HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05191987 - S.3 5�
THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Adopted this Order on May 19, 1987 , by the following vote:
AYES; Supervisors Fanden, Torlakson, Schroder
NOES; None
ABSENT; Supervisors Powers, McPeak
ABSTAIN; None
------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------
SUBJECT; Camino Tassajara
Supervisor Robert Schroder advised that it had come to
his attention, after the agenda had been posted, that Alameda
County had announced its intention to close the Alameda County
portion of Camino Tassajara. He stated that he has been meeting
with staff of Contra Costa County, Alameda County and the cities in
. the area in an attempt to resolve the problems of excessive speed
and truck traffic on Camino Tassajara. He commented on the
importance of continuing to seek a resolution of these problems.
Board members unanimously agreed that there was a need
to take action at this time. Therefore, IT IS BY THE BOARD ORDERED
that the County Administrator is REQUESTED to contact the Alameda
County officials relative to the efforts being made to resolve the
traffic problems on Camino Tassajara.
cc: County Administrator
1 hereby certify that this is a true and cerrcct copy of
an nc,ion taken and en.csed on the minutes of the
Burd of Supervisors on „ae ate vINOW-1.
RIB- 0f TC:i:6.. !T. cicri: of tt t,ocard
Of Supol-4.5}4'3 zmd county Adrnini strator
By e , Deputy
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY
The following item(s) , S . 3 , 5 . 4 , 5. 5 , MR. 2
was(were) brought to the attention of Board members after the
agenda was posted. The Board by unanimous vote agreed on the need
to take action.
May 19 , 1987
S - 3
Phil Batchelor
The Board of Supervisors Contra Clerk of the Board
and
County Administration Building osta County Administrator
<415,372-2371
651 Pine St., Room 106 County
Martinez, California 94553
Tom PowKs, 1st District
llsner C.Fdrdsn,2nd DWict
PAbwt 1.8d"der,3rd Districtr.
smWright P..k.4th.District RECEIVED
Tom ToAdnon,5th Dlst ict
MAY 2 2 1987
May 22 19$7 Pesti.BATtN UPE
�/ K BOARD
B OST 0 O SOP.
Oe u
S -
Mr. Edward Campbell , Chair Rd. #4721C
Alameda County
Board of Supervisors
1221 Oak
Oakland, CA 94612
Dear Ed:
I want to thank you for continuing your decision on the truck issue on Tassajara
Road to allow time for us to work out a solution to the problem. We have talked
about many possibilities, and I think it may be better for me to put my thoughts
in writing and use that as a basis for our discussion.
First, let me assure you that I am just as concerned about the truck traffic as
you are, and during the last 6 months, I have worked to reduce the number of
trucks on that road significantly. While, ideally, we would like to see no
trucks on Tassajara Road, practically, trucks will be on the road. There are
local delivery trucks that are exempt from load limits and Tassajara Road is a
Federal Aid Highway.
My view is that if the truck traffic will ,be shared by all three major routes
(Tassajara Road, Crow Canyon Road and Sycamore Valley Road) to the area, the
burden Will be spread out and the safety on all three routes will be improved.
For this reason, I placed a load limit on the section of Camino Tassajara between
Blackhawk Road and Blackhawk Drive. This load limit effectively excludes trucks
going to Danville and San Ramon, where most of the construction activities are
currently underway. Our monitoring of the truck flow in the area shows that
presently, Sycamore Valley Road is carrying the bulk of the truck traffic rather
than Tassajara Road. In fact, the most recent count shows that there are less
than 9 trucks per hour during normal working hours on Camino Tassajara at the
County line.
I also recognize that even if all three routes will share the traffic
proportionally, Tassajara Road, being the least improved road, will not be able
to support the level of truck traffic created by future developments.
Consequently, I insisted on a construction mitigation measure for Camino
Tassajara as well as Tassajara Road. We are requiring each new development to
contribute $477 per dwelling unit toward the rehabilitation and repair of Camino
Tassajara and Tassajara Road. We estimate that about $1.9 million dollars will
be collected from proposed future developments for upgrading the structural
section of the road.
Mr. Ed Campbell
May 22, 1987
Page Two
On a mileage oasis, we have offered $700,000 (37%) to Alameda County as your
share of the construction mitigation funds from the developer. My staff has
indicated to me that this amount will be adequate to place a thick asphalt
overlay on Tassajara Road so that it will withstand the truck traffic generated
by the proposed developments.
To address your concern that the fees will not be collected in time to fix the
road, we have looked into how we can advance the necessary funding now. I have
two suggestions. The first one is for Alameda County to fund the project now
using FAS funds. As- we collect the mitigation fees, Alameda County will receive
its proportional share of the fees. Our engineering staff estimated that a
0.4-foot asphalt overlay costing about $400,000 will be adequate for now. The
amount that you receive over and beyond the project cost could be used toward
additional maintenance needs and to repay your interest cost for advancing the
funds. The repayment fees, up to the loan amount plus interest, can then be used
on other roads and will not be restricted to Federal Aid Secondary roads. The
second alternative is for us to bond the $1.9 million using ABAG's credit pool
program. I have instructed staff to work with your staff to implement the above
if either proposal is acceptable to you.
I have also instructed staff to prepare the necessary study to place Camino
Tassajara on the radar speed enforcement list. Staff has reported that the
necessary study has been completed, and we anticipate the California Highway
Patrol to start radar enforcement sometime during the week of May 25th.
I have also requested that the California Highway Patrol increase their presence
on Camino Tassajara to enforce the speed and the load- limits. Captain Oliver has
been most cooperative.
As you can see we are working to solve the problem. Judging from the recent
truck count, the problem is being solved. Let me pledge to you' that we will
continue to monitor the situation and take whatever steps are feasible to keep
the truck traffic at an acceptable level.
?Ver ru urs,
ob
Rertl Schroder
District II
RIS/MMS:lv
CampDell.t5
cc: Supervisor N. Fanden
Supervisor S. McPeak
Supervisor T. Powers
Supervisor T. Torlakson
P. Batchelor, County Administrator