Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05021989 - T.1 T.1 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on May 2, 1989, by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Schroder and Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor McPeak ABSTAIN: Supervisor Fanden SUBJECT: Appeal of Tetrad Engineering (Tony Calderon, owner) from decision of Public Works Director relating to conveyance of storm waters and improvements to the downstream ditch system, Pacheco area (LUP 2109-87 ) . This being the time set for hearing of the appeal of Tetrad Engineering (Tony Calderon, owner) from decision of the Public Works Director relating to conveyance of storm waters and improvements to the downstream ditch system in connection with the construction of a medical office building on Center Avenue in the Pacheco area; and Michael Walford, Public Works Director, reviewed the proposed construction site and the conditions of approval for LUP 2109-87 which require compliance with Division 914 (Drainage) of the Subdivision Ordinance. He noted that the Department had reviewed the drainage requirements to determine that an unreasonable burden was not being placed on the applicant, and that the property currently has full frontage improvements along the frontage streets and that the on-site public improvements consists only of widening the existing sidewalk on Center Avenue and installing sidewalk on C Street. He stated that the Department did not believe that installing 175 feet of storm drain line in the earthen ditch to satisfy "collect and convey" would be an unreasonable burden for this development. Mr. Walford advised that if the Board denies the appeal and decides to honor the applicant' s request for reimbursement from future developers, the Public Works Department has no objection to working out a reimbursement agreement. Gary Albertson, Tetrad Engineering, 5528 Pacheco Boulevard, Pacheco, representing, Tony Calderon, appeared and responded to the staff report submitted by the Public Works Department, and referred to a map he had supplied the Board members showing the general area in question and the location of the drainage ditch and Grayson Creek. He stated that he felt that if the County had intended that the applicant should install a closed conduit system, the adequacy of the ditch would be irrelevant. He noted that the area is presently a low density, single family residential area, but eventually it will be developed as a high-density, multi-family area, and that it is unfair to request Mr. Calderon to improve the entire ditch system on his own. Mr. Albertson requested that, if the Board denies the appeal, it set up some sort of reimbursement agreement so that the other 80 per cent of the area pays its fair share. Board members discussed the matter, including its past enforcement of the collect and convey provisions of its ordinance. Supervisor Fanden noted that the area under discussion is in Supervisor McPeak' s District, and therefore requested that decision on the matter be deferred so that Supervisor McPeak may be present and possibly work with the applicant and staff to reach an agreement. Board members further discussed the matter.