The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutMINUTES - 03081988 - 3.8 r7 - 1. 3. 3.7 Jr .� . THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on March 8 , 1988 , by the following vote: >. AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisor Schroder ABSTAIN: None ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBJECT: Correspondence Agenda Item 3. 1 Letter dated February 17, 1988 from Barbara Shipnuck, President, and Larry E. Naake, Executive Director, County Supervisors Association of California, 1100 K Street, Suite 101, Sacramento 95814-3941, commenting on the County' s membership for the 1988-89 Fiscal Year. ***REFERRED TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 3 . 2 - Separate Board Order - 3 . 3 Letter dated February 22, 1988 from Congressman Pete Stark, House of Representatives, Washington, D.C. 20515, expressing appreciation to the Board for its support of the "State and Local Law Enforcement Compensation Act" (HR 3711) , and requesting the Board to send 'a letter of support to the Judiciary Subcommittee on the Administrative Law and Governmental Relations who is now reviewing the proposed legislation. ***REFERRED TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR TO PREPARE APPROPRIATE LETTER FOR CHAIR'S SIGNATURE ' 3 . 4 Letter dated February 24. , 1988 from Mayor Colleen Coll, City of Concord, 1950 Parkside Drive, Concord 94519, advising of the City staff ' s review of the proposed Buchanan Field Golf Course, Driving Range and Restaurant Project. ***REFERRED TO DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR FOR INFORMATION 3. 5 Letter dated February 24 , 1988 from Robert J. Rossi, General Counsel, North State Development Company, P.O. Box 1458 , Pittsburg 94565-0458 , providing a notice of non-renewal of Land Conservation Contract for Agricultural Preserve No. 4-70. ***REFERRED TO DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT AND ASSESSOR Continued on Page 2 Board Order Page 2 Correspondence Agenda Item 3. 6 Report dated February 3 , 1988 from the 1987-1988 Contra Costa County Grand Jury on the Department of Social Services and the Homeless. ***ACKNOWLEDGE RECEIPT AND REFER TO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR 3.7 Letter dated February 17, 1988 from Rev. Mac R. Stanley, Chairman, Human Services Advisory Commission, 2425 Bisso Lane, Suite 103 , Concord 94520 , requesting clarification as to Board policy on the method to be used to allocate $25,000 of Challenge Grant Funds for the purchase of u library materials. ***REFERRED TO INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE 3. 8 Letter dated February 26, 1988 from Boyer P.J August, Ed.D, 546 E1 Pintado, Danville 94526, expressing an interest in participating on a County Task Force for Self Esteem. ***REFERRED TO INTERNAL OPERATIONS COMMITTEE 3 .9 Letter dated February 27, 1988 from B. T. Duncan, Secretary, American Civil Liberties Union, Mt. Diablo Chapter, advising of the Union' s position relative to the rights of citizens to peaceably assemble and protest the actions of their government. ***ACKNOWLEDGED RECEIPT' IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the aforesaid actions as noted (***) are APPROVED. cc: Correspondents County Administrator Community Development Director Public Works Director Assessor Internal Operations Committee i I hereby certify that this€s n tree and correct coney of an r�rFi + taker- and. wf on esf the Board of Supervisors on thie date PHIL c-1 thr.'. rlcard of GupeEn'Jisovs and Count;Administrator By Deputy (3/8/88) i THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA a Adopted this Order on March 8, 1988 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Powers, Fanden, McPeak, Torlakson, Schroder NOES: None ABSENT: None ABSTAIN: None ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ SUBJECT: Wildlife, Coastal and Park Land `Conservation Bond Act Initiative The Board received a letter dated February 12, 1988 from James C. Eller, Legislative Representative, California Farm Bureau Federation, Public Affairs Division, 1127 11th Street Suite 626, Sacramento 95814 , urging the Board to oppose the Wildlife, Coastal and Park Land Conservation Bond Act Initiative on the June 1988 ballot. IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the County Administrator is AUTHORIZED to send a letter to the California Farm Bureau Federation advising of the Board' s previously adopted, position in support of the Wildlife, Coastal and Park Land Conservation Bond Act Initiative. cc: County Administrator i he^•I)y certify that this is a true and correct copy of ari �iv,'i n taken and entered on the minutes of the Board of Supervisors on flie date sfeosan. PNI .. SATCHMILOP, Clerk of, the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator i By -` � , Deputy I TO- BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FRCH: County Transportation Committee Contra ra Supervisor Tom Torlakson ( Chair) and Costa Supervisor Robert Schroder DATE: County March 8 , 1988 SUBJECT: Legislation -- AB 2733 and SB 1715 SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION• The Transportation Committee has reviewed AB 2733 , which was referred by the Board, and SB 1715 and recommends the following: 1. That the Board of Supervisors support both proposed bills ' progress through the legislative process until such time that the BART/Colma issue is resolved in a manner satisfactory to all parties concerned. 2 . That the Board of Supervisors authorize staff to communicate with the authors of the legislation and the County's lobbyist, as appropriate, to ensure that the bills ' progress does not hinder or adversely affect efforts in the Bay Area to reach an equitable agreement with all the parties concerned. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The bills will not have a direct impact on the County' s functions, but could affect the infrastructure needs of the County. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND: AB 2733 -- Campbell: This bill was introduced in 'response to BART' s proposed agreement to construct a station at Colma which is outside of the BART district. The bill would require that: 1 . the BART district cannot extend it services and facilities to other areas through other forms of affiliation, and would provide instead that the extension of district services and facilities beyond the district' s boundaries, as those boundaries existed on January 1, 1988 , may be provided only within a county which has been annexed to the district pursuant to existing procedures. (Annexed county( ies) would be required to buy in at an amount determined to be proportional to the historical payments made by existing district members) . i Orig. Dept. - Community Dev. , TPD dpll:boBartCo. lma CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT;XX YES SIGNATURE: RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ON MAK 8 1988 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER i I VOTE OF SUPERVISORS 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN, CC: D.J. Smith, Smith Gray & Assoc. ATTESTED - MAR Community Development - TPD PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR M382/7-83 BY ��e .DEPUTY 2. the expenditure of any district funds for the purpose of extending services and facilities within annexed territory, that the district provide one additional station within the boundaries of the district as they existed on January 1, 1988 , for each station proposed to be provided within the annexed territory, until such time as the district ' s service commitments, as defined, are met. 3 . any existing agreement by the District to extend district services and facilities beyond the boundaries of the District as they existed on January 1, 1988, shall not be effective unless and until the county in which those services and facilities would be provided is annexed to the district. SB 1715 -- Boatwright, etal. This bill would prohibit the BART district from extending service to any area outside the district until it has met specified existing service commitments. The bill would: 1. prohibit any extension of service without annexation; 2. specify certain district reimbursement considerations in this connection; and , 3 . require the annexing county to adopt sales and use and real property taxes for the benefit of the BART district equivalent to those adopted in the counties within the existing district. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: The authors of the two bills would not have the benefit of the County' s position on their bills. dpll:boBartCo. lma ( 3 . 2. 88)