Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03061990 - T.6 T. 6 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, COUNTY OF CONTRA COSTA Adopted this Order on March 6, 1990 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Schroder, Torlakson and Fanden NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor McPeak ABSTAIN: None ------------------=-------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Hearing On Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment For Bethel Island Area. On February 27, 1990, the Board of Supervisors continued to this date the hearing on the recommendation of the East County Regional Planning Commission on the proposed amendment to the County General Plan (County File 412-87-EC) and approval of the Specific Plan (County File #1987-2SP) together with various requests for changes to the Land Use Element in the Bethel Island area. Supervisor Torlakson requested clarification on issues including deed notification relative to levee condition. Karl Wandry, Community Development Department, and Victor Westman, County Counsel responded to Supervisor Torlakson' s request. The following persons appeared to speak: Sanford M. Skaggs, P.O. Box V, Walnut Creek, representing Abe Grossman, commented on issues including the on-island and off-island development, financing, and requested that the Board amend the plan; Roger Foott, 530 Howard Street, San Francisco, representing Abe Grossman Associates, commented on levee breaching; Eric Hasseltine, 2380 Salvio Street, Concord, commented on issues including developing shoreline, new levee systems, extension of Byron Highway to the south, the number of proposed units, and the bonus plan; Jack Whitener, P.O. Box 623, Bethel Island, representing the Bethel Island Fire Protection District, commented on written material presented to the Board; Eva Hue, 618 Taraval, San Francisco, commented on land use and spoke in opposition; Roger W. Bacon, 1897 2nd Avenue, Walnut Creek, commented on issues including protection of the quality of Delta water and subsidence, and he presented a list of properties that have been down- zoned; Bob Dal Porto, 5691 Marlin Drive, Byron, presented written material to the Board and commented on his proposed project and responded to concerns raised by Supervisor Torlakson; Duncan M. Simmons, 1807 13th Street, Sacramento, representing the California State Lands Commission, spoke in opposition, commenting on the inadequacies of the Environmental Impact Report, and presented written material to the Board; Charles Pringle, 8300 Jantzen Road, Modesto, expressed concerns relative to the density of his property on Bethel Island, roads, and the General Plan; 1 1� Filipe Johansson, 66 Mozden Lane, Pleasant Hill„ spoke on the Specific Plan as approved by the East County Regional, Planning Commission; Rachel M. Baldocchi, P.O. Box 407, Bethel Island', commented on deed restrictions, read a letter in opposition to a deed notification requirement, and presented a petition; James Crow, 6883 Piper Road, Bethel Island, commented on levee breaching; William Costanzo, 145 No. Hartz, Danville, representing Bethel Island Properties, Inc. , submitted written comments in opposition to the deed notification requirement; Chap Ramsay, P.O. Box 389, Bethel Island, spoke on not labeling Bethel Island as unsafe; Bill Billeci, P.O. Box 55, Bethel Island, spoke in opposition to the proposed specific plan, and commented on the greenhouse effect, levee safety, earthquake danger, and deed notification; John Mass, Knightsen, 4211 Delta Road, representing the Knightsen Community Council, requested that the extension from Byron Highway to Cypress not be omitted, and that the Oakley Fire Protection District continue to provide the fire protection for that area; Richard Rockwell, 1610 "A" Street, Antioch, representing the Pedro Martins Family, appeared in opposition addressing issues including density, levees and breaching; Don Adams, 6777 Riverview Drive, Bethel Island, addressed the contradictory information received from BIMID; Constance Brady, 2690 Taylor Road, Bethel Island, spoke in opposition, commenting on the relative elevations for Bethel Island and Sandmound, the levee-breaching language in the plan, and density; Frank Andronico, 7050 Riverview Drive, Bethel Island, spoke in opposition to the Specific Plan, commenting on the need for growth; Alan Cohen, 17300 17th Street, Tustin, representing Bethel Island Partners, spoke in opposition to the proposed plan and commented on issues including density, levee-breaching, and a plan to make the island safe; . Guy Bjerke, 1280 Boulevard Way, Suite 211, Walnut Creek, representing the Building Industry Association, commented on fees and the proposed density bonus program; The Chair read comments from the card submitted by Kenneth Henry, 1885 Monte Sereno Drive, Danville, representing the Willow Park Marina Homeowners Association, in opposition; Lynn Jochim, 101 Ygnacio Valley Road, Suite 400, Walnut Creek, representing Chartered Land and Cattle Company, spoke in favor of the Specific Plan; Betty Smith, P.O. Box 145, Knightsen, representing the Pastor Family, commented on zoning for the Pastor property and presented written material; Norman W. Bettencourt, Rt. 1, Box 45, Brentwood, commented on issues including his parcel of property on the island, breaching the levees, and in favor of development on the island; Ralph Wallace, P.O. Box 2, Bethel Island, commented on the plan as proposed today being unfair to the Bethel Island residents; 2 ' I The Chair advised of letters from Walter J. and Virginia F. Pierce and Dean Lesher to be submitted for the record. Supervisor Torlakson requested clarification from staff on issues including breaching, on island versus off island, and levee safety. Mr. Wandry responded to Supervisor Torlakson' s request. Howard Holmes and Eric Mednick, representing the Bethel Island Municipal Improvement District, also responded to Supervisor Torlakson' s request.- Supervisor equest.Supervisor Torlakson moved to close the public hearing and set a decision for two weeks from today but to leave the written record open for another seven days. Supervisor Schroder seconded the motion. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing on the above matter is CLOSED with the record left open for written comment until March 13, 1990 at 5 : 00 p.m. ; and decision on this matter is DEFERRED to March 20, 1990. Supervisor Torlakson identified certain key issues for the Board' s further consideration. He spoke in support of reinstituting the recreational bonus plan and providing public access to the waterways. He also commented on issues including preserving agriculture and wetlands, levee safety and levee fees, and the issue of down-zoning. Mr. Wandry responded to Supervisor Torlakson' s request on zoning. Mr. Torlakson commented on the issue of patchwork development and the idea of mandatory clustering coupled with the a fund to buy development rights or transfer of development rights, and he also commented on the road issues in the plan, reducing the number of off- island units, leaving the Burroughs property out of the plan, the economic feasibility of the plan, commercial economics, deed notification, the fire protection issue, and the waterfront park. Supervisor Schroder expressed concern with the rigidity of the plan and he questioned the bonus plan. Supervisor Powers commented on the concept of acquiring development rights and the need for flexibility, various land uses, and the levee system. Supervisor Torlakson requested further clarification from staff on the issue of the position of FEMA on development below the flood elevation and further information on the greenhouse effect and on subsidence. Karl Wandry requested an amendment to the motion that the Board would take written testimony to 5: 00 p.m. on March 14, 1990 and to continue the hearing to March 27, 1990. Following discussion by the Board, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the hearing on the above matter is CLOSED, with the record left open for written comment until March 9, 1990; and decision is DEFERRED to March 20, 1990 at 2: 00 p.m. 1 hereby certify that this Is a true and correct copy of an action taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of 8upa on t e data shown. ATTESTED: Orig. Dept. : Clerk of the Board PHIL BATC fELOR.Clerk of the Board cc: Community Development Dept. S► and Administrator County Counsel a By .DeDuty 3