Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06231987 - T.7 M 1 T7 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Adopted this Order on June 23 , 1987 by the following vote: AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Torlakson, Schroder NOES: None ABSENT: Supervisors Powers and McPeak ABSTAIN: None SUBJECT: Administrative Appeal of George Harris, Rainbow Homes, Inc. , on Development Plan 3039-87 and Subdivision 6501, West Pittsburg Area. The Chair convened the hearing on the appeal of George Harris, Rainbow Homes, Inc. , 529-C Garcia Avenue, Pittsburg 94565, from the decision of the Community Development Director denying his request for a revision to an approved Development Plan 3039-87 and Subdivision Map 6501 in the West Pittsburg area. A copy of the report from Harvey Bragdon, Director of Community Development, is attached and included as a part of this document. Mr. Bragdon recommended denial of the appeal. Supervisor Torlakson noted that the number of units to be constructed is less than what was originally approved. He expressed the opinion that the reduced density would have less impact on the surrounding area. He advised that the developer would incur delays in the construction schedule of the project if the application process would have to be reinitiated. James Snow, 2727 Alhambra, Martinez, owner/developer, appeared to address the issue of the appeal. All persons desiring to speak having been heard, the public hearing was closed. On recommendation of Supervisor Torlakson, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the appeal of George Harris, Rainbow Homes, Inc. , is GRANTED with the condition that a revised subdivision map must be filed and that any additional staff costs related to the revised plan would be accounted for and billed to the developer. cc: Community Development Dept. Ihereby certify thatthIs13atrucand car--cfcopyof G. an action taken and entered on, the nninuf n cS "he County Counsel Harris Board of Supervisors on the date shown. C ATTESTcD: a-�ML, Z3, /f �Vz PHIL B0f1 CHF_LOR, Clerl,of the Board of Supervisors and County Administrator By 42' ��� p Deputy S. TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Harvey E. Bragdon Contra Director of Community Development ^_�a DATE: June 16, 1987 Wu"`�' � SUBJECT: Appeal from George Harris, Rainbow Homes, Inc. SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION- Deny appeal for waiver of- development plan and subdivision application requirements. BACKGROUND: On July 13 , 1984, James Snow (applicant) and M.C.S. Corporation (owner) submitted requests for rezoning from D-1 to M-29, and development plan approval and subdivision approval to divide 2 . 5 acres into 68 condominiums in the West Pittsburg area. The filing fee was $4 , 855. 00. The items were subsequently scheduled for hearing before the County Planning Commission on September 25, 1984, and later rescheduled to October 9, 1984 , whereat they were approved. An extension of time for the final map was requested on June 9 , 1986, and later withdrawn on June 24, 1986 . Mr. Harris met with Community Development staff on April 24 , 1987, to discuss the procedure for gaining approval of a revised map which would retain the existing site plan but reduce the number of units to 34. Staff reviewed the revised plan and found that even though the number of units were reduced, there was no evidence that the project impacts would be reduced accordingly. Staff found that the revised plan was not in substantial conformance with the approved development plan, DP 3039-84 and Subdivision 6501 and informed Mr. Harris that a new application would be required with the following fees: Development Plan - Flat fee: $1 , 330 - 34 units @ $20/unit 680 Subdivision - Flat fee 980 - 34 units @ $90/unit 3 , 060 Total $6,050 JGM:jn 1S:harris.jm CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATUR RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMM 14 OF IdO D COMMITTEE APPROVE �_ OTHER 2. Fees are established by code and there is no provision for waiving them for situations like this. Further, staff has a concern that the public would not have the opportunity to comment on the project if the amended plans were able to be approved administratively. JGM: jnl: 5:rainbow.jm