HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03241992 - 1.35 /�, /,
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: Phil Batchelor, County Administrator
Costa
n. js
x• County
DATE: March 19, 1992 c°spa 66U `4~`
SUBJECT: LEGISLATION: SB 1538 (Kopp, et al)
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt a position of SUPPORT AND SEEK AMENDMENTS in regard to SB
1538 by Senators Kopp, Ayala, Marks & Rosenthal and Assemblymen
Conroy, Filante & Nolan which substantially broadens the Ralph M.
Brown "Open Meeting" law.
BACKGROUND:
Current law (The Ralph M. Brown Act, Chapter ,9, Part 1, Division 2,
Title 5 of the Government Code, commencing with Section 54950)
requires that the meetings of the legislative bodies of local
agencies be conducted openly, provides certain notice requirements
concerning public meetings and makes it a misdemeanor for a member
of a legislative body to attend a meeting where a violation occurs,
if the member had knowledge of the fact that the meeting violates
the act.
SB 1538 has been introduced by Senator Kopp and others. As
introduced, SB 1538 does the following:
1. Applies the Brown Act to all private nonprofit organizations
with regard to their boards of directors concerning programs
or activities supported by grants, contracts, or other funding
from federal, state or local public agencies .
2 . Defines the term "public works project" for purposes of
current law which already applies the Brown Act to all
nonprofit corporations which are created by a local agency
formed to acquire, construct, maintain or operate any public
works project as long as the local agency appoints any of the
members of the board of directors of the corpora on. �AA
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: /f/�7 de`�
IL RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE e
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S):
ACTION OF BOARD ON Marcn Z4 , APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: County Administrator ATTESTED MAR 2 4 1992
County Counsel
PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
District Attorney
UPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Steve Swendiman, ' 'Executive Director, CSAd
Les Spahnn, SRJ. Jackson, Barish & Associa es
BY DEPUTY
M382 (10/88)
-2-
3 . Deletes the distinction between serving in their official
capacity and any other capacity in which an officer of a local
agency may serve for purposes of current law which already
applies the Brown Act to any board, commission, committee or
other body on which officers of a local agency serve which is
supported in whole or in part by funds from the agency.
4 . Eliminates the distinction between whether a board,
commission, committee or similar body is organized and
operated by a local agency or by a private corporation for
purposes of current law which includes in the definition of
"legislative body" any board, commission or committee or
similar body which exercises any authority of a legislative
body of a local agency which is delegated to it by that
legislative body.
5 . Requires an advisory body to post an agenda for its meetings
in the manner required of the body it advises .
6 . Includes within the definition of a "legislative body" any
standing committee of a governing body regardless of its
composition.
7 . Includes within the definition of a "meeting" for purposes of
the Brown Act any congregation of a majority of the members of
a legislative body in the same time and place, except a purely
social or ceremonial occasion other than one organized by and
for the legislative body itself, provided that a majority of
the members .refrains from using the occasion to collectively
discuss any business within the subject matter jurisdiction of
the agency.
8 . Includes within the definition of a "meeting" for purposes of
the Brown Act, any series of gatherings of less than a
majority of the legislative body to hear, discuss or
deliberate upon any item that is within the subject
jurisdiction of . the agency, if the cumulative result is that
a majority of members has become involved in the gatherings.
9 . Includes within the definition of a "meeting" for purposes of
the Brown Act, any other use of personal intermediaries or
technological devises that permits a majority of the members
of a legislative body to become aware of an item of business
and of the views or positions of other members with respect
thereto, and to negotiate consensus thereupon.
10 . Makes a public record under the California Public Records Act
any recording of an open and public meeting made under the
direction of a local agency.
11 . Requires meetings to be held within the boundaries of the
territory over which the agency exercises jurisdiction, with
limited exceptions .
12 . Requires that the agenda for the meeting contain a meaningful
description of each item of business, as defined.
13 . Provides additional restrictions on the type of discussion
which may take place on an item not on the agenda by providing
that no action or discussion shall take place on an item not
on the agenda except that members of the legislative body may
respond to statements made or questions posed by members of
the public speaking during the public comment period to the
extent of asking a question for clarification, providing a
reference to staff or other resources or requesting a report
back from staff at a subsequent time.
14 . Provides additional restrictions on those items which may be
brought up -and acted on which were not listed on the agenda by
providing that the determination by the legislative body of
the need for action must be a good faith, reasonable
determination and that the need to act on the item is so
-3-
imperative as to threaten serious injury to the public
interest if action were deferred to a subsequent special or
regular meeting and that the need for action came to the
attention of the local agency subsequent to the posting of the
agenda.
15 . Provides that an opportunity must be provided for members of
the public to address the legislative body before action is
taken on an item at special as well as regular meetings of the
legislative body.
16 . Prohibits the legislative body from abridging or prohibiting
public criticism of the agency or its programs or services on
any basis other than reasonable time constraints, except as
defined for cases of personal attack on a named or clearly
identifiable public employee.
17 . Provides standardized formats and information which must be
provided on any item to be discussed in closed session.
18 . Limits the circumstances under which "pending litigation" can
be discussed in closed session by indicating that litigation
shall not be considered "pending" if it is contingent. on some
future action of the legislative body and specifies that legal
advice as to the potential litigation consequences of an
action before the action has been taken, must be provided
openly as a matter of public record. The current requirement
for a memorandum from legal counsel setting forth the specific
legal authority for the closed session is repealed. .
19 . Limits the persons defined as "employees" for purposes of
holding a closed session for various purposes relating to
employees by excluding from the definition of "employee" any
elected official, members of a legislative body, or persons
providing services to the local agency as an independent
contractor or the employee of an independent contractor.
20 . Increases the reporting requirements following a closed
session by requiring the legislative body to publicly report
any action taken in closed session and the vote of every
member present on real estate negotiations, litigation and
pending litigation issues, claims for various liability
losses, various personnel actions and certain collective
bargaining matters . The bill also prescribes how the reports
are to be made and would require a written summary of the
information to be posted.
21 . Requires that an audio tape be kept of every closed session
and requires that the tape be kept for one year. The tapes
would not be public records but would be available for
inspection by the district attorney, grand jury or superior
court in camera regarding potential violations of the Brown
Act.
22 . Restricts the periods of time within which a closed session
can be held ,regarding the salary and benefits of employees to
periods of active consultation and discussion and would
exclude from closed sessions employees directly or indirectly
interested in the outcome of negotiations .
23 . SB 1538 makes other changes in provisions of the Brown Act
dealing with penalties for violating its provisions . .
What SB 1538 does not do is to apply its provisions to the State
Legislature, state agencies or other. boards, commission or
committees established by the Legislature. On March 17, 1992, at
the request of Supervisor Schroder, the Board of Supervisors asked
that SB 1538 be listed on the agenda for March 24, 1992 so the
Board could consider taking a position on the bill . From the
discussion among the Board members, it is staff ' s understanding
that the Board wishes to support SB 1538 as introduced, but also
ask the author to apply the Brown Act to the Legislature and its
-4-
committees, state agencies and state boards, commissions and
committees . If the concept of "open meetings" is appropriate for
local government it is not clear why it is not also appropriate for
state government. It is, therefore recommended that the Board
adopt a position of SUPPORT AND SEEK AMENDMENTS in regard to SB
1538 and include in --its support of SB 1538 provisions which would
made all provisions of the Brown Act also applicable to the
Legislature, state agencies and boards, commissions and committees
in the same way these provisions are applicable to local
government.