Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05031988 - I.C1 %� .. I. 0. To� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS t FROM: V'�V1 1L a INTERNAL OPERATIONS.�COMMITTEE DATE: April 25, 1988 SUBJECT Notifying Applicants of Flood ,Control and Fire District Requirements SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATIONS: 1. Request the Community Development Department to print their notice to applicants for land use. entitlements on bright colored paper.' placing language such as "Important" in block letters at the top of the page and revising the text to indicate that collect and convey , and road improvement requirements may be "extremely expensive". 2 . Request the Fire Chiefs Association and the Building Inspection Department to jointly prepare a notice which Building Inspection can provide to each 'applicant for a building permit at '.. the time" the application is issued indicating that approval from the appropriate fire district is required, and ' that the applicant should check with the appropriate fire district. 3 . Request the County Administrator' s Office to prepare a study of 'the plan.checking staff in the Riverview and Consolidated Fire Districts to determine the volume of plan. checking in each district, the number of staff assigned, and to determine whether there is a feasible way to transfer one existing staff .member. from_ one or the other, of the districts to Building Inspection to do all plan checking for all fire districts The County Administrator should report this matter, along with his recommendations, to our Committee on July 11. BACKGROUND: On March 15, 1988, at the request of Supervisor Torlakson, the Board of Supervisors , referred to our Committee the need to provide more complete notification .to applicants for land use entitlements and building permits of the flood control, road, and fire district requirements. Supervisor Torlakson noted problems which have occurred when developers were not aware of these requirements and only after building permits were obtained were the, developers advised of extensive additional costs to comply with fire district, requirements. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT; YES SIGNATURE; RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR X RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE X APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE s: Sunne W. McPe.ak Tom Torlakson , ACTION OF BOARD ON ay APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X. UNANIMOUS '(ABSENT ' ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES:_ NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD .ABSENT; ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC: 'County, Administrator ATTESTED Terry McGraw, CAO' s Office 8.8__._..__..__ Director, Building Inspection PHIL BAT ELOR. CLERK OF THE BOARD OF ' .Chief Alan Little, Riverview Fire Dist. SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Asst. Chief Harguth, Consolidated Fire Terry Curtola, BIA BY -�.� ,DEPUTY M382/743 — Page 2 Our Committee met with staff from the Community Development Department, Flood Control District, the Consolidated and Riverview Fire Districts, County Counsel, and Terry Curtola, representing the Building Industry Association, on April 25, 1988 . The issue regarding flood control and road requirements appears 'to ' be more easily addressed. Our Committee reviewed a form -which is now being provided by the Community Development Department to all applicants for subdivisions, development permits, land use permits, and variance permits. While the existing notice does caution the applicant that the collect and convey and road improvement requirements may be expensive, we believe these requirements need to be highlighted through the .measures recommended in recommendation No. 1 above. The Community Development Department indicates that meeting these additional suggestions will not be a problem. In terms. of the fire district requirements, `we have a much more complex problem. We reviewed a report from the County Administrator' s Office summarizing the results of a meeting between the fire districts and Building Inspection which outlined three options for resolving the communications problems between the fire districts and Building Inspection. These include having the individual requesting a building permit provide verification prior to the ,issuance of the building permit that the appropriate fire district, and possibly other special - districts, have reviewed . and approved the required plans. This option is supported by the fire .districts. The second option would involve having the developer supply an additional set of plans to the Building Inspection Department at the time the. individual applies for a building permit. Building Inspection. would then forward the copy of the plans to the appropriate fire district, although the fire district ' s comments would not necessarily have been received prior to the issuance of the building permit. The third option would have 'one fire protection engineer assigned . to the Building , Inspection Department to perform all fire district plan checking in the Building Inspection Department. This third option is supported by the Building Industry Association and is opposed by the fire districts for reasons which are set forth in their correspondence with our Committee. Supervisor' Toriakson tends to support the idea of having a fire protection engineer assigned to Building Inspection, and has asked that the County Administrator' s Office determine the level of staffing the fire districts presently have in the plan checking area. The County Administrator should also determine the feasibility of assigning one of these fire district staff members to Building Inspection to perform plan checking on behalf of all of the fire districts. Our Committee is, therefore, recommending the above recommendation No. 2 as an interim measure until the County Administrator reports -back to our Committee on the feasibility of assigning staff to Building Inspection to centralize the plan checking for all fire districts. i