Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04051988 - 2.12 i THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 2. 12 Adopted this Order on _April 5, 1988 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Fanden, McPeak and Schroder NOES: Supervisors Powers and Torlakson ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None --------------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------------------------------- SUBJECT: Request Of Serafino Bianchi For Reconsideration Of The Board Decision To Deny Application For Land Use Permit No. 2048-87 In The Alamo Area. On March 22, 1988, the Board of Supervisors sustained the denial decision of the San Ramon Valley Regional Planning Commission 'as the Board of Appeals relative to Land Use Permit Application #2048-87 filed by Serafino Bianchi to establish a pre-school facility at 1420 Livorna Road in the Alamo area. The Clerk of the Board of Supervisors received a letter dated March 25, 1988 from Serafino Bianchi, 4347 Cowell Road, Concord, President, Bianchi Schools, requesting that the Board of Supervisors reconsider the matter. Supervisor Schroder advised that the matter before the Board today was whether to grant reconsideration and hold a hearing, and agreed to take very brief statements from individuals desiring to speak. Supervisor Fanden commented that she was willing to deny Mr. Bianchi' s request at this time for all the reasons stated at the last public hearing and moved to deny the request for reconsideration. Supervisor Schroder seconded the motion. Supervisor McPeak questioned staff relative to the procedure for a proposal by Mr. Bianchi for less than 65 children. Karl Wandry, Community Development Department, responded to i Supervisor McPeak' s inquiry. Supervisor Fanden commented on the character of the neighborhood not being a neighborhood in transition nor new development, and advised that it would be a violation of that neighborhood to impose this child care center on it no matter what the number. Supervisor McPeak commented that the ordinance does not speak to neighborhoods in transition. Supervisor Schroder advised that he was not referring to the child care ordinance but was referring to the land use permit provisions. Karl Wandry advised the Board that Mr. Bianchi had not applied for anything less than 65 children. Serafino Bianchi, Bianchi Schools, commented that the Board by denying his project had violated its own policy, and requested a reconsideration by the Board on this matter. Frank Bellici, 1430 Livorna Road, Alamo, commented that there was no new evidence in this case, and no reason for the Board to reverse its stand on the matter. He commented also that Mr. Bianchi does not own the property involved and that this is not a question of child care but a question of land use.