Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04041989 - 1.14 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR DATE: APRIL 4, 1989 SUBJECT: Approve an Increase in Payment Limit for Design Services for the Buchanan Field Airport, West Side Improvements, Project No. 0662-6R4075-86 Specific Requests) or Recommendation(s) & Background & Justification I. RECOMMENDATION APPROVE an increase in the payment limit from $172 , 000 to $226, 000 in the existing Consulting Services Agreement with Leptien-Cronin-Cooper, Inc. for the performance of engineering design and extend the time of completion to July 7, 1989 . II. FINANCIAL IMPACT Funding for the payment limit increase is being provided by the Airport Enterprise Fund. i III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND A. On January 27, 1987, the Board approved a Consulting Services Agreement with Leptien-Cronin-Cooper, Inc. for engineering services for the Buchanan Field Airport, West Side Improvements Project. B. On July 12, 1988, the Board approved an increase in the payment limit from $155, 000 to $172, 000 for work which was performed outside the original scope of services. Continued on attachment: X yes Signature Recommendation of County Administrator Recommendation of Board Committee Approve Other: Signature(s) : Action of Board on: APR 4 1989 Approved as Recommended Other Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN _X Unanimous (Absent I. ) ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON Ayes: Noes: THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF Absent: Abstain: SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN. Attested APR 4 1989 Orig. Div. : Public Works (DESIGN) PHIL BATCHELOR, cc: County Administrator CLERK OF THE BOARD Auditor-Controller OF SUPERVISORS AND PW Accounting I COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR H. Wight, Airport T. Dudziak, RE Leptien-Cronin-Cooper, Inc. JB:bb BO:4 .t4 BY _ 1dd.A1'VAd_JA-4; DEPUTY CLERK Buchanan Field BO:4 .t4 III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND Cont'd. C. Proposed changes in the Airport Master Plan require modifications to the plans prepared by the consultant. Additional funds are needed to pay . for the changes in design. IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION I The lack of approval would prevent the completion of the project design. i C