Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 04191988 - 1.77 Fil : AS EX OFFICIO THE GOVERNINGSBODOYlOF)THE1 1,77 TO. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS MORAGA FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT FROM; t BARTON J. GILBERT, DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICES DEPT ��lJll+� DATE; APRIL 19, 1988 SUBJECT; FIX DATE FOR HEARING ON SUBSTITUTION OF A SUBC CTORh STRUCTURAL IMPROVEMENTS AT FIRE STATION NO. 1, 1280 MORAGA WAY, AND NO. 2, 331 RHEEM BOULEVARD, MORAGA, AND ADDITION AT FIRE STATION Na. 2 (6JEE RTZATION NO_ WEE3881 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION I. RECOMMENDATION: FIX May 3, 1988 at 10:30 a.m. for a hearing to consider the request of TJ Construction Co. , Inc. for permission to substitute a new roofing subcontractor for the project, Structural Improvements at Fire Station No. 1, 1280 Moraga Way, and No. 2, 331 Rheem Boulevard, Moraga, and Addition at Fire Station No. 2 (Authorization No. WPE388); AUTHORIZE the Director of General Services to give written notice of at least five working days to the listed subcontractor of the hearing, pursuant to Public Contract Code Section 4107. II. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None. III. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATION/BACKGROUND: A. On July 14, 1987, the Board, as ex officio the governing body of the Moraga Fire Protection District, awarded a construction contract for the subject project to the prime contractor, TJ Construction Co., Inc. , Moraga, California. B. The prime contractor, in a letter dated April 4, 1988, requested approval to substitute American Design Roofing, Pleasant Hill, for the roofing subcontractor listed in the original bid, Redwood Roofing Service, Inc. The reason given for the requested substitution was failure to perform the subcontract. C. The General Services Department Architectural Division, in a letter dated April 5, 1988, notified Redwood Roofing Service, Inc. of the prime contractor's request for substitution. The notification gave five working days within which to submit written objections to the substitution. Failure to file such written notice would have constituted consent to the proposed substitution. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: X YES SIGNATURE: Rowtaaf RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE S ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED X OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TARN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. cc: Architectural Division ATTESTED APR 19 1988 Administrator's Offic ----- -- County Counsel PHIL BATCHELOR. CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Moraga Fire Protection District SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TJ Construction 0 BYjlh�s-�,1 � Ai ,DEPUTY M382/7-83 File: 255-8601(F)/C.1 D. Redwood Roofing Service, Inc., in a letter dated April 7, 1988, did object to the substitution and TJ Construction Co., Inc. , in a letter dated March 12, 1988 (sic) , affirmed its desire to substitute another roofing subcontractor. E. Since Redwood Roofing Service, Inc. has filed written objections to the substitution, it is necessary for the Board to schedule a hearing and to provide five working days notice of the hearing date to the subcontractor, all as specified in the Public Contract Code, Section 4107. IV. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: Failure to approve this recommendation will leave the issue unresolved, will delay completion of the project, and, possibly, expose the Board to claims by the prime contractor for delay. 25501B04.18B RDH:pg Page 2 of 2