Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03051991 - 1.3 (2) POSITION ADJUSTi01T REQUEST 1--030 No. � 10 Date: Dept X10,./ r _ COPERS Department Social Service :Budge.. JniLTo Qrg. No. 5000Agency No. 53 ' Action Requested: That salary range­fo .:1 s�pf�SQ�-al Service 3nformatioD Systems Analyst be adjus b e�t;1 -1bEligibility_ Work_,Supervisor r- Reallocate salary level or Social Service Ditonnation systems Ana.Lyst k (Class Code XQWD Salary Range '2534-3080) Proposed Effective Date: Dayafter BoarT rova , . Explain why adjustment is needed: See attached memo Classification Questionnaire attached: Yes No x Cost is within department's budget: Yes x No Total One-Time Costs (non-salary) associated with this request: $ N/A Estimated Total cost of adjustment (salary/benefits/one-time): Total Annual Cost $ 3,049 Net County Cost $ 832.68 Total This FY $ 1,285 N.C.C. This FY $ 346.95 Source of Funding to Offset Adjustment: Department must initiate necessary appropriation adjustment +: . and submit to CAO. Use additional sheets for further 38 explanations or comments. - (for) D ad 17 Reviewed by CAO and Released To Personnel Department Deputy C ty Administrator Date Personnel Department Recommendation Date: 2-13-91 Reallocate class of Social Service information Systems Analyst QWD) -f?`omsa•l;ary level C5-1719 ($2534-3080) to salary level C5-1790 ($2720-3306). Amend Resolution 71/17 establishing positions and resolutions allocating classes to the Basic/Exempt Salary Schedule, as described above. Effective: ®da followin Board -action. 4,01Date (f i ct r ersonnel ---------------=__---__- ---- ------------- County Administrator RecommeendationDate:IT rA prove Recommendation of Director of Personnel sapprove Recommendation of Director of Personnel Other: .(foil) County dministrator Board of Supervisors Action ""Phil 'Batchelor, Clerk of 'the Board of Adjustment APPROVED on :MAR 5 1991 ;Supervisors and .County Administrator MAR 5 ?991 Date: By. APPROVAL OF THIS ADJUSTMENT CONSTITUTES A 'PERSONNEL/SALARY RESOLUTION AMENDMENT. P300 (M347) 7/89 (Rev. ) SOCIAL SERVICE DEPARTMENT CONTRA COSTA COUNTY TO: Phil Batchelor, County Administrator DATE: 1-29-91 FROM: James A. Rydingsword, Director cc: T. Enea BY: Judy Campbell, Dept. Personnel Officer Exec. Team L. Fugazi S. Beadle SUBJ: SALARY INEQUITY ADJUSTMENT: SOCIAL SERVICE INFORMATION SYSTEMS ANALYST I. REQUEST ACTION This memo and the attached P300 request that the salary range for the class of Social Service Information Systems Analyst be adjusted to the level of Eligibility Work Supervisor I. II. FINANCIAL IMPACT Difference between the two classes is $257 per month, or $3, 084 annually. County general fund impact of that amount would be $832. 68 (27% share) . III. BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR REQUEST In February, 1990, after a lengthy development process in which AFSCME Local 512 participated closely, two new classes were established by Board Action: Senior Social Service Information Systems Analyst, and Social Service Information Systems Analyst. Persons from other classes were reallocated to the Senior level. One position was created at the lower Analyst level but was not filed. The lower level class was particularly established to allow for lateral transition form Eligibility Work Supervisor I into a systems career track. The minimum qualifications and experience can only be met by an individual with public assistance supervisory experience. The Analyst class salary was therefore set to mirror that of Eligibility Work Supervisor I. Salary schedules in early 1990 show the two classes' salaries as identical. In the late summer and fall of 1990, specific inequity adjustments were made to the class of Eligibility Work Supervisor I. Those adjustments resulted in the current salary disparity of top step of $3306 for the Supervisors and $3049 for the formerly parallel analyst class. This effectively renders that class inoperable in that an incumbent would need to take a significant demotion to be in the class. Gen 9c (New 3186) IV. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION Failure to re-establish the parity between these classes will result in the Department's inability to fulfill agreements with an employee organization to allow bridge entry into the Systems area. With the anticipated implementation of Magic it will become important to utilize appropriate staff, classes, and positions fully. Ability to move a current supervisor into the Systems area may help eliminate impact of pending layoff in that class. Attachment JC:td P300 Disk 1 jcwp ssinfo.300 _