Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03061990 - 1.26 ' File: 250-8741(F)/C.1 �� 26 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS --S,E L _ Contra Y1 FROM: / ` Costa BARYON J. GILBERT, DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES DEPT. iii 4:: ... County DATE: MARCH 6, 1990 a coux'Ci SUBJECT: FIX DATE FOR HEARING ON SUBSTITUTION OF A SUBCONTRACTOR FOR CENTRAL COUNTY CORPORATION YARD FOR PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, IMHOFF PIACF ANO TMHOFF ORTV _ MARTIN (AITHORI ATION NO_ WHIM) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S)OR RECOMMENDATION(S)&BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. RECOMMENDATION: FIX March 13, 1990 at 11:00 a.m. for a hearing to consider the request of Dickman-Nourse, Inc. for permission to substitute a new earthwork and paving subcontractor for the project, Central County Corporation Yard for Public Works Department, Imhoff Place and Imhoff Drive, Martinez (Authorization No. WH181B) ; AUTHORIZE the Director of General Services to give written notice of at least five working days to the listed subcontractor of the hearing, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 4107. II. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND: A. On February 27 1990, the Board awarded a construction contract for the subject project to the prime contractor, Dickman-Nourse, Inc. , Mountain View, California. B. The prime contractor, in a letter dated February 12, 1990, requested approval to substitute Eugene G. Alves Construction Co. , Pittsburg, for the earthwork and paving subcontractor listed in the original bid, A & E Paving, Inc. , San Jose. The reason given for the requested substitution was inadvertent clerical error. C. The General Services Department Architectural Division, in a letter dated February 12, 1990, notified A & E Paving, Inc. of the prime contractor's request for substitution. The notification gave CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _)YES SIGNATURE: 6&4)%0U& RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON MAR 6 Inc APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED _d_ OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS(ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: General Service ATTESTED MAR 6 1990 Architectural Division PHIL BATCHELOR,CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Administrator's Office SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR County Counsel Public Works Department Dickman-Nourse, Inc. M382 (10/88) BY Q� ,DEPUTY File: 250-8741/C.1 five working days within which to submit written objections to the substitution. Failure to file such written notice would have constituted consent to the proposed substitution. A & E Paving, Inc. , in a letter dated February 13, 1990, did object to the substitution. D. Since A & E Paving, Inc. has filed written objections to the substitution, it is necessary for the Board to schedule a hearing and to provide five working days notice of the hearing date to the subcontractor, all as specified in the Public Contract Code, Section 4107. IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this recommendation will leave the issue unresolved, will delay completion of the project, and, possibly, expose the Board to claims by the prime contractor for delay. 25041B02.26B RDH:ss Page 2 of 2