Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 07101990 - 1.6 f6 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: July 10, 1990 SUBJECT: Approving Willow Pass Road Widening Project Project No.: 0662-6R4134-86, West Pittsburg Area. CP# 89-73. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) &BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: APPROVE Project and FIND on the basis of the initial study and all comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment, ADOPT the Negative Declaration, and DIRECT the Public Works Director to begin right-of-way acquisition and to prepare contract plans and specifications for construction. DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. II. Financial Impact: The estimated project cost is $2,020,000, funded by West Pittsburg Area of Benefit, (75%), Drainage Area 48B (18%), West Pittsburg Redevelopment (5%), and State Transportation Development Act funds (2%). III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background: The project is needed to alleviate traffic congestion and to provide for the safe movement of vehicles. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE: ` _ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON JUL 10 1.990 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER _ VOTE OF SUPERVISORS ✓ UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I hereby certify that this Is a mts and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the JJ:drg Board of Supervisors on the date shown. c:BO10.t7 ATTESTED: JUL 10 1 p — PHIL BATCHELOR,Clerk of the Board Of Supervisors and County Administrator Orig. Div: Public Works (Design Division) cc: County Administrator �, •• +• ..—.. flePutY PW Road Engineering Community Development Attn: Gus Almquist Approving Willow Pass Road Widening Project July 10, 1990 Page Two III. Reasons for Recommendations and Background Cont'd: The project, has been determined to be in compliance with the General Plan. A Negative Declaration of environmental significance pertaining to this project was published May 9, 1990 with no protest, and the Board has considered the negative declaration together with all comments received during the public review period. IV. Consequences of Negative Action: Delay in approving the project will result in a delay of design and construction and may jeopardize funding.