Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 02091993 - 1.53 RECEIVED JAN 2 81993 CLERK BOARD OF SUPERVISORS CONTRA COSTA CO. Michael Ullman Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences Massachussetts Institute of Technology E10-104A Cambridge, Mass 02144 phone: (617)253=5764 January 22, 1993 Contra Costa County Board of Supervisors 651 Pine Street Room 106 Martinez, CA 94553 Copies for Gayle Bishop, Sunne Wright McPeak, Tom Powers, Jeff' Smith, Thomas A. Torlakson Dear Supervisors, I am a native of the Bay Area currently and temporarily living in Boston, where I do research at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. During a recent visit back home I had the opportunity to do a lot of hiking, especially around Mount Diablo and elsewhere in the East Bay. And while this experience on the one hand made me realize how much I love and miss California, on the other hand it sickened me to see how much and how quickly my state is changing for the worse. Everywhere where I used to hike and fish there are now houses, streets, parking lots and shopping centers. Those areas which used to be far away from urban areas are now within sight, smell and sound of cars and houses. This rampant and destructive development must stop. I respectfully and strongly encourage you to support legislation to severely limit the East Bay's growth, leaving a maximum of wild and open space left for all to en- joy. In particular, I would like to voice my strong opposition to two projects which would result in further development and destruction of open and wild lands: the Mid State Toll Road and the Tri Valley Wastewater Authority. Both of these projects will result in the destruction of huge areas of open space, with the concomitant loss of wild habitat and recreation areas for everyone. cc: BOARD MEMBERS (Provided Rather than encouraging development in open areas, thereby decreasing the quality of life of all Contra Costa, Alameda,and other Bay Area residents, it would make far more sense to encourage development in existing urban areas — while discouraging wild and open space development. Such a two-pronged policy would have several advantages. In addition to preserving open space for wildlife and recreation, it would revitalize decaying urban areas, and create a situation in which more efficient and less polluting transportation systems could be put in place — ie, mass transport systems which require a relatively dense populations. Thank you very much for your attention, Sincerely, Michael Ullman Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences MIT 2