Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05221990 - I.O.8 -�............. Contra Costa County •-' - — Health Services Department A� ,4 PUBLIC HEALTH DIVISION O� 1�31111Nh i^ ., _ l Administrative Offices 1111 Ward Street Martinez;California 94553 C�,SpAcou May, 11', 1990 To: Supervisor Sunne McPeak Supervisor Tom Powers Internal Operations Committee From: Wendel Brunner, M.D. Director of Public Health Re: Status Report on Study of Cancer Incidence and Control in Contra Costa . County The Prospective Cancer Review Committee has evaluated the outline of study methodology for a Prospective Study of the Incidence of Cancer in Contra Costa County and has developed a preliminary draft of recommendations to the Health Services Department. Prospective Study of Cancer Incidence. The Review . Committee is very concerned that 'a prospective environmental and occupational epidemiologic study of cancer in Contra Costa or. the Bay Area is unlikely to be ''funded .by the National Cancer Institute, or other major funding agency. The methodologic difficulties of environmental epidemiology, which have become increasingly. apparent in the last. several years, mean that it would be almost impossible to detect air pollution-induced cancer by this study. The number of cancers 'that may be caused by air pollution in the Bay Area, while devastating to the individuals affected,' are too, few to be detected in an environmental epidemiologic study These difficulties 'with,statistical power, coupled with the decades of time which would be required to implement such a study', leave the proposal, in the opinion of the Committee, unlikely to be funded. I have my own concerns about repeating the experience with the Austin Study. In that case, large amounts. of money were invested and the community' s expectations were raised, only ;,to have the results prove to be inconclusive: The - Committee did suggest, however, that the difficulties they perceive with the prospective cancer study and its possible funding should be further explored with several other academic experts in the community before finally deciding that ther proposal, as outlined, is not feasible. I am following up with the assistance of the Committee to obtain this additional consultation. A372 (1/89) Additional Recommendations . The Committee 'did feel, however, that it is very important not to. await the results of decades-long studies, but instead carry out proactive activities to reduce known, existing public health threats . In particular they recommended: 1) Work with the BAAQMD and other agencies to reduce toxic air pollution both from industrial sources and vehicle pollution. 2) Reduce occupational exposures to toxics and other health hazards through education of workers in small businesses . Support and. expand public health occupational clinical services. Implement occupational reporting in the State Tumor Registry. 3) Develop an environmental epidemiologist position for the local Health Services Department, perhaps funded from environmental health fees, to investigate cancer and other chronic disease clusters, follow-up on occupational health problems, evaluate community health impacts from fires or toxic emissions, and implement community health surveys . Bay Area Cancer Coalition. The Cancer Review Committee was quite supportive of a number of initiatives of the Contra Costa County Health Services Department and the Contra Costa Board of . Supervisors, particularly the Bay Area Cancer Coalition, whichwasinitiated by the Contra Costa Board. That Coalition has been effective in integrating local health departments, State Health Services Department, volunteer agencies, academic -institutions, and public policy makers in a program to identify the causes of cancer and develop. effective prevention programs . Many members of the Review Committee. have been involved in the Bay Area Cancer Coalition, and feel that it has been a truly innovative initiative in cancer control. The Prospective Cancer Review Committee is developing a- detailed set of recommendations to the Health Services Department., which is currently being reviewed by Committee members. I am also following up with the additional academic consultants suggested. I will report back to the :Internal Operations Committee on the final report of the Prospective Cancer Review Committee and the additional consultants . WB:lh cc: Mark Finucane, Health Services Director 2