HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03191991 - H.3 H. 2 & 3
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
DATE: March 19, 1991
MATTER OF RECORD
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Purchase of Real Property at 40 and 50 Douglas Drive,
Martinez
The Board this day adopted Resolutions 91/177 and 91/178
consumating the purchase of 40 and 50 Douglas Drive in Martinez.
Jim Hicks, 1000 Court Street, Martinez, Business Agent for
AFSCME, appeared and suggested the hard freeze has resulted in many
County Employees working under class and underpaid,• and that the funds
proposed to be used for purchase the above properties could be used to
provide pay increases for members of AFSCME.
Following discussions with the County Administrator' s staff,
Supervisor McPeak requested that Board members and Jim Hicks be
furnished with a memo setting forth the savings anticipated from
purchasing the property with bond money from very low interest rates
as opposed to continued leasing of the subject property.
cc: County Administrator - D. Bell
143
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Adopted this Resolution on March 19, 1991 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Schroder, McPeak, Torlakson and Powers
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
RESOLUTION NO. 91/178
(Government Code § 25350)
SUBJECT: Consummate Purchase and
Accept Grant Deed
Accept Assignments of Agreements
50 Douglas Drive
Martinez Area
W.O. 5164
The Board of Supervisors of Contra Costa County, RESOLVES THAT:
This Board on February 12, 1991, passed Resolution of Intention No. 91/96 and Notice fixing
March 19, 1991, at 11:00 A.M. in its Chambers, County Administration Building, 651 Pine Street,
Martinez, California, as the time and place where it would meet to consummate the purchase of the real
property described therein from Bank of the West, a California Banking Corporation, said property
being required for office purposes. Said Resolution was duly published in the Contra Costa Times in
compliance with Govt. Code Section 6063.
The Board hereby;
1. CONSUMMATES said purchase and EXERCISES the County's Option to Purchase the office
complex at 50 Douglas Drive, Martinez; California, in accordance with the terms of the Lease
dated January 22, 1991, between Bank of the West and the County;
2. ACCEPTS assignment of the lease between Bank of the West and R. J. Roberts, Inc. dated
August 20, 1987, as amended by four Addenda, two dated August 20, 1987, and the other two
dated March 16, 1988 and March 28, 1989, and AUTHORIZES the Director of General Services
to execute the "Assignment and Assumption of Leases' agreement between Bank of the West
and the County;
3. ACCEPTS assignment of the agreement dated as of January 22, 1991, between Bank of the
West as owner and Interactive Resources, Inc. as architect, for architectural services for tenant
improvements on the first floor at 50 Douglas Drive, Martinez;
4. ACCEPTS the deed from Bank of the West, a California Banking Corporation, and ORDERS the
Real Property Division to have it recorded together with a certified copy of this resolution.
Funds for the purchase were provided from the sale of Certificates of Participation to finance the
1991 County Buildings Acquisition Project as approved by the Board of Supervisors on January 22,
1991, by Resolution No. 91/63. The funds were deposited with the Trustee, Bank of America, who will
transfer the amount for the purchase to the escrow agent for disbursement in accordance with the
County's final escrow instructions for the acquisition.
orig.: Public Works (R/P)
cc: Auditor-Controller (via R/P)
Public Works Accounting
County Recorder (via R/P)
PBG:rs
C:brl6b.t3
RESOLUTION NO. 91/ 178
t
SUBJECT: Consummate Purchase and Accept Grant Deed 50 Douglas Drive, Martinez Area
March 19, 1991
Page 2
This Board has reviewed the City of Martinez's Environmental Impact Report dated August, 1982,
which included this property, and has DETERMINED the County is acting as a Responsible Agency
pursuant to Section 15381 of the California Environmental Quality Act. The Board FINDS that changes
or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of the City of Martinez and not the County,
and that such changes have been adopted by the City of Martinez. The Board hereby ADOPTS those
mitigating measures which pertain to;the County's project; DIRECTS the General Services Department
to provide preferred parking for carpools in accordance with the County's Transportation Systems
Management guidelines; and DIRECTS the Community Development Department to file a Notice of
Determination with the County Clerkpursuant to Section 15096. The City of Martinez has determined
that the project conforms to the City's General Plan.
I hereby certify that this Is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervisors on the d own.
ATTESTED: 1�MAP, 19 1
PHIL BATCHELOR,Clark of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
BY S AA A A. .. / .,w�,... .�.. -- s Dept
RESOLUTION NO. 91/ 178
Mfr S I
* ; f. Alteration of the direction or rate of flow
of ground waters? _x_
.;.- . Project Description/Site Visit
g. Change in the quantity of ground waters,
4: either through direct additions or
withdrawals, or through interception of an
aquifer by cuts or excavations? x
Project Description/Site Visit
h. Substantial reduction in the amount of
water otherwise available for public water
supplies? x
j A, ` _.
_• ,4: ::. :; Project Description/Site Visit
i . Exposure of people or property to water
}
related hazards such as flooding or tidal
waves? _,,,x
F.E.M.A. Flood Map - Panel 90 of 625
4. Plant Life. Will the proposal result in:
U.S.G.S. Quad Overlay No.
a. Change in the diversity of species, or
number of any species of plants (including
trees, shrubs, grass, crops, and aquatic
plants)? _x�
Project Description/Site Visit
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of plants? ,x
U.S.G.S. Quad. Overlay No. 5.
C. Introduction of new species of plants into
an area, or in a barrier to the normal
replenishment of existing species? _x
U.S.G.S. Quad Overlay No. 5.
d. Reduction in acreage of any agricultural
crop? _x
Project Description/Site Visit
5. Animal Life. Will the proposal result in:
a. Change in the diversity of. species, or
numbers of any species of animals (birds,-
land animals including reptiles, fish and
shellfish, benthic organisms or insects)? ix
U.S.G.S. Quad Overlay No. 5.
b. Reduction of the numbers of any unique,
rare or endangered species of animals? _,x
Please note: "S" is for significant; "I" is for insignificant.
-3-
S I -
U.S.G.S. Quad Overlay No. 5.
C. Introduction of new species of animals
into an area, _or result in a barrier to
the migration or movement of animals? x
Project Description/Site Visit
d. Deterioration to existing fish or wildlife
habitat? x
Project Description/Site Visit
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in:
a. Increases in existing noise levels? x
Project Description/Site Visit
b. Exposure of people to severe noise levels? x
U.S.G.S. Quad Overlay No. 16.
7. Light and Glare. Will the proposal produce new
light or glare? x_
Project Description/Site Visit
8. Land Use. Will the proposal result in a
substantial alteration of the present or planned
land use of an .area? x
General Plan Land Use Designation: Commercial - 1992 Countywide G.P.
9. Natural Resource. Will the proposal result in: .
a. Increase in the rate of use of any natural
resources? x
Project Description/Site Visit
10. Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
a. A risk of an explosion or the release of
hazardous substances (including, but not
limited to oil , pesticides, chemicals or
radiation) in the event of an -accident or
upset conditions? x
Project Description/Site Visit
b. Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or an emergency evacuation
plan? x
Project Description/Site Visit `—
21. Population. Will the proposal alter the
location, distribution, density, or growth rate
of the human population of an area? x
Project Description/Site Visit
Please note: "S" is for significant; "I" is for insignificant.
-4-
S I
r; t
12. Flousing. Will the proposal affect existing
housing, or create a demand for additional
'. ;.' housing? x
Project Description/Site Visit
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal
result in:
a. Generation of substantial additional
vehicular movement? x
Project Description —
•ifs++.,-;•. ..
' b. Effects on existing n
g parking facilities, or
demand for new parking? —x
Project Description/Site Visit
�S4K
C. Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? x
"- U.S:G.S. Quad Overlay No. 17.
d. Alterations to present patterns of
circulation or movement of people and/or
goods? —x
U.S.G.S. Quad Overlay No. 15
e. Alterations to waterborne, rail or air
traffic? x
Project Description/Site Visit
f. Increase in traffic hazards to motor
vehicles, bicyclists or pedestrians? —xy
U.S.G.S. Quad Overlay No. 15 & 17.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal .have an
effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered governmental services in any of the
following areas:
s ' a. Fire protection? x
�;.. ... —
"' Project Description/Site Visit
b. Police protection? —x
Project Description/Site Visit
C. Schools? x
Project Description/Site Visit —'
d. Parks or other recreational facilities? x
Project Description/Site Visit
e. Maintenance of public facilities, including
roads? x
Please note: "S" is for significant; "I" is for insignificant.
-5-
C S I
Project Description/Site Visit
f. Other governmental services? _x
Project Description/Site Visit
15. Energy. Will the proposal result in:
a. Use of substantial amounts of fuel or
energy? _x
Project Description/Site Visit
b. Substantial increase in demand upon
existing sources or energy, or require the
development of new sources of energy? _x
Project Description/Site Visit
16. Utilities. Will the proposal result in a need
for new systems, or substantial alterations to
the following utilities: _x'
Project Description/Site Visit
17. Human Health. Will the proposal result in:
a. Creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard (excluding mental health)? !x_
Project Description/Site Visit
b. Exposure of people to potential health
hazards? x
Project Description/Site Visit
18. Aesthetics. Will the proposal result in the
. obstruction of any scenic vista or view open
to the public, or will the proposal result in,
the creation of an aesthetically offensive site
open to public view? _x
U.S.G.S. Quad Overlay No. 14.
19. Recreation. Will the proposal result in an
impact upon the quality or quantity of existing
recreational opportunities? x
Project Description/Site Visit
20. Cultural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
a. Alteration of or the destruction of a
prehistoric or historic archaeological site? x
Sonoma State Notification Dated
b. Adverse physical or aesthetic effects to a
prehistoric -or historic building, structure,
or object? ,_x�
Please note: "S" is for significant; "I" is for .insignificant.
-6-
C S
Project Description/Site Visit
C. Does the proposal have the potential to
cause a physical change which would affect
unique ethnic cultural values? _x
Project Description/Site Visit
d. Will the proposal restrict existing
religious or sacred uses within the
potential impact area? _x
Project Description/Site Visit
21. Mandatory Findings of Significance.
a. Does the project have the potential to
degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish
or wildlife population to drop below self
sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a
plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory? _x_
Project Description/Site Visit
b. Does the project have the potential to
achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of
long-term, environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is one which
.occurs in a relatively brief, definitive
period of time while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.) _x_
Project Description/Site Visit
C. Does the project have impacts which are
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? (A project may impact on two
or more separate resources where the impact
on each resource is relatively small , but
where the effect of the total of those
. impacts on the environment is significant.) _x_
Project Description/Site Visit
d. Does the project have environmental effects
which will cause substantial adverse
effects on human beings, either directly
or indirectly? _x_
Project Description/Site Visit
III. Discussion of Environmental Evaluation
Please note: 'IS" is for significant; "I" is for insignificant.
-7-
S I
Based on the foregoing review, the project will not result in any
potentially significant environmental impacts. See discussion that follows
for narrative review of individual items.
Please note: "S" is for significant; "I" is for insignificant.
_g_
IV. Determination
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant
effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be
prepared. —X—
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant
effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attached sheet have been added to the project. A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on .
the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
February 14, 1991
b'4-4z�
Date Signature
R7 1.N e w 4d Ty
RD2:hmshl .ins
-9-
ADDENDUM
INITIAL ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
SHELL AVENUE FAMILY AND WOMEN'S SHELTER
Earth
The proposal would utilize the existing church structure and parsonage. Now new
grading., buildings or structure additions are proposed. Map no. 3 of the
Environmental Base Map Overlay system indicates that there are no landslides on
the property or in proximity to the property that might adversely affect soil
stability.
The Environmental Base Map Overlay (EBMO) system shows that the site is not near
an active or potentially active geologic fault. The nearest active fault
(Concord Fault) is located approximately two miles to the east.
Air
The project will generate less than 20 trips per day in terms of average daily
vehicular traffic. The San Francisco Bay Air- Quality Maintenance District
considers such increases in traffic volumes to be negligible. The project will
not generate any odors that are not already present in the neighborhood
associated with existing uses (restaurants, bars, residences, etc. ).
Water
The project site is not near any body of water. Insofar as the project does not
involve any additions, no additional runoff from the project would be generated.
Runoff from the project would continue to be handled as it has in the past. The
project will not affect any aquifer or public water supply.
Plant and Water Life
No known rare or endangered plant or animal species are located within a mile of
the project. . Therefore, it is unlikely that the project will have any adverse
affect on any sensitive species. The project would not introduce any exotic
plant or animal life in the community that might be disruptive to existing
eco-systems. The project does not lie near any riparian or delta habitat;
therefore, the project will not impact any fish habitat.
Noise
The project lies just beyond the 60 dBA contour line on the Noise Element Map of
the 1991 General Plan. Multi-family residential uses are normally considered to
be acoustically compatible where the noise impacts are less than 65 dBA at the
site.
Light and Glare
New exterior lighting will be restricted such that it shines on the subject site
only and not on adjoining properties.
-10-
Land Use
The 1991 General Plan designates the site Commercial . The Retail-Business
zoning district conforms with that designation. That zoning identifies
eleemosynary activities such as the proposed use as a permitted use. Therefore,
the proposed use is conformable to the general plan designation.
Natural Resources
The proposed shelter would significantly increase the rate of use of any natural
resource.
Risk of Upset
The project would not involve manufacturing or use of any hazardous substances.
The project will be brought up to building and fire code for a multi-family
residential structure so as to ensure a structure that will not pose safety
hazards to the occupants.
Population
The clientele at the shelter shall be limited to homeless individuals . . .
Housing
The project will not have any impact on the County's housing supply.
Transportation/Circulation
Based on the number of employees, shelter service needs and movement of
clientele to and from the site, the total number of vehicle trips per day
generated by the shelter will be a maximum of 20. This level of traffic may
mean 'a slight increase in the number of trips generated from the site during the
week but should be a reduction in the number of trips. previously generated on
Sundays. The project by itself will not cause a reduction of the level of
service of any nearby intersection including Shell Avenue/Pacheco Boulevard.
It is anticipated that most shelter residents will use nearby transit facilities
to travel to and from *their destinations. Transit stops are located within 500
feet of the site on Pacheco Boulevard.
Seven on-site parking spaces will be provided for these vehicles. Shelter
residents will be restricted in their use of on-site parking for any private
vehicles. On-street parking by shelter residents will not be permitted.
The project will not introduce any hazards to existing traffic, nor will the
project interrupt with existing waterborne, rail or air traffic.
Public Services
The existing structure will be modified as necessary to comply with existing
fire and building code requirements.
Recreation
The site plan provides for an on-site recreation yard on the north side of the
church.
Energy
The shelter will not significantly increase the demand on electrical , gas or
other energy supplies.
Utilities
The shelter will rely upon existing utility systems in place. The project will
only make marginal and insignificant increases in service requirements for water
and sewer service needs.
Human Health
The site is not located on or near an identified toxic waste site.
Aesthetics
Structural improvements will be largely confined to the interior of the
structure. The exterior will be painted, and a perimeter fence installed.
Therefore, the appearrance of the structure will not materially change.
Cultural Resources
The site is not listed on the County Register of Historic Places, nor are there
any such historic places within a quarter-mile of the site. The California
Archaeologic Inventory (Sonoma State) has examined the site and. concluded that
the site is unlikely to contain any cultural resources.
The structure has not been used as a church for several years, therefore the
proposal will not impact on any religious or- sacred uses of the area.
-12-
:. Social Service Department Contra Please reply to:
2401 Stanwell Drive,#200
James A. Rydingsword Costa P.O.Box 5488
s
Director J Concord,California 94524
County
February 15, 1991
TO: Potentially Interested Party
FROM: Social Service Department
Contra Costa County
RE: Proposed Use of 1310 Shell Avenue for Family and Women's Shelter
Attached is a project description for a proposal to use the buildings at 1310
Shell Avenue in Martinez as a transitional shelter for homeless families and
single women.
Public Hearing
The Board of Supervisors will consider a proposal to fund this program at a
public hearing to be held as described below:
Board of Supervisors Chambers
_McBrien Administration Building, Room 107
651 Pine Street
Martinez, CA
March 19, 1991 - 11 a.m.
Questions on Proposed Program
Prior to the public hearing, any questions or comments on the proposed program
may be made by writing or calling:
Social Service Department
2401 Stanwell Drive, Suite X1200
Concord, CA 94520
646-5103
Environmental Determination
For purposes of compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act, the
Community Development Department of Contra Costa County conducted an initial
environmental study and concluded that the project will not generate any
potentially significant environmental impacts. Accordingly, a Negative
Declaration of Environmental Significant has been issued on this proposal (see
attachment) on November 2, 1990. To be considered, any written comments on
the adequacy of the environmental determination must be delivered to the
Community Development Department by no later than 5:00 p.m. Monday, March 18,
1991, at the following address:
Bob Drake
Community Development Department
Contra Costa County
651 Pine Street, jAhtFloor North Wing
Martinez, CA 94553
BMcC:sls
Attachment
cc: Clerk of the Board
City of Martinez, Community Development Dept.
City of Martinez, City Manager's Office
etaE.
Community Contra Harvey of Community
n
Development Director of Community Development
Department (c�Ost }
County Administration Building County
651 Pine Street
4th Floor, North Wing
Martinez, California 94553.0095 "'" `
Phone:
646-2091 ..; February 15, 1991
._s
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR
SHELL AVENUE FAMILY AND WOMEN'S HOMELESS SHELTER
Project Description:
A proposal to convert an existing church and parsonage into an emergency and transitional
shelter program for up to 45 homeless individuals. The subject property is located at 1391
Shell Avenue in the Martinez/Mountain View area.
As the owner of an abutting property, or as an otherwise interested person or organization,
you are invited to submit any comments you may have on this project, and raise any
significant environmental issues of which you are aware so that they can be considered in the
environmental review process.
This letter plus enclosures will constitute a Notice of Preparation. Please circulate this
information to the appropriate persons and agencies as soon as possible. I would encourage
those interested to contact me directly by phone or letter to convey any concerns they may
have about the environmental review for the project.
If you require further information regarding this Notice of Preparation, please contact me at
(415) 646-2091 no later than Monday, March 18, 1991.
Sincerely,
BOB DRAKE,
Senior Planner
BD/jn
c:shelter.nop
enclosures
cc: File
'
California Environmental Quality Act
NOTICE OF
Completion of Environmental Impact Report
Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
es1PINE STREET NORTH WING'4TH FLOOR MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA 945S3-0095
'
Telephone: <415> O48-2O91 Contact Person: Bob Drake
'
Project Description and Location:
SHELL AVENUE FAMILY AND WOMEN'S SHELTER PROGRAMA proposal to establish an emergency and transitional shelter program for up to 45 homeless
individuals. The subject property is }onatad ot #1391 Shell Avenue in the Martinez, Mountain View
area. (ZA: F-12) (R-B) (APN375'O12-OSO & 01O)
An initial study has been completed which has concluded that the project 'will not result in any
potentially significant environmental impacts. The.proposal provides for round-the'dooksupervision
by trained staff' an admissions policy to screen ineligible individuals, limitations on the keeping of
private vehicles at or near the site.
The Environmental Impact Report or Justification for Negative Declaration is available for review at the
address below:
Contra Costa County Community Deve|opmnent13upartmnent
4th Floor, North Wing, McBhenAdrninistnation Building
051 Pine Street
Martinez, California
RAvievvPeriod for Environmental Impact Report orNegative Declaration: 2'15'91
thru 3'18-91
By
Community Development Department Representative
white copy' Wo yellow uvpv' mo pink copy pvymu
' •_�+ ,p�yr a�j7'.i:.r +4 5 -t f:`4 w'� �',r yci,`,�-uttd3'+•r`� �• -
jj�y�" •n ;"',i�'^' r.:l't v +r � `�. 3�r�.w��1Y''..w'°'"�7�"•f7t�9t : • "+�
�. =t. ! _ • ;;'. �act" r S} ''�•+t-t� p'r .+.'°'„�„ S�ya.:�f"�:�'�""�n'r '•�:
t , •' • s tLLS r j�'r ar*±�{a1 M11�{�i kv T°t iet.4i t}�4.1`,
I JJ. T�,,. i. a- •. r ��,�,�'n'•�`�;'jl�,�x`rtts � ��`a'.r d,�?t�t�t'}'�`{��.f P"�.n'�`t i �}��`!"��tk,, iF'•r�
V.C„- ¢y - t - • 5••�.,,����ppffgg.1 }1�r+ C ',�a. }t.-V 1.1- P .V'w
Pliar �f Sa 4i, Rt. = CTh1�:afraa;iT y1.{LL`,•ti Y}
}�•'rf•'�'CtM 'Q.� - •,y. F.4._{ �4'''Yf� 5;: i rJ S' r -,y t ,,'a w� i:..
A '� .r r x ti��r..'Y� isaY' .�` °a e'. _;•.,...!L7 � i�.,
4i �4r 1�.;�,..,``•rF � + t fr R h ^a }� a}:Y}r ,r','�S i at ' ; +•
,h.kJLr �jr 't. t' aS'!..r ti r r J.•b� '�t,:{y• i_ .ir ti ��t1 y • ''.
-:17�>iay�A --„'� Fil;.ra�-�a �� •• � Vii �r .�; ;:
ro rr ? ; 1 w't •h�� } > `” C+ zh .r is
t� aF}'��'t'tp�l. �*ar ,,t� 5 r i S1•S�Ki� ( 'ir�'1�1 I.� � ,A�7+ c� f .G.
.t`, ,hvo,+4a•I' - �,�, 7JC,� � ;r+: r .n t t r• r' xr Ls tiff/ �� ".•'•K t X,5'•S'
I r,4,'sla4 �" •r>•;f��"�s ��;tr� to .� t.'1(�b .� ^r,t i. •.�`�?.d.e' *„t,;Q�1j�;• :'.•
i=tG'�'�r' '�,r� '�;( �t +''� Cy. 1,R't#t•r. �c ,�:Y r W K. c��a�'S 5".r.y 2 .��.•r,
i ��5•,.aL t�, s yx 7 5K � r�i 7 l�' ,.
. Zi..•YI'r' ••��jj'ii'',��J,� �` ' +A�.,r,{. h't ...� 1••-'*•x ti: �1 '� Z'!r' - 'S t
`�`� .�;'rii"t»''��� � .3a p .t�yy~�y�79,;}"�r�"i+l}•Pt q _
C♦.. iiY1' r
u
_ ♦ iii kJ�S"♦' 4 � • .
�. •- • •�ri:'/a�rf'�� /1y�nl,.r�.i'a:t,`' :Yt'i�i't:;::�n' ,�'
,yrki�5rI +Tj R�1,=.{;t + � r t�a ► •..
�S `
+s t di.'�,y f, ri r ti r ,, _ 5r}r- }.:'4`•+.y'3 r�S+€'t j { },_ � F t. .'!
�'4�M�•,�}_^,�•��'`���c;,;,,.rh �,�7 t t y kra•� � f .�� r. i }, `�s �}'
:Jtl' ✓., �:/i i•��.lt r•Yi�_.�.1-C�75 id- ""_51•x. r l .. S.•_1"•. .�,",t' ,,r,1
rj'^.�Yr �� �* • .+'+�; MB.�" k�:w -Y. r t► r:'a. ,t: ^+tib'-, ..''y
�:.•: •il:. JF t rl1( r I.J,•.t�''r�••i. l}�''t'.•+"�`�• /i I .
i Is • '',S 'r f(,�'~R� re' *.A '.�r tir ffr t++4,. f t+ q,
•!` Its G•, -t '� 2�'', - •� a .• ja... • rv- c, i,', • �. f
x•!11! Y'�'• +.r Y M
Of •
4 �1IRA CO-T CONTRA COSTA
�O Tq
i,
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AG FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT
��F�28 PM 2- 51
2010 GEARY ROAD ��RE DIS[tL�CC PLEASANT HILL, CA 9452
h�ct__ t,:yiJ
(415)930-5500 {? "VL{
BUREAU OF FIRE PREVENTION
February 26, 1991 .
Contra Costa County
Community Development Department
651 Pine Street, 4th Floor
Martinez, CA 94553
Attn: Bob Drake, Senior Planner
Subject: 1310 Shell ,Avenue - Martinez area
Dear Mr. Drake:
We have reviewed the project description to establish a 45 bed
emergency and transitional shelter at the subject location. This
project is regulated by codes and ordinances administered by this
Fire District relative to Contra Costa County Ordinance 89/68 and
the State Fire Marshal' s Regulations. If approved by your
office, the following shall be required:
1. The developer shall submit two ( 2) complete sets of plans and
specifications of the subject project, including built-in
fire protection systems (when required) , .to this office for
review and approval prior to construction to insure
compliance with minimum requirements related to fire and life
safety. Plan review fees will be assessed at that time.
(2.206)C.C.C. Ord. 89/68
It is requested that a copy of the conditions of approval for the
subject project be forwarded to this office when compiled by the
planning agency.
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact
the undersigned.
Si cerely,
R. 4anA
Fire Inspector
RSR:vw
cc: C.C.C. Social Service Department
Inspector Bridges
File
RSR/SHELLAVE.91
•c nnsA
V'v••
t ��R t t P►� 2. 25
FVE_
HAC
Fr'RGENCY SI HL'171M 0OMM:E'11 E
March 8, 1991
Mr. Bob Drake
Community Development Department
County Administration Building
651 Pine Street
4th Floor, North Wing
Martinez , California 94553
RE: SHELL AVENUE FAMILY AND WOMEN'S HOMELESS SHELTER
Dear Mr. Drake,
The Emergency Shelter. Committee is a sub-committee of the Homeless
Advisory Committee (HAC) . Our purpose is . to review present
emergency shelter provisions .for homeless individuals within our
county and to inform and recommend to the HAC how the county can
better meet the needs of .our homeless citizens .
In reviewing the proposed homeless shelter on Shell Avenue in
Martinez , the Emergency Shelter Committee commends the County for
obtaining funding for such a shelter and recommends the
acquisition, rehabilitation and implementation of this project.
The committee will also recommend.that HAC go on record to support
this project.
The committee also encourages the county department and personnel
responsible for the oversight of this project to continue to
involve the community at large and HAC in the developmental and
implementation phases of this project. Our membership is very
interested in the homeless within our county and thus desires to
contribute to a successful program at this location.
Sincerely,
Merlin Wede ohl
Chairperson
Emergency Shelter Committee