HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03221988 - S.5 i
TO� BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
FROM. Sunne Wright McPeak ('eorn}�`
Introduced March 17 , 1988 for Costa
DATE: Action on March 22 , 1988 (r�y'^
SUBJECT: Timetable for Board of Supervisors Review of
Buchanan Field Noise Study, N6ise1=Abatement
Ordinance, and Master Plan
SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) &'BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION.
RECOMMENDATION
In order to insure ample opportunity for public input and
review by the Aviation Advisory Committee, the Board of
Supervisors directs the following timetable for review of
the Buchanan Field noise study, noise abatement ordinance,
and master plan:
1) The Aviation Advisory Committee should schedule
additional public meetings regarding the noise study
and the proposed noise abatement ordinance and present
its recommendations to the Board of Supervisors for
hearing no later than _the, end of April, 1988 .
2) The Board of Supervisors shall not take any action on
the proposed airport Master Plan until the noise study
has been presented and the new noise abatement
ordinance has been acted upon.
BACKGROUND
I met on February 5, 1988, with representatives of the
airport and Aviation Advisory Committee (AAC) to review the
noise study and progress on the Master Plan. I asked that
the noise study and proposed new noise ordinance be ready
for the Board of Supervisors to review within about 60 days
( the end of March) . Those in attendance thought that two
months should be sufficient time for full public review and
discussion before the AAC. It now appears more time is
needed before the AAC to ensure full public participation.
I also made it very clear on February 5, 1988, that I .would
not recommend any action on the Master Plan until a new
noise abatement ordinance had been adopted. The airport
officials requested that they be allowed to present the
proposed Master Plan at the same time the noise study was
presented. I consented, provided everyone understood I
wanted the noise abatement ordinance enacted as soon as
possible. We have been waiting for months on this item, and
it should be adopted in the near future. However, a few
more weeks to accommodate more public input would be
appropriate at this time.
CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _ YES SIGNATURE:
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE S :
ACTION OF BOARD ON a APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED �rOTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE
_UNANIMOUS (ABSENT _ AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN
AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. .
CC: Public Works Director ATTESTED
County Administrator PHIL BATCHELOR, _CLERKt OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY ,DEPUTY
M382/7-83