HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06201989 - T.5 To: ,�R;U q %M§XASORS r. 5
t'
Vii-ector of Community Development Cmtt"d
April 14, 1989 Costa
DATE;
Appeal - Land Use Permit X2084-88 c1 Ir ty
�J� IL�
SUBJECT; Mr. William F. Young (Applicant/owner) by Mr. William F. Young
from the Board of Appeals Denial of Mr. Young' s Appeal of the
Zoning Administrator Denial on December 19, 1988
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) A BACIQ,ROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMIMATI ON
1. Accept the Environmental Documentation' prepared for this
project, as being complete and adequate.
2. Deny the appeal of Mr. William F. Young, which upholds the
Zoning Administrator and Board of Appeals Denial of LUP
2084-88 .
3. Adopt the County Board of Appeals findings as set forth in
Resolution No. 24-1989 as the basis for your Board' s
decision.
BACKGROUND
This request for a 2nd residential unit was submitted by Mr.
William F. Young on August 5, 1988. The County Zoning Adminis-
trator after review and consideration denied the request on
December 19, 1988. Mr. Young appealed that decision to the
Planning Commission sitting as the Board of Appeals. The Board
of Appeals upheld the Zoning Administrator decision on February
28, 1989 by denying Mr. Young's appeal. Following that denial,
on March 9, 1989 Mr. Young appealed the Board of Appeal decision
to the County Board of Supervisors for a hearing and deter-
mination.
A&CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: - VES SIGNATURE
RECOMMENDATION OPCOUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMA ON OF RD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER `
'3'1 GNATURE 1 S 1'
ACTION OP BOARD ON June 20 , 1989 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER X
On May 23, 1989, the Board of Supervisors continued to this date
the hearing on the appeal of William F. Young and M. Nell Young
(appellants) from the decision of the Contra Costa County Planning
Commission sitting as the Board of Appeals upholding the decision of
the Zoning Administrator on the request by William F. Young (applicant
and owner) to establish a second residential unit (LUP 2084-88) in the
El Sobrante: area.
Karl Wandry, Community Development Department, presented a
summary of previous actions on the Land Use Permit 2084-88
application, commenting that subsequent to the May 23, 1989 meeting
continuing the hearing to this date that they have met with the
applicant and addressed the concerns that everyone had. He advised
that the applicant has submitted a revised site plan before the Board
today that is acceptable to staff and meets the conditions or problems
that were addressed with staff. He commented that the staff
recommendation was for approval of the land use permit with the
original conditions.
William F. Young, 1125 Kelvin Road, E1 Sobrante, commented that
agreement had been reached and he had no further problems.
The public hearing was closed.
Supervisor Fanden moved to approve .the staff recommendation as
was presented with the agreements that were reached by both parties.
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that recommendation 1 is APPROVED; and
Land Use Permit 2084-88 is APPROVED as revised with conditions (Exhibit
A attached) .
vara OF SUPERVISORS
I Hereby certify that this is a true and correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) Board of Su
ATTESTED.
TTESTED son!On the date shown.
AYES' NOES:
ASSENT: . ABSTA I N: PHIL 1ATCHELDR,Clerk of the Board
of Supemsm and County Administrator
CC,. Community Development Dept.
County Counsel ByL:nG ,Deputy
Wm. F. & Nell Young
Public Works-Tom Dudziak
Assessor
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL FOR LAND USE PERMIT 2084-88:
1. Development shall be as shown on revised plans submitted on June 20, 1989.
2. The second residential unit must be rented or leased and provide complete
independent living facilities for one or more persons.
3. The second unit must consist of permanent provisions for food preparation,
eating, sleeping, water, and sanitation.
4. The second unit must remain clearly subordinate in size, appearance, and
location of the existing principal residence.
5. The second unit may not exceed 600 sq. ft. or contain more than two
bedrooms or one bathroom.
6. The second unit and the principal residences exterior finish, shall be of
similar style and design.
7. The County Building Inspection Department requirement for a land survey and
their regulations together with all other County regulations must be
satisfied.
8. If a separate sewage or water system are proposed, they must gain West
County Sanitary District and E.B.M.U.D. approval .
9. Three off-street parking spaces shall be provided on the site. Location of
the parking .spaces must be shown on plans for building permit.
10. Proof of recordation of the following disclosure or deed restrictions must
be submitted to the Community Development Department prior to the issuance
of a building permit:
"You are purchasing a property with a permit for a residential second unit.
This permit carries with it certain conditions that must be met by the
owner of the property. The permit is available from the current owner or
from the Contra Costa County Community Development Department."
11. Comply with drainage, road improvement, traffic and utility requirements as
follows:
The applicant shall conform to the requirements of Division 914 (Drainage)
of the Subdivision Ordinance by:
a. Conveying all storm waters entering or originating on the subject
property to an existing adequate storm drainage facility.
An exception is permitted from that provided that the applicant:
Maintains the existing drainage pattern and does not dispose
of concentrated storm waters onto adjacent property, and
MEN N A
Limits the size of the second residence to a maximum of 1000
square feet total ground coverage, and does not appreciably
increase the area of "permanent" impervious surfaces
(driveways, sidewalks, patios, etc. ) that may result from
the placing of the second residence on this property.
12. The applicant shall pay $1,749 Bridge/Thoroughfare Fee for the Richmond/ E1
Sobrante Area of Benefit.
13. The applicant shall obtain an encroachment permit from the Public Works
Department, for any construction of driveways or other improvements within
the right of way of Kelvin Road.
14. The applicant shall install all new utility distribution services under-
ground.
15. If construction of drainage improvements is required, the applicant shall :
a. Furnish proof to the Public Works Department, of the acquisition of
all necessary rights of entry, permits and/or easements for the
construction of off-site, temporary or permanent, road and drainage
improvements.
b. Submit improvement plans prepared by a civil engineer to the Public
Works Department, for review, pay the inspection and plan review fees.
The plans shall be submitted prior to the issuance of any building
permit. If final inspection is requested prior to construction of
improvements, the applicant shall execute a road improvement agreement
with Contra Costa County and post bonds required by the agreement.
TB:vpl
lupXX/a:2084.rev
10/25/88
2/8/89
8/29/89