HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 06231987 - 2.1 THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on June 23 , 1987 , by the following vote:
AYES: Supervisors Fanden, Torlakson, Schroder
NOES: None
ABSENT: Supervisors Powers , McPeak
ABSTAIN: None
------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT: Services for Runaway Youth
At the conclusion of the workshop on services for
runaway youth, the Board requested Gerald S. Buck, County Probation
Officer, to synopsize the issues raised in the testimony and to
recommend actions for the Board to consider in providing services
to runaway youth.
In a report to the Board dated June 8, 1987 Mr. Buck
identified 12 issues that need to be addressed relative to the
problem of runaway youth. He presented six recommendations which
included placing a higher priority on the provision of services for
this segment of the population, legislative reform and allocation
of funds for additional shelter facilities. Mr. Buck submitted a
concept paper , "Services for Runaway Youth in Contra Costa County,"
(copies of the referenced documents are attached and included as a
part of the record) .
IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED that the report and Concept
Paper of the County Probation Officer are REFERRED to the Budget
Committee.
cc: Budget Committee
County Probation Officer
County Administrator
1 hereby certify that this Is a trueand correct copy of
an action taken and entered on the minutes of the
Board of Supervi rs on the date shown.
ATTESTED: 01j, /IS'! - -
PHIL BA CHELOR, Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors and County Administrator
F0
By Deputy
21 -001
Probation DDepartment Contra County ction °�,
Administrative Offices ('Costa =Datw.
IV
D
A10th moor CU "1 'r
Administration Building �/
651 Pine Street jMartinez, California 945531415) 372-2700 SORSDTo: The Board of Supervisorste:
6/8/87
From: Gerald S. Buck, Subject
County Probation Officer Services for Runaway Youth
On June 2, 1987 a Public Hearing addressed the issue of Services
for Runaway Youth. Twenty-two persons offered testimony before
the Board, including six from law enforcement, four from County
Departments, three from the Children' s Home Society, four from
citizen advisory groups, a parent and others representing various
agencies.
Issues Raised in Testimony:
1. The act of running away is symptomatic of a wide variety
of personal and familial problems.
2. The number of- runaways is unknown due to under reporting
and the police take hundreds of missing reports which do
not result in referral for service.
3. Law changes in 1976 forbade lockup, but brief secure
detention is possible but not available in the County
due to a prohibition against commingling runaways with
delinquents. This is troublesome to police, especially
when a child refuses to go to the non-secure shelter or
a runaway is apprehended from out of state.
4. Sometimes "crimes" are fabricated by frustrated parents
in order to permit detention at Juvenile Hall.
5. The six beds at Sherman House in Pleasant Hill and the
one emergency foster home are not adequate to meet the
needs of those willing to receive services. Over 200
runaway referrals have been rejected since December,
1985 due to all beds being taken.
6. Many runaway youth are repeaters and several who are
referred for service don' t follow through. Youth who
are runaways eventually commit crimes or may be
victimized or gravitate to the larger cities. ,
Board of Supervisors -2- 6/8/87
7 . Existing services of brief shelter and crisis counseling
is likened to triage treatment of a MASH unit. There
are no resources for outreach, prevention or follow-up
services. There are not enough localized shelter or
counseling services for areas of the County beyond the
central region. Existing services contracted by
Probation with the Children' s Home Society have had to
be supplemented by the agency and federal grants in
order to continue.
8. Runaways who cannot be served by CHS often become
referrals to Lion' s Gate or other County services.
9. The Youth Service Bureau in West County provides a
valued service through its multi-disciplinary assessment
team for early and appropriate intervention services.
10. Any effective system of services for runaway youth must
muster all the resources of the community: County,
city, agencies, foundations, corporate community.
11. Supervisor McPeak proposed a "Challenge Grant Effort"
wherein the County would match contributions from other
sectors of the County.
12. Supervisor Schroder pointed out that the Board has had
several hearings and discussions of the runaway problem
dating back ten years and nothing much has been done to
address this serious problem. He advocated giving this
youth problem a higher priority, even at the cost of
other services.
As the time allotted for the hearing had expired, the Board asked
that the advisory bodies led by HSAC should convene and present
alternative recommendations for action by the Board. The Board
also asked the County Probation Officer to provide a follow-up
report with definitive recommendations for action by the Board.
In addition, the Board is referred to the attached "concept paper"
dated February 25, 1987.
Recommendations:
1. That the Board of Supervisors make a commitment and
place a higher priority to the provision of services for
runaway youth.
Actions Needed:
a. The symptom of running away are the result of a
wide variety of problems and thus a systems
approach and master planning are needed.
Board of Supervisors -3- 6/8/87
b. The Board should direct that a Master Plan be
designed for services to runaway youth along the
lines of the two Corrections Master Plans
previously prepared and adopted.
2. Current shelter and crisis services are not sufficient
and should be augmented by additional funding via the
CHS contract for additional emergency foster homes and
crisis counselors. An outlay of $70,000 is needed to
preclude rejection of runaways referred to the Sherman
House program.
3 . The Board should adopt, encourage and support broad
based blended funding for full spectrum services for
runaway youth, which would include:
a. Outreach and early intervention through application
of multi-disciplinary assessment and service
delivery.
b. Short-term shelter in foster homes and a second
residential facility in East County for a total of
24 beds.
C. Extended counseling services for follow-up to
minimize repetitive runaway. -
4. The Board should direct the Youth Services Board to
direct its resources, including its advisory bodies, to
assist in the development of a systems approach to the
problem and to oversee the delivery of services, keeping
the Board advised on a regular basis.
5. The Board should support legislative reform which would
address youth in need of service who become runaways,
including the issue of multi-disciplinary assessment and
limited secure detention.
6. The Board should use its resources to bring a greater
awareness of the runaway problem to the attention of the
entire County community.
GSB:ds
Attachment
cc: Phil Batchelor, CAO
Natalie Russell, Chair, JJ-DPC
Charles Eddy, Youth Crisis Services
. SZRVIC$S FOR RUNAWAY YOUTH
IN CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
A Concept Paper
BACKGROUND
Prior to 1976 minors who ran away or were beyond the control of
their parents were frequently arrested and detained in Juvenile
Hall along with delinquent youth. The Probation Department pro-
vided counseling to 1 ,000 families a year. Law changes have pro-
hibited placing these youth in Juvenile Hall. In 1978 emergency
shelter and services for non-delinquent youth were shifted to the
Children's Home Society through a contract with the Probation
Department.
In the period 1977 through 1983, law enforcement intervention in
these matters waned, but since then the number of youth coming to
the attention of the police for runaway and being beyond control
has dramatically increased. It is estimated that there are at
least 2,000 youth per year who are in need of emergency housing,
crisis counseling or both due to family conflicts. Referrals to
Youth Crisis Services (Sherman House) have increased 62% since
1982-83. Since 1985 there have been several times when Sherman
House has been full, and referrals from law enforcement agencies
have been rejected in over 150 incidents to date.
The Sheriff and Police Chiefs of the County concur that the
absence of appropriate shelter and crisis counseling frequently
results in acceleration of the child' s problem, and often leads to
delinquent acts or exploitation.
Research studies indicate that children who runaway have often
been abused in their home, suffer from serious family dysfunction
and many become homeless "street kids" absent services and early
intervention.
CURRENT SERVICES
Through a contract with the Children's Home Society, the Probation
Department provides the only emergency residential center and
related crisis intervention services for runaway children.
Services consist of a six bed facility, Sherman House, in Pleasant
Hill, one emergency foster home in West County, and brief crisis
counseling.
The contract is insufficient to provide current services and CHS
has secured a small Federal grant to supplement the County's cost.
- 2 -
THE PROBLEM
As the County population grows and as families become less able to
resolve their internal conflicts without assistance, there has
been an increasing number of youth who come to the attention of
the police. Some are observed on the streets while others come to
the police seeking aid and assistance.
Existing emergency housing is limited to seven youth at any given
time at present. These resources are not sufficient to meet the
needs of 2,000 youth a year among the County's 717,000 residents.
Due to restricted resources, the current intake policy restricts
referrals to those from justice agencies. Direct family referrals
seeking aid would increase workload beyond the present level of
about 550 per year.
This paucity of resources has, with increasing frequency, resulted
in the need to reject referrals of youth in need of assistance.
In such incidents the police may "relabel" the child as a depen-
dent or delinquent in order to provide housing, but in some
incidents there are no housing or counseling alternatives. Those
youth not aided may eventually be arrested for a crime, may be
exploited by adult criminals or may gravitate to San Francisco.
None of these alternatives is acceptable or worthy of Contra Costa
County.
THE NEEDS
1. There is a need for a community commitment to provide
the barest essential services for these youth who have
been victimized by their environment and social
standing.
2. There is a need for a mandate that a County agency be
responsible for the provision of a coordinated service
system which will:
a. Provide adequate short-term emergency housing.
b. Provide short-term crisis and family counseling.
c. Maximize use of all available community resources.
d. Provide coordination and cooperation among the
several disciplines interacting with runaway youth
(Police, Probation, Social Services, Mental Health,
Drug Abuse, etc. ) .
3
3. There is a need for resource expansion through a blended
effort of Federal and local government funding, coupled
with the business and corporate co=aunity and individual
contributions.
4. There is a need for youth and families to be aware of
and have direct access to services which can help them
resolve their problems.
A PLAN OF ACTION
A. Immediate Actions Needed:
1. Develop a Master Plan for the provision of services to
non-delinquent youth in need.
2. The Board of Supervisors should designate the -County
Probation Officer as the agent of the County responsible
for the provision and coordination of services for run-
away and beyond control youth in Contra Costa County.
3. In the spirit of public-private partnership, resources
to meet the needs of these youth should be provided
through a community development effort.
4. Current services should be augmented to a level which
would preclude rejection of referrals. This could be
accomplished by adding three additional emergency foster
homes, two additional family counselors and two addi-
tional child care staff.
5. Additional counseling space should be provided at
Sherman House to meet the current and projected needs
for staff work space and to encourage the expanded
utilization of volunteers, student interns and others to
augment professional staff.
B. Long Range Actions Needed:
1. A second emergency receiving six bed home for runaways
is needed in either East County or West County areas.
Such a facility would .best serve the need if it were
designed and constructed specifically for its function.
It should be homelike, but also provide counseling and
recreational areas. Such a facility should be County
owned or leased and could, perhaps, be built on County
property. The facility should be operated via contract.
- 4 -
2. A network of more emergency foster homes should be
acquired to guarantee no rejection of referrals and to
provide for extended residential care when appropriate
and needed. A total of 12 foster hones are projected to
be needed. This would provide a total of at least 24
beds.
3. Sufficient family counselors and child care staff should
be available to ( 1) meet the needs of youth in residence
at shelter facilities and foster homes, (2) provide
outreach services to intervene in the total community,
(3) provide follow-up counseling, and (4) provide
preventative services.
4. Interagency - interdiscipline assessment panels should
be operative in each region of the County as is now
provided by the West Contra Costa County Youth Services
Bureau.
5. A County Runaway Hotline should be established, marketed
and publicized by the principle provider of Youth Crisis
Services.
6. To encourage a broader base of interest, funding and
support, Youth Crisis Services should establish an
advisory committee with representatives from the
building trades, service clubs, private agencies,
volunteers, youth and others.
7. To develop a system for recruiting, training and utiliz-
ing additional student interns and volunteers.
AN OPPORTUNITY
Contra Costa has an opportunity to plan and develop a model of
enriched programs for youth desperately in need of early inter-
vention services. The concepts outlined here feature a whole
community effort directed to a real population, identified youth
at risk. No prevention effort could be more rewarding in humane
values, preservation of the family unit, and also be cost
effective considering the vast expenditures of justice services
after the fact.
Something real must be done to offset the burgeoning cost of
police, jails, courts and probation services. These concepts
offer an alternative.
GSB:ds
2/25/87