HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07141992 - 1.89 /V
- -. .
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
®89
FROM: Mark Finucane, Health Services Director - l Contra
Costao:
DATE: July 6, 1992 County
SUBJECT: ESTABLISH POLICY REGARDING ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT OF
HAZARDOUS MATERIALS INCIDENT NOTIFICATION VIOLATIONS
FOR MORE INFORMATION: Barbara Masters
370-5014
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)do BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Approve Policy developed by the Health Services Department establishing criteria for pursuing
administrative enforcement of violations of State law requiring businesses to immediately
notify the HSD of a release or threatened release of hazardous materials when injury or
damage to the community or the environment may occur.
2. Authorize the Health Services Director to implement the Policy with all businesses that handle
hazardous materials.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Potential revenues.
BACKGROUND:
The Hazardous Materials Inventory and Emergency Response Planning Act requires businesses to provide
immediate notification to the "administering agency" of a hazardous materials release. Prior to 1990,
violations of this requirement could only be pursued through a criminal complaint. However, a new law
established a mechanism to enable an administering agency to pursue an administrative enforcement action
for this type of violation.
As described in the attached Policy, the Health Services Department is the administering agency under the
Hazardous Materials Inventory and Emergency Response Planning Act. As such, the HSD is responsible
for the coordination and planning of emergency response agencies that will be involved with releases, fires
and explosions involving hazardous materials.
The HSD has emphasized with the industries in Contra Costa County the importance of prompt notification.
On November 5, 1991, the Board of Supervisors approved adoption and implementation of HSD's Policy on
Hazardous Material Incident Notification (hereinafter referred to as the Incident Notification Policy),which
was designed to provide guidance to industry on the notification requirement under the Act. That policy was
developed in coordination with the Contra Costa Community Awareness and Emergency Response (CAER)
group. As described in the Incident Notification Policy, prompt notification of the HSD is essential in order
to enable the HSD to: (1) dispatch emergency response teams quickly; (2) assess the extent of the release
and whether neighboring communities are at risk; (3) determine whether the Co unity Notification
Network should be activated; and (4) respond to inquiries from the pu c and the pr ss.
l
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: ��
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
0
APPROVE _OTHER
SIGNATURE (S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON oZ APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
UNANIMOUS (ABSENT) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: County Counsel ATTESTED 1�
County Health Officer PHIL BATCHELOR, 17LERK O THE BOAAD OF
Hazardous Materials Commission SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY AMDINISTRATOR
BY v DEPUTY
Page Two
Establish Policy Regarding Administrative Enforcement of
Hazardous Materials Incident Notification Violations
June 1992
Although enforcement of a notification violation may be pursued through a criminal
complaint, the administrative enforcement action provides another option for pursuing a
penalty. Unlike a criminal complaint, no trial would be necessary, although a hearing
process is specified in the law. An administrative complaint carries a maximum fine of
$2,000 per violation per day. In addition, administrative enforcement would allow the
administering agency to retain the full penalty, less $200 that is required to be required to
be deposited in the Hazardous Material and Waste Enforcement Training Account.
Adoption of a policy is required to implement the administrative enforcement option.
MF:BM:no
cc: County Counsel
County Health Officer
Hazardous Materials Commission
Contra Costa County
Health Services Department
ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT POLICY
FOR HAZARDOUS MATERIAL INCIDENT NOTIFICATION VIOLATIONS
I. PURPOSE:
The purpose of this Policy is to establish criteria for pursuing administrative enforcement
procedures for violations of State law regarding immediate notification of the Health
Services Department of a release or threatened release of hazardous materials when injury
or damage to the community or the environment may occur.
II. BACKGROUND:
Contra Costa Health Services Department is the administering agency under the Hazardous
Materials Inventory and Emergency Response Planning Act. This Act requires, among
other provisions, that industries regulated under this program immediately notify the
administering agency of releases or threatened releases of hazardous materials that could
significantly impact public health and the environment. As the administering agency, the
HSD is responsible for the coordination and planning of emergency response agencies that
will be involved with releases, fires and explosions involving hazardous materials.
Moreover, on November 5, 1991, the Board of Supervisors approved adoption and
implementation of HSD's Policy on Hazardous Material Incident Notification (hereinafter
referred to as the Incident Notification Policy), which was designed to provide guidance to
industry on the notification requirement under the Act. That policy was developed in
coordination with the Contra Costa Community Awareness and Emergency Response
(CHER) group. As described in the Incident Notification Policy, prompt notification of the
HSD is essential in order to enable the HSD to: (1) dispatch emergency response teams
quickly; (2) assess the extent of the release and whether neighboring communities are at
risk; (3) determine whether the Community Notification Network should be activated; and
(4) respond to inquiries from the public and the press.
Penalties for violating the notification requirement may be pursued through a criminal
complaint or by administrative complaint issued by the administering agency. An
administrative complaint carries a maximum fine of$2,000 per violation per day, or $5,000
per day if a business knowingly violates the requirement after reasonable notice. A criminal
complaint carries a maximum fine of $25,000 (or $50,000 for a second violation) and/or
imprisonment.
While some violations may warrant criminal prosecution, others may not. Administrative
enforcement offers another remedy -- to supplement referrals to the District Attorney -- to
ensure appropriate enforcement of all violations. An administrative enforcement action
requires that the HSD file a complaint and hold a hearing, which affords a business due
process before imposing a penalty, while obviating the need for a costly and lengthy court
trial.
III. REFERENCE:
This Policy provides guidance for the implementation of Chapter 6.95, Sections 25514.5 and
25514.6 of the California Health and Safety Code, with respect to administrative
enforcement of Section 25507, requiring immediate notification of a hazardous materials
release notification. See also HSD Policy on Hazardous Material Incident Notification.
1
IV. POLICY:
A. In determining whether to pursue an aclrninistrPlive AnfoT^-.*inent
seriousness of the violation will be assessed. The following criteria will be utilized
in making the determination:
1. The length of time between the start of the release or threatened release and
notification of HSD. HSD will consider, for example, whether there were any
indications prior to the incident that there was a potential for such a release,
such as the need for an emergency shutdown of a major unit.
2. The potential endangerment to the public health or safety or the environment,
including the potential for public concern, resulting from afire, explosion, smoke
or excessive flaring. The type of material, including its volume and toxicity,
involved in the release or threatened release will be considered.
3. The cooperation demonstrated by the business in assessing the seriousness of the
release or threatened release. The HSD will consider, for example, whether the
business provides all the available information at the time of the initial
notification and in subsequent verbal and written communications.
4. The history of violations for a release or threatened release, including prior
violations of the Incident Notification Policy.
5. The compliance by the responsible business of the Incident Notification Policy.
The HSD will consider whether the guidelines were followed.
B. The HSD intends to diligently pursue all violations until such time as the violative
conditions have been resolved to the HSD's satisfaction and the penalty has been
collected.
V. ADOPTION:
In accordance with Section 25514.6(e), the HSD adopts this policy to implement the
administrative enforcement process as described under Sections 25514.5 and 25514.6 of the
Health and Safety Code.
r t ellr -�-
Date Mark Finucane, Dir ctor of Health Services
xenfpol.acc
6/92
2