HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04071992 - 1.82 1 . 8
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
FROM: Phil Batchelor, County Administrator Costa
A County
,p
Aril 1 1992
DATE:
SUBJECT: LEGISLATION: SB 1683 (Leroy Greene)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
Agree to CO-SPONSOR SB 1683 by Senator Leroy Greene if the bill is
amended to include provisions amending Revenue & Taxation Code
Section 4703 in order to provide for a temporary, one-year increase
in the allowable property tax delinquency rate for the secured
property tax roll which serves as the trigger which must be
maintained in order for the County General Fund to benefit from the
surplus funds in the tax losses reserve fund from 3% to 4% .
BACKGROUND:
Generally, the law requires the Auditor-Controller to distribute
property taxes based on the amount actually received. In this way,
all jurisdictions share in the uncertainty about the level of
delinquencies and hence the amount each jurisdiction will receive.
There is, however, an alternate method of distributing property
taxes known as the "Teeter Plan" after a former County
Administrator in this County.
Under this alternative, the County agrees to distribute a fixed
percentage of the property tax to other jurisdictions, regardless
of the amount that is actually received. This protects other
jurisdictions from the uncertainty about the actual level of
collections . One of the conditions of this alternative is Revenue
& Taxation Code Section 4703, which requires the creation of a tax
losses reserve fund, consisting of an amount equivalent to 4% of
the total of all taxes and assessments levied on the secured roll
for that year. Once the fund reaches 4% in a given year, any
further amounts may be deposited in the general fund.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): �Z" h
ACTION OF BOARD O prl APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
K UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC:
County Administrator
Auditor-Controller ATTESTED
Treasurer-Tax Collector PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
County Counsel SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Les Spahnn, SRJ. Jackson, Barish & Associates
BY •� DEPUTY
M382 (10/88)
-2-
As an incentive to collect property taxes and keep the
delinquencies down to an absolute minimum, Section 4703 also
provides that this tax losses reserve fund need be maintained at
only 3% of the total of all taxes and assessments levied on the
secured roll and everything above that can be transferred to the
general fund. However, this is only permitted where the
delinquency rate has been 3% or less for three consecutive years .
If the delinquency rate slips above 3% again in only one year, then
the County must maintain the tax losses reserve fund at the full 4%
for another three consecutive years before they can reduce it
again.
Contra Costa County has maintained its delinquency rate at just
below 3% for the past several years. Primarily because of the
recession, the Treasurer-Tax Collector and Auditor-Controller are
warning that delinquencies are up substantially this year and as a
result we may be unable to hold the delinquency rate below 3% . The
difference between keeping the tax losses reserve fund at 3% versus
4% is worth $4 million a year to this County. Hence, over a three
year period we effectively lose $12 million if we have to build the
reserve back up to 4% and then keep our delinquencies below 3% for
another three years .
We are, therefore, suggesting a one-year exception which would
allow the delinquency rate as of June 30, 1992 to be as high as 4%,
and still allow the County to draw down the surplus funds in the
tax losses reserve fund for the 1992-93 fiscal year. This will
protect the County against the possibility of slipping slightly
over the 3% delinquency rate on June 30, 1992 .
The Treasurer-Tax Collectors ' Association is sponsoring SB 1683,
which includes a number of technical amendments to the codes . They
have agreed to include the amendments we wish to make to the
"Teeter Plan" in order to provide this one-year exception to the 3%
or less for three consecutive years rule. The bill has not
actually been amended yet, but we anticipate that it will be
amended within a few days . Therefore, we are recommending that the
Board of Supervisors agree to co-sponsor SB 1683 if it is amended
to include this County' s provisions as noted above.