Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05261987 - 1.28 1--028 TO BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: PHIL BATCHELOR Contra County Administrator Costa DATE'. May' 18, 1987 County SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CONTRACT WITH CONTRA COSTA COUNTY BAR ASSOCIATION FOR CONFLICT DEFENSE SERVICES SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(.S) a BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: , Authorize the County Administrator or his designee to execute a contract amendment with the Contra Costa County Bar Association for conflict defense services to increase the payment limit up to $1,500,000 for fiscal year 1986/87. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds are included in the approved budget for 1986/87 to cover the costs of the Bar contract and any remaining orders for attorneys' payment for conflict cases initiated before the first contract became effective in 1984/85. The 1986/87 approved budget for Budget Unit 0248 is currently $1,570,000. No additional funds need to be appropriated at this time for Budget Unit 0248. REASONS FOR RECOMMENDATIONS/BACKGROUND: In 1983, your Board became very concerned about controlling the escalating costs of court-appointed counsel in conflict cases. As directed by your Board, the County Administrator's Office organized a task force which recommended that the County contract with the Contra Costa County Bar Association for conflict defense services. A contract was executed for 1984/85. The current contract with the Bar Association is operative until September 30, 1987 and continues the current fee schedule until that time. The cooperation of the Contra Costa County Bar Association and its Conflict Program Administrator have been critical to the County's ability to contain costs where possible, while guaranteeing constitutional representation of indigents in conflict cases. As indicated in the Third Quarter Budget Report, the increased expenditures for conflict defense services can be attributed to a number of factors. First, a projected 13% increase in the number of cases referred by the Public Defender's Offices for representation by the Criminal Conflict Program. Second, the program has been paying this year for a number of homicide cases and two capital cases, which . are very expensive to defend. Third, there has been an increase in the number of felony information filings in Superior Court, which are now at over 1,700 filings per year. This increase is attributable to a vigorous prosecution effort, including the CLEAN ST drug program, which generates a large number of cases from the City of Richmond and unincorporated areas in West county. CONSEQUENCES OF NEGATIVE ACTION: After the contract payment limit is reached, appointment and approval of payments to private attorneys for conflict cases will revert to the method used before the 1984/85 contract and become a responsibility of the judges again yment o co lict attorney services is a mandated County cost. CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: _ YES SIGNATURE; X RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION O OAR COMMITTEE X APPROVE OTHER SIGNATURE(S)' ACTION OF BOARD ON APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS --�— I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE X UNANIMOUS (ABSENT ) AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT; ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. CC-. CAO-Justice System Programs ATTESTED _ MAY 2 6 1987 CCC .Bar Association--Attu: Conflict PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Program Administrator SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR M382/7-83 BY ���ff DEPUTY