Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 03221988 - 1.3 (2) TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FWW: Phil Batchelor C ltra County Administrator Costa DATE: March 14, 1988 SUBJECT: Legislation: Assembly Bill 4611 (Elder) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt' a position - of support for AB 461.1 by Assemblyman Elder, which authorizes waiving the two-year limit on processing an assessment appeal when the amount in dispute exceeds $10 million. This bill is a,. part of the Board's 1988 Legislative Program and the County is, therefore, the sponsor for this measure. BACKGROUND, Under current law, if the assessment appeals board fails to hear evidence and fails to make a final determination on an application for reduction in assessment of property within two years of the timely filing of the application, the taxpayer' s opinion of market value as reflected on the application is the value upon which taxes are to be levied for the tax year covered by the application unless the taxpayer and the County Assessment Appeals Board mutually agree in writing to an extension of time for the hearing. In certain very complex assessment appeals, however, it is simply not possible to gather all the necessary evidence; hear the appeal and render a final decision within the two-year period. In such cases, there is no effort to delay the processing of the appeal. It is simply that the complexity of the issue and the need for outside experts can make it impossible to complete work on the appeal within the two-year period. The County' s Assessment Appeals Board is currently faced, with just such a situation. Upon the recommendation of County Counsel, the County has included an item in the Board' s 1988 Legislative Program which would waive the two-year time limit when' the amount in dispute exceeds $10 million. Assemblyman Elder has introduced . AB 4611 in response to the County' s request. By having the exception apply only to cases where the amount in dispute exceeds $10 million and certain factors exist, AB 4611 limits the exception to the. very few, CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: _X RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE APPROVE OTHER S I GNATURE IS ACTION OF BOARD ON March 22, 1--928 A'.=PROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AMID CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN. AYES; NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE 'SHOWN. V CC: County Administrator ATTESTED, County Assessor PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF :County Counsel SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Ralph Heim, Jackson/Barish Assemblyman Dave Elder xll BY ,DEPUTY M382/7-83 - Page 2 extremely complex cases which should be exempted from such an arbitrary limit. ' Since AB 4611 has been introduced at the request of the County, it is appropriate for the Board to support AB 4611 and indicate that the bill is sponsored by .the County. f 1