Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04021991 - 1.59 .a. 54 TO: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYra ` ■ T1l FROM: Phil Batchelor %` �A`/A� -_ Costa Executive Director DATE: April 2 , 1991 SUBJECT: Repayment of Debt SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS (S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Determine that Contra Costa County Redevelopment Agency indebtedness to the County of Contra Costa - Assessment District . 83-1 - dated January 17, 1984 in the principal amount of $100, 000. 00, September 12, 1984... in the principal amount of $100, 00. 00, and October 22, 1985 in the principal amount of $433 , 132 . 00 plus accrued interest to date, has been repaid. FISCAL IMPACT No General Fund monies are involved. The Agency incurred"expenses. for public improvements that exceeded those provided for in. Assessment District 83-1. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS In 1984 and 1985, the County and the Redevelopment Agency entered into loan agreements providing for the advance of certain funds to the Redevelopment Agency for Agency operations. The advances were as follows: CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: ? RECOMMENDATION OF EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR RECOMMEND ON OF AGES Y COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER . 17 SIGNATURE(S) ACTION OF AGENCY ON April 2, 1991 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED x OTHER VOTE OF COMMISSIONERS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ON THE DATE SHOWN. cc: Community Development County Administrator Auditor-Controller ATTESTED April 2, 1991 Public Works PHIL BATCHELOR, T Redevelopment Agency AGENCY SECRETARY ; File C3 . 1(a) SRA13/repaydbt.bos BY (21,h 01 j DEPUTY op Outstanding Debt Original with accrued interest, Date Principal Amount as of 6/30/90 1/17/84 $100, 000. 00 $ 197, 356.00 9/12/84 $100, 000. 00 $ 182, 655. 00 10/22/85 $433, 132. 00 $ 674,926. 00 Total $633, 132.00 $1, 054,937 . 00* The cost of completing the infrastructure improvements at the Pleasant Hill BART exceeded available revenues from Assessment District 83-1 by $2,827, 677.68. The Redevelopment Agency, from its own funds, assumed those obligations. Since those funds could have been paid by Assessment District proceeds, had the Agency not borrowed them, it is appropriate that the Agency be credited for these expenditures by a reduction in its debt to those Assessment Districts. *Accrued interest to date will be computed and considered repaid.