HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06091992 - 1.62 � o62w
TO: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY Contra
FROM: Phil Batchelor �` -y s Costa
Executive Director County
qty
DATE: June 2, 1992
SUBJECT: North contra Costa County Shoreline Corridor and Rodeo Waterfront
Feasibility Study.
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Accept and approve the North Contra Costa County Shoreline Corridor
and Rodeo Waterfront Feasibility Study.
FISCAL IMPACT
None.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
The North Contra Costa County Shoreline Joint Powers Agency (JPA) was
formed on April 3 , 1990 in response to the Rodeo Waterfront
Committee's request to help restore the Rodeo Marina to its full
potential. The JPA consists of representatives of the Contra Costa
Board of Supervisors and the East Bay Regional Park District and is
advised by members of County Service Districts in the towns of Rodeo
and Crockett.
The JPA was formed for the purpose of preparing a feasibility study
of the Northern Contra Costa County Shoreline area from Lone Tree
Point in Rodeo to the Carquinez Strait Regional Shoreline in Crockett.
The feasibility study would explore alternatives for park and
shoreline related uses of the area which meet the i erests and needs
of all parties.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATU /
RECOMMENDATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RI TIM OF AGENCX COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF AGENCY ON June 9, 1992 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF COMMISSIONERS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY ON THE DATE SHOWN.
cc: Community Development
SRA2 5/j b/shorodeo.bos ATTESTED June 9, 1992
PHIL BATCHELOR,
AGENCY SECRETARY
BY
DEPUTY
Both members of the JPA provided $10, 000 each and the State Coastal
Conservancy granted $20, 000 to the JPA to hire a consultant firm to
prepare the feasibility study. Public workshops were held at each
phase of the study beginning June 27, 1991 and concluding on April
15, 1992 , including a public meeting in Rodeo on the Rodeo
Waterfront portion of the study on March 18, 1992 .
The East Bay Regional Park District is concurrently accepting this
study. The JPA will continue to have regularly scheduled meetings
and will act within its capacity to implement the provisions of the
feasibility study.
A summary of the Study's conclusions and findings are provided in
Attachment A.
Next steps for the Agency, given the findings and conclusions, are
outlined below. Staff will pursue these steps in conjunction with
the Rodeo Redevelopment Advisory Committee.
1. Create and circulate a Request for Proposals for a Rodeo
Downtown/Waterfront Specific Plan;
2 . Retain a consultant to prepare the Specific Plan;
3 . Have the necessary environmental documentation prepared for
the Specific Plan; and
4 . Amend the Rodeo Redevelopment Plan to incorporate the
Downtown/Waterfront Specific Plan.
i
�1
ATTACHMENT A
This report summarizes the Shoreline Corridor and Waterfront Feasibility Study which
was performed under the direction of the North Contra Costa County Shoreline Joint
Powers Agency (JPA). The County and the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD)
are the members of the JPA. The purpose of the study (1) was to identify potential
land use and development alternatives for restoring the Rodeo waterfront and marina
areas; and (2) assessed the feasibility of and presented alternatives for a trail corridor
connecting Lone Tree Point and the Carquinez Regional Shoreline.
1 . Rodeo Waterfront
A preferred plan for the Rodeo marina was developed as part of the JPA
process. This preferred plan, which was analyzed in detail, includes a total of
230 berths, a new two-lane boat launch ramp, a new fuel dock and a facility
to accommodate hand-launched boats. Other commercial uses include a 110-
boat dry stack storage facility, a 15,000 square foot restaurant on the bluff,
expansion of the existing chandlery, re-establishment of the bait shop and
continuation of the existing cafe. Recreational uses include launching, lessons,
rentals and sales for windsurfers, kayakers and small hand-launched boats. The
marina could also function as an alternative parking and staging area for the
Lone Tree Point park. Public access facilities would consist of a landscaped
corridor through the marina, a new fishing pier, and possibly a pedestrian
overcrossing of the railroad from the marina to Lone Tree Point.
The development of a shoreline linear park was envisioned for the remaining
waterfront area, from the marina north to the sewage treatment plant site.
Development alternatives for the waterfront include a restaurant and retail
development at the intersection of San Pablo and Parker Avenues and a light
industrial or RV park between San Pablo Avenue and the railroad, adjacent to
the sewage treatment plant site.
The State Coastal Conservancy performed a financial feasibility analysis of the
marina improvements. The estimated development cost was $7.9 million, not
including land acquisition costs. The analysis indicated that the marina and
related commercial revenues could support a debt of $6.4 million (assuming a
majority of the financing was low-interest governmental loans)--leaving a $4
million gap. The shoreline linear park improvements are estimated to cost $3.4
million. Therefore, the total cost of the preferred marina/waterfront plan is
$11 .3 million--leaving a $7.4 million gap without land acquisition costs. The
identified alternative commercial development along the waterfront could
provide a funding stream to reduce the overall financial gap. Thestudy
identifies potential grant and loan programs which may be available to help
reduce the financing gap. The preferred plan, however, would still require a
substantial commitment of local funding to be implemented.
This Rodeo Waterfront study represents the first step in the revitalization
process of the marina and waterfront area. Significant further analysis is
warranted to determine if the preferred plan is feasible given market, real estate
and economic conditions. The next step may include a downtown/waterfront
Specific Plan and an amendment to the Redevelopment Plan. These steps
would be required to analyze the relevant market conditions, proposed land
uses, development standards, infrastructure requirements, and necessary
financial participation. The specific plan process will also determine the
appropriateness of the EBRPD, County, the Redevelopment Agency, and
Coastal Conservancy continued involvement in the revitalization process.
2. Shoreline Corridor
The Shoreline Corridor portion of this study identified and analyzed seven trail
segments. A shoreline trail was deemed infeasible because of the active
railroad tracks which run adjacent to the shoreline throughout the study area.
An inland trail alignment, however, was considered feasible which uses San
Pablo Avenue and adjacent lands from Rodeo to Crockett, local streets within
Crockett, and the Carquinez Scenic Drive or Carquinez Regional Shoreline to the
Bull Valley Staging Area. Potential exists to enlarge the Selby Open Space
holding of the East Bay Regional Park District (EBRPD) and make this area a
destination park. An upland trail corridor was identified for further review.
The inland alignment feasibility depends upon the use of the public right-of-way
for development of bicycle lanes and sidewalks. Off-street pedestrian and
equestrian trails can be developed within the open space currently belonging
to EBRPD; Lone Tree Point, Terry's Park in Rodeo, the Selby Open Space, and
the Carquinez Regional Shoreline.
The roles and responsibilities of the JPA members were identified as follows:
a. EBRPD would be responsible for design, development, and maintenance
of all trail segments within its properties or on properties with negotiated
trail or recreational use easements. They should work with private
property owners to negotiate the easements or acquire the land
necessary to implement the trail plan.
b. The County would be responsible for the design, development, and
maintenance of all bikeway and pedestrian facilities associated with the
public right-of-ways.
BL3/ipastdy.ata