate in a Child
Care Mitigation Program. This mitigation program of the Contra Costa Centre Association (LCCA) is funding a child care
affordability program and the construction of permanent child care facilities.
In approving the Park Regency Apartment Project in 1988, the Board of Supervisors required that an on-site child care facility be
provided. The child care center came to be known as "Kids Wonderland.' It was determined that an optimal child care facility
should have space for 90-120 children. A major factor limiting capacity was the availability of outdoor space. Another major
limiting factor was the extremely high property values associated with the Pleasant Hill BART Station area.
In order to proceed with Kids Wonderland, solutions to the three problems of land availability/cost,construction/permanent financing
cost, and the affordability of child care needed to be resolved. The County, through its Redevelopment Agency, orchestrated the
following solutions:
1. Land Availability/Cost. The owner of the Park Regency Apartment Project was required to provide the land at a
substantially below market price to Kids Wonderland. In addition, the Agency provided an easement on property it owned
adjacent to the child care center at no cost to the operator. The easement area permitted the center to enroll 92 children.
2. Construction/Permanent Financing Cost. Financing this $700,000.00 facility had capital availability and cost of capital
dimensions. A creative solution involving funds of Kids Wonderland, COCA, and funds secured with Mello-Roos bonus
was conceived:
a. Contra Costa Centre Association Contribution
Child Care Mitigation Program funds were available to finance a portion of the facility. In exchange for having
first rights to 50% of the child care slots being created, the CCCA agreed to provide $100,000 towards the
construction of Kids Wonderland.
b. Mello-Roos Financing
A portion of the Park Regency Apartments public infrastructure requirements were being financed with Mello-Roos
bonds. Child care centers, while not a traditional project for financing under the Mello-Roos procedures, are
eligible because the facility could be owned by a public entity. Federal tax law, however, did not provide for the
financing of privately owned child care facilities on a tax exempt basis. Federal tax law does, however, provide
that up to 5% of the proceeds of any tax exempt bond issue may be used for certain "bad costs" that would
otherwise be ineligible. Because the remaining portion of the Mello-Roos issue consisted of clearly "good costs,"
the County was able to provide$205,000 in financing for Kids Wonderland at substantially below market tax exempt
rates.
3. Child Care Affordability. Using interest earnings on its capital account, the CCCA will be able to subsidize child care for
its tenant employees at Kids Wonderland and elsewhere. Five of the eleven commercial property owners in the area secured
their Child Care Mitigation contribution by participating in the Mello-Roos bonds. Because child care affordability is not
eligible,the property owners agreed to pay for eligible County improvements, in exchange for which the County contributed
a like amount for child care affordability. This application of an "asset transfer" is a creative marriage of public finance
and public program objectives.
C. Budget/Costs/Savings
The total cost of land and construction for Kids Wonderland is approximately$700,000. Over 80% of the financing of this project
came through creative public/private partnership sources. The sources of funding for the project are as follows:
Developer land subsidy $200,000
Contra Costa Centre Association contribution $100,000
Contra Costa County Mello-Roos contribution $205,000
Owner equity $145,000
Redevelopment Agency land subsidy $ 50,000
D. Results
With this rather unique package of financing, the owner of Kids Wonderland was willing to proceed with construction. Construction
is currently under way, with an expected completion date of December 1. In addition, the CCCA has capitalized a fund that can
provide an ongoing revenue source for child care affordability.
JK:lh/SRA5:executiv.sum