HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06021987 - 1.82 TO: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS �,�„♦
l.11�JI�,I}1, a
FROM: Phil Batchelor, ��'v.7lQ
County Administrator
DATE: June 2, 1987 County
SUBJECT: Fiscal Review Committee for Proposed San Pablo Merger
Plan Amendment
SPECIFIC REQUEST S) OR R.ECOMMENDATIONS(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION
RECOMMENDATIONS
Authorize the County Administrator to call for the creation of a
Fiscal Review Committee pursuant to California Community
Redevelopment Law in connection with the proposed San Pablo Merger
Plan for the City of San Pablo.
FISCAL IMPACT
The purpose of the Fiscal Review Committee is to determine the
financial burden and detriment upon the County and other taxing
agencies; therefore, the financial impact of the project has not
been determined. There will be incidental staff costs in the
creation of the Committee and analysis of the project.
BACKGROUND/REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS
California 'Community Redevelopment Law (Health & Safety Code
Section 33353 ) provides that in connection with the amendment of a
redevelopment plan which uses tax increment financing, the County
or any affected taxing entity may call for the formation of a
Fiscal Review Committee within 15 days after receipt of the
preliminary report on the proposed amendment.
The Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Pablo has notified the
County that they are preparing an amendment merging four
redevelopment project areas, E1 Portal, Bayview, Oak Park and
South Entrance Redevelopment Project Areas. The City of San Pablo
has submitted a Preliminary Report on the proposed Merger Plan, and
a Negative Declaration of Environmental Significance to the County.
It is prudent to call for the formation of a Fiscal Review
Committee at this time. This Board action will authorize staff to
do so.
The Committee will analyze the financial burden and detriment which
may be created by the project and recommend measures to alleviate
or eliminate those burdens. Such measures could include
modification of the project and/or a sharing of tax increment.
CONTINUED ON ATTACB14ENT: YES SIGNATURE: &�
RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE
APPROVE OTHER
SIGNATURE(S) :
ACTION OF BOARD ON Z 1987 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER
VOTE OF SUPERVISORS
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A
fi UNANIMOUS (ABSENT —t ) TRUE AND CORRECT COPY OF AN
AYES: NOES: ACTION TAKEN AND ENTERED ON THE
ABSENT: ABSTAIN: MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF
SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN.
cc: CAO ATTESTED AN 2 �98�
Redevelopment PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR
BY DEPUTY