HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05071991 - IO.3 I.O.-3
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra
FROM: INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
Costa
n1 s
}
April 22, 1991 �° -- `Pti'4 County
DATE: rrq-(40-
REQUEST FROM HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION THAT THE TRAINING
SUBJECT: INSTITUTE BE MADE MORE HANDICAPPED ACCESSIBLE
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS:
1, Request the County * Administrator to discuss with the
Community College District the possibility of increasing the
nighttime lighting at the entrance to the first floor of the
George Gordon Education Center and report to our Committee
on the outcome of these discussions on July 8, 1991.
2. Request the County Administrator to discuss with the
Community College District the feasibility of
recommendations # ' 2 and # 3 made by the Human Relations
Commission, namely:
* "Keeping the elevator unlocked during office hours and
evening meetings to assure ready and easy access to the
second floor." and
* "Eliminating the restriction that only those with
disabilities can use the elevator to gain access to the
second floor thus eliminating the need for disclosure
of physical condition by those with non-obvious
disabilities, and eliminating the isolation otherwise
imposed on persons with disabilities."
If these requests are unacceptable to the Community College
District, then attempt to negotiate a compromise which is
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENTYeS YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY D I R RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE TH
SIGNATURE(S): S ER SUNNE WRIGHT McPEAK
ACTION OF BOARD ON a 7; 1991 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
X UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: ATTESTED '�� /, /99/
Please see Page 2. PHIL BATCHELO ,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY DEPUTY
M382 (10/88) 61
acceptable to both the Community College District and the
Human Relations Commission and report his findings and
conclusions to this Committee on July 8, 1991.
3 . Authorize the members of our Committee to send a letter to
the President of the Community College District Board of
Trustees to advise them of the situation the County is
confronting and soliciting their cooperation and support in
finding a mutually acceptable solution to the problem. This
letter should also offer to have our Committee meet with the
President of the Board of Trustees if that is the wish of
the Board of Trustees.
4 . Request the County Administrator to write to the City of
Martinez soliciting their cooperation in providing enhanced
enforcement of the disabled parking spaces in the area of
the Community College District.
BACKGROUND:
The Board of Supervisors recently received and referred to our
Committee a letter expressing the Commission' s concern that the
second floor of the George Gordon Education Center (The Training
Institute) is not more readily accessible to the handicapped.
While the second floor is accessible to the handicapped by use of
an elevator on the first floor on the Community College District
offices, this elevator is locked at all times and must be
unlocked during the day by college district personnel to allow
access to the second floor. In the evening, arrangements must be
made in advance with the Community College District in order to
gain access to the second floor of the building. The procedure
is only available to those who are in a wheelchair or otherwise
obviously disabled. Unless advance arrangements are made, it is
often impossible for a handicapped individual to gain access to
the second floor of the building for a meeting unless the group
holding the meeting has stationed an individual in the lobby of
the Community College District offices to allow access to
individuals who may need to use the elevator.
The Human Relations Commission believes that this procedure is
cumbersome, continues to subtly discriminate against the disabled
and requires advance knowledge that a disabled individual may
wish to attend the meeting.
On April 22, 1991 our Committee met with the Chair and staff to
the Human Relations Commission as well as staff from the
Personnel Department, County Counsel' s Office and County
Administrator' s Office. The Chair of the Commission reviewed
with our Committee the attached report. We also had available to
us correspondence between County staff and the Commission on this
subject.
As a result of our meeting, we have agreed to make the above
recommendations to the Board of Supervisors in an effort resolve
this issue satisfactorily and at minimal expense to anyone.
We will meet again on this subject on July 8, 1991 and will
hopefully be able to make a final report to the Board of
Supervisors following this meeting.
cc: County Administrator
Director of Personnel
County Counsel
Chancellor, Community College District (Via CAO)
President, Board of Trustees
Community College District (Via CAO)
Chair, Human Relations Commission
Ami Mezahav, Coordinator, Human Relations Commission
f
..I
Contra s........L HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
Room 103, Adm. Bldg.
Costa
s 651 Pine Street
County Martinez, California 94553
'� �' (415) 646-2013
0
DATE: April 11, 1991
TO: C. Van )`darter,
Assistant County Administrator
FROM: Ami Mezahav,
Coordinator
SUBJECT: REPORT ON ACCESS ISSUES AT THE GEORGE GORDON EDUCATION
CENTER, 500 COURT ST, MARTINEZ
At issue here is access for disabled individuals to the George Gordon Education
Center in Downtown Martinez. In memos' dated July and August 1989 former HPLC
Director Fred Persily notified County staff of the building's inaccessabilty to
people with disabilities who are interested in attending various important meetings
that are often held at the Center during work hours and in the evenings.
County staff responded to this request by suggesting that the Commission move
it's meetings from the Gordon Center to an accessible location. All meetings held
at the Center would still be off limits to those with disabilities, unless previous
arrangements were made for someone from the Community College District to be
present to allow people in wheelchairs or scooters entrance through the first floor-
lobby to the elevator. Furthermore, according to this policy only those with
apparent disabilities were to be allowed to use the elevator. An embarrassing
incident during which disabled persons were barred from attending an earthquake
education meeting highlighted the impracticality of this policy. Thereafter the
CAO began to recommend to various County bodies that formerly met at the
Center that they would be best off if they too moved they're meetings.
Throughout this process the HRC continued to maintain that it was the
responsibility of the Center and of the County to make 500 Court Street
accessible to all rather than to close its doors to meetings that might be of
interest to disabled individuals. After reviewing the recently passed Americans
with Disabilities Act and learning; from County Staff that a ramp to the second
floor public entrance from the street is a prohibitively expensive prefect. the Chair
of the Commission in Sep. 1990 offered the following; suggestions to remedy the
access situation:
1. Lighting; the entrance to the first floor for evening public meetings to
eliminate current risks to personal safety.
Keeping; the elevator unlocked during office hours and evening meetings
to assure ready and easy access to the second, floor.
3. Eliminating the restriction that only those Nvith disabilities can use the
elevator to gait: access to the second floor thus eliminating this ?geed fo
disclosure of physical condition by those with non-obvious disabilities- .
and eliminating the isolation othervrise imposed. on persons wit'r:
disabilities.
ACCESS PAGE 2
4. Placing signs or symbols at the first floor and primary entrances, visible
to the public with disabilities, for the purpose of identifying the
entrances and locations of the access entrance.
5. Enhanced enforcement by. local Police of reserved disabled parking.
Commission staff is glad to report that some of these suggestions appear to have
been adopted. Unfortunately, others have not. The Chair of the Commission is
interested in having the Board of Supervisors move on this issue.