Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06111991 - 2.4 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: VALENTIN ALEXEEFF, DIRECTOR - GMEDA DATE: JUNE 11, 1991 SUBJECT: FIRST QUARTER REPORT OF THE GROWTH 1\1ANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS) &BACKGROUND &JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: �. ACCEPT the attached First Quarter Report of the Growth Management and Economic Development Agency. II. Financial Impact: None III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: (See attached report) For attached report, see DATE File Continued on Attachment: SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON June 11, 1991 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of an action taken end entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervi on the date shown. vA:dg statr tl.bo ATTESTED: i/ X99/ p PHIL B CHELOR,Clerk of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator Orig Dept: GMEDA cc: County Administrator Eli _ ,Deputy County Counsel Public Works Community Development Building Inspection GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRST QUARTER REPORT JANUARY - MARCH 1991 By Valentin Alexeeff, Director TABLE OF CONTENTS I. First Quarter Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. First Quarter Strategy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . 1 I11. Organization Plan . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 IV. Reconnaissance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 V. Initial Assessment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 0 VI. Actions to be Initiated Second Quarter . . . . . . . 21 e FIRST QUARTER REPORT JANUARY - MARCH 1991 Following is the first of four quarterly reports on the goals and objectives of GMEDA. If you have any questions or comments and wish to discuss this report, please call me at 6-1620. I. First Quarter Plan A. Mission Statement Improve Agency strategy for development. B. Objectives 1. Establish Agency presence. 2. Identify role for Agency. 3. Begin appraisal of operating environment. 4. Gain cooperation of Department Heads within the Agency. 5. Gain support and charify expectations of Supervisors, key departments and other agencies. 6. Identify short term and long term goals for the Agency, as well as a method for their implementation. 7. Identify parameters of Agency Director's role and responsibility. 8. Present personal style. I1. First Quarter Strategy A. Identify dysfunctional circumstances related to Agency departments and divisions. 1. Seek balanced view from multiple perspectives regarding department strengths and weaknesses. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 1 2. List perceived problems of departments. 3. Establish dialogue on the problems. 4. Assess strengths and weaknesses. a. Use incidents to frame the issue. b. Try to obtain maximum dialogue. B. Identify areas of interaction and chart relationship. Acknowledge role of agencies listed. 1. Supervisors and staff a. Develop rapport as Agency spokesman and as strategist. 2. Administration a. Provide steady support and reliability. 3. Departments internal to Agency a. Understand departments and help them realize their potential. 4. Departments external, but interdependent with Agency a. County Counsel - Provide greater role in areas of liability and policy formation. b. Environmental Health - Clarify and expand role in project review. C. Fire Districts - Clarify and expand role in project review. d. Data Processing - Bring Agency departments up to same level. Use technology available to improve service. e. General Services - Make more efficient use of facilities. f. Personnel - Improve interaction and process. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 2 5. Cities a. Managers - Maintain relationships and work on common interest. b. Planners, Engineers, Building Officials - Build on Agency technical expertise. C. Councils - Find common ground. 6. Other Agencies a. CCWD - Determine areas of interaction and cooperation. b. EBMUD - Determine areas of interaction and cooperation. C. CCCSD-Identify areas of conflict,interaction, and cooperation. d. EBRPD - Determine needs for improved relations. e. ABAG - Determine role. L MTC - Develop County transportation strategy. g. CCTA - Develop County transportation strategy. h. School Districts - Establish role of. Agency and help school districts understand their role in development. 7. Special Interests Identify concerns and roles. a. Environmental community b. Development community C. Consultants and contractors 8. Media a. Press - Begin to identify Agency goals, mission, and perspectives. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 3 C. Chart Agency Path 1. Gather all documents pertaining to formation of the Agency and identify present status. (GMEDA formation report to be out soon.) 2. Select specific areas for detailed attention and monitoring. a. Permit Center b. Code Enforcement C. Economic Development d. Solid Waste e. Transportation Planning f. East County D. Combine goals stated in the Nineteen Points with input gained from investigation. 1. What do I want from Department Heads, senior staff, key staff, other staff? 2. How to articulate my expectations? a. Style and attitude b. Level of performance C. Specific changes or enhancements d. Check up on requests 3. Provide Administration with expectations. E. Outline strategy for development in 2nd and 3rd quarter. Develop'strategy to improve County effectiveness with other agencies. 1. Cities a. Define areas of common purpose. b. Define areas of controversy. C. Identify potential County services. d. Identify organizational functions. e. Develop long term County strategies to clarify short term steps. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 4 2. Agencies (as identified in II. B. 7. above) a. List agency and its formal authority. b. Indicate areas of formal and informal interaction. C. Clarify goals of County and those of agency. d. Prepare strategy where needed. 3. Joint Committee a. Establish context and County role. F. Establish budget priorities. 1. Fund GMEDA operations. 2. Identify unfunded mandates. 3. Review flow of workplan offset against flow of cash. 4. Develop summer intern program. G. Review projects. 1. Disasters a. Clayton Valley Farms b. Landmark West C. Konics d. Nielsen 2. Negotiations a. Blue water b. Tassajara C. Dougherty Valley H. Develop strategy for East County. L Identify Torlakson's outlook a. Staff problems b. Politics C. Long term outcome VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 5 2. Identify Community Development staff perspective 3. Identify Public Works staff perspective 4. Clarify role for ECRPC, OMAC, BI Pride, etc. III. Organization Plan A. Operations 1. Organize functions by department in the following way: a. Department Division b. Activity C. Authority d. Source of Funding 2. Focus on items falling through cracks and their causes. 3. Develop annual performance appraisal process for every employee where none exists. 4. Develop goals for each department based upon GMEDA report and interviews. B. Funding 1. Continue strategy for full cost recovery of fees to fund departmental operations. 2. Make every effort for Agency to become self-sufficient. Two issues must be addressed: a. What to do about State or local mandates that do not provide adequate funds to cover expenses. b. What to do about funds that are returned to General Fund to balance budget without adequate nexus. 3.. Develop acceptable cost allocation plan for GMEDA staff (four employees). VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 6 tl C. Policy L Identify and combine written policies (consistent) using General Plan and non-General Plan sources in following areas: a. Delta b. Mt. Diablo and foothills C. Agricultural areas d. City spheres of influence e. East County L Other incorporated areas that would benefit from policy direction and coordination IV. Reconnaissance A major goal of my first quarter activities was assessment of the terrain. This was done through 180 meetings with Supervisors, staff, agencies, and others as follows. A. Supervisors Met with every Supervisor and had tours with some in an effort to discuss problems identified that Agency was intended to solve. Tours were intended to see the district through their eyes. I have attended Board meetings and closed sessions of topical and procedural context. B. Agency Departments Met with individual Department Heads to discuss their expectations and concerns. Met with senior staff for introduction and to discuss operation constraints. An Executive Committee, comprised of the three Department Heads and myself, has been established to discuss Agencywide issues. Several meetings at various levels have been held on the budget. 1. Public Works Meetings have been held with individual staff members on topic issues such as flood, toll roads,transportation, airports, and maintenance yard personnel. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 7 2. Community Development Meetings have been held with individual staff members and public on code enforcement, General Plan, specific plans, redevelopment and economic development, San Ramon area development, East County development, East County Regional Planning Commission, and solid waste. 3. Building Inspection Meetings have been held on personnel matters, blue water, and City contracts. 4. Application and Permit Center Meetings have been held on further steps in establishing center, and gaining participation of Fire Districts and Environmental Health. C. Administration Regular meetings regarding the Board's agenda and issues for Department Heads have been attended for context and administrative perspective. In addition, I have attended meetings dealing with such topics as personnel, helicopters, contract administration and others within administrative context. D. Other Departments Met with other County departments to help provide a smooth transition. Departments included Personnel, General Services, County Counsel, Auditor, and Data Processing. I have also met with the East County Planning Commission, and both the San Ramon Planning Commission and the Central Planning Commission in social functions. E. Cities Accomplished individual meetings with every City regarding matters of mutual concern. The perspectives of the Cities were instructive. Some have raised issues I have responded to. F. Other Agencies I have met with CCWD, EBRPD, and CCTA to discuss matters of mutual concern. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 8 G. Press I have met with reporters on several occasions to discuss Agencywide, as well as specific issues. H. Applicants I have met with key applicants whose projects enabled me to better understand the workings of the Agency. 1. Outside County I took two trips outside the County. I met with the State Planning Directors Association to help develop that network and identify Statewide issues. I have also met with Cal Poly Community Development Department to discuss an internship program for Contra Costa County. V. Initial Assessment A. Supervisors Each Board member expressed specific Countywide and district interests. I perceive a commitment from each Board member to make the County self- sufficient financially, to require cities to acknowledge County role as a part of any negotiation, and to maintain as much commitment to human service needs as possible. Each Supervisor has areas of conflict with local elected officials in their district which become important since the same constituency must decide who is right. The Board will benefit by seeking consensus on difficult decisions and receiving improved staff support on local matters. The following are initial perceptions and responses. 1. Each Board member expressed frustration at mistakes, internal bickering, and specific issues. Each member has watchdog groups of constituents, who react to actions taken by County officials or other members of the Board. Special interests are becoming more diverse, increasing in demand, and generating greater pressure so even when procedures are followed properly, conflicts erupt. When mistakes are made, the fall-out is dramatic and can be crippling to the institution. The increased pressure of constituents blurs public policy mandates w since there are many publics to be served. VA:dg statrptl.bd ce�lli91� 9 Staff needs to help broaden and clarify issues to provide negotiating room among constituencies. Procedural and systematic measures to reduce mistakes are necessary. 2. Supervisors receive substantial amounts of negative reaction from cities. Staff must develop strategies to overcome the waste of time and energy in interjurisdictional conflict. 3. Supervisors need to have assurance that development procedures are more efficient, orderly, and reliable. Staff needs to know that Supervisors will not intrude into routine items or violate own policies or regulations without careful appraisal of the consequences. Procedures shall be simplified and improved to reduce the amount of quality issues that the Board must deal with. Staff will work to respond to'concerns raised by the Board within broader policy context. 4. Supervisors identified needed changes as indicated within GMEDA formation document. Progress in changes will be monitored and new requests will be added. 5. Supervisors' • offices are expected to be council and staff to unincorporated areas. Staff will help devise allocation of personnel strategies to respond to community issues (though limited by reduced County resources). 6. GMEDA was formed to bring the development departments together, and to improve coordination and operation of the County. A process for improved integration of department functions will be developed and implemented. B. Administration Administration is viewing most issues through a revenue shortfall lens. Non- revenue issues are lower priority with a few notable exceptions. The issues brought about by three independent departments responsible for development, caused significant shift in resources last year to respond to the problems of organization and coordination. With the Nineteen Points and the formation VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 10 of the Agency, the issue has left administration to be resolved by the Agency. The Agency will be able to fix certain matters quickly while others will require assistance on a broader scale than the Agency. These issues are resolution of revenue issues, relocation to a common site, and clarification of role and responsibility. General progress reports will be made quarterly with topical meetings as frequent as necessary. Clear steps need to be taken within overall goals set for the Agency. Some mid-course correction will be appropriate. The following.are initial perceptions and responses. 1. How can progress be measured and cost justified? Documentation of actions and mutual agreement on criteria for evaluation to be instituted. 2. What services can Agency provide for Administration? Predicting and pacing issues, developing broader contexts, anticipating problems and diffusing them. C. Departments Each department embodies goals,self vision,standards of acceptable behavior, relationships, strengths and weaknesses, ethics, prejudices based upon experience and training, priorities, frustrations, factions, and other aspects of history. I have begun my assessment mostly by listening to the departments and to others commenting on the departments' operations. I have little experience with first-hand evaluation though this will change with time. I stated that I would not make changes until I was satisfied I understood matters. Generally, the departments are proud of their accomplishments and respond to criticisms from external sources in terms of lack of funds or conflicting expectations. I have reviewed problems brought-to my attention and can offer some initial suggestions. Problem review and consideration of alterative approaches will continue through the first year. For instance, I plan to follow specific applications to the processes to understand systems. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 1 1 L. Building Inspection The context for building code operation is simple and straightforward. Fees are paid for the performance of a variety of inspections to ensure that codes are met. The variables for a building inspection operation are: • Cost of inspection • Speed of inspection process • Efficiency in making arrangements, tracking, and keeping up with issues • Quality of inspection relative to thoroughness and problem solving • Determination of client: developer, home-owner, policy body, community, etc. • Ability to shift emphasis and approach • Selection of code standards From what I can assess, the Department was following standards established in previous decades while expectations for the Department had changed. With the hiring of Frank Lew, a reorganization has begun that shifted the emphasis from speed and developer-orientation to quality of inspection and thoroughness. The efficiency due to the computer innovations should not be hampered and should continue to be enhanced. However, state of the art experimentation should be avoided at this time. There are informal meetings on a weekly basis with the Director of Building Inspection that keep me updated on the progress. Within the second quarter, I will conduct some evaluation of the change and relate the benefits and drawbacks. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 12 The Department is vulnerable in several areas: a. Building Inspection generates revenue which finds its way to other departments and the General Fund. The natural oversight body of the use of building inspection fees is the BIA. Should they perceive that funds are diverted for non-building inspection uses, they will have political and legal options to pursue. b. Quality control in the field. C. Role in interpreting standards. 2. Public Works Public Works is oriented to transportation and flood control. The vast majority of Public Works revenues are restricted. Consequently, project accounting is easy to maintain. Some functions and revenues come from the General Fund, and their need and funding is under study. Productivity is the primary objective of the Department and therefore public works' operations are set up to evaluate quantity and quality of individual output. Actions of the Director and supervisory staff are oriented to enhancing productivity within the ranks. Effort is made to reward high productivity and to punish low productivity or a negative attitude. Department focus is based upon execution of standards and making one's case. In my own experience, the Department will accept views contrary to its own, but this requires persistence and supportive evidence. The Department is strong in output, morale, esprit de corps, and work ethic. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 13 The Department is vulnerable in several areas: a. Changing standards Over time, public desire for flood control facilities, for instance, has changed from trapezoidal channels and concrete structures to preservation of habitat and ambiance. The change for flood control has been hard and slow according to EBRPD and some cities. Other forms of change come from Supervisors or Commissions who waive standards or demand new ones. Public Works attempts to hold firm to the status quo and appears intransigent. While it's true that Public Works should strive for consistency in County policy, they clarify and reaffirm standards more often. Otherwise, they appear to be headed in their own direction despite the intent of policy makers and the public. Workshops provide a good opportunity to consider changes in standards since they allow the presentation of equity issues. b. Administration policy Occasionally, Public Works becomes highly frustrated by administration policies or actions pertaining to promotion, reclassification, budgetary measures, and purchasing because it isn't as responsive as Public Works needs. By setting high standards of performance for itself, it raises similar expectations of other agencies. When expectations aren't met, there is a tendency to push harder and keep pushing. With the perception that Public Works is less hampered (or less sensitive) to politics than other departments, resentment occurs. r C. Promotions The issues at the yard are complex and have many antecedents, however, institutions are being challenged everywhere for inherant bias. Bias may not be intentional, but has the appearance of creating a closed system. Affirmative action programs across the Nation are trying to develop a level playing field or even undo previous problems. The issues have become highly symbolic and spill into the community which suddenly makes Department personnel matters public-political issues. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 14 There is a need to innovate and truly demonstrate a commitment to creating new opportunities, otherwise the Department is forever tied to perceived previous injustice. Based upon my initial review I have the following concerns: (1) Policies related to development and operation need to be reviewed in its present context. Public Works needs to reaffirm direction previously established and modify as necessary. (2) Public Works perspective needs to be broadened to incorporate additional concerns pertaining to environment. ` (3) Public Works needs to update its role in the County development process. 3. Community Development This Department is most easily evaluated in comparison to Building Inspection and Public Works. Income is split between fees, General Fund, and miscellaneous sources. The Department develops policies and standards on varying levels of abstraction and from varying perspectives. Planners are the most flexible to changes in policy and, at times, considered too flexible in interpreting standards of other departments. Many of the professional planners view their work as a calling. Planners donate hours to the County at a higher rate than the other two departments. a. The Department is vulnerable in several areas: (1) Planning is not set up on a billable, hourly basis or work- product basis similar to the other departments and received new unfunded projects. The implication is that resources can be stretched just incrementally thinner to accommodate the next mandate. (2) Staff members receive a lot of sympathy due to high workloads and may be held less accountable for performance or mistakes than the other departments due to higher tolerance for poor decisions. The extent of gray area in planning policy also adds to the higher level VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 15 of unpredictability in planning response on a project. . The external community, including environmental, city, and development elements, lament the lack of Predictability also due to the individual planner, the workload, the region, the project, and so forth. (3) The high workload of the County and uncertain funding make the Department to appear to "rob Peter to pay Paul" to make ends meet. Community Development is looked upon as charity by Building Inspection, and as a sloppy accountant and diverter of restricted resources by Public Works. b. Based upon my conversations, I have the following measures to propose. (1) Develop standard Conditions of Approval for use in applications. Circulation of draft Conditions and possible forums for their analysis include the following: (a) Community Development, Building Inspection, and Public Works (b) Other departments such as County Counsel and Administration (c) Supervisors (d) Planning Commissions and relevant committees (e) Other agencies such as EBRPD, EBMUD, CCWD (f) Interest groups such as Save Mt. Diablo, BIA, Land Alliance, etc. (2) Each discretionary process should include appropriate standard Conditions, with findings, appropriate to the site. (3) The proposal for bonding use permits to ensure compliance with Conditions will be considered. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 16 (4) Community areas will be selected for association with . specific planners who will get to know those areas and become the primary contact person for development issues in that area. (5) Department workload and organization will be examined. (b) Certain applications will be discussed at an interdepartment meeting including CDD, PWD, BID, and where applicable, Fire, Environmental Health and County Counsel. (7) Work toward a work plan and control system for time required by staff to attend meetings and process projects. Contrast desirable versus present circumstances. (8) A separate strategy needs to be developed for East County. (a) Identify communities geographically i) West Pittsburg ii) Oakley iii) Bethel Island iv) Byron v) Discovery Bay (b) Identify policy needs for those communities i) Public Works • Roads • Lighting • Drainage • Other infrastructure ii) Community Development • Planning policies • Design issues • Parks • Redevelopment/economic development • Community needs VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 17 iii) Code Enforcement • Inventory of violations • Sources of funding for abatement iv) Other Issues • Nature of liaison with local groups. • Which issues are real needs that must be addressed in a context of limited resources? (9) All committees that are not mandated by law should be given sunset dates to force determination of their cost effectiveness. 4. Interdepartment Areas A number of responsibilities transcend individual departmental operations. The issues generally include funding, delineation of authority, coordination among agencies, mixed perspectives, and changing policies. These are areas that will require the greatest coopetition and creativity. a. Code Enforcement This is an extremely difficult area because there are no dedicated funds, issues are messy, there is no professional doctrine, codes and enforcement mechanisims are inconsistent and no department sees the code enforcement function as their mission. The path is not yet clear though day to day opertions have improved through the efforts of John Gregory and the individual code enforcement officers. Some proposals have been made though funding issues keep the matter unresolved. b. Permit Assistance This area is receiving a lot of attention and suggestions for improvement. The key will be to alter some departmental traditions in favor of long-term improvements. There is a need to resist instituting every suggestion without careful scrutiny. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 18 C. Transportation Planning This is a traditional area of contention between Community Development and Public Works. The Department Heads have been making a serious commitment to resolving issues and improving the quality of this process. d. Economic Development The dimensions of economic development are unlimited. The key issues are areas of focus and commitment of resources. The area will become the Agency priority once processing issues are resolved. e. Computer Automation An arrangement has been made between Building Inspection and Community Development to upgrade the computer capability of Community Development which will include money and technical assistance. An overall plan for upgrade will be developed by the end of the third quarter. f. Budgeting Within the requirements of budgeting established by the CAO, the Agency has two goals, (1) to become self.-supporting and (2) to establish cost accounting for all activities. The intent is to identify unfunded activities and to determine their priority among the range of unfunded County activities, to review work program items for flow and priority, and to clarify expectations regarding productivity and performance. 5. Cities Relationships are mixed due to history, staff, location, and issues. There is a need to improve relations simply to reduce time staff is involved in battles rather than cooperative productive action. I have met with every city and will continue to seek cooperative relations. a. Establish positive context for relations based on mutual benefit. b. Separate policy from technical interaction. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 19 C. List City/County issues by jurisdiction. d. Develop strategy white papers for City/County issues that will promote long-term focus, consistency, and reliability. (Topic, subtopic, general intended outcome, city reponse, areas of ° compromise and approach.) 6. Agencies Schools, parks, water, and sewage treatment all have independent policy bodies, perspectives, and reactions to events. Similar to cities, areas of common puprose and difference need to be mapped out and strategy developed for correction. 7. Special Interests There is a need to systematically identify interest groups and their intent for the purpose of future negotiations. a. Identify interests in common and in conflict. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 20 VI. Actions to be Initiated Second Quarter GMEDA 1. Develop operational priorities for budget and work program. 2. Continue to expand understanding of internal workings of departments. r 3. Develop intern program for the three departments through Cal Poly San Luis Obispo. INTERDEPARTMENTAL COORDINATION AND COOPERATION 1. Review application process and make appropriate changes. 2. Develop standard conditions through a process of including departments, other agencies, supervisors, and interest groups. 3. Conduct interstaff meetings upon application acceptance for selected types of projects. 4. Conduct regular coordination meetings for the following: A. Transportation B. Code Enforcement C. Permit Assistance 5. Improve interdepartmental coordination on grading procedures and inspection. 6. Reconcile designated funds for code enforcement and workload -review penalties. 7. Develop work program and timeframe for expansion of computer assistance. 8. Review budget opportunities for joint hiring of Geologist - Soils Engineer for GMEDA departments. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION 1. Develop outreach program for job openings in entry and mid level PW, BI, CD. 2. Develop exam training to be held in Richmond and Pittsburg. (Issues such as vocabulary, special equipment training, attitude) VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 21 3. Develop evaluation for file on what each individual would need to do to advance to the next step without any guarantee. 4. Have ladders for each department for every position. 5. Evaluation procedures of affirmative action coordinators. SUPERVISORS Provide strategic reviews of interjurisdictional issues. CITIES Develop cooperation/conflict strategy for each city. PERMIT ASSISTANCE COUNTER Equipment 1. Install a dedicated telephone. 2. Provide a computer terminal for public access. Determine what information should be accessible. Hand-outs 3. Redesign and reorganize the complete group of customer handouts. The handouts should be reviewed and prepared by staff in related departments to assure that they are correct and consistent. These handouts need to be standardized for all departments. The idea of the "Home Club Look" was suggested as an option for a consistent look in all the brochures. "Most often asked questions" should be answered in the typically designed handout. 4. Refine and distribute a sample lot plan to customers. 5. Investigate development of a set of videos for public to view over monitor. Coordination/Communication Information 6. Prepare a glossary of commonly used development terms. Distribute the glossary from the APC. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 22 7. Develop a simplified alphabetical phone list showing employee areas of responsibility within GMEDA. , 8. Use the terminals more effectively to answer customers inquiries. 9. Develop an Employee Reference Book. A compact informational book containing numbers and who to call for pertinent information. Similar to the "Answer Book" used by Public Works. 10. Consider improved routing procedures. Staff Training 1 L. Set up a program to orient each department to the operations of other departments on the counter. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Personnel Establish performance appraisal structure for every employee, every year regardless of whether pay raise is involved. Budget Identify every work product and relate to funding source. Identify all unfunded mandates for reconsideration and possible sunset. Process Establish list of draft standard conditions by June 17 for internal review. Circulation of draft conditions and possible forums for their analysis include the following: A. Community Development, Building Inspection, and Public Works B. Other departments such as County Counsel and Administration C. Supervisors D. Planning Commissions and relevant committees VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 23 E. Other agencies such as EBRPD, EBMUD, CCWD, other Cities F. Interest groups such as Save Mt. Diablo, BIA, Land Alliance, etc. Each discretionary process should include appropriate standard and exceptional Conditions, with findings, appropriate to the site. Form a committee comprised of CDD, PWD, BID, CC, EH, and Fire to meet regularly and review major applications shortly after submittal. Identify Planners to be associated with specific unincorporated communities and establish their responsibilities by June 17. Review feasibility of bonding for use permit conditions and provide report by June 17. Establish calendar and log for projects that are controversial to maintain status for staff, Phil, Board of Supervisors, interest groups, etc. Projects Coordinate activities of Dougherty Valley development. Documents Complete General Plan Prepare and implement strategy for zoning. Provide comprehensive code revision. Meetings Establish a capacity for departmental meeting attendance within current staff. All committees not mandated by law should be given sunset dates to force determination of their cost effectiveness. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 24 East County Prepare work program for current staff efforts in East County to reconcile with expectations and funding. A. Identify communities geographically (1) West Pittsburg (2) Oakley (3) Bethel Island (4) Byron (5) Discovery Bay (6) East County Airport B. Identify policy needs (1) Public Works • Roads • Lighting • Drainage • Other infrastructure (2) Community Development • Planning policies • Design issues • Parks • Redevelopment/economic development • Community needs (3) Code Enforcement • Inventory of violation • Sources of funding for abatement C. Determine level of staff interaction (1) Nature of liaison with local groups (2) Which issues are the priority needs that must be addressed in a context of limited resources? VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 25 BUILDING INSPECTION 1. Establish clear hierarchy of responsibility for decisions. 2. Reorganize grading. 3. Improve client orientation. 4. Continue leadership in computer technology. 5. Expand supervision of field inspectors. 6. Improve coordination of code enforcement personnel. 7. Review relationship between cost of service,value added, and speed of permit review. 8. Upgrade training and professional capability of staff. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Review Public Works' standards in light of expectations of other agencies, applicants, Planning Commissions, and Board members. 2. Update Public Works' role in relation to other departments. 3. Broaden Public Works' perspective in relation to environment. PREPARE STRATEGY FOR THE FOLLOWING: 1. Economic Development 2. Code Enforcement 3. Solid Waste 4. Transportation UNRESOLVED ISSUES 1. County annexation strategy and position on changes in spheres of influence. 2. Role of staff in East County. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 26 w f 3. County position on toll road. 4. Funds and authority to be committed to Economic Development. 5. Definition of County role in development beyond revenue enhancement. 6. Extent of unfunded committees that County can afford to staff. Staff priorities for work. 7. Fee study behind, need to resolve cost of processing. 8. Proposal for Outreach Planners remains unfunded. 9. No funding source for code enforcement. 10. Need process to establish priorities. VA:dg statrptl.bd (6/11/91) 27 ",-004 GROWTH MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AGENCY CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FIRST QUARTER REPORT JANUARY - MARCH 1991 By Valentin Alexeeff, Director