Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06261990 - 1.1 (2) t TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: June 26, 1990 SUBJECT: Approving Plans and Specifications for Knightsen Community Water System Project No.: 7498 -6X9E96-89, Knightsen Area SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) &BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. Recommended Action: APPROVE the Plans and Specifications for the Knightsen Community Water System Project and ADVERTISE for bids to be received on Thursday, July 26, 1990 at 2:00 p.m. DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to publish the Notice to Contractors in accordance with Section 20125 of the Public Contract Code. II. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The estimated contract cost of the project is $302,000.00. It is to be funded by Safe Drinking Water Bond Grant (100%). III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND: The project is needed to provide a safe, dependable supply of potable water to the citizens of Knightsen. The Public Works Director has filed with the Board of Supervisors the Plans and Specifications for the Project. Continued on Attachment: X SIGNATURE4- &,111 _ RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR _ RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON JUN APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED V OTHER_ a VOTE OF SUPERVISORS UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: I hereby certify that this;Is a true and correct copy of EJS:drg an action taken and entered on the minutes of the d:BO\26.t6 Board of SupervLaam o�tr d hWn. ATTESTED: JUN 11100 Orig.Div:Public Works(Design Div.) PHIL BATCHELOR,Clerk of the Board cc: County Administrator of Supervisors and Countv Administratot Attn: E. Kuevor Auditor-Controller � � PW Accounting &Y C .Deputy Construction Community Development Attn: Gus Almquist Approving Plans and Specifications for Knightsen Community Water System June 26, 1990 Page Two III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND CONT'D: The general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum; rates paid on this project, have been filed with the Clerk of the Board and copies will be made available to any interested party upon request. On March 25, 1986 the Board of Supervisors adopted a Negative Declaration and found that there was no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. N. CONSEQUENCE OF NEGATIVE ACTION: If the project is not approved for advertising, it will not be constructed.