HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05171988 - 2.5 orn
q
TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY AND AS
GOVERNING BOARD OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL
AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
FROM: J. MICHAEL WALFORD, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR
DATE: May 10, 1988
SUBJECT: Letter from Mr. Robert Rice Requesting Special
Consideration in Payment of Drainage Fee, West Antioch
Area
Specific Request(s) or Recommendation(s) & Background &
Justification
I. RECOMMENDATION
A. DENY request of Mr. Robert Rice for waiver of drainage
fees for the Andover Commons Senior Citizen Project in
the West Antioch Creek Watershed based on the
following:
1) The impervious surface drainage fee represents a
uniform distribution of the necessary drainage
infrastructure cost to all developments, and
2) The proposed senior citizen housing project will
add storm water runoff into the drainage system,
and will contribute to the need for downstream
improvements, and
3) The impervious surfaces created by this
development are no different from those created
by other developments, and
4) This development's failure to pay its fair share
would require all other developments in the
watershed to be assessed a higher fee, and
5) Failure to treat all properties in an equitable
manner undermines the validity of the ordinance.
Continued on attachment: X yes Signature:
Recommendation of County Administrator
Recommendation of Board Committee
Approve Other:
Signature(s) :
Action of Board on: May 17, 1988
Approved as Recommended X Other
Vote of Supervisors I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS
A TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
X Unanimous (Absent — ) ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON
Ayes: Noes: THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
Absent: Abstain: SUPERVISORS ON DATE SHOWN.
Attested
Orig. Div. :Public Works (FC) PHIL ABATdHELOR,
cc: County Administrator CLERK OF THE BOARD
County Counsel OF SUPERVISORS AND
Community Development COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
Public Works
Flood Control
MFK:and Robert Rice
BO: 3 .t5
qf(PBy
UTY CLERK
B. DIRECT staff to measure the amount of impervious surfaces to
be created by the Andover Commons Senior Citizen Project, to
determine if said amount is consistent with the category of
Multi-Family use, and to collect the fee based on the actual
amount of new impervious surface if the quantity is
significantly less.
II. FINANCIAL IMPACT
The fee due on the property in question, APN 72-011-052 , is
estimated to be $15, 300 based on the old County Service Area
Ordinance for Area D-3 , or $105, 000 based on the new
Impervious Surface Ordinance for Drainage Area 55 which will
be in effect starting May 7, 1988.
III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND
Attached is a memo from County Counsel discussing the legal
implications of waiving drainage fees and the necessary
evidence that must be present to justify such an action.
Consistent with the comments in the memo, the past and
present drainage fee ordinances uniformly spread the cost
of drainage infrastructure to all of the developing
properties on an acreage basis, or on a square foot of new
impervious surface basis. We believe the New Impervious
Surface Ordinance is the most equitable method. In
developing the new ordinance, care was taken to maintain
fair treatment for all developing properties. This fair
treatment is documented in our report of January 5, 1982 ,
"Report on Impervious Surface Drainage Fee Ordinance. "
Senior citizens ' housing may have significantly less impact
on many infrastructure needs, i.e. , traffic, domestic
water, sanitary services. Unfortunately, in the case of
drainage, the impact is in direct proportion to the amount
of impervious surface being added to the watershed.
Rainfall has the same affect where it falls on senior
citizen housing rooftops as it does on rooftops on
commercial buildings. To the extent that the senior citizen
units are smaller than normal multi-family units, an
adjustment in the fee should be made. We recommend that the
Andover Commons Project be compared to our land use
impervious surface standards to insure that the appropriate
fee is charged. It is possible that the total amount of
impervious surface being created is below the standard
amounts used for multi-family.
IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION
Failure to implement the intent of the Drainage Fee
Ordinance and its basis for equitably spreading the
infrastructure cost to all developing properties, would
undermine the ordinance and result in many requests of the
Board for exceptions.
COUNTY COUNSEL'S OFFICE
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
Dare: April 25, 1988 MARTINEZ, CALIFORNIA
To: Board of Supervisors
From: Victor J. Westman, County Counsel
By: David F. Schmidt, Deputy County Counsel U
Re: Legality of Exemption of Senior Housing from Drainage Fees
SUMMARY:
Drainage fees are required by state statute to be fairly
apportioned on the basis of benefits conferred on the involved
properties. Any decision to waive or reduce drainage fees for the
Andover Commons project (or senior housing in general) would have
to be based upon evidence convincing the Board that drainage from
such development would be less than that from other development
charged higher drainage fees. Absent evidence of this type, a
decision to waive or reduce drainage fees for the Andover Commons
project (or senior housing in general) might be subject to legal
challenge by other property owners or developers in the area on
the basis that drainage fees are not being fairly apportioned-.i.-on
the basis of drainage generated or benefits conferred.
BACKGROUND:
On 1-27-88, the developer of the Andover Commons Retirement
Complex in the City of Antioch applied to the Flood Control
District for exemption from, or reduction in, the drainage fees
applicable to the project. The project, which is designed for
active seniors, will contain 211 residential units contained in 4
three-story buildings , all connected to, a two-story community
building.
The project is. located in an area which was recently
converted from a County service area (County Service Area D-3) to
a drainage area (Drainage Area 55) . Under the existing fee
ordinance, which calculates .drainage fees by theacre, the Andover
Commons project would pay $1-5:,300 in drainage fees. Under the new
fee ordinance (Ord. No. 88-24) , which will take effect on May 7 ,
1988, the drainage fees for the project would be $105, 000.
Drainage fees under the new ordinance are based upon the average
area of impervious surface created by different categories of
development (e.g. , single family residential, multi-family
residential, etc. ) . Fees are payable upon recordation of a
subdivision map or upon issuance of building permits, whichever
occurs first.
Board of Supervisors -2- April 25, 1988
On 4-5-88, the Board requested a further report from the
Flood Control District on the proposal to exempt or reduce
drainage fees. In addition, the Board requested that this office
submit an opinion on the legality of exempting or reducing
drainage fees for senior housing. This memo responds to the
Board' s request.
DISCUSSION:
The drainage fees imposed and collected by the Flood Control
District are authorized by section 63-12. 2 of the Water Code -
Appendix, which provides:
"Fees may be collected pursuant to this section
for payment of all or any portion of any such drainage
facility costs if the costs, whether actual or estimated,
are based upon findings by the board, that development
of property within the planned drainage area will require
construction of the facilities described in the drainage
plan, and that fees are fairly apportioned within the
local drainage area on the basis of benefits conferred on
property within the area. The fee as to any property
within the drainage area may be charged as a condition
precedent to the development of such property, and no
building permit therefor shall be issued or the final
map for a subdivision approved until payment thereof,
and such fee shall not exceed the pro rata share of the
amount of the total actual or estimated costs of all
such drainage facilities within the drainage area
which would be assessable on such property if such
costs were apportioned on a uniform fee schedule ,
excluding, however, such property within the area
as, in the opinion of the board, is incapable of
development from fees. "
The language just quoted does not expressly authorize that
fees be waived or reduced, except where the board determines that
property is incapable of development. Moreover, the statute
requires that drainage fees be fairly apportioned on the basis of
benefits conferred. The,._statutory requirement that drainage fees
be fairly apportioned is <similar to the rule which requires that
rates and fees for sewers and drains be reasonable, fair ,
equitable, uniform and without discrimination against particular
property owners. (Boynton v. City of Lakeport Municipal Sewer
District (1972) 28 Cal.App. 3d 91, 94; 11 McQuillin, The Law of
Municipal Corporations (rev. ed. 1983 ) Sewers and Drains, § 31. 30a,
pp. 221-222. )
Under the existing (but to be amended 5-7-88) drainage fee
ordinance, drainage fees are calculated based upon the acreage of
the property being developed. Evidently, the underlying rationale
Board of Supervisors -3- April 25, 1988
for this method of. fee apportionment is that the larger a parcel
is , the more drainage it will generate and the higher the fee
should be. Under this method of fee apportionment, any decision
to waive or reduce drainage fees for a particular project or class
of projects (e.g. , senior housing) would have to be on the basis
that the project or projects will generate a lesser amount of
'drainage than other comparably-sized properties.
As we understand the Andover Commons project, it will include
a substantial amount of parking and other impervious surfaces that
tend to generate surface drainage. If our understanding is
correct, it may be difficult to establish that the drainage
impacts from the Andover Commons project would be less than those
from other comparably-sized projects or properties .
Under the new drainage fee ordinance (No. 88-24) , which will
become effective on May 7 , 1988, drainage fees are calculated
based upon the average impervious surface area to be added by
different categories of development (e.g. , single family
residential, multi-family residential, etc. ) . Materials prepared
by the Flood Control District state that there is a close
connection between the amount of impervious surface area and the
amount of drainage generated by development. (See "Report on
. . .Impervious Surface Drainage Fee Ordinance" December 198.1.: and
revised January 5, 1982. ) These materials support the proposition
that any decision to waive or reduce drainage fees for a
particular project or class of projects should be based upon the
Board' s conviction that impervious surface area or drainage from
the project or projects will be less than that from other projects
or classes of projects subject to higher drainage fees.
It is our understanding that the Andover Commons project will
include a substantial amount of parking and other impervious
surfaces, but we do not know how these areas compare with the
average or assumed figures applicable to the multi-family
residential category. If the actual impervious surface area of
the Andover Commons project (or senior housing in general) is less
than that assumed for multi-family residential development, the
drainage fees could be adjusted accordingly ( i.e. , reduced to
reflect actual impervious, surface area or drainage impacts) . . I.f
the impervious surface area is not less, a decision to waive or
reduce the drainage fees might be subject to legal challenge by
other property owners or developers in the area.
In researching this matter, we have reviewed and considered
an ordinance currently being considered by Contra Costa County
Sanitation District No. 7-A. (See Ordinance No. 34 ; copy
attached. ) Under the Sanitation District ordinance, the sewer
connection fees for the project may be reduced by 75 percent,
subject to certain conditions. Given the generally lower water
Board of Supervisors -4- April 25, 1988
usage of senior citizens, a board could validly conclude that
impacts from a senior housing project on a sewer system would be
lower, thus justifying lower connection fees. While such a
finding may possibly be made in the case of sewer usage, a similar
finding in the case of drainage impacts may not be valid.
We have also. considered .Government Code section 65915 and
other statutes which reflect a. legislative policy to promote low
and moderate income housing and senior housing. (See Civ. Code,
§§ 51. 2 and 51. 3; Health & Saf. Code, §§ 19900, 19901, 50670,
50736, 51450-51471. ) None of these statutes waives, reduces or
limits drainage fees charged by flood control districts or other
drainage entities. However, Government Code section 65915 does
authorize the granting of density bonuses and other financial
incentives to assist low and moderate income housing. Presumably,
the City of Antioch could grant such incentives to the Andover
Commons Project, and the incentives could offset the drainage fees
charged by the Flood Control District.
DFS:tb
Attachment
cc: J. Michael Walfo.rd, Public Works Director
Attn: Milton F. Rubicek, Administrative Services Division
Phil Batchelor, County Administrator
Attn: John T. Gregory, Management Analyst
3-14-88 draft
ORDINANCE NO. 33
BEFORE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7-A
AN ORDINANCE ALLOWING REDUCTION OF CONNECTION FEES
AND DEFERRAL OF PAYMENT
The Board of Directors of Contra Costa County Sanitation District
No. 7-A ordains as follows:
SECTION 1. Section 6 of Ordinance No. it is amended to read as
follows:
"SECTION 6. Connection and Development Fee adjustment.
A. The Board of Directors may reduce the
Development Fee or Connection Fee required herein by
75%, when one or more of the following conditions have
been satisfied:
V
"(1) The propertyVserved by the
connection islused exclusively for physically
or mentally handicapped persons, in
accordance with the provisions of Welfare and
Institutions Code section 5116.
"(2 ) The property served by the
connection has received a density bonus or
;j
ether incentive by the in agency with u G
jurisdiction, pursuant to Government Code
sections 65915-18.
ta �C
4
. : "(3) The property- served by the
connection consist of senior citizen
housing, in accordance with the provisions of
Civil Code section 51.3.
"(4) It appears from the application f
filed with.'the District that the main sewers
{ to be constructed allow for future connection-
-to the District lines from properties other
than those to be served as shown in the
Y.
application.
"B. Before any reduction is granted by the Board
of Directors under Paragraph A. , the developer shall
enter into a contract with the District. The contract
S
shall provide that if the use of the property is
subsequently. changed.so ' that none of . the above
conditions applies to the
pp property, the developer or
current owner, or both, shall pay forthwith to the
District the difference between the connection fee paid
2
C Q�a and the full connection fee which was applicable at the
time of connection. "
"C. The Board of Directors may defer payment of
the Development Fee or Connection for up to ten years,
when one or more of the conditions set forth, in
Paragraph A. have been satisfied. Before such a
deferral is granted, the developer shall enter into a
contract with the. District. .The contract shall provide
that if the use of the property is subsequently changed
f
so that none of the above conditions applies to the
property, the developer or current owner, or both, j
shall pay the fee to the District forthwith."
. . ''SECTION 2. . EFFECTIVE .DATE. This ordinance becomes effective 30
days after passage, and within 15 days of passage shall be
published once with the names of Directors voting for and against
it in the Pittsburg Post Dispatch and Antioch Daily Ledger,
newspapers published in this County and circulated in the
District.
PASSED on , 1988; by the following
vote:
AYES:
3
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
ATTEST: Ronald A. Tsugita,
District Manager/Engineer and Chair, Board of Directors
Secretary to the Board of
Directors
4