HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06061989 - 1.6 TD: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: June 6, 1989
SUBJECT: Approving Plans and Specifications for Parr Boulevard Overlay,
Project No. 4109, North Richmond Area.
Specific Request(s) or Reconnrendation(s) & Backgroiuri & Justification
I. RECOMMENDED ACTION:
APPROVE the Plans and Specifications for the Parr Boulevard Overlay. Project
and ADVERTISE for bids to be received on Thursday, July 6, 1989 at 2:00 p.m.
DIRECT the Clerk of the Board to publish the Notice to Contractors in
accordance with Section 20392 of the Public Contact Code, and
DIRECT the Director of Community Development to file a Notice of Exemption
with the County Clerk.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The estimated contract cost of the project is $236,000. It is to be funded
by Roads Funds.
III. REASONS FOR RECONA7II•IO2ITION/BACKQtOUND•
The Public Works Director has filed with the Board of Supervisors the Plans
and Specifications for the Parr Boulevard Overlay Project.
The general prevailing rates of wages, which shall be the minimum rates paid
on this project, have been filed with the Clerk of the Board and copies will
be made available to any interested party upon request.
1
Continued on attachment: X yes SignatureRez.rc u
Reccuumandation of County Administrator
Recommendation of Board Committee
Approve Other:
Signatures)
Action of Board on: JUN 6 1989
Approved as Recommended t/ Other
1 Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CEZTIFY THAT TILS IS A TRM AND
CORRECT ODPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AND
1 ETTPERED ON
I/" Unanimous (Absent ) THE PERS S OF THE BOARD OF
Ayes: Noes: SUPERVISORS ON DATE SROM.
Absent: Abstain:
Attested JUN 6 1989
Orig./Div. : PW (Design) Phil Batchelor,
cc: VCcunty Administrator Clerk of the Board
Attn: E. Kuevor of Supervisors and
Auditor-Controller County Administrator
PW Accounting
Construction
Community Development (�
Attn: Gus Almquist
FW/cw By
bo:d316.t6 Deputy Clerk
Page 2
Parr Blvd. Overlay
The project has been determined to be in compliance with the General Plan.
A negative declaration of environmental significance pertaining to this
project was published with no protest, and the Board has considered the
negative declaration together with all comments received during the public
review process. The Board hereby FINDS, on the basis of the initial study
and all comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect on the environment, and APPROVES the
negative declaration.