Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06271988 - 1.98 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: HARVEY E. BRAGDON, DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DATE: June 22 , 1988 4: Ccntra Costa CCun y SUBJECT: Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Development Status SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS Approve and authorize the Chair to sign letter to Cities of Concord, Pleasant Hill and Walnut Creek regarding development in the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area, as recommended by the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Steering Committee. FISCAL IMPACT None BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS A March 3 , 1988. letter (attached) to the Board of Supervisors from representatives of the Cities of Concord, Pleasant Hill, and Walnut Creek were referred to this office and the Pleasant Hill BART Station Area Steering Committee for response at its June 15 meeting the Steering Committee recommended the attached response letter. CONTINUED ON ATTACB14ENT: YES SIGNA 7 RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECO ATI OF ISOA.7 COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S) : ACTION OF BOARD ON 2 8 AAA APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT �- ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS -ON THE DATE SHOWN. cc: Community Development (Orig. ) ATTESTED JUN 2 8 1988 County Counsel PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF County Administrator THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BY 1. hf J`, DEPUTY Ra25 : 6-28-88 .bol JK:krc a v .1 Vtl TRI—CITY PLEASANT HILI. BART OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE RECEIVE MAR 4 1988 March 3, 1988 ►MST eArHEIOP CLERK BOARD OF SuPfRv5ORS T0: CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS a . CONTRA COSTA CO. FROM: TRI-CITY PLEASANT HILL BART OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE SUBJ: REPORT ON FEBRUARY 17 AND MARCH 2 MEETINGS On February 17 and March 2, 1988 the Tri-City Pleasant Hill BART oversight Committee held its first meetings. The purpose of this committee, which is comprised of representatives from the cities of Walnut Creek, Concord, and Pleasant Hill, is to oversee and evaluate the impact of the Pleasant Hill BART Station Development. At these meetings, the committee identified the following issues as most critical and in need of immediate attention: 1. What does the mandatory review of the development entail? What are the legal ramifications of mandatory review? Does the requirement for mandatory review mean that development should be halted until traffic can be sufficiently mitigated to allow acceptable service levels at surrounding intersections? If so, we request that development be halted. 2. How much development is Contra Costa County legally bound to permit through existing development agreements? Can the Pleasant Hill BART Station project be scaled back? 3. What is the status of approvals and renewals for all projects yet to be built? 4. Can the County provide us with an analysis of the assessment districts and tax increment financing associated with the Pleasant Hill BART Station project? 5. The Committee would like to receive copies of the Cherry Lane •EIR as well as a status report on the Pleasant Hill BART Phase III traffic study. 6. Given the Park Regency General Plan/ Specific Plan amendment, the County should be required to expand the study area and conduct a more comprehensive traffic study as part of the Park Regency EIR. We request that the County Board of Supervisors stop the issuance of further development permits in the Pleasant Hill BART Station specific plan area until these questions are answered and the full impact of the development can be evaluated. We would also like the Board of Supervisors to begin investigating these questions as soon as possible. Given the gravity of the traffic problem anticipated from this development, we know that you will understand the need for an immediate response to our requests. DISTROLM0N cc: Pleasant Hill City Council dmi-a�>lrn Concord City Council '-'� CCountyAA.dministretor D � Walnut Creek City Council N,eclLh Carvices '?1—Cc-nnL!7:.y DGVClopmeTtt 60 F�uc V:rr<s ceunsol