Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutMINUTES - 05121987 - 1.35 ro: BOARD OF SUPERVISORS FROM: Phil Batchelor Contra County Administrator Costa DATE: May 6, 1987 County SUBJECT: Legislation: Assembly Bill 2519 (Campbell) SPECIFIC REQUEST(S) OR RECOMMENDATION(S) & BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a position of support for AB 2519 by Assemblyman Bob Campbell which would add a $50 assessment on to drunk driving fines for i the Sheriff ' s criminalistics laboratory and an additional '$50 assessment on to drunk driving fines for the County' s alcohol programs. BACKGROUND: In the Board' s 1987 Legislative Program was a proposal to seek legislation which would eliminate the $50 distribution from the Fines and Forfeitures Fund for the criminalistics laboratory and alcohol programs and, instead, add these same amounts on as an additional assessment on top of the existing fine. For example, if the current fine for drunk driving is $390, under current law, $50 for each such conviction is transferred to the criminalistics laboratory and $50 is transferred to the alcohol programs. iThe proposal supported by the Board would have authorized the court to add two $50 assessments on top of the $390 fine thereby requiring the defendant to pay a total of $490. . Fifty dollars ( $50) of this increased payment would go to the criminalistics laboratory and $50 would go to the alcohol programs. None of the basic Fine and Forfeiture Fund would be diverted for these purposes. Therefore, while the criminalistics laboratory and alcohol programs would not gain any funding directly, the County and the cities would gain additional funding because these two $50 amounts would not be removed from the Fine and Forfeiture Fund before it is distributed to the County and cities. Assemblyman jCampbell has introduced AB 2519. This bill does not accomplish what was included in the Board' s 1987 Legislative Program. AB 2519, as introduced, adds an additional $50 assessment on top of the existing fine for the criminalistics laboratory and for the alcohol programs and does not eliminate the diversion of $50 from the basic fine to the?, criminalistics laboratory and alcohol programs. Therefore, AB 2519, as CONTINUED ON ATTACHMENT: YES SIGNATURE: - I �� Z X RECOMMENDATION OF COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR RECOMMENDATION OF BOARD COMMITTEE X APPROVE OTHER S I GNATURE(S): ACTION OF BOARD ONS May 12, 1487 APPROVED AS RECOMMENDED � OTHER VOTE OF SUPERVISORS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS IS A TRUE UNANIMOUS (ABSENT AND CORRECT COPY OF AN ACTION TAKEN AYES: NOES: AND ENTERED ON THE MINUTES OF THE BOARD ABSENT: ABSTAIN: OF SUPERVISORS ON THE DATE SHOWN. cc: County AdministratorATTESTED MAY 12 1961 _ Health Services Director PHIL BATCHELOR, CLERK OF THE BOARD OF Sheriff-Coroner SUPERVISORS AND COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Roy Chiesa, W.C.-Danville Muni Ct. 10 Auditor-Controller M382/7J ' kson/Barish & Associates BY ,DEPUTY , ssemblymann Campbell Page 2 introduced Iwould increase the funding to the criminalist ics laboratory ,from $50 for each conviction - to $100, and would likewise increase funding to the alcohol programs from $50 to $100 for each conviction. i While the I Board' s original proposal provides additional discretion and flexibility to the County and the cities, it may not be as readily supported in the Legislature as would the current version of AB 2519 since the current version of AB 2519 actually increases funding going to specified programs rather than leaving the additional funding decisions at the discretion of the Board. We are, therefore, recommending that the Board support AB ,2519, as introduced, but also authorize the County Administrator to attempt to obtain amendments to accomplish the Board' s original purpose. If it isnot possible to obtain those amendments, we believe there is sufficient value in AB 2519 as introduced to justify the Board' s supporting it. �I i 4 1 i