The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 07171990 - IO.1 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Contra 1 ,Y' FROM: ' Costa n, INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE x; County 7 C,o,• - .•c4„ DATE: July 9, 1990 srA couK� SUBJECT: STATUS REPORT ON THE COUNTY'S AFFIRMATION ACTION PROGRAMS SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Request the County Administrator to convene a meeting with the Advisory Committee on the Employment and Economic Status of Women (ACEESW) and include in the meeting the Affirmative Action Officer, and appropriate staff from. the County Counsel' s Office, Personnel Department and County Administrator' s Office. The purpose of this meeting is to receive and review requests from the ACEESW for changes in the County' s Affirmative Action Program or processes. This meeting is to take place by September 30, 1990 so the County Administrator will have an opportunity to review and evaluate each of the requests from the ACEESW and forward a report to our Committee by November 30, 1990 for discussion at our meeting on December 10, 1990 with his recommendation as to why each request from the ACEESW either should or should not be implemented and his recommendations for any actions which should be taken by our Committee or the Board of Supervisors. 2 . Request the ACEESW to make any suggestions they wish for changes to the format of the salary data presented in the final six pages of the attached report and forward those suggested changes to the Affirmative Action Officer by July 31, 1990. 3 . Request that the Affirmative Action Officer prepare and distribute her next semi-annual report to our Committee by November 30, 1990 for discussion by our Committee on CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YP C YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOA D COMMITT APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): SUNNE WRIG McPEAK OM POWERS ACTION OF BOARD ON July 17 , 1990 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE _2L UNANIMOUS(ABSENT I IV ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: ATTESTED i7 1990 PHI BATA LOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Please see Page 3 . M382 (10/88) BY � � ,DEPUTY -2- December 10, 1990. This report is to include data on hiring., promotions and separations for the period April 1 , 1990 through June 30, 1990. In addition to the materials normally presented to our Committee by the Affirmative Action Officer, the next report is also to include the following elements: A. Salary data for each County Department and a summary table county-wide distributed by salary levels similar to that outlined in the last six pages of the attached report, with any changes in format which are agreed on with the ACEESW and utilizing December, 1987 and June, 1990 data for comparison purposes. B. An estimate of the cost required to break down the departmental hiring, separation and promotion data for the Social Services Department in order to isolate the social work staff and review the hiring of women and minorities among this staff separate from the rest of the department. C. Comprehensive data on the minority and women-owned status of vendors from whom the County purchases services and supplies and on the minority and women-owned status of personal and professional service contracts which are entered into by the County. 4. Request the Affirmative Action Officer to plan to make a report to the 1991 Internal Operations Committee by April 1, 1991 on hiring, separation and promotion data for the period July 1, 1990 - December 31, 1990 and then every_ six months thereafter. 5. Request the Public Works Director and Director of General Services to review the data presented to our Committee by the Affirmative Action Officer dealing with the hiring and promotion of women and minorities in the skilled . craftsj discuss with the Affirmative Action Officer and Director of Personnel what actions can be taken to improve the recruitment of women and minority candidates for the skilled , crafts and report to our Committee on December 10, 1990 on what steps they believe they can take to improve the hiring and promotion of women and minorities in skilled craft positions. 6. Request the County Administrator to include in his evaluation of department heads a comment on the extent to which the department head is making all reasonable efforts to achieve appropriate affirmative action goals within his or her department. BACKGROUND: This is the latest in the series of quarterly and now semi-annual reports we have asked the Affirmative Action Officer to make to our Committee. Among the highlights of the report are the following conclusions: * Females were hired and promoted above their labor force representation both in 1989 and in 1990. * Hiring of minorities, particularly Blacks and Asians, were above their labor force representation. The same was true for Hispanics during 1989 but not so far in 1990. American Indian/Alaskan Natives continue to be behind their labor force representation. -3- * Blacks and American indian/Alaskan Natives were promoted above their labor force representation in 1989. All minorities were promoted above their labor force representation in 1990 except for American Indians/Alaskan Natives. * On construction contracts other than the West County 'Justice Center, the County met its 2% WBE goal (actual 5. 3%) but failed to meet- its 13% MBE goal (actual 3 . 2%) . The Affirmative Action Officer is to be commended on a report format which is much easier to read and which is much easier to understand. As is noted in our recommendations we are continuing to refine the report on salary ranges which will then be run for all departments for the next report. We. were dismayed to see that little progress seems to be being made in the hiring and promotion of females and minorities in the skilled crafts. We have, therefore, asked the Public Works and General Services Departments to take a look at the data,- talk to the Personnel Department and Affirmative Action Officer and then see what changes in their procedures can be made to improve the recruitment, hiring and promotion of women and minorities into skilled craft positions. cc: County Administrator Public Works Director Director of General Services Personnel Director County Counsel Affirmative Action Officer Chief Assistant County Administrator Janet Scoll Johnson, ACEESW 5804 Alameda Avenue Richmond, CA 94804 A �v COISSI O' 06 , \ o � ♦ I r I dSrA�o� CoI Female Hires Percent 19$9 100 188 78% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ss >» - - - - - - io - - - - 40 20 0 Females Males Goal=42% Females were hired above their labor force representation in 1989. Female Hires Percent 1990 100 80 - - - - - - - - - - 20.9- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 66°Jo f0 - - - - - - - - 105 40 - >> - - - - k- 20 .....,..,.:...,�....::.:: w::::: 0 Females Males Goal=42% In 1990, females were hired above their labor force representation. - 2 - Contra Costa County AFFIRMATIVE ACTION OFFICE 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94533 (415) 646-4106 Date: July 2, 1990 To: Internal Operations Committee / From: Emma Kuevor, Affirmative Action Offic � '!� Subject: Affirmative Action Biannual Report The Internal Operations Committee has requested a report on a biannual basis of the County's Affirmative Action Program. The report represents the County's hires,promotions and separations for October,November and December 1989,and for January,February, and March 1990. This report also presents the County's Minority/Women/Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (MBE/WBE/DBE)Contract Compliance Program for construction, purchasing and professional/personal service contracts. AFFIRMATIVE ACTION PROGRAM The County compares itself against the 1980 Census Labor Force Data. The census data for Asian/ Pacific Islanders includes Filipinos. For purposes of this report, the Filipino employees are presented separately because of their large representation in our County. The labor force data for Contra Costa County that is used to determine if we have met our goal is: Goal Race/Ethnic/Sex 42.% Female employees 7.7% Hispanic employees 7.6% Black employees 5.4% Asian/Pacific Islander employees (includes Filipino) .6% American Indians/Alaskan Native employees Minority Hires Percent 19$9 25 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 39 16% 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 24 10% 10 12 10 5% 5 4% 1 .4% 0 Hispanic Blacks Asian Filipino Amer.Ind. Goal = 7.7% 7.6% 5.4% .6% Each minority group exceeded their labor force goal except American Indian/Alaskan Native employees. Minority Hires Percent 1990 25 20 - - - - - - - - - - - -55- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 17% 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7% 18 18 5°k 6% 5mossimom 5. 0% 0 Hispanic Blacks Asian Filipino Amer.Ind. Goal= 7.7% 7.6% 5.4% .6% Minorities (hired in January, February, and March of 1990) exceeded their labor force representation for Black and Asian employees but not for Hispanic or American Indian employees. - 3 - Female Promotions Percent 1989 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 65 60 - - - - - - - - -53%- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 58 - - - - - - - - - 47% 40 20 0 Females Males Goal =42% Females were promoted above their labor force representation. Female Promotions Percent 1990 100 80 - - - - - - - - 134- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 64% 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 40 3696 20 ....................:....:::::.::::.:::._: 0 Females Males Goal=42% Females were promoted significantly above their labor force representation the first quarter of 1990. - 4 - Minority Promotions Percent 1989 25 20 - - - - - - - ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 18 15% 15 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 10 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 7" 6% 6 5% 5 3 - - - - - - - 3- - - - 2% 2% 0 Hispanic Blacks Asian Filipino Amer.Ind. Goal = 7.7% 7.6% 5.4% .6% Black and American Indian/Alaskan Native employees were the groups that exceeded their labor force representation. Hispanic and Asian employees were below their labor force representation. Minority Promotions Percent 1990 25 38 21% 20 - - - - - - - 15 - - - - - - - 18 10% 10 7% 1% 5% { 0 Hispanic Blacks Asian Filipino Amer.Ind. Goal = 7.7% 7.6% 5.4% .6% All minority groups were promoted above their labor force representation except American Indians for the first quarter in 1990. - 5 - Female Separations Percent 1989 100 80 106 60 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 76 - - - - - - 42% 40 20 0 Females Males Goal =42% Female employees separated from the County above their labor force representation of 42% when compared to male employees. Female Separations Percent 1990 100 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 123 56% 93- - - - - 44% 40 20 0 Females Males Goal =42% Females separated at a higher percentage in 1990 than males. - 6 - Minority Separations Percent 1989 25 32 20 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' 180 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - .. z.< <> 15 - - - - - - - - 16 ;=? : 10% 10 - - - - - - - - - - - -g- - - - - - - - - - - - 4% 6 5 gel, - - - - - - - - - .- - - - - - - - f .5% 0 Hispanic Blacks Asian Filipino Amer.Ind. Goal = 7.7% 7.6% 5.4% .6% All groups except American Indian/Alaskan Native employees separated from the County above their labor force representation. Minority Separations Percent 1990 25 20 - - - - - - 15 28 12% 10 10 �<` 7 5 4"k :;,-,-.%:;::::: 5 2% t50% 0 Hispanic Blacks Asian Filipino Amer.Ind. Goal= 7.7% 7.6% 5.4% .6% Black employees were the only group that separated from the County at a percentage higher than their labor force representation. All other groups were below their labor force representation. - 7 - OCCUPATIONAL CATEGORIES There are eight occupational categories that job classes are grouped based on federal guidelines from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. The categories and the number of females and minorities hired and promoted are: Female Hires 1989 Occupational Categories Total Number/Percent Officials/Administrators 1 0 Professionals 88 63 72% Technicians 15 12 80% Protective Services 5 1 20% Para-Professionals 26 21 81% Administrative Support 93 87 94% Skilled Crafts 1 0 Service Maintenance 12 4 33% Females were predominately hired in the Administrative Support and Professional occupational categories. Female Hires 1990 Occupational Categories Total Number/Percent Officials/Administrators 5 3 60% Professionals 86 61 70% Technicians 58 32 55% Protective Service Worker 22 1 4% Para-Professionals 23 12 52% Administrative Support 105 95 90% Skilled Crafts 2 0 Service Maintenance 14 5 35% Females were predominately hired in the Administrative Support, Professionals and Technician Occupational Categories. - 8 - Female Promotions 1989 Occupational Categories Total Number/Percent Officials/Administrators 11 2 18% Professionals 40 23 58% Technicians 34 26 76% Protective Services 18 2 11% Para-Professionals 1 0 Administrative Support 7 5 71% Skilled Crafts 0 Service Maintenance 11 4 36% Females were predominately promoted in the Technicians, and Professional categories. Female Promotions 1990 Occupational Categories Total Number/Percent Officials/Administrators 1 1 100% Professionals 56 34 60% Technicians 107 83 77% Protective Service Workers 19 0 Para-Professionals 2 1 50% Administrative Support 17 15 88% Skilled Craft 2 0 Service Maintenance 6 0 Females in 1990 were primarily promoted in the Technicians and Professional Occupational Categories. - 9 - Minority Hires 1989 Occupational Categories Total Hispanic Black Asian Filipino Amer.lnd. Officials Admin. 1 1 100% Professionals 88 7 7 4 4 1 8% 8% 4% 4% 1% Technicians 15 2 6 1 1 13% 40% 7% 7% Protective Services 5 3 60% Para-Professionals 26 2 8% Admin Support 93 13 18 4 6 14% 9% 4% 6% Skilled Crafts 1 Service Maintenance 12 2 2 16% 16% Minority employees were predominately hired in the Administrative Support and Professional categories. - 10 - Minority Hires 1990 Occupational Categories Total Hispanic Black Asian Filipino Amer. Ind. Officials Admin 5 1 20% Professionals 86 3 6 5 7 0 3% 6% 5% 8% Technicians 58 5 12 8 3 0 8% 20% 13% 5% Protective Services 22 3 13% Para-Professionals 23 4 1 3 2 0 17% . 4% 13% 8% Admin. Support 105 12 27 2 6 0 11% 25% 1% 5% Skilled Craft 2 Service Maintenance 14 6 1 42% 7% Minorities were primarily hired in the Administrative Support and Technician Occupational Categories in 1990. - 11 - Minority Promotions 1989 Occupational Categories Total Hispanic Black Asian Filipino Amer. Ind. Officials Admin 11 1 9% Professionals 40 3 3 2 1 8% 8% 5% 3% Technicians 34 3 10 3 1 1 9% 29% 9% 3% 3% Protective Services 18 2 11% Para-Professionals 1 Admin. Support 7 1 1 14% 14% Skilled Crafts 0 Service Maintenance 11 1 4 9% 36% Minority employees were predominately promoted in the Technicians and Professional categories. - 12 - Minority Promotions 1990 Occupational Categories Total Hispanic Black Asian Filipino Amer. Officials Admin 1 Professionals 56 4 5 2 7% 8% 3% Technicians 107 11 22 10 1 10% 20% , 9% .9% Protective Services 19 2 1 10% 5% Para-Professionals 2 1 50% Admin. Support .17 2 6 11% 35% Skilled Crafts 2 1 50% Service Maintenance 6 3 1 50% 15% Minority employees were primarily promoted in the Technicians and Professional categories in 1990. - 13 - An employee that separates from County service is an employee that leaves County employment. The basis of the separation may be due to the following: resignation,constructive resignation,layoff,death, retirement, dismissed, or rejection from probation. The County has hired females and minorities above their labor force representation but they are also separating from County service at percentages higher than their labor force representation. The following is an summary of the types of separations from County service: 1989 Female Total Type of Separation Number Percent 108 RESIGNATIONS 68 63% 2 CONSTRUCTIVE RESIGNATIONS 2 100% 28 RETIREMENT 15 54% 29 LAYOFF 13 45% 2 DISMISSED 0 4 DEATH 1 25% 9 REJECTED PROBATIONERS 5 56% Female employees separated from County service primarily due to resignations and retirements. 1990 Female Total Type of separation Number Percent 110 RESIGNATIONS 75 67% 2 CONSTRUCTIVE RESIGNATIONS 1 50% 85 RETIREMENTS 37 43% 0 LAYOFFS 5 DISMISSALS 2 40% 0 DEATH 13 REJECTED PROBATIONERS 8 61% Females separated from County service based on resignations and retirements in 1990. - 14 - 1989 Minorities TOTAL TYPE OF SEPARATION HISP BLACK ASIAN FILIPINO AMER.IND. 108 RESIGNATIONS 9 13 6 7 8% 12% 6% 6% 2 CONSTRUCTIVE RESIGNATION 28 RETIREMENT 3 6 11% 21% 29 LAYOFF 3 9 1 1 10% 31% 3% 3% 2 DISMISSED 2 100% 4 DEATH 1 25% 9 REJECTED PROBATIONER 2 2 22% 22% Minority employees separated from County service primarily due to resignations and layoffs. 1990 Minorities TOTAL TYPE OF SEPARATION HISP BLACK ASIAN FILIPINO AMER.IND. 110 RESIGNATIONS 5 13 8 3 0 4% 11% 7% 2% 2 CONSTRUCTIVE RESIGNATION 1 1 50% 50% 85 RETIREMENT 1 8 0 1 0 1% 9% 1% 0 LAYOFF 5 DISMISSALS 0 2 40% 0 DEATH 13 REJECTED PROBATIONER 3 4 23% 30% The majority of minorities left County service by resigning or from retirements in 1990. - 15 - SUMMARY The County's Affirmative Action Program continues to hire and promote minority and female employees at percentages higher than their labor force representation. Although separations are also high among minorities and females, the separations are primarily due to resignations,retirements, and layoffs. County Department Heads and Affirmative Action Coordinators are commended for their efforts in changing the racial and sex composition of their departments by actively assisting the Personnel Department recruit applicants and by reviewing their workforce composition before selecting a job applicant or an employee from a promotional pool of applicants. MBE/WBE/DBE CONTRACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM The County continues to increase the participation of Minority Business Enterprises (MBE's) and Women Business Enterprises (WBE's) in the award of contracts financed entirely with County funds. WEST COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER The West County Justice Center total projected expenditures as of December 31, 1989 and March 31, 1990 are: $29,678,350 Total 3,288,460 MBE's 11.% 571,203 WBE's 1.9% Workforce goals performed at the worksite by subcontractors had overall: December 31, 1989 March 31, 1990 33.8% MBE's 21.5% 2.5%. WBE's 3.4% This meets the County's workforce goal of 20.7% but falls short of the female goal of 6%. This is the only project with workforce goals.. There were $5,591,400 or 18.8% of the contract dollars committed to local businesses as of December 31, 1989 and March 31, 1990: $29,678,350 Total 5,591,400 local businesses 18.8% 11,000 local MBE's .01% 0 local WBE's 5,580,400 local non-minorities 18.8% - 16 - OTHER CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS For the reporting period January 1, 1990 through March 31, 1990,construction projects awarded with individual contract amounts in excess of$50,000 totaled$4,419,056: $4,419,056 Total 3,513,608 Contracts with MBE/WBE Goals 113,541 MBE's or 3.2% 187,606 WBE's or 5.3% The County fell short of its MBE goal of 13% but exceeded the 2% WEE goal. Contracts awarded with Disadvantage Business Enterprise(State or Federally funded)goal requirements were: $905,448 Total 348,138 DBE's or 38.4% The County has exceeded the usual 20% goal in State and Federally funded contracts. The County has a commitment to its local businesses and we encourage the participation of our local businesses. Of the total contracts awarded in excess of$50,000 ($4,419,056), local firms received: $1,947,219 local firms 44% $1,761,605 local non-minority firms 39% $169,000 local WBE's 3.8% $16,614 local MBE's .3% The County's current cumulative totals for fiscal year 1989-1990 are as follows: Total contracts awarded in excess of$50,000: $10,645,853 Total contracts awarded with M/WBE goals: $ 8,402,267 Total contracts awarded with DBE goals: $ 2,243,586 Total contracts awarded to MBE's: 9% or $769,031 Total contracts awarded to WBE's: 7.6% or $638,611 Total contracts awarded to DBE's: 21% or $471,386 Total contracts awarded to Local Firms: 19% or $2,029,750 Non-Minority 16.7% or $1,782,305 Minority .7% or $78,445 WBE's 1.6% or $169,000 The current cumulative totals indicate the County has not met its MBE goal of 13% but it has exceeded its WEE goal of 2%. It also indicates local non-minority businesses are receiving a large number of the County's contracts. - 17 - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM The Community Development Block Grant(CDBG)Program has contracts that are funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development(HUD)and are required to adhere to HUD regulations which include a 20%MBE goal(There are no WBE goals). Their reporting requirements for contracting activity is on a semi-annual basis (October 1, 1989 to March 31, 1990). There are: . $150,715 Total CDBG funds spent this semi-annual period $40,715 Non-Profit $30,000 School District $38,000 Canal Frontage Improvement-Pittsburg $42,000 Rodeo/Parker Ave Frontage Improvement HOUSING AUTHORITY The Housing Authority also has contracts that are funded by the U.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). There were: $919,782 Total for Five Contracts 202,786 MBE's or 20% 43,919 WBE's or 4% The Housing Authority met their 20% MBE goal and contracted an additional 4.5% ($43,919) with WBE's. PURCHASING CONTRACTS The County continues to review the quarterly reporting procedures for our purchasing contracts. Departments have been sent their quarterly reports to review. We continue to work with departments' and the Data Processing Division of the County Administrators' Office to identify vendors that should be excluded from the report. The County had: Oct/Nov/Dec. 1989 Jan/Feb/March 1990 2,280 Vendors 2,600 $5,334,543 Total Dollars 4,949,281 886 Local Vendors 975 $1,889,977 Total Local Dollars $1,442,872 (or 35%) (or 29%) - 18 - PROFESSIONAL/PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACTS The County continues to review the services quarterly report with the assistance from the departments. The service report indicated: Oct/Nov/Dec 1989 Jan/Feb/March 1990 2,990 Vendors 3,040 $12,061,087 Total Dollars $13,878,177 1,554 Local Vendors 1,588 $7,012,812 Total Local Dollars $7,930,831 (or 58%) (or 57%) ADDITIONAL REQUESTS 1. The Internal Operations Committee was given the Affirmative Action brochure for review and comments. Departments were also ask their comments. Enclosed is the finalized brochure. 2. On May 3, 1990 members (Janet Scoll Johnson and Joe Hogan) of the Affirmative Action Subcommittee of the Advisory Committee on the Economic and Employment Status of Women met with staff from the County Administrators Office (Scott Tandy and Emma Kuevor), Data Processing Division (Ron Saari and Doris Stamps) and County Counsel's Office (Mary Ann McNett) to discuss issues regarding the reporting system for the semi-annual (formerly quarterly)reports and the salary level report.Emphasis was placed on attempts to make the data more readily available to departments and organizations. We reviewed the revised charts and additional charts will be sent to Janet and Joe so they can provide their comments on an acceptable format,before another salary range report is produced. A review of private sector affirmative action plans was also suggested; however,the group was reminded of the affirmative action plans previously presented and reviewed by the I.O. Committee from Santa Clara County, PG&E, and Pacific Bell. We reviewed the cost of developing and implementing the charts and the need to decide on the type of charts we would want prior to finalizing the charts for the new hires, promotions, and separation reports. The meeting ended with a discussion of an pre-apprenticeship program that would establish a trainee job class to increase the number of women in the Skilled Trades. Emphasis is placed on the County becoming a training ground for women who want to enter the trades. This biannual report is presented with many of the changes suggested by the subcommittee to make the report easier to read. We continue to look at and review our reporting format of all the reports produced by the Affirmative Action Office. - 19 - CONCLUSION The County continues to show progress in its Affirmative Action Program and MBE/WBE/DBE Programs. Departments have cooperated in this effort and the statistics indicate that progress is being made in both program areas. - 20 - > O C, n a a n o C 1 N — N d r O In In { { 0 p _ d 7 {_ d d m N Q (7 d as a as a ID sa a O N N N rn rn co w N O A OV N W O CD ti H Y 010 owpA H r 0 L 0 O o ._ N N N O O A W s N O �o y A O A u tj W N .T7 m N Y m m M y N • A � r co O --1 W H o 10 n { 0 c CD .... A A W v = 1 :c Z W V ..' N O v ti b CD W 4 3 __ Y a, CD A W O -J \ C CD I 3 y Q M M ID Of Y -e r - A A W W W O •r Z 4 �a cr � M A A A A A Q H V. M A 1 1 I I I I 1 Z 1 w r a.Cn AP A In N 'd M b N M Z m rn A A N H O Y Y r i A s )' M 45 x 14 y I 1 1 1 1 = M 04 Z O • M A H H Y ►+ Z <\ A Q ! O a (D n O 3 t) O } - =r c a• � � m c Cu O n =7 - m v Ln Cn O nr { 34 A N WO �o Ap wrn x H • o 0 u i_4 rn o r+! H • Y 0o av+ o-- ov 0C ov N N Ch tN A . .a Q Qi x �n n N w N ! O tN V Qi %0 A w N 84 Cn�n to w rn w H . A V —• O OO z N w Co aL7t CA j. t'". ZE- - N A N V •--• ^J 04 to — 30 N m CT. N N N lP c C — 0) A +--• a W Y N CO ki, V A04 C% 1 K 1 cDtin U'o x w ►Ni O vi > - t• _. Y N CD '+1 z L b A o N v. -N LA cc tinm H A 'r _ H a w M v, o, I o w rn p H O > f x rm � x �s • Y a z ►q s x I)p r+ H H3p M Z c� Ow x • a s • r U � rn y s O s � -- N 'o «� x m n o n 0 n -+ c 9 CU 0 0 O N W d O N � O m z m u7 ,A a -0-k @ 0 %k nc A.co WPI --j Z H O N In T � ►� ' CTT Cp W W 4.n y oW oa oN H N oa Oa 01.x+ ro z 0 Na IWi+W �A X 3 s � Ln N u+CO M4 H z l+q D a -• W --j Cn H rct VT CO - oT 3 ro r a 1 1 lJ�Na t11 .�. .j T" m r ,Do W ....W Y W TQC! T� 0 N H z) �O Ca W W -n CO ` I tr O 1 I i I I X A x t M D i0 4+ W T v ti q Ca � y 1 z z ►� 0 K �O W W 3 LT CD N p X H tt CC } n r m y C I I 1 I MI Z c. Ju Cr cy M ' +L1W VfT H Y 'M YA (� 10 to N P4 W W NN M b VI M Z W J N N W H O y y • rx • W-- W� NN X Ya N 71 I I 1 I m� tiyl ►+ X sa y .. H Hy X 6 s 0 s . - Z. 0 O C -i � m r -• N 0, C) N -+ _ 0' O' X > > > m N 0! 0) N N - C; d cc V%a a as a 0 N N W N W V N A %0 N al ON x y O v co Ol W O� W Y 0 -•� N 0 o kp 0 ov 0 C o0 N_.. Na O 07 0+ N 07 Al-m VnN ASD �• Cb N -- 10 W O p1 M w H _ t% in rn o7 a rn W H 7 N W O In W co z c 3 _ C a In W N 0, N x _ C N z U In V l,n W N 0\ m V N A N N W d O N co u 0 0 H 7 c a o W N N In Z N _ IC c FA C q w c Y � O - V a O CO y ~ \ A 3 d O� V W N a %0 = m Ic M N N Y c V N W N A Y •�1 2 4 �► er h. A t0 O W N Ot W V. MI M n A = ti M q N M Z o p N y O YY A .. to s Y � � s x • � z .+ • s so M Z cl s pq •0 s O s y s O r -u X O O ;o (7 CD � Iv -1 N -• ID ID N O N D K 0—. N d N 7 -• r O Q (D 3 N In V) IL n -• 1 O f- 7 m ON N 3 a c f D O O m ID f 0 - 7 D a --+ O ;o + O -. D O N D < N 1 M N (D O Z N a°a as a as a a s ea a .44a 'ea a A J - In A VI A tr W A N O .n O, A A I 1 O N Q`W O— v `"o A-- In O In v - In rn rn 'V H 00� tow O+ln ON OO 1 W W O O O N O OO O N o 0 0 y r ON o1 01 ON O A O co O-- OO N A N N In W - �'• N N CO OJ N N O N Cl 0 C) A W O N N N W Un A A Ri 0%C, A v NN ll1 N1O O+• W ON M N ►+ H to J J N o` �n- a v rn -- o v, v y m W Ln N In a s In w m 10 O'- �! N D D Z Nl v�n N N O N W Ib 10 �1 t, Y N A •• �O N N O N N O� N W 1 O ,.n�C '* O C v ' .... N •� M cD In�O 1 1 •.• •..• In- � W A A � O \ 4 u Z f O N N H ~ N O Q: O W N N In IN 3 Cr (D I > o N A A A IA m 'j M M C7 FA > CD [` 3 3p N N N 'I Z 6 ♦ ID cr h. A M 10 03 W Cl Ol O� M O A Ln•-- 1 1 - .... ... ti M H V Ir M Z. 10 m W v v H O Y Y w _ t• _ 30 fq I 1 1 I 1 Z M Zp N w - H H Y M T. Ir y ti O J _ ..., N C G p, (C 0 O (D d D -< fi Ln D N 'I r C, cD fi B O _. -• ul -• ro d C) ? (o -+ to -+ N -• (D to 3 Ci c Cr O "D O a or O •+ n -r D — D -• -• z T Y O - O n > < o -a m Ln + — m o co z p cn ac a as Zk as a as a ac*k as a as a _. cD as a N W Ol 111 a 1Ji W W a �D Oou O W CI, co O -' NOS W W Z H Cl A AW 117 ON -_j C . `-• co O N W J O J A lJi N ro y _ O� W .! N Y o � o C) co 0 0 — 0m H r OW OI_n O-n ON OO W J N %.n A N N A a V-� O OW O\lz .Z W A �.�+W a l31 A �O s OA ON vN coW N "' ro M r H W O� co V v co v m y O: 1J7 O W W A N O u Z A D O N > 3 > W •f 0'! O o a a s o o m � "o C" z f7 LO1 N m H OA ON 10 CD O -- W N D c J N v N o -- N W N o+ Z •< s � M IV W Y � 2 N N �_n " H ►�+ 3 d' Y C) N �o N N = M M N Y r4 n r W Y\ 0 ro x Kf a o O Y t9 n M y to ro V co M A a L' Z M r N O` In M N lA b U M z W H O N W > Y V s Y � N ',0 7S ti Z M O% z zv Y M H H Y ►� Z M O V --• a � s Contra Costa County MBE/WBE CONTRACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM Affirmative Action Office 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553 (415) 646-4106 DATE: March 7, 1990 TO: Emma Kuevor Contract Compliance Officer FROM: Sheila Wa Contract Co nce Specialist SUBJECT: Status Repor on West County Justice Center WEST COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER STATUS REPORT AS OF DECEMBER 31, 1989 This $29,678,350.00 project is approximately 75% complete. To date, the Prime Contractor has a projected expenditure of $3,288,460.00 or 11.1% through the utilization of MBE .sub- contractors, 2nd tier sub-contractors, suppliers and truckers as follows: Carlos Interiors MBE/Hispanic Non--Local $ 317,775 Valverde & Son MBE/Hispanic Non-Local 329,285 Aire Sheet Metal MBE/Black Non-Local 1,616,000 Fred Grimes Trucking MBE/Black Local 9,000 Jensen Electric MBE/Hispanic Non-Local 800,000 Gaffney Glass MBE/Black Non-Local 16,400 Watson Electric MBE/Amer. Ind. Local 200,-000 and $571, 203 or 1.9% through the utilization of WBE sub- contractors, 2nd tier sub-contractors, suppliers and truckers as follows: Kinel of California WBE Non-Local $ 1,480 Frank Alegre Trucking WBE Non-Local 2,806 R & S Trucking WBE Non-Local 46,917 Bauman Landscape WBE Non-Local 490,000 City Electric Supply WBE Non-Local *300,000 * Actual contract = $5001,000; however, because they are suppliers, 60% of $ are. counted. Page 1 of 4 Walsh Construction through their Project Manager, Bob Abbott, has made, and is continuing to make, a concerted effort to increase the minority and female participation on this project in order to meet or exceed the County's goals by 13% minority and 2% female. This effort is evidenced by the increase in participation from 2% at time of bid opening to 11.1% through January 1989 for minorities and from .0005% to 1.9% through January 1989 for females. Walsh Construction is continuing to encourage sub-contractors to utilize minority and/or female suppliers and second tier sub-contractors wherever feasible. $5,591,400 or 18.84% of the contract dollars were committed to local business. ($5,580,401 or 18.83% to non-minority local firms and $11,000 or .01% to local minority firms and 0% to local women-owned firms. ) A breakdown of firms, their locality and percentage of the contract follows: WEST COUN'T'Y JUSTICE CENTER $29,678,350.00 Phase B Percentage Walsh Construction, Sacramento, CA 10.2 Areoplex, Sacramento, CA .08 Automated Filing System, Emeryville, CA .2 AA Aimes Co. , San Leandro, .CA less than 6k Anning-Johnson Co. , Burlingame, CA 1.2 Frank Alegra Trucking, Lodi, CA .00009 Allen Building Products, Oakland, CA .46 Arrowoods, San Dimas, CA 1 Bauman Landscape, San Rafael, CA (WBE) 1.9 Beck Steel, Inc. , Lubbock, TX 5.4 Boldig Enterprises, Rancho Cucamonga, CA .4 The Brookman Co. , Burlingame, CA 1. 1 California Builders Hardware, Concord, CA 1. 2 Carlos Interiors, San Francisco, CA (MBE-H) 1 ' CM Security Group, Montreal, Canada .88 Coast Insulation, Martinez, CA .08 Contra Costa Electric, Martinez, CA . 12 Display concepts, Sacramento, CA .09 Emerald Food Service Equipment Co. , Secaucus, NJ .15 Norwalk Food Service Equipment Co. , Secaucus, NJ 3 Erickson, Fairfield, Ca 1.4 Falconer Glass Industries, Sacramento, CA .37 Gaffney Glass, Sacramento, CA (MBE-B) .49 Gallette & Sons, Inc. , Martinez, CA 5.4 Gradeway, Fremont, CA 1. 3 Fred Grime's Trucking, Richmond, CA (MBE-B) .0003 The Healthco International, Hayward, CA .11 Hope' s Architectural, Jamestown, ..NY .4 J.R. Enterprises, Saratoga, CA . 4 Kidde Automated Systems, Long Beach, CA 8. 4 Lafayette Manufacturing, Hayward, CA .3 Page 2 of 4 Percentage Lodestar Elevator Co. , Benicia, CA .15 Masonry Services, Pleasanton, Ca 8.9 J.W. Mc Clenahan, San Mateo, CF • 12 B.T. Mancini Co. , Santa Cruz, CA A Marathon Engineering, Mountain Ranch, CA •25 Nor-Cal Caulking, Sacramento, CA •26 Oakland Fence, Hayward, CA 1.6 Overhead Door Co. , Stockton, CA .09 Owen Pacific, Hayward, CA 1.1 Pacific Allied Fire Protection, Oakland, CA 1.8 Penninsula Floors, Fremont, CA •1 R & S Trucking, Sebastapol, CA (WBE) .0015 Security Metal Products, Hawthorne, CA • 5 Herb Shearer Plastering, Inc. , Bakersfield, CA 7.8 Tec-Flor Services, San Francisco, CA •2 Universal Security Products, Hayward, CA 1.4 Valverde & Sons Painting, Santa Clara, (MBE-H) 1.18 Western State Design, Hayward, CA 45 Second-Tier Sub-contractors: Aire Sheet Metal, Redwood City, CA (MBE-B) .05 Jensen Electric, Watsonville, CA (MBE-B) .26 Watson, Electric, San Pablo, CA (MBE-AI) .0067 City Electric Supply, Novato, CA (WBE) .001 For the period October 1 through December 31, 1989 the following contractors were actively performing work on this project with workforces composed of the ethnic/gender composition reflected below. MINORITY FEMALE Percentage Percentage Walsh Construction 66 0 Oakland Fence 0 0 Galleti & Sons, Inc. 53 0 J.W. Mc Clenahan 20 0 Contra Costa Electric 18 18 Masonry Services 30 0 Bauman Landscape (WBE) 28 0 Gradeway 50 0 Jensen Electric (MBE/Hispanic) 0 0 Beck Erectors 42 0 Page 3 of 4 Percentage Percentage Aire Sheet Metal..(MBE/Black) 94 7 Pacific Allied Fire Protection 0 0 Lodestar Elevator Co. 0 0 Coast Insulation 34 0 Carlos Interiors 49 0 Owen Pacific 62 0 North Bay Construction 28 0 Anning Johnson 26 1 Glastech 6 32 J.R. Enterprises 0 0 Nor-Cal Caulking 39 0 Plant Insulation 41 0 Tile West II 15 3 Overall percentages of workforce participation for the project during this period are 33.83% minority and 2.5% female which meets the County's workforce goals of 20.7% minority but falls short of the female goal of 6%. Bob Abbott, Walsh Construction Project Manager, has been notified of this via a copy of this memo. SW:ss Page 4 of 4 WP:A:\Letters\WCJC. two Contra Costa County MBE/WBE CONTRACT COMPLIANCE PROGRAM Affirmative Action Office 651 Pine Street, Martinez, CA 94553 ( 415) 646-4106 DATE: June 27, 1990 TO: Emma Kuevor ontract Compliance Officer FROM: eila Walker ntract Compliance Specialist SUBJECT: Status Report on West County Justice Center WEST COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER STATUS REPORT AS OF MARCH 31, 1990 This $29 , 678 , 350 . 00 project is approximately 90% complete. To date , the Prime Contractor has a projected expenditure of $ 3 , 288 , 460 . 00 or 11 . 1% through the utilization of MBE sub- contractors, 2nd tier sub-contractors, suppliers and truckers as follows: Carlos Interiors MBE/Hispanic Non-Local $ 317,775 Valverde & Son MBE/Hispanic Non-Local 329, 285 Aire Sheet Metal MBE/Black Non-Local 1,616,000 Fred Grimes Trucking MBE/Black Local 9, 000. Jensen Electric MBE/Hispanic Non-Local 800,000 Gaffney Glass MBE/Black Non-Local 16,400 Watson Electric MBE/Amer. Ind. Local 200,000 and $ 571 , 203 or 1 . 9% through the utilization of WBE sub- contractors, 2nd tier sub-contractors, suppliers and truckers as follows : Kinel of California WBE Non-Local $ 1,480 Frank Alegre Trucking WBE Non-Local 2,806 R & S Trucking WBE Non-Local 46, 917 Bauman Landscape WBE Non-Local 490,000 City Electric Supply WBE Non-Local *300,000 * Actual contract = $ 500 , 000 ; however, because they are suppliers , 60% of $ are counted. Page 1 of 4 Walsh Construction through their Project Manager, Bob Abbott, has made , and is continuing to make , a concerted effort to increase the minority and female participation on this project in order -to meet or exceed the County' s goals of 13% minority and 20 female . This effort is evidenced by the increase in participation from 2% at time of bid opening to 11. 1% through January 1989 for minorities and from . 0005% to 1 . 9% through January 1989 for females. Walsh Construction is continuing to encourage sub-contractors to utilize minority and/or female suppliers and second tier sub-contractors wherever feasible. $5 , 591 , 400 or 18 . 84% of the contract dollars were committed to local business . ( $5 , 580 , 401 or 18 . 83% to non-minority local firms and $11, 000 or . 01% to local minority firms and 0% to local women-owned firms . ) A breakdown of firms, their locality and percentage of the contract follows: WEST COUNTY JUSTICE CENTER $29,678,350.00 Phase B Percentage Walsh Construction, Sacramento, CA 10.2 Areoplex, Sacramento, CA . 08 Automated Filing System, Emeryville, CA . 2 AA Aimes Co. , San Leandro, CA less than 6k Anning-Johnson Co. , Burlingame, CA 1. 2 Frank Alegra Trucking, Lodi, CA . 00009 Allen Building Products, Oakland, CA . 46 Arrowoods, San Dimas, CA 1 Bauman Landscape, San Rafael, CA (WBE) 1 . 9 Beck Steel, Inc. , Lubbock, TX 5 . 4 Boldig Enterprises, Rancho Cucamonga, CA . 4 The Brookman Co. , Burlingame, CA 1 . 1 California Builders Hardware, Concord, CA 1 . 2 Carlos Interiors, San Francisco, CA (MBE-H) 1 CM Security Group, Montreal, Canada . 88 Coast Insulation, Martinez, CA . 08 Contra Costa Electric, Martinez, CA . 12 Display concepts, Sacramento, CA . 09 Emerald Food Service Equipment Co. , Secaucus, NJ . 15 Norwalk Food Service Equipment Co. , Secaucus, NJ 3 Erickson, Fairfield, Ca 1 . 4 Falconer Glass Industries, Sacramento, CA . 37 Gaffney Glass, Sacramento, CA (MBE-B) . 49 Gallette. & Sons, Inc. , Martinez, CA 5. 4 Gradeway, Fremont, CA 1. 3 Fred Grime ' s Trucking, Richmond, CA (MBE-B) . 0003 The Healthco International, Hayward, CA . 11 Hope ' s Architectural, Jamestown, NY .4 J.R. Enterprises, Saratoga, CA . 4 Kidde Automated Systems, Long Beach, CA 8. 4 Lafayette Manufacturing, Hayward, CA . 3 Page 2 of 4 Percentage Lodestar Elevator Co. , Benicia, CA . 15 Masonry Services, Pleasanton, Ca 8 . 9 J.W. Mc Clenahan, San. Mateo, CA . 12 B.T. Mancini Co. , Santa Cruz, CA . 4 Marathon Engineering, Mountain Ranch, CA . 25 Nor-Cal Caulking, Sacramento, CA .26 Oakland Fence, Hayward, CA 1. 6 Overhead Door Co. , Stockton, CA .09 Owen Pacific, Hayward, CA 1. 1 Pacific Allied Fire Protection, Oakland, CA 1 . 8 Penninsula Floors, Fremont, CA . 1 R & S Trucking, Sebastapol, CA (WBE) . 0015 Security Metal Products, Hawthorne, CA . 5 Herb Shearer Plastering, Inc. , Bakersfield, CA 7. 8 Tec-Flor Services, San Francisco, CA . 2 Universal Security Products, Hayward, CA 1 . 4 Valverde & Sons Painting, Santa Clara, (MBE-H) 1. 18 Western State Design, Hayward, CA 45 Second-Tier Sub-contractors: Aire Sheet Metal, Redwood City, CA (MBE-B) .05 Jensen Electric, Watsonville, CA (MBE-B) . 26 Watson, Electric, San Pablo, CA (MBE-AI ) . 0067 City Electric Supply, Novato, CA (WBE) .001 For the period January l through March 31 , 1990 the following contractors were actively performing work on this project with workforces ccmposed of the ethnic/gender composition reflected below. MINORITY FEMALE Percentage Percentage Walsh Construction 75 0 Oakland Fence 7 0 Galieti & Sons, Inc. 33 0 J.W. Mc Clenahan 30 0 Contra Costa Electric 20 25 Masonry Services 22 0 Bauman Landscape (WBE) 12 0 Gradeway 37 4 Page 3 of 4 Percentage Percentage Coast Insulation 12 0 Carlos Interiors 22 2 North Bay Construction 16 0 Anning Johnson 13 0 Glastech 0 33 J.R. Enterprises 0 0 Nor-Cal Caulking 25 0 Tile West II 15 3 Arrowwood' s Installation 52 0 Electrical Corporation of America 18 0 Bay Area Refrigeration 0 0 Watson Electric (MBE/AI ) 0 0 Overall percentages of workforce participation for the project during this period are 21 . 52% minority and 3 . 37% female which meets the County' s workforce goals of 20.7% minority but . falls short of the female goal of 6%. Bob Abbott, Walsh Construction Project Manager, has been notified of this via a copy of this memo. SW: ss Page 4 of 4 WP:A: \Letters\WCJC. two OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR C N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y Affirmative Action Office Administration Building 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 QUARTERLY REPORT For the reporting period January 1, 1990 through March 31, 1990 construction projects awarded with individual contract amounts in excess of $50, 000 totaled $4, 419,056. Contracts with M/WBE goals totaled $3 , 513 , 608 . Of this $3 , 513 , 608 , Minority Business Enterprises received $113 , 541 or 3 . 2% and Women Business Enterprises received $187, 606 or 5. 3%. Contracts awarded in this period with DBE requirements totaled $ 9051448 with DBE ' s receiving $348,138 or 38.40. A total of $1, 947, 219 or 440 of the total contracts in excess of $50,000 was awarded to local firms; $1,761,605 or 39.8% to local non-minority firms ; $169 , 000 or 3 . 8% to local women business enterprises and $16 ,614 or . 3% to local minority firms. Following is a breakdown of contracts awarded by department: I . GENERAL SERVICES I . Central County Corporation Yard $3, 338,000 *Dickman-Nourse, Inc. 916,172 Alves Construction, Pittsburg 573 , 565 RMT Landscape, San Leandro 81,989 Evans, Livermore 175,572 Precision Fence, Stockton 28,336 G & L Rebar, Martinez 32,828 Hewatt Steel, Benicia 1291875 S.S. Studs, San Lorenzo 23 , 500 Westmark, Tacoma, WA 37,095 All American Insulation, San Jose 14,320 Enterprise Roofing, Concord 57, 369 Walnut Creek Glass, Walnut Creek 63 ,750 D.L.M. , Novato 145,700 Harris Drywall, Martinez 72, 160 Carmichael Flooring, Carmichael 16,468 Murray Painting, Martinez 36,830 Arrow Acoustics, Hayward 13 ,462 Pitts Plumbing & Mechanical, San Ramon (WBE) 169,000 Cal-Neva, Concord 198,400 Kelly & Son Fire Sprinkler, Clayton (MBE - Black) 16, 314 Del Monte Electrical, Walnut Creek 265 ,000 R & B Cement, San Jose 50,000 Cookson Overhead Doors, San Francisco 33,475 Panalized Structures, Manteca 99,500 Striping Graphics, Petaluma 5 , 208 E.F. Thorn Interiors,. Antioch 11,575 Pacific Coast Waterproofing, Oakley 6,680 Tile West, Berkeley 33 ,489 Millertemcom, Lafayette 9,590 Accurate Partitions Corp. , Fresno 7 ,669 California Commercial Company, Sacramento 9,509 R. Montoya Company, Martinez 1,150 Hart Window Coverings, Sacramento 2, 450 2. First Floor Remodel - 30 Muir Road $63 ,768 *RGM & Associates, Concord 37,151 Gaunt Iron & Machine, Concord 4,782 Granados Door & Hardware, San Rafael 3 ,406 Northland Drywall, Dixon 2,784 McLin Paint, Byron 1,000 Air-Kraft Heating, Concord 5,600 L.V. Electric, Fremont (MBE - Mexican/American) 7,230 Continental Building Specialty, San Francisco (WBE) 735 City Electric Supply, San Francisco (WBE) 1 ,080 Total General Services Contract $3 ,401,768 MBE _ $105, 530 or 3% J WBE _ $170,815 or 5% II . PUBLIC WORKS 1 . Nichols Road Overhead Replacement ** $434 , 369 *Valentine Corporation, San Rafael (DBE-Spain) 142, 575 Harrington Design, Walnut Creek 43,644 Cal-Safety, Fremont (DBE - Women) 40,000 Care-Free Greens, Roseville (DBE - Women) 1, 200 American Pile Driving, San Francisco 70 , 300 (DBE - American/Indian) Salinas Reinforcing, Livermore 35, 015 (DBE - Mexican/American) Chrisp Company, Fremont 12,135 W.M. Concrete, Oakland (DBE - Black) 5,500 V. S. L. , San Jose 21,000 Owl Concrete, Vacaville 63,000 2. Lone Tree Way Widening ** $471,079 *William G. McCullough, Antioch 340 , 531 Spirit Oil, San Jose (WBE) 12,342 Central Fence, San Leandro (DBE - Portuguese) 2,278 National Concrete Saw Cutting, Stockton 6,000 (DBE - American/Indian) Highway Safety Supply, Fair Oaks (DBE - Women) 14, 575 Page 2 of 4 Steiny & Company, Vallejo 77,000 Ayalla Trucking, Manteca (MBE - Mexican/American) 4,936 Holman Electric, San Francisco 3 ,639 (MBE - Mexican/American) Severina' s Aviation & Fuel, San Francisco 9,778 (MBE - Mexican/American) 3. Wildcat & San Pablo Creek Irrigation $1114840 *Bauman Landscape, San Rafael 87,038 Columbia Electric, San Leandro (WBE) 6 ,840 Aamigo, Anderson (WBE) 9,951 Sheridan Sales, Roseville (MBE - Mexican/American) 7,711 Bay Area Welding, Richmond (MBE - Black) 300 Total Public Works contracts with M/WBE requirements $111 , 840 MBE = $8, 011 or 7. 16% WBE = $16 ,791 or 15. 01% Total Public Works contract with DBE requirements $905 , 448 DBE = $348, 138 or 38. 4% III. Grand total construction contracts with M/WBE $3 ,513 , 608 Requirements MBE = $113 , 541 or 3 . 2% WBE _ $187,606 or 5. 30 Grand total DBE contracts $905, 448 DBE = $348 , 138 or 38. 4% Cumulative totals through the third quarter of fiscal year 1989-90 are as follows: Total contracts awarded in excess of $50,000 $10, 645 , 853 Total contracts awarded with MBE/WBE goals: $8,402, 267 Total contracts awarded with DBE goals: $2, 243, 586 -- contracts awarded to MBEs ( 9%) : $769 , 031 -- contracts awarded to WBEs (7 .60) : 638,611 -- contracts awarded to DBEs ( 210) : $471, 386 Total contracts awarded to Local Firms ( 17%) : $1,844,136 -- non-minority local ( 16.7%) $1,782, 305 -- minority local ( . 7%) $78, 445 -- WBEs local ( 1. 69%) $169,000 * Prime Contractor ** DBE Goal Requirements Page 3 of 4 IV. The Community Development Black Grant Program ( in the Community Development Department) and the Housing Authority let contracts that are funded by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and are required to adhere to HUD regulations, which include a 20% MBE goal (There are no WBE goals) and reporting requirements for contractor activity on a semi-annual basis. For the period October 1 ,1989 - March 31, 1990, the departments reported the following activity: $151, 363 . Total CDBG funds spent this semi-annual period 40,715 Non-Profit 30, 000 School District 38, 000 Canal Frontage Improvement - Pittsburg 42 , 648 Rodeo/Parker Avenue Frontage Improvement V. HOUSING AUTHORITY The Housing Authority also let contracts that are funded by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) . There were: $919 ,782 Total for Five Contracts 202 , 786 MBE ' s or 200 43 , 919 WBE' s or 4% The Housing Authority met their 20% MBE goal and contracted an additional 4 . 50 ( $43 , 919) with WBE' s. Page 4 of 4 WP:A: \letters\quarterly.A90 June 20 , 1990 MBE/WBE SUPPLIES REPORT 10/01/89 through 12/31/89 DEPARTMENT LOCAL TOTAL CONTRACTS County Administrator 19, 194 13 82 J37 , 331 Agriculture 6,595 95 13 6,935 Animal Services 7 ,214 26 47 27 . 759 Assessor 4,067 23 22 38, 356 Auditor 90-971 68 20 14, 591 Building Inspection 4, 670 30 29 15, 222 Clerk Recorder 216,865 67 54 323, 320 Community Services Admin. 70, 756 40 28 26, 582 , Cooperative Extension 274 22 10 1 , 236 County Counsel 1 ,323 39 9 3, 342 Municipal Court Admin. 23, 481 23 39 101 , 848 District Attorney 18, 670 38 64 48 , 533 Fire District - Consolidated 58, 417 31 146 186, 724 - Moraga 5, 784 51 34 11 , 337 - Orinda 5, 409 35 33 15, 331 - Riverview 16, 756 6 49 267 , 629 - West 1 , 937 7 21 26 , 181 Health Services - Medical 332, 549 29 482 1 , 135, 618 Health Services-Public Health 43,404 22 134 191 , 734 Health Services-Grand Total 375, 953 51 616 1 , 327 , 352 Library 12, 023 2 172 453 , 922 Private Industry Council 2 ,256 47 10 4 , 735 Personnel 13, 881 69 33 20,039 MBE/WBE SUPPLIES REPORT 10/01/89 through 12/31/89 DEPARTMENT LOCAL TOTAL CONTRACTS $ % # $ Community Development Redev. 2a4 . 7QQ F,9 7 39? ,471 Comm. Development-GraLd Total 258, 535 61 36 421 ,801 Probation 70, 543 35 121 197 ,003 Public Defender 5, 170 64 18 7 ,995 Public Works - Airport 19,651 77 32 25,495 Public Works - Grant Total 55, 764 59 97 93, 191 Retirement 1 , 745 47 9 3, 680 Sheriff - Coroners 140,274 17 216 820,035 Social Services 124,794 55 66 223,278 Superior Court/Jury Commiss. 53,346 72 23 73,970 Treasurer/Tax Collector 925 18 10 5,012 Veterans Services 154 71 7 215 Personnel Merit Board -0- 0 3 205 . General .Services - 59g 219 R3 144?g ,R-�Q .,',,GRAND TOTAL 1 , 889 ,977 35 2,280 5 , 334 , 543 Page 2 WP:A: \letters\Dept. list 5/ 10/90 SUPPLIES REPORT 01 /01 /90 through 03/31 /90 )EPARTMENT LOCAL CONTRACTS ,:ounty Administrator 34 24 , 322 12 . 61 91 192 , 803 riculture 5 2 , 139 78 . 94 12 2 , 710 -knimal Services 15 11 ,441 33 . 51 46 34 , 134 kssessor 11 9 , 311 61 . 56 24 15 , 124 auditor 9 4 , 931 36. 01 22 13 , 694 3uilding Inspection 15 2 , 641 19. 44 38 13, 586 ;lerk Recorder 17 38 , 462 48. 09 63 79,465 'ommunity Services Admin. 23 17 , 179 18 . 84 44 91 ,169 :oo erative Extension 8 766 34 . 93 16 2, 194 ;ount Counsel 6 2 , 246 43 . 15 13 5 , 205 lunici al Court Admin. 16 29 , 963 29. 01 46 103,262 A strict Attorney 34 34 , 600 59 . 28 66 58 , 363 'ire District - Consolidated 56 58 , 370 30. 32 120 192 , 502 Mora a 16 3 , 595 16 . 14 37 22 , 271 - Orinda 13 5 , 049 29 . 51 26 17 , 111 Riverview 36 23 , 356 34 . 25 62 68 , 175 - West 6 12 , 705 42. 00 14 30 , 245 lealth Services - Medical 147 369, 570 27 . 54 572 1 , 341 , 756 Public Health 65 81 , 411 30 . 84 208 263, 939 Grand Total 212 450, 982 28 . 08 780 1 , 605 , 696 Abrary , 19 19 , 677 5 . 51 183 356, 874 rivate Industry Council 8 2 , 202 57 . 98 12 3,803 ?ersonnei 18 14J. 135 50. 02 28 28,258 SUPPLVES REPORT 01 /01 /90 through 03/31 /90 DEPARTMENT LOCAL TOTAL CONTRACTS # $ . Community Development 18 28 , 607 70. 17 35 40 , 763 Community Redevelopment 2.2 45, 170 37 . 34 43 120, 949 COMM. DEVEL. /REDEVEL. Grand Total 40 73 , 777 45 . 62 78 161 , 713 Probation 41 43, 881 23. 17 120 189 ,311 Public Defender 11 11 , 647 71 . 05 20 16 , 393 Public Works 34 18, 154 42 . 54 63 42 , 670 Airport 14 7 ,248 45. 46 31 15 ,944 PUBLIC WORKS/AIRPORT Grand Total 48 25 , 403 43. 33 94 58 , 615 Retirement 5 3 , 161 86. 03 9 3, 674 Sheriff - Coroners 132 144 , 249 16. 55 292 871 , 393 Social Services 39 149 , 747 36. 25 79 413, 062 Superior Court/Jur Commiss . 15 16,380 40 . 83 31 40 , 116 Treasurer/Tax Collector 5 792 7 . 96 12 9 , 956 Veterans Services 3 319 49. 79 7 642 Personnel Merit Board 1 226 41 . 12 6 550 General Services 76 223, 805 81 . 33 144 287 , 461 975 2915 2 , 600 GRAND TOTAL 1 , 442 , 872 4 , 99 , 281 Page 2 WP:A: \letters\Dept. list MBE/WBE SERVICES REPORT 10/01/89 through 12/21/89 DEPARTMENT LOCAL TOTAL CONTRACTS County Administrator 85 ,863 23 95 364 , 338 Agriculture 110 35 4 308 Animal Services 12 ,883 52 30 24 ,649 Assessor 7 ,647 31 15 24 ,303 Auditor 182 1 14 12,449 Building Inspection 53,317 58 15 90.,619 Clerk Recorder 31 , 512 22 66 .143,385 Community Services Admin. 542,931 97 46 559 , 703 Cooperative Extension -0 0 l 301 County Counsel 965 21 16 4 ,689 Municipal Court Admin. 47,847 42 80 111 , 864 District Attorney 511316 62 60 82 , 633 Fire District - Consolidated 93,926 43 235 218, 309 - Moraga 9, 643 72 28 13,344 Orinda 10,218 28 54 36,449 Riverview 22,000 34 93 64,432 West 57 , 534 94 19 61 ,047 Health Services - Medical 3, 143,278 63 448 4,969 , 595 Health Services-Public Health 474 ,424 52 302 895,753 Health Services-Grand Total 477, 567 115 .750 5, 865,348 Library 11 ,841 7 28 1490958 Private Industry Council 815 ,849 96 86 846,258 Personnel 142 , 951 24 45 577,049 MBE/WBE SERVICES REPORT 10/01/89 through 12/31/89 DEPARTMENT LOCAL TOTAL CONTRACTS Community Development - Redev. 62.;273 41 14 151 ,257- Comm. Development-Grand Total 113,646 52 59 217 , 527 Probation 21 , 198 13 71 154 , 672 Public Defender 5,489 31 45 17 , 377 Public Works - Airport 5,225 34 32 15 ,424 Public Works - Grant Total 91 ,047 66 82 138,990 Retirement 0 0 1 2 ,963. Sheriff - Coroners 97,276 22 187 445 , 540 Social Services 584 , 796 70 247 831 , 155 Superior Court/Jury Commiss. 194 ,077 65 224 297 ,000 Treasurer/Tax Collector 150 2 6 5 , 821 Veterans Services 245 60 2 406 Personnel Merit Board 300 40 2 736 General Services 288,334 41 284 697 ,446 GRAND TOTAL 7,012 , 812 58 2,990 12,061 ,087 Page 2 WP:A:\letters\Dept.list 5/ 10/90 5EK V I-LL Ktf'Ur 01 /01 /90 through 03/31 /90 DEPARTMENT LOCAL CONTRACTS County Administrator 29 64 , 943 13. 7 89 473 , 795 Agriculture 3 323 29 . 2 8 1 , 107 Animal Services 22 16, 673 61 . 85 32 26 ,955 Assessor 5 1 , 739 14 . 18 13 12 258 Auditor 3 5, 705 53 . 0 11 10, 763 Building Inspection 4 6 , 123 42 . 77 13 14 , 315 Clerk Recorder 26 77 , 810 46. 98 61 165 , 610 Community Services Admin. 40 -1 , 009,389 98. 74 50 1 , 022 , 222 Cooperative Extension 0 0 0 3 591 County Counsel 7 1 , 726 35 . 39 19 4 , 877 Municipal Court Admin. 37 69 , 233 48. 69 78 142 , 176 District Attorney 34 102 , 009 65. 03 82 156 , 845 Fire District - Consolidated 110 70 , 727 33. 63 202 210 , 297 - hlora a 24 9 , 150 73. 94 30 12 , 374 - Orinda 26 22 , 533 69 . 2 49 32 , 561 - Riverview 66 31 , 466 16. 14 101 194 , 907 - West 8 47 , 458 82 . 92 21 57 , 229 Health Services- Medical 210 3, 767 , 338 65. 97 478 .5 , 709 , 822 - Public Health 131 501 , 806 55 . 14 259 910, 018 - Grand Total 341 4 ,269, 195 64 . 49 737 6, 619, 841 Library 8 14 , 122 22 . 08 23 63 ,937 Private Industry Council 66 524, 873 96. 18 79 545, 677 , Personnel 15 162 , 633 25 . 2 36 645 , 148 01 /01 /90 through 03/31 /90 DEPARTMENT LOCAL TOTAL CONTRACTS Community Development 31 24 , 122 3=. 91 43 73 , 284 Community Redevelopment 7 90,227 63, 62 15 141 720 COMM. DEVEL. /REDEVEL. Grand Total 38 114 , 349 53. 16 58 215, 087 Probation 21 19,414 13. 89 69 139, 725 Public Defender .29 11 , 611 38. 66 55 30, 028 Public Works 19 47 ,967 1.8. 05 65 265 , 616 Airport 12 16, 023 55. 86 24 38 , 679 PUBLIC WORKS/AIRPORT Grand Total 31 63,991 21 . 74 89 294 , 296 Retirement 0 0 0 1 906 Sheriff - Coroners 82 99, 836 21 .36 192 467 ,257 Social Services 234 597, 423 52 . 91 301 1 , 128 , 946 Superior Court/Jur Commiss. 147 183,001 61 . 48 220 297 , 621 Treasurer/Tax Collector 2 465 . 95 12 48, 923 Veterans Services 1 53 13 . 45 2 394 Personnel Merit Board 2 2 , 520 42 . 21 4 5 , 969 General Services 127 330, 376 39. 54 300 835 , 523 1 , 588 57 . 14 .3, 040 GRAND TOTAL 7 , 930 , 831 13 878 177 Page 2 WP:A: \letters\Dept. list u � w � �.ct ° K3 7j,9 c4 Gp '" r RS Q 7, Q pri t., P • ct �k % t�fS � p v 0► • V O G D i U G •�e G W rte ° C •C � VA 9 Nwt, �W W IS N N G o o �o •o �C es Q � U v OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y Affirmative Action Office Administration -Building 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 June 11, 1990 Ms. Janet Scoll-Johnson 5804 Alameda Avenue Richmond, CA 94804 Dear Janet: Thank you for taking the time from your busy schedule to meet with us on May 3 , 1990 as we continue to review the County's Affirmative Action reports. I believe we are getting closer to presenting affirmative action data that will be more readily available and easier to read. Clarity of the data is one of our primary objectives. At our meeting, we reviewed various formats of charts that had been compiled using our AS software, and you will be receiving charts using "Pixie" software. After we agree upon the format of the charts , we can discuss the number of charts to be produced and begin to generate charts based on the hires , promotions, and separations reports. You suggested that the County review the affirmative action plans from the private sector. As you may recall, the County made a presentation, before the Internal Operations ( I.0. ) Committee of the Board of Supervisors , comparing three affirmative action plans from Santa Clara County, PG&E, and Pacific Bell. The possibility. of having a pre-apprenticeship program that would include training and establishing a new job class at the trainee level that would lead to an apprentice position in the County was also discussed. The purpose of the program would be to increase the number of women in the trades. We look forward to discussing the feasibility of this program in the future. Thank you again for your time and commitment to affirmative action within our County. Sincerely, Emma Kuevor Affirmative Action Officer CC: Board of Supervisors Scott Tandy, Mary Ann McNett, Ron Saari, Doris Stamps WP:A: \letters\Joe.Jan OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y Affirmative Action Office Administration Building 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 June 11, 19,9 0 Mr. Joseph M. Hogan 237 Corliss Drive Moraga, CA 94556 Dear Joe: Thank you for taking the time from your busy schedule to meet with us on May 3 , 1990 as we continue to review the County' s Affirmative Action reports. I believe we are getting closer to presenting affirmative action data that will be more readily available and easier to read. Clarity of the data is one of our primary objectives. At our meeting, we reviewed various formats of charts that had been compiled using our AS software, and you will be receiving charts using "Pixie" software. After we agree upon the format b of the charts , we can discuss the number of charts to be produced and begin to generate charts based on the hires , . promotions, and separations reports . You suggested that 'the County review the affirmative action plans from the private sector. As you may recall, the County made a presentation, before the Internal Operations ( I .O. ) Committee of the Board of Supervisors , comparing three affirmative action plans from Santa Clara County, PG&E, and Pacific Bell. The possibility of having a pre-apprenticeship program that would include training and establishing a new job class at the trainee level that would lead to an apprentice position in the County was also discussed. The purpose of the program would be to increase the number of women in the trades. We look forward to discussing the feasibility of this program in the future. Thank you again for your time and commitment to affirmative action within our County. Si cerely, � Emma Kuevor Affirmative Action Officer CC: Board of Supervisors Scott Tandy, Mary Ann McNett, Ron Saari, Doris Stamps WP:A: \letters\Joe.Jan OFFICE OF THE COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR C O N T R A C O S T A C O U N T Y . Affirmative Action Office Administration Building 651 Pine Street Martinez, CA 94553 (415) 646-4106 June 27, 1990 Joseph M. Hogan 237 Corliss Drive Moraga, CA 94556 Dear Joe: The enclosed are charts prepared using a PC with the format suggested to us by your committee. The General Services Department is used before we consider preparing charts for the other departments. e Your review and comments are requested. If I can answer any questions, don't hesistate to call. Sincerely, Emma Kuevor Affirmative Action Officer CC: Scott Tandy Maryann McNett Ron Saari Doris Stamps B:Janet.doc Salary Levels by Sex in Contra Costa County General Services Administraion '66% 70% 78 66 60% ` SO% 10% ■Fu* 30% ®ilre 10% ` 10% 0% 1987 1989 Salary Level $0.1 - $24,999 1987 1989 Percent Count Percent Count Female 34% 40 35% 35 Male 66% 78 65% 66 Total 100% 118 100% 101 79 90� \ 20p}�y� :,��•�';::+\.;.\oma:� 7096 ' •1,'1�\.\ �\\t.{;:: 1:::\y\y<:tiv}�:..Jiff:++i:?i: .\ilii•..';:... .civ\::p..•..: �.�„:.+\titi..:�;.}+v�v. '<\\``W�\ vim\::\ •i;�:•'-�iJ�\�\ti�;n�.�\•1\\C�:. `-,:fti-;., °\'v. \ 241�0 '::$: :^-- ::°•iS^??":-''�-.+'��-.'.•�,. " 4+\4\i�ZJ�U\"S\\�\\•\\\�\, � 1�(::.�{jy phi.?.::•�` \��;" . y�y 1/W 8'4;24\tiSq_.:':i;?v\,♦`;�"ti::, �T .•\;4+""\�y.,:i.;.+....`"..... LY 70 Y A '3"•\�'`�`tv�" ♦� ' '>'.` :�� 1987 1989 Salary Level $25,000 - $36,999 1987 1989 Percent Count Percent Count Female 10% 9 20% 17 Male 90% 79 80% 70 Total 100% 88 100% 87 Salary Levels by Sex in Contra Costa County General Services Administraion 93% 9ft 100% 28 44 90% \ \2 0% , ^^ N ,016 30% Mai 20% 016 1987 1989 Salary Level $37,000 - $48,999 1987 1989 Percent Count Percent Count Female 7% 2 35% 2 Male 93% 28 65% 44 Total 1000 30 100% 46 10096 5 9096 10096. 9 VY IY we ::.4\\•\`moi?:'�'v` `•v'\i\v\A•:J.v$'yLri:. i'i-`,:`. 1096 yi i:•\�:�::al ii4�iij.:i:riff:., ;.'\ 11�•IRiNN 198917 - IM Salary Level $49,000 - $60,999 1987 1989 Percent Count Percent Count Female 0% 0 10% 1 Male 100% 5 90% 9 Total 100% 5 100% 10 Salary Levels by Sex in Contra Costa County General Services Administraion �oox 1w% 1 3 10096 6016 - ■Femak 30% `^' 20% 1016 1981 1989 Salary Level $61,000 - $90,999 1987 1989 Percent Count Percent Count Female 0% 0 0% 0 Male 100% 1 100% 3 Total 100% 1 100% 3 Salary Level $91,000 - + 1987 1989 Percent Count Percent Count Female 0% 0 0% 0 Male 0% 0 0% 0 Total 100% 0 100% 0 Salary Levels by Race/Ethnic in Contra Costa County General Services Administraion. 56% S>% 60% 66 58 ,.� >'= El m ■elegy 40% 31% 37 ,�.\.. 31 30% Eg F1* 20% \ .tet• ,• 12 0 Am.bdJAWM 10% • ,* ..ar. Px.wm* 1% 0% 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 1981 1989 Salary Level $0.1 - $24,999 White Black Hispanic Asian Filipino Indian/Alask Paclslanders Total (90) Count (go) Count (%) Count (90) Count (90) Count (90) Count (90) Count (90) Count 1987 56 66 31 37 12 14 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 100% 118 1989 57 58 31 31 12 12 . 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 101 11% 11% 80°6 68 61 ' . 0 WMe 60% !elm 5096 40% EE Aim Fkm 9% 9% 8% 8 3% 1% 6% <<: 1 1% Pa&& 3 1 0% 1 0% 0% 1987 1989 Salary Level $25,000 - $36,999 White Black Hispanic Asian Filipino Indian/Alask Paclslanders Total (9a) Count (40) Count (go) Count (%) Count (90) Count Count (go) Count Count 1987 77 68 9 8 9 8 3 3 0 0 1 1 0 0 100% 88 1989 77 67 8 7 11 10 2 2 0 0 1 1 0 0 100% 87 Salary Levels by Race/Ethnic in-Contra Costa_ County • General Services Administraion 81% 87% 9096 2 40 W* 70% 5096 > ' ti. ®bw 4096 _ ®RON :r `• ®Amer.MAWm W IY MIMi 4 10% 3�% 26 �' 4% ®Pu.hlmelet ,., 1 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% ..ft 1987 1989 Salary Level $37,000 - $48,999 White Black Hispanic Asian Filipino Indian/Alask Padslandets Total (50) Count (gc) Count (%) Count (%) Count (%) Count (90) Count (50) Count (90) Count 1987 87 26 3 1 7 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 10056 30 1989 87 40 7 3 4 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 46 10096 S 100% 90% � � e �tales 70% 60% SO% ®As 4096 ®FWN 30% ®Amer.MJAWM 1� �y �p ®ft wow 1O% ?? 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% .+::%<.:} 0% 0% 0% 0% 1987 1989 Salary Level $49,000 - $60,999 White Black Hispanic Asian Filipino Indian/Alask Paclslanders Total (90) Count (90) Count (%) Count (go) Count (%) Count (90) Count (90) Count (cYo) Count 1987 100 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 10 1999 90 9 0 0 10 1 10 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 10 Salary Levels by Race/Ethnic in Contra Costa County General Services Administraion " 10096 10096 3 9096 80996 <` ®ark 50%40% �} EB Asm ": ES Fkm 30% e Am.MJA1t M W A ,.`. IE 0% 0% 0% VA YA ::.:`ti 0% 0% 0% 096 0% 0% YA 1987 1989 Salary Level $61,000 - $90,999 White Black Hispanic Asian Filipino Indian/Alask PacIslanders Total (%) Count (%) Count (%) Count (%) Count (%) Count (g'o) Count Count (go) Count 1987 100 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% l 1989 100 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 3 Salary Level $91,000 - + White Black Hispanic Asian Filipino Indian/Alask PacIslanders Total (%) Count (90) Count (%) Count (%) Count (%) Count (%) Count (9o) Count (9c} Count 1987 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 0 1989 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100% 0