HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05081990 - 2.6 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Contra
FROM: Costa
COS
Phil Batchelor, County Administrator 's s
x, County
DATE: May 2 , 1990 ,C7) -- UGP
SUBJECT: LEGISLATION: COUNTY FISCAL RELIEI` PROGRAM OF 1990 (Chandler)
SPECIFIC REOUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION($)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECONIlYIENDATION
Adopt a position in SUPPORT of Assemblyman Chris Chandler' s
County Fiscal Relief Package of 1990 , consisting of ACA 53 , ACA
54, AB 3605 , AB 3606, AB 3607, AB 3608 and AB 3609 .
BACKGROUND:
Assemblyman Chandler has written to Supervisor Torlakson
requesting the Board of Supervisors ' support for his County
Fiscal Relief Program of 1990 . This Program is a package of two
Constitutional Amendments and five bills which taken together
would, if enacted, provide substantial fiscal relief for
counties.
The seven measures and a brief summary of each follows:
* Assembly Constitutional Amendment 53. This measure would
provide that no statute, other than an urgency statute, and
no executive order or regulation, which mandates a new
program or higher level of service on local government would
become operative sooner than 90 days after the Commission on
State Mandates determines either that the state is not
required pursuant to the measure to provide a subvention of
funds for the increased cost or that sufficient funds have
been appropriated to pay local government for the increased
cost.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: AYES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD.COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S): 6&1116 /.1 &
ACTION OF BOARD ON May R 1990 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
vv I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
AᅵUNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
CC: ATTESTED MAY 8 1990
Please see Page 3 . PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY Aa&11'6" DEPUTY
M382 (10/88) '
-2-
ACA 53 continues in operation the Constitutional waivers for
reimbursement when a local agency has requested the measure,
when the legislation defines a new crime or changes an
existing definition of a crime or when the mandate was
enacted prior to January 1, 1975. Other than these three
exceptions, the Commission on State Mandates must issue its
finding within the 90 day period and no legislation which
included a state mandate on local government could go into
effect until such a finding had been made and filed with the
Secretary of State.
* Assembly Constitutional Amendment 54. This measure would
enact a provision in the State Constitution prohibiting the
courts from establishing county general assistance levels.
* AB 3605. This bill would transfer to the State Controller
for allocation to counties the revenue represented by 1/2 of
1 percent ( . 5%) of the sales tax rate. The funds would be
allocated to counties on the basis of population. Assuming
that each 1% of the sales tax rate generates $2. 4 billion
and that Contra Costa County has slightly over 2 . 5% of the
population in the State, a sales tax rate of . 5% should
bring the County approximately $36 million annually.
* AB 3606. This bill would establish the Office of Local
Government in the Governor' s Office. The purpose of the
Office would be to collect from and disseminate information
to local government. The bill also requires the Office of
Local Government to conduct a study of the funding of county
court systems, including the public defenders' offices. It
has long been felt that if local government had an advocate
in state government similar to the State Superintendent of
Public Instruction, local government' s needs might not be
overlooked as easily. This proposal is certainly a good
start in that direction.
* AB 3607. This measure requires the Auditor to insure that
each County receives 30% of the property tax generated
within its boundaries, reducing the amount going to the
schools as necessary to provide the County with the 30%
figure. No property tax would be taken from any taxing
jurisdiction other than the schools. Since Contra Costa
County presently receives only 24% of the property tax,
increasing the County' s share to 30% would generate at least
an additional $33 million in revenue annually.
* AB 3608. This measure requires the state to buy-out the
local share of the AFDC Program over a period of four years,
as follows:
1991-92 96 . 0% of the non-federal share.
1992-93 97. 5% of the non-federal share.
1993-94 99.0% of the non-federal share.
1994-95 and thereafter: 100%
This formula would apply to the AFDC and foster care
programs. Effective with the 1991-92 fiscal year, the state
would pay 100% of the non-federal costs of the support and
care of hard-to-place adoptive children.
The state would be required to implement a quality control
system to oversee the AFDC Program. A county would be
penalized at the rate of 1/2 percent of the non-federal cost
of the AFDC Program for each 2 percent of error in excess of
3%.
- 3-
When fully implemented, this bill would eliminate the
County' s match for the AFDC and AFDC-FC (foster care)
Programs, thereby saving the County in excess of $6 million
annually, based on the adopted budget for the 1989-90 fiscal
year.
* AB 3609. This measure allows the County to include the
first year cost for personnel staffing in a new jail
facility as a part of their 25% local match for purposes of
obtaining state jail bond funds. If this bill were enacted
in time it might allow the County to obtain credit for some
or all of the increased cost of some $10 million to staff
the new West County Detention Center for the 1990-91 fiscal
year, rather than having to provide for these staffing costs
plus the entire 25% match for the bond funds which were used
to construct the jail.
This package of Constitutional Amendments and bills would provide
a substantial measure of fiscal relief to Contra Costa County.
In view of that fact it is recommended that the Board of
Supervisors indicate its support for ACA 53 , ACA 54, AB 3605, AB
3606, AB 3607 , AB 3608 and AB 3609 .
cc: Assemblyman Chris Chandler
County Administrator
Auditor-Controller
Sheriff-Coroner
Social Services Director
Larry Naake, Executive Director, CSAC
Les Spahnn, SRJ. Jackson, Barish & Associates